Friday, February 28, 2025

Zenlinskyy was set up. Two against one is MAGA fun?

 Yes, entirely aware of the political incorrectness of the headline, but work it out.

The event, on video.

The absolutely justified reaction, on video, and the entire world will take notice.

Republican politicians who should have called a halt to things are so fearful of being primaried they are lackeys, that is shown to the entire world also. Spineless, worthless, and servile.

This week, Trump met several national leaders of other countries, and MSNBC reported its view that trump is either ignorant of tariffs being a sales tax on consumers, or lied about it, and had some words about the then upcoming visit by Zelinskyy, which as noted, went off the rails because the Ukrainian head of state was not going to be spineless, worthless and servile, but instead was willing to stand up to a pair of white nationalist bullies, who set up the scenario in advance and then played it out on TV for no reason except for who they are. 

It is all on YouTube and it is not an overly long experience to watch and form an opinion. Please do so.

UPDATE: Lincoln Project voices an opinion. Aside form inhospitable and unhelpful words against Trump voters, there is a lot to ponder in what is said. Trump voters will or will not alter outlooks, but aside from that question, how the Vance - Trump tag team ambush playing out was viewed in that video, think about it from the standpoint of European power states, and from the standpoint of Taiwan.

But moreover, think about it from the standpoint of your children in a pluralistic world which has been gravely insulted by crass stupidity on the part of Vance, and Trump.

Wednesday, February 26, 2025

Holy shit!

Video. Story link behind video, starting -

President Donald Trump has huge plans for Gaza. He revealed his vision for the coastal enclave in a music video shared on his Truth Social platform late Tuesday, which appears to have been created with generative AI.

It begins with images of the war-torn region, left battered by its ongoing conflict with Israel, before posing the question “What’s next?” in red, white and blue letters. Then, the destruction disappears and the sun suddenly comes out, turning the smog-filled sky blue as it shines down on a new Gaza, reimagined as a swanky vacation destination featuring a giant golden statue of Trump, bearded belly dancers and parties, too.

“Donald Trump will set you free, bringing the life for all to see. No more tunnels, no more fear,” a voice sings. “Trump Gaza is finally here!”

______________UPDATE____________

With Trump you never know. Yes, the deal. Real estate. But a thread of uncertainty says, if Trump wants the Arab nations to come up with a plan, he has to convince them that the need is there. "Trump Gaza" being a vehicle to prove a will to say, "Come up with a better idea more in line with the Gaza experience, or this could be the new reality." In that light, the video is a good idea. 

All the Internet gives me is the video, the write up story. Trump cannot say, "It's to jog the locals," as that would give away the impact. 

So, a super-crass thing, is it real Trump, or Trump steering a different direction?

End of story. I sure of hell don't know what's between those ears, and if I knew it might scare. 

FURTHER: It is easy to accept the belief this particular short super-crass video may be propaganda to get Arab states off the dime to commit to the mop up. Because that video is so butt stupid offensive if serious of some warped thinking, it is easy to invent other scenarios.

As said, what's between those orange ears is frightening. This is the President of the whole United States that put out that video, not some clown cowboy in Wyoming or Dallas. You want to say, "It can't be real." What if it is?

 

A partial screen capture telling you what it says and what the included image says. Little guy with red cap, you got gulled.

 

click the image to enlarge and read


image source: https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2025/02/25/trump-cutting-medicaid-republican-budget/80282600007/

I only know what I read on the Internet, and sometimes it's not needed to read between the lines. Sometimes things are said that stand on their own.

Did you think he meant you, when he said Great Again? Go figure. Great Again for the truly grateful. (Gratude scales, and the most grateful separate themselves out.)

 _____________UPDATE___________

Coincidentally, only knowing what the Internet tells me, I stumbled upon an Ian Bremmer TED talk. Look back at the photo, weigh it in terms of Bremmer's presentation. There are problems, but understanding even a part of them helps.

David Brooks had his own speech on The Internet, and . . . 


 

Tuesday, February 25, 2025

Numbers are nice to have public, when public actions are considered. Judging a failure or a success, without numerical measurements, is open to propaganda and bullshit.

 With Elon's government aimed chainsaw and private sector layoffs being reported, there might be a net national loss of jobs this month, or since Jan 20, rather than job growth.

Inflation, how bad, when eggs at the market are over five bucks a dozen? And with an unneeded trade war. Give me a number, a percentage growth, explained as to the yardstick used to get there.

Homan, how many deported, at what cost, including Homan's salary, and I'd include Stephen Miller's too, although some might challenge that since Miller wears several hats among Trump's minions. Allocate it, but a share goes to the "millions will be deported" pitch Miller's been pushing since during the election and after.

But if a trickle have been deported; a massive job loss has happened; and if inflation is rampant as worse than any time in Biden's tenure, including the rebound that happened after the time when Biden was pump priming to mop up Trump's covid mess; then we have three strikes, and, unfortunately, not out because the national economy and health as a nation is not baseball.

But the three strikes can be assumed, since we hear the Administration barking all the time, but wholly unwilling to give us numbers. Reliable numbers backed by evidence would be best, but they've given us no numbers. How many flights to where have Homan's rangers accomplished? Five? Seven? More? Less?

Even with positive numbers failure can be contested; but with losing numbers, what's not determined? 

A capton is a caption, an image is a captured event in time which Senators or others can critique, under the U.S. of A. Constitution's First Amendment.

Tina Smith called him a "dick."

 Tina Smith is the junior Democratic Party Senator from Minnesota.

Sen. Smith has many that agree with her assessment. 

Who'd disagree? Crabgrass cannot guess beyond Trump, Elon himself, and those in the private sector who work for one of Elon's adventures. 

Crabgrass, not otherwise constrained, agrees with Sen. Smith.

UPDATE: Any bets on whether that chainsaw had gas in it so it could be waved around running? Would you trust Elon with a running chainsaw in hand to not make a fuck-up loss of limb for someone else, perhaps even himself? Elon needs to grow up. Cancelling jobs is not a game or cause for chicken-shit display. It is serious hurt for those being sacked, with abundant arbitrariness except at DOD, where Hegseth is firing in accord with his prejudices, and not at all as arbitrary. Note his prejudices, note who's severed, and what a surprise? No surprise at all. Women, black generals, JAG corps career lawyers who'd be a check against Hegseth's prejudices are notable service-member cancellations without even pseudo explanation offered.

Also targeted government-wide, probationary employees, since those would be Biden appointees/hirings, and presumably enough, Democrats, so jettison them all because the point is to fire Democrats, then hire back Repubicans. It is to replace, not to downsize, although some ancillary downsizing may also happen. It is the spoils going to the victor, something civil service law was intended to limit, but that like other history is MAGA constrained. You elected. You deserve it.

....................................................................

A bonus --- Elon's Week (five or more bullet points)

1. dancing onto stage with Chainsaw at CPAC

2. Conversation/interview with softball questions at CPAC after setting down chainsaw

3, Posting on X (formerly know as Twitter before I bought and simplified naming)
(that's at least a dozen things, three dozen, so already I can email back)

4.  on-going discussing of past week bullet-point email with Trump, (loved it, said it was his idea)

5. Sending list-task bullet-points email

6. Preparing DOGE junior braintrust to convert: email returns >> database >> AI prompt engineering aimed at extracting causes to fire vs. keep

7. Sought counseling in anticipation of being call a "dick" by one or more senators
 
8, Responded on X (previously Twitter) saying, "Senator - justify your week"

9. conversation with Trump about being called a dick (he thought it was his idea)

10. Joint Presser with Trump, no dog, no pony, manchild gripped on mock totem pole styling - manchild too young to be traumatized, not playing as normal but well behaved while being carried like a prop

11. indirectly suggesting in my email that federal employees do not own their own weekends but can be tasked on Friday "due by Monday"

12, ditto (multiple each-separate email, multiple agencies, really each a separate task but I'll count it only once)

13, Being tolerant of diversity among my young DOGE braintrust (all white males - BUT w. one of Indian-subcontinent ethnicity from Berkeley. good coder)

14. Kept up with South African mis-government - ongoing, ever since Apartheid ended

15, Checking agency parking lots for gas only or non-Tesla parking at charging stations

Busy week, all that in one week, three times what I'm asking of probationary punks! If you don't have that drive, remember, I AM THE ELON OF THE UNITED STATES and we keep three best and fire the rest.

And that is really how Elon reported his own week's bullet points. Truly. You doubt, go ahead and ask him what he put in his email sent back to himself. 

He'll tell you.

UPDATE: In the course of writing of 21 resigning federal tech experts who refuse to be a part of killing vital federal services, AP noted in passing that Musk, at CPAC, was " hoisted a blinged-out, Chinese-made chainsaw above his head" and I cannot second source that the America First theme featured a Chinese product, but if that piss ant waves a saw from China I want to be able to buy an electric car from China, because their technology seems to have a cachet. 

Actually, any electric auto but a Tesla will do. Tesla is a part of a mad jackass's empire, which I do not like. The empire I will dislike because I have come to dislike the jackass, and one is the other. Senator Smith called him a dick. I call him a piss ant. Whether than arguing which is more spot on, let's agree, we both are correct.

NOW. Do read that entire AP article. It claims besides 21 engineers being appalled, they note by letter that some of Musk's people can't find their ass with both hands, although the AP item phrased it differently, and the group resignation letter might also have used more standard language. But if it is true, and sensitive systems are being put at mercy of a less than prime time crew, hell will pay, or might.

Would you change your job to work in any capacity for Elon Musk? Even at a pay raise? Or do you instead have fears and/or integrity?

Parting thought, BOYCOTT TESLA. There are options. Elon seems wigged out, and the brand just might have been allowed to fall below a current industry quality norm.


Sunday, February 23, 2025

RT has published its own view of Europe, an unflattering one.

 https://www.rt.com/news/613075-eu-leaders-fear-america/

It is another voice heard, not necessarily correct, but adding a Russian view.

More:

https://www.rt.com/news/612823-trenin-russias-long-term-play/

https://www.rt.com/news/612981-last-battle-of-cold-war/ 

https://www.rt.com/news/613109-rubio-russia-talks-purpose/

The theme of "a changing world order" seems prevalent in the RT publishing.

What is getting little sensible U.S. press coverage, is Rubio making press statements, which are overridden in U.S. news, by Musk and a chainsaw.

https://www.rt.com/news/613109-rubio-russia-talks-purpose/ 

Clearly Crabgrass has no bar or measure to weigh that last link's reporting, but it is because U.S. outlets either don't give a shit or colletively decline to say much.

Also, if Russia and the U.S. are meeting without Europe present, or China, this is to reach some form of bilateral understanding going forward, not a larger thing where other voices might be invited. With that fact, what the Russian press, close to the Russian government, is reporting, is relevant to any attempt to understand what's happening. China is probably wondering "what's happening" more than I am.

Russia shares a border with China. We share an Ocean with both. And there will be a new head of the U.S. Navy under Hegseth. And Ukraine has natural resources.

And Hegseth in Europe did not display a negotiation position without being told to.

What is unclear to Crabgrass is whether Russia has a strong opposition to U.S. taking economic gain from Ukranian mining as some conceptual repayment for a period of arms supply which seems possibly at an end, amounts spent being capped. Russia keeps its real estate gains, U.S. gets resources, E.U./NATO gets a message, so that long term reevaluations are happening.

UPDATE: The rare earth mining situation appears that no productive mining is going on now, nor was before Russian entry into Ukraine. Had Russia toppled Kiev in its blitzkreig start of things on entering, Russia would have the mineral potential. Now the U.S. wants it and Russia seems willing to allow that, in exchange for keeping seized lands. But that's reading between the lines; 

search = Ukraine U.S. rare-earth-mining (past day) 

Surely untapped rare-earth possibilities need capital to be exploited, and Russia is sanctioned, and China is the current big player in rare-earth trade. So, the actual status of Ukrainian mineral wealth, potential vs actual, is under-reported in the U.S.

FURTHER: It appears that the land taken by Russia along its border with Ukraine gives it a Black Sea warm water port, and the industrialized border region; war torn perhaps, but rebuildable. And Russian gas pipelines to Europe cross Ukraine and appear to remain intact, whatever the fighting. That, again, is unclear. Russia has other lines to supply European energy consumption, but full supply includes Ukraine trans-shipment. It is all a ball of thread, as to the economics of something seemingly short of all-out-war. Crabgrass admits its limited understandings, otherwise called ignorance of facts.

A further thing,Russian based military in Syria have seemed content with Israeli intrusion into that nation. And before Russian military entry into Ukraine, Bennett, then Israel's Prime Minister, visited Moscow and appeared to have some kind of an understanding about not supplying any Israeli arms to Ukraine. More threads to tie into the tapestry telling the story of it all.


Friday, February 21, 2025

Another voice heard on the other side of the Atlantic.

 Link. Lithuania's Minister of Defense, get "armed to the teeth." Small time window.

Chainsaw for Democracy. [UPDATED]

 This actually happened, Javier Milli of Argentina came out from behind the stage curtain and brought Musk, at CPAC, a chainsaw which Musk waved about and the image and video of it is all over the web. Pick your outlet/post of the event, as it was.

(So what is Trump up to in order to feel a need for this diversionary shit? More- )

Two things. First, Musk was intentionally unclear, calling it "the chainsaw for democracy," while dressed yet again all in black like a warlock, the clarity question being was/his intent "for democracy" to be target or beneficiary?

Second, as a guess, MbS declined to be the one showing up and handing over the chainsaw.

Below image credit:  https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/gettyimages-2200924637.jpg  (fair use)

Horses ass? You decide.


Symbolic of what he's doing, a blunt meat ax would have better served his purpose.

UPDATE: Elon day-by-day looks to be loosing it. And in need of help. 

____________MAJOR UPDATE____________

Few words. Major importance. While Elon was prancing around with a chainsaw the formal Trump appointees were holding a press conference full of lies and half truths, and notice Trump intends to steal Ukraine nature resources and to throw Zelanskyy under the bus. That was for the insiders, the chainsaw dance for the MAGA supporters. Showing Trump's regard for them and keeping them on script. A tangible demonstration they, at CPAC, can take seriously, because it is at CPAC.

The press has been given its attention, and told the spin. Let's see who spins it as counseled, who gets fresh and candid.

FURTHER: The link to the press conference, here. Steven Miller talking about the millions already rounded up and deported, all criminals; the finance guy talking about how Elon's cut his two trillion of fat from spending, and how the tariff threats and such as is price-happenings at grocery stores being unrelated, the latter being Biden's fault, just occurring now after Biden's left. Everybody's heard of aftershocks. The dark clouds are Biden aftershocks, but happy times really are here again. And we can now trust that the Zelanskyy tyrant who will not hold and has not held elections will come around to embrace the Trump terms of a fair Ukraine ending if he simply survives under the bus and comes out a better believer, having gotten his mind right. No wonder Trump told Elon to jump around at CPAC as he did before the election, and this time use a prop. It was because Trump is modest to a fault about how good a job he'd been doing and did not want to look as if too full of himself to appear boastful and immodest, traits he has always shunned, taking the high road, always, instead. 

Understand the presser, understand the man.

 

Thursday, February 20, 2025

The European perspective seems clear, and a panel discussion held in English seems to be messaging native English speakers. Russian aggression needs to be forestalled, among those still feeling that way. And others, going their own way have consequences.

 Negotiations without Ukraine are absolutely unaccepable being an in-English theme of a panel of European Union leaders needs attention on on both sides of the Atlantic and by other nations who might over-trust one nation where now there is doubt.

And Ukraine membership in NATO seems fitting for that nation's long term interests and its security. Europe seems to see it. Who does not?

Leave it there. This is the link. Watch the panel. 

UPDATE: Another panel of Europeans

FURTHER: Link. Another link. These are voices people in the States should listen to in order to understand things beyond X (formerly Twitter) or Trump's blurb issuances on his simplified tweet channel.

FURTHER: These politician/diplomats understand Trump as well as many in the U.S. and are adaptive people, with a memory and a past of adapting to a fight. The Germans understand avoiding two fronts, and Europe has had its worries before over Russian aggression. They seem to push NATO for Ukraine as their issue. Time is short for them since as with others they did not take Trump fully seriously that he would leave them alone. He has, they get it. Long term solutions or results seem clear, a collective belief that reliance upon the U.S. was effective for a while and going forward will be confronted because there is no other choice. Not happy with Trump's VP and DOD head - what was said, how it was said, they are not impolite.

Just say no to McKinsey; and all its aspects; as it is a right-of-center consultancy for wealth and the wealthy.

Phrased another way - you ain't ever gonna get Medicare for All out of Mayor Pete.

No more than you can see it coming from Hakim Jeffries, the new Nancy Pelosi.

.........................................

What fed into posting this screed is an AP feed that for reasons I do not know lit up the pinball machine without reaching the "tilt" termination. Whose brainfart? I do not know, but if Medicare for All is the winning theme to revive a moribund Democratic Party, don't beat it down with an individual who nobody can ever see touting it with honesty as his formative days were with McKinsey. He has McKinsey in his DNA, corporatism abundant, and being given the Transportation Department by Biden was a softball appointment, because who's going to locally complain when road and bridge improvements are funded and jobs result? His feet have never been put to the fire.

There are two threads, the AP widely carried one and The Hill being its own source.

First - AP

Buttigieg weighs a decision with huge implications for Democrats: Run for Senate or president?

TRAVERSE CITY, Mich. (AP) — Some believe the Democratic Party’s next savior is living here, huddled with family, in the relative obscurity of a small city on the shores of Lake Michigan.

Pete Buttigieg has yet to decide if that’s a responsibility he wants.

For now, Buttigieg, the 43-year-old former U.S. transportation secretary, is discussing his future with party officials, labor leaders and top strategists. He must decide soon whether he wants to return to the national spotlight as a candidate in Michigan’s U.S. Senate race or step aside to instead seek a much bigger role as his party’s next presidential nominee.

Prominent allies believe Buttigieg cannot feasibly do both, even as others raise the comparison to Barack Obama, who was elected president just four years after becoming a U.S. senator.

[...] The Democratic Party may be hurting more at this moment than it was two decades ago, when voters turned to that first-term senator from Illinois over more established candidates to lead their comeback from the Bush years. Indeed, Democrats, demoralized and afraid, are crying out for strong new leadership with President Donald Trump and his allies, notably Elon Musk, racing to transform Washington while gutting key federal agencies.

 [...] Buttigieg has lowered his profile since leaving the Biden administration last month.

He hasn’t done any media interviews. He declined to speak to The Associated Press for this story. And he has challenged Trump only with a handful of social media posts, notably pushing back on the Republican president’s blaming of diversity hiring for the deadly midair collision at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.

But based on the response, Democrats like what he has to say. His posts on X frequently garner millions of views. And just over a week after joining the newer social media platform Bluesky, he has quickly become one of its most-followed Democrats.

If that's a yardstick to measure anything substantial, I'll eat my MAGA cap.

Buttigieg, a former mayor of South Bend, Indiana, has been a more visible presence around his new home of Traverse City, a lakeside resort town that calls itself “the Cherry Capital of the World.” His husband, Chasten Buttigieg, grew up in Traverse City.

[...] It’s much the same at the local coffee shop, Higher Grounds Trading Co., which features a pride flag out front and progressive messages on the walls. [...] “He’s been coming in more frequently,” barista Sydney Hall said recently, noting she’d served Buttigieg and his husband earlier that day. [...] Aaron Wright, president of the Traverse City-based Up North Pride, praised Buttigieg and his family for “sacrificing their physical safety for the betterment of their local area, the state and society.” He noted Traverse City is just 20 minutes from where members of a local militia plotted to kidnap Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.

“That’s the No. 1 thing that I would imagine they’re considering is the physical safety of being where they are, as the people that they are, because people are drinking out of the firehose of misinformation and disinformation,” Wright said. “Malignant groups that want to see people like me suffer.”

That's a long way to saying Pete has bloc appeal to those loving identity politics. He has those feet in one of the blocs, and is not divest of an identity.

Wright’s husband, Trenton Lee, chair of the local Democratic Party, said his political opponents in local campaigns often focus on his sexuality rather than policies.

“Pete offers that challenge to the other side, where if you took out his sexual orientation, the way he’s able to articulate issues and then actually work on them, he’s a shoo-in for whatever he runs for,” Lee said. “It forces them to be like, ‘The only issue I have is that he’s gay.’”

No. The issue I have with him is Republican lite. And it is the Republicanism in a tepid form of corporatism that the Republican Party of Trump has turned upon as unhelpful to real, paycheck to paycheck people who see Replacement effort as alive and against them. 

Continuing with AP for Mayor Pete -

Buttigieg is already facing allegations from some critics that he moved to the state solely to help his political career.

Duh. Like he noticed most of Indiana is not as accepting as South Bend -

“It’s not just that he carpet-bagged to Michigan a few years ago after being the mayor of South Bend. It’s that he did it in the most unrelatable enclave in the entire state,” said Jason Roe, a Republican strategist and former executive director of the state party.

Traverse City, Roe said, is an “elite bubble” that only “underscores an elitism that was one of the problems in the Democratic Party.” Roe added that he’ll be surprised if Buttigieg enters the race, “because if he runs and loses, he could be done.”

A plum opportunity in a key state

There may be no better staging ground for an ambitious Democrat in 2025 than Michigan.

Democratic Sen. Gary Peters’ unexpected retirement created a rare Senate vacancy ahead of next year’s midterms. A Republican hasn’t been elected to the U.S. Senate in Michigan this century, although Mike Rogers came within less than 1 percentage point last fall and is planning to run again.

Michigan also offers a home state advantage to any prospective presidential candidate in 2028. The state is expected to host one of the nation’s opening presidential primaries. And in the general election, Michigan will be a premier swing state.

Buttigieg is leaning on powerful allies to help make his decision.

Longtime Michigan Sen. Debbie Stabenow, who retired in January and considers Buttigieg a close friend, attended his twins’ birthday party and visited him at home recently. She said she doesn’t expect to endorse in the Senate primary, but she told him directly he’d be a “very strong” candidate.

“If he announced now, he’d be the front-runner,” Stabenow told the AP.

 [...]

So, the Obama plan, Senate briefly and then go for the big brass ring. Obama was likeable and seemed a populist progressive more than his opposition. Pete, no.

If you can see Pete standing on a stage with Bernie and AOC pitching Medicare for All, you see something I do not. 

The Hill wrote its own coverage rather than carrying the AP, as did most outlets. The Hill - its headline -

Buttigieg excites Democrats as he mulls Michigan Senate bid

I doubt Hakim Jeffries is "excited" but his reptilian hindbrain's instincts for middle grounders tells him it's okay to be looking at one of us rather than a true progressive, and Ken Martin likely thinks, Right-on, Hakim. The fact is better is needed. The Hill's reporting:

 

Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg is considering a run for Michigan’s Senate seat, the latest development to roil what is quickly shaping up to be one of next year’s most competitive and closely watched races.

Buttigieg moved to the Great Lakes State with his Michigan-native husband in 2022, triggering questions about his political future after eventually leaving his post in the Biden administration’s Transportation Department. Last week’s announcement from Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.) that he wouldn’t seek another term in 2026 appears to have opened a clear path for Buttigieg.

While he would likely face opposition and wouldn’t automatically coast to the nomination, Democrats said they’re excited by the prospect of Buttigieg jumping in and suggested he would be an early favorite as one of the best surrogates for the party.

“I’m excited,” said former Rep. Mark Schauer (D-Mich.) about the prospect of Buttigieg entering the race. “I think he is a rare political talent, which he’s demonstrated as the Transportation secretary and on the campaign trail.”

Buttigieg has experienced one of the most rapid rises of any Democrat of the past five years, going from mayor of South Bend, Ind., to becoming one of the most prominent voices in the party. 

He turned in an unexpectedly impressive performance in the 2020 Democratic presidential primaries, winning the Iowa caucuses and nearly winning in New Hampshire. Though he dropped out in March, he endorsed then-candidate Joe Biden and became a key supporter, eventually joining Biden’s administration. 

Political observers have expected Buttigieg to seek elected office again, and he has been rumored as a possible 2028 presidential candidate. Early polling has often placed him as one of the top potential choices for Democrats. 

But a Senate run in 2026 may be the launching pad for a long political career regardless of any larger future ambitions. 

“If it’s your end-state goal to become president, this gets you to D.C. in one of the very top elected jobs in the country,” said Michigan Democratic strategist Adrian Hemond. 

Buttigieg had already been speculated to be planning a run for statewide office in Michigan since moving to Traverse City a few years ago, but much of that had focused on a possible gubernatorial run, with Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D) reaching her term limit in 2026.

[...] 

Pollster Steve Mitchell, the CEO of Mitchell Research & Communications, said the firm conducted polling last year on the gubernatorial race and found in September that Buttigieg had a “huge lead” over other possible candidates. With Peters not running, a Senate bid would be easier to pull off for someone relatively new to the state, he said. 

“It seems to me, given the fact that he came to Michigan two years ago, is not originally from here, running for the Senate is a lot better position than running for governor,” Mitchell said, adding that running for governor requires a deeper understanding of the state government. 

Candidates seeking office in a state they’re relatively new to have often faced accusations of “carpetbagging,” but Mitchell said history shows many more instances of those candidates pulling off successful Senate runs than gubernatorial bids. 

He pointed to Robert F. Kennedy’s (D) successful bid for Senate in New York in 1964 despite his background in Massachusetts, and former Sen. Hillary Clinton’s (D) victory in New York in 2000 despite being from Arkansas. 

She was from Chicago, Arkansas being by marriage, and "Hillary's turn" was disaster, no question, she could not even defeat Trump then, which Biden did, and we need not rehash problems and possibly needed solutions at length, again. here and now. The Hill continuing - 

Matthew Morey, the communications chair for the Kent County Democratic Party in Michigan, said Buttigieg also has “deep” ties to the Midwest and has showed his “commitment” to that region of the country. And he argued that Buttigieg can have crossover appeal. 

“While he absolutely appeals to a huge swath of the Democratic base, he also has demonstrated that he can work with anybody who is wanting to make a little bit of progress,” Morey said. 

Buttigieg has blazed a bit of his own path in the media, often seeking out appearances on major conservative media channels and other seemingly hostile outlets. 

The Democrat appeared regularly on Fox News’s daytime newscasts during the 2024 campaign and sparred with Fox anchor Shannon Bream on the network’s public affairs show last summer over issues like immigration and crime. 

“There are a lot of Americans who my party can’t blame if they are ignoring our message because they will never hear it if we don’t go on and talk about it,” Buttigieg said while defending his decision to appear on Fox in 2019.

Still, Democrats said the field is open and they expect a competitive and lively primary. While a few other candidates have ruled out bids, others such as state Senate Majority Whip Mallory McMorrow (D) and Reps. Haley Stevens (D) and Hillary Scholten (D) are among the top names being floated, each certainly prominent within Michigan. 

“I don’t think that Buttigieg clears the field at all, but he’s certainly a very, very strong candidate, and if he gets into this race, I expect he will raise money very, very quickly,” Hemond said.

Corporatism has a pecuniary appeal, that is true but unfortunate, yet then the rubber has at some point to meet the road, and selling McKinstry, against JD, good luck on that, it won't work. JD is as good a talker as Mayor Pete. And has been elevated higher in Trump world. Add to that saying Pete has "crossover appeal" is a euphemism for calling him Republican lite, and that's a loser these days even for actual Republicans. Middle of the road is a place for roadkill. We need someone with a fighting spirit and progressive ideals people can trust as real, which means a person like AOC or Greg Casar, not less. 

In Michigan, who knows what sells, but if Pete runs there and loses, game over.

So, for the long term good of the nation, I hope he runs and loses, so that recognition of middle road failure might reach even between Hakim Jeffreys' ears, and between the ears of Schumer and Ken Martin. Progress or failure, and when you lose the spoils there will always be a Project 2025 or such, to capitalize.


Wednesday, February 19, 2025

What did Truman mean, and how the term can be fleshed out. Being unsure, I talked things over with a bot. [UPDATED]

 Truman used the term "stuffed shirts" and it seems to overlap the term "empty suit."

But in one case, add something to a garment, in the other subtract something so the terms do not fully correlate?

How to flesh out the difference in detail? 

Send Hegseth and Vance to Europe.

If having to guess at differentiation, Vance is, the stuffed shirt, Hegseth the empty suit under my first order impressions and my guess at wording nuance.

I think I got that correct, and as to the meanings overlapping -

Add the text of their speeches to a multi-billion parameter LLM, retrain, or focus via prompts and chat to see if there is any discernible before-after difference as a conversation with a bot progresses. Crabgrass guess: There will not be.

..............................................

Perhaps - it is feasible, I might be wrong and so I should do the chat. "Walk the walk, don't just talk the talk." Result, via a serial "query - response" conversation I had with Microsoft's Copilot:

 ......................,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.............

What is the difference in meaning between stuffed shirt, and empty suit?

"Stuffed shirt" and "empty suit" are both pejorative terms used to describe people, but they have different connotations.

1. **Stuffed shirt**: This term typically refers to someone who is pompous, self-important, or excessively formal. A "stuffed shirt" is often seen as someone who takes themselves too seriously, is inflexible, or lacks a sense of humor. They may be overly concerned with appearances and protocol, often coming across as arrogant or condescending.

2. **Empty suit**: This term, on the other hand, refers to someone who appears to be important or competent but lacks substance, skill, or effectiveness. An "empty suit" might have a high-ranking position or impressive title but is ultimately ineffectual, lacking the ability or knowledge to perform their duties well. They are often seen as all show and no go.

Both terms are used to criticize individuals, but while a "stuffed shirt" is more about attitude and demeanor, an "empty suit" is about lacking real capabilities or substance. Does that make sense?

Hegseth speaking in Europe, or Vance, which is which, stuffed shirt, empty suit?

Based on their recent speeches in Europe, we can draw some distinctions:

  1. Pete Hegseth: His remarks in Europe have been quite forceful and controversial. He emphasized that European countries should not rely on American troops indefinitely and need to invest more in their own defense. This approach might make him seem like a "stuffed shirt" due to his stern and formal demeanor, as well as his focus on protocol and appearances.

  2. J.D. Vance: His speech at the Munich Security Conference criticized European leaders for issues like mass migration and restrictions on free speech. He also met with controversial figures, which could be seen as lacking substance or effectiveness in addressing the core issues. This might align him more with the term "empty suit," as he appears to be making grand statements without substantial action or capability behind them.

So, Hegseth could be seen as the "stuffed shirt," while Vance might be considered the "empty suit." Does that help clarify things?

I see it the exact opposite. How am I wrong, or am I correct?

Your perspective is valid, and it’s always interesting to see how different people interpret public figures and their actions. The distinction between "stuffed shirt" and "empty suit" can be subjective, and people may see different qualities in the same person.

In the case of Hegseth and Vance, you may have observed their actions and statements differently, which led you to categorize them in the opposite way. Maybe you perceive Hegseth as lacking substance or effectiveness and Vance as being overly formal and self-important.

[Boy, the bot nailed that one. Continuing - ]

Ultimately, both interpretations can be correct depending on the lens through which one views their actions and demeanor. Your insights and experiences shape your understanding, and there's no absolute right or wrong in such subjective assessments.

If you feel like sharing more about your reasons, I'd be happy to dive deeper into this discussion.

Vance seemed to be telling people they were acting wrongly while Hegseth seemed to be telling people what to do and how things are, so is that relevant?

Absolutely, your observations are relevant. The way someone communicates and the tone they use can significantly impact how they're perceived.

  1. J.D. Vance: If he was focusing on criticizing others' actions and pointing out where he believes they went wrong, this could come across as being condescending or overly critical without offering substantial solutions. This might align more with the term "stuffed shirt," as it emphasizes a pompous attitude.

  2. Pete Hegseth: On the other hand, if he was assertively telling people what to do and how things should be, this could be seen as taking a strong stance but lacking in-depth knowledge or effective solutions. This might align more with the term "empty suit," as it highlights a forceful yet superficial approach.

Your interpretation is indeed relevant, as the context and style of their communication can influence whether they are seen as a "stuffed shirt" or an "empty suit." Your perspective adds valuable nuance to the discussion.

It’s fascinating how different elements of a speech or demeanor can shape our perceptions. If you have more insights or specific examples from their speeches, I'd love to hear them!

Vance seemed to be tediously talking of democracy in his view, while Hegseth discussed supposed negotiation of a done deal whose terms were already decided, so how do you deal with that?

Your observations add more depth to the discussion. Let's break it down:

  1. J.D. Vance: If he was focusing heavily on his views of democracy and it felt tedious or repetitive, this might contribute to the perception of him being a "stuffed shirt." His approach might come across as overly formal and self-important, emphasizing his perspective without offering much new or practical insight.

  2. Pete Hegseth: On the other hand, if Hegseth was discussing a negotiation with terms that were already decided, it might seem like he was presenting a façade of authority and decision-making without actually contributing to the process. This could align with the "empty suit" perception, where the appearance of action and influence is not backed by real substance or impact.

Your interpretation highlights how the content and delivery of their speeches can influence their perceived roles. It's all about the context and nuances of their communication styles.

By considering these factors, your viewpoint seems well-founded and offers a fresh perspective. Thanks for sharing those details!

If you have more specific examples or thoughts, I'd love to continue this engaging conversation!

..................................................

So, the bot had it called differently than I did, "Based on their recent speeches in Europe, we can draw some distinctions," it said, and that is where it gave links via footnotes, which got lost in transcribing the person-and-bot conversation.

The bot than sought further input and well-mannerdly said if it is how you say, then perhaps . . . [telling me what it thought, probabilisticly I wanted to hear] where it was programmed to answer added person text in light of its probabilities based on LLM training and the previous thread of prompts, and it did well.

Now readers have the benefit of bot speak and my thoughts, and can, from the bot's initial differentiation of the two terms, form their own thoughts of which official was more the stuffed shirt, which more the empty suit. Hopefully generic discourse and analysis on the web, by paid reporters and/or bots, can be more easily appreciated in a context of simple terms, juxtaposed.

 ____________UPDATE_____________

In accessing the bot, no harm, no foul. Seattle Times in an Feb. 18 item, not so.

How Microsoft and other U.S. tech giants supplied Israel with AI models

 [...] The Israeli military uses AI to sift through vast troves of intelligence, intercepted communications and surveillance to find suspicious speech or behavior and learn the movements of its enemies. After a surprise attack by Hamas militants on Oct. 7, 2023, its use of Microsoft and OpenAI technology skyrocketed, an Associated Press investigation found.

The investigation also revealed new details of how AI systems select targets and ways they can go wrong, including faulty data or flawed algorithms. It was based on internal documents, data and exclusive interviews with current and former Israeli officials and company employees.

Israel’s goal after the attack that killed about 1,200 people and took over 250 hostages was to eradicate Hamas, and its military has called AI a “game changer” in yielding targets more swiftly. Since the war started, more than 50,000 people have died in Gaza and Lebanon and nearly 70% of the buildings in Gaza have been devastated, according to health ministries in Gaza and Lebanon.

[...] Among U.S. tech firms, Microsoft has had an especially close relationship with the Israeli military spanning decades.

That relationship, alongside those with other tech companies, stepped up after the Hamas attack. Israel’s war response strained its own servers and increased its reliance on outside, third-party vendors, according to a presentation last year by Col. Racheli Dembinsky, the military’s top information technology officer. As she described how AI had provided Israel “very significant operational effectiveness” in Gaza, the logos of Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud and Amazon Web Services appeared on a large screen behind her.

The Israeli military’s usage of Microsoft and OpenAI artificial intelligence spiked in March to nearly 200 times higher than before the week leading up to the Oct. 7 attack, the AP found in reviewing internal company information. The amount of data it stored on Microsoft servers doubled between that time and July 2024 to more than 13.6 petabytes — roughly 350 times the digital memory needed to store every book in the Library of Congress. Usage of Microsoft’s huge banks of computer servers by the military also rose by almost two-thirds in the first two months of the war alone.

Microsoft declined to provide any comment for this story and did not respond to a detailed list of written questions about the cloud and AI services it provides to the Israeli military.

In an expansive statement on its website, the company says “respecting human rights is a core value of Microsoft″ and it is committed “to champion the positive role of technology across the globe.” In its 40-page Responsible AI Transparency Report for 2024, Microsoft pledges to “map, measure, and manage generative AI risks throughout the development cycle to reduce the risk of harm,” and does not mention its lucrative military contracts.

Advanced AI models are provided through OpenAI, the maker of ChatGPT, through Microsoft’s Azure cloud platform, where they are purchased by the Israeli military, the documents and data show. Microsoft has been OpenAI’s largest investor.

OpenAI said it does not have a partnership with Israel’s military, and its usage policies say its customers should not use its products to develop weapons, destroy property or harm people. About a year ago, however, OpenAI changed its terms of use from barring military use to allowing for “national security use cases that align with our mission.”

The Israeli military declined to answer detailed written questions from The AP about its use of commercial AI products from American tech companies, but said its analysts use AI-enabled systems to help identify targets and independently examine them together with high-ranking officers to meet international law, weighing the military advantage against the collateral damage.

“These AI tools make the intelligence process more accurate and more effective,” said an Israeli military statement to the AP. “⁠They make more targets faster, but not at the expense of accuracy, and many times in this war they’ve been able to minimize civilian casualties.”

Other U.S. Tech firms also work with Israel’s military

Google and Amazon provide cloud computing and AI services to the Israeli military under “Project Nimbus,” a $1.2 billion contract signed in 2021, when Israel first tested its in-house AI-powered targeting systems. [...] while Palantir Technologies, a Microsoft partner in U.S. defense contracts, has a “strategic partnership” providing AI systems to help Israel’s war efforts.

Palantir is billionaire Peter Thiel, plus others, military-contracting for cash. The Copilot bot I encountered was passive and well mannered, and as best I know, led to no death directly or indirectly. Certainly not in my brief encounter with it.

However, is it not OpenAI and Microsoft in a tight grip together that are touting the hell out of "Copilot" as "you really cannot do without it" while the truth is you can?

And most do. And that is why Microsoft is beating the drum so hard after blowing thirteen billion or more while also planning on forcefeeding Windows 11 users, soon, their crackerjack product, Microsoft Recall, which I sure as fuck don't want. 

Desires differ, and some may be peeing in their pants over the prospect of Microsoft Recall on every desktop, but those are likely ones Tulsi Gabbard has to ride herd over to curb improper and inelegant  thinking that we all somehow want to be trailed in great detail, cradle to grave. 

Do we? Are the spooks right that the sheep need herding?

 

Tuesday, February 18, 2025

Leonard Peltier sentence commuted to house confinement.

 Seattle Times,

Throughout his nearly half-century in prison, Peltier has maintained that he didn’t murder FBI agents Jack Coler and Ronald Williams during a confrontation that day on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota. Native Americans widely believe he was a political prisoner who was wrongly convicted because he fought for tribal rights as a member of the American Indian Movement.

“He represents every person who’s been roughed up by a cop, profiled, had their children harassed at school,” said Nick Estes, a professor of American Indian Studies at the University of Minnesota and a member of the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe who advocated for Peltier’s release.

Biden did not pardon Peltier. But his Jan. 20 commutation of Peltier’s sentence to home confinement, noting Peltier had spent most of his life behind bars and was in poor health, prompted criticism from those who believe Peltier is guilty. Among them is former FBI Director Christopher Wray, who called Peltier “a remorseless killer” in a private letter to Biden obtained by The Associated Press.

[...] “We never thought he would get out,” said Ray St. Clair, a member of the White Earth Band of the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe who traveled to Florida to be there for Peltier’s release. “It shows you should never give up hope. We can take this repairing the damage that was done. This is a start.”

Peltier was active in AIM, which formed in the 1960s and fought for Native American treaty rights and tribal self-determination.

Peltier’s conviction stemmed from a 1975 confrontation on the in Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota in which the two FBI agents were killed. According to the FBI, Coler and Williams were there to serve arrest warrants for robbery and assault with a dangerous weapon.

Prosecutors maintained at trial that Peltier shot both agents in the head at point-blank range. Peltier acknowledged being present and firing a gun at a distance, but he said he fired in self-defense and that his shots weren’t the ones that killed the agents. A woman who claimed to have seen Peltier shoot the agents later recanted her testimony, saying it had been coerced.

He was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder and given two consecutive life sentences.

Two other AIM members, Robert Robideau and Dino Butler, were acquitted on the grounds of self-defense.

Many of Peltier’s supporters and even some prosecutors have questioned the fairness of his trial and the evidence presented against him. But Michael J. Clark, president of the Society of Former Special Agents of the FBI, pointed out that numerous federal judges have denied Peltier’s appeals.

To avoid any/all confusion, this was done by Biden on the way out. Not Trump.

Bezos gets his Post in a wringer again.

Why not link to the story, per the Daily Mali

Jeff Bezos' Washington Post backs out of running $115,000 front page advertisement targeting Elon Musk

The Jeff Bezos' owned Washington Post has reportedly backed out of running a $115,000 front page advertisement targeting DOGE head Elon Musk amid the Amazon founder's budding friendship with President Donald Trump.

Advocacy group Common Cause announced that it had signed the costly agreement with the newspaper to run an ad that would have covered the entire front and back page of Tuesday's paper as well as a full page advertisement inside the paper.

The group said it planned to purchase the ad in collaboration with the Southern Poverty Law Center Action Fund. 

Copies of the paper with the wrap would then be sent to subscribers on Capitol Hill, at the Pentagon and at the White House, according to The Hill. 

The ad's design, which is still available on the group's website, features a large photo of Musk with his head tilted back, laughing, along with a cutout image of the White House.

'Who's running this country: Donald Trump or Elon Musk?' it asked.

Further down on the page, the advertisement features smaller text that reads: 'Since day one, Elon has created chaos and confusion and put our livelihoods at risk. And he is accountable to no one but himself. 

'The Constitution only allows for one president at a time,' it says. 'Call our senators and tell them it's time Donald Trump fire Elon Musk.' It also included the URL FireMusk.org.

[images omitted]

Common Cause President Virginia Kase Solomon told The Hill the paper's advertising sales representative was informed of the nature of the ad and seemed confident that running it over the paper wouldn't be a problem.

But on Friday, Common Cause was informed the Post would not run the wrap around advertisement.

'We submitted the artwork back on Tuesday of last week. I'm assuming it went through a legal department or other kind of review,' she recounted.

'They said, "You can have something inside the paper, but you can't do the wrap."

'We said "thanks, no thanks" because we had a lot of questions.

'Is it because we're critical of what's happening with Elon Musk? Is it only OK to run things in The Post now that won't anger the president or won't have him calling Jeff Bezos asking why this was allowed?'

The decision came after Bezos was featured prominently at the 47th president's swearing-in ceremony, after he announced his plans too donate $1 million to the incoming president's inaugural fund.

Bezos and his fiancee Lauren Sanchez had earlier traveled to Mar-a-Lago for dinner with the then president-elect.

[...] 

[links in original] If this keeps up, Elon with a clear mandate might become a Trump liability to where The Apprentice in Trump comes out, just like the days on TV.

The launch contracts, and protection from IG actions likely would remain, as would the money come election time, but the DOGE puppies might take a hit but then the Heritage Top Dog Catholic Project 2025 putsch would feel slighted, etc.

Elon and his black Great Again cap and carrying his son like a Totem Pole around the Oval Office for pressers might, unlike Buddy Holly's love, fade away.

UPADTE: Bonus 1. Bonus 2. You need a Bonus 3? Try This.

Rather than updating any earlier post, Hegseth held a press conference while engaged with NATO in Europe.

  

 


Link. Posted by AP on YouTube. A few questions were taken, it being unclear whether they were staged or culled or identified in advance or extemporaneous. 

The item speaks for itself. Luckily he did not have to blow his nose.

______________UPDATE________________

It would be wrong to leave it there. Even if a lapel handkerchief is a ceremonial fixture of being a suit, wearing a suit, it still is a handkerchief suggesting it's use in the normal course of events, for which a national flag is clearly be inappropriate.

Whoever thought it was a good touch has bad judgment.

That said, Hegseth was not unclear. His European appearance coincided with that of JD Vance, and both spoke in what struck Crabgrass as a condescending manner to people who've centuries of experience and not under three hundred years of existence as a nation, a nation which would not have any Aryan people like Hegleth or Vance except they - the ancestors - came here from Europe as immigrants from need. More respect seemed appropriate for a far more extensive and tortured history whereby Western culture evolved to become Western culture. 

It is not something invented here. The epics of Western culture were all written there. Vance's Augustine wrote there, Newton and Einstein were from there. The Bronze age was there. The Iron Age followed there. The industrial Revolution was founded on European soil by Europeans. Capitalism and banking, and Marxism, were all things from Europe before being a part of a colony that rebelled but had to find itself and its way. 

Respect seemed lacking, and Trump is ultimately responsible for, and likely approving, how his representatives handled themselves. They were clear and spoke with no hemming or hawing, nor with any idiosyncratic speech habits, but somehow the norm of dealing with equals got confused. Good politically, long term, you judge.

 Things seemed to go beyond bravado, approaching insult. Hegseth seems headed to do well as Secretary of Defense. The attitude he showed there needs to be used among defense contractors, including those with launch contracts. But that is a top down thing. South Africa was a British colony after the States rebelled and became independent. In terms of the history of things.

NATO member defense ministers met and discussed Ukraine. Hegseth spoke publicly at length before the press was dismissed for the private consultations.

Britain chaired the meeting, Hegseth's speech was the longest part of the public part of the meeting. Guardian posted online the entire public portion. Here.

Coverage included pre-meeting movement and conversations not recorded.

The meeting was gaveled into order a bit after the 9:00 min mark, Hegseth beginning at roughly 13:30 min into the coverage. 

What Hegseth said was nothing really new, given current news as well as Trump's earlier statements about European spending and resolve. And given current news of Trump's view that pre-2014 Ukraine borders may be adjusted in negotiation toward ending current war, and as Hegseth expressed, forming a permanant move toward not having further war develop. Hegseth stated a U.S. position where watching his comments will flesh out reader understanding of where the meeting might have gone after the press and public were excluded from further ongoing defense minsters' discussing and deliberations over options and events. 

Hegseth saying the U.S. would be concentrating more on Asia and the Pacific than on Europe and the Atlantic, while not withdrawing from or intending to end NATO as a force in which the U.S. will remain a participant. That notice was given.

Terms Trump thinks are a basis on which the Ukraine war can be ended were stated by Hegseth, and have been reported already by media. Nothing really new there.

How Europe will react long term to what Trump has been saying and what Hegseth said is a future concern, but Hegseth giving a public speech among NATO representatives while Vance gave a speech about non-military events and thoughts suggests Europeans may feel it in their interest to reevaluate the U.S. as an ally.

Their view of their own best interests may diverge from what they have been publicly told by Trump's representatives as to how they might view the world's relations. That Trump's viewpoint is a four year thing is known by all, but the 2028 election outcome in the U.S. is known to nobody. European politicians will weigh that. Presumably they understand long term possibilities and will do what they believe is best for their own nations. What that will be, will be shown as time passes.

And there is a world economy running in parallel to military considerations. Interlocking national banking understandings exist which we citizens of one nation may have no knowledge. Crypto looms. Prices seem only on an upward trend. 

____________UPDATE___________

With  U.S, food policy seemingly being downsized and being rolled into the State Department with its civilian led structure, and the U.S.AID existence being ended as a spook usage for promoting regime change, (and with Afghan poppies being left to Taliban control); internationally, less untoward spook power per Gabbard leadership fits. 

Cargill in Minnetonka, MN, will continue to be a major presence in worldwide food trade, but food as a weapon tied to the spook regime changers will be less a net U.S. action point going forward. This is good. Trump seems right minded that way. Regime change war, Iran in particular, seems destined for Israel to front as a U.S. proxy. But Iran getting the bomb has been clearly red-lined as not happening.

Whether things turn out ugly that way, or Iran remains close but not armed with actual nuclear weapons, how that evolves is uncertain. The Saudis want to have nuclear weapon power, but the international consensus is keep the Shia nations without it and the Sunnis will be satisfied. Pakistan and India seem to be coexisting in mutual deterrence, and, interestingly, Hegseth mentioned "deterrence" in his European NATO public presentation, when referencing U.S. Pacific/Asia aims.

Trump seems to have an ordered change but not too major a change in mind, internationally, curbing the spooks extremism, but his U.S. domestic actions are being met with dug in resistance more than with shock and awe. Elon is becoming a lightning rod for Trump but if that backfires Elon's public-facing role will be quickly and expeditiously downsized even where the campaign cash matters greatly to Republicans and will continue to hold sway in politicians' influence trading. Both houses of Congress, both parties, will continue to suck. It is where Democratic Party reform and power can grow, if leadership will only let it.

FURTHER: Pelosi needs to be replaced with a progressive. Her calling herself "a progressive" is an insult to everybody who really is one. The California of Phil Burton was good but is gone as a political thing. It needs reinvigorating and neither Newsom, nor Harris chasing a gov-ship fit with its growth and prospering. 

Medicare for All. The party that honestly embraces it will survive. The other will regroup to who knows what. Klan rebirth with all that entails? Something else?

 

Elderly Trump voters - Elon is coming for your Social Security.

Seattle Times today's feature story -


 This is from the Oval Office, the photographer kneeling, shooting upward, Trump's desk corner out of focus, Elon in focus. Elon did not expressly say, "coming after Social Security payments because I want a tax break to continue for billionaires," but he did say, "I have never seen a 150 year old," implying some SS payments are not being terminated at death. That is easy to say, but intent to squeeze old Trump voter's Social Security is implied, at least as how I read Elon. And more so, to really squeeze Harris voters. Others may reach other implications, but a below post has Elon's Oval Office Press Conference linked. Listen and decide, good guy or unelected super wealthy pirate against non-billionaires. With his dark Great Again ballcap, wanting to move back to the post-Civil War robber baron days. Even if Trump had other times in mind in flooding the nation with red caps, Elon likes the turn of the century robber barons Teddy Roosevelt railed against. (They were all white.) 

Perhaps Elon is well intentioned. Perhaps not. But he sure does skew the wealth curve, and seems to look at Social Security while ignoring Pentagon waste. That's the bona fides of his approach. Reminds one of Reagan's "welfare queen" theme as an excuse to go after poor blacks, so that now it will be "social security queens" or some such theme to sell pulling the rug out from under the needy.

The story is covered widely, e.g., this search. A Feb. 13, USA Today screen capture:

 


So, rural Minnesota food stamp recipient Trump voters, do you want a prick into your privacy rights regarding your dealings with the federal government? Even the merest pin prick into such things - should it remain protected and private? Aid is given where needed, and need can be a privacy worry in any community, particularly in small towns where people know each other. 

Your burdens and needs are none of DOGE's business, you're not defrauding anybody, you are scraping by as best you can while millionaires and billionaires hunt your people. Is that just? Is it weaponizing things against the needy? Is it what you expected in November when you went to the polling place? 

Should you beg Elon to quit? You are not Trump's enemy. You voted for him and are not going to be on his list. But Elon and his people seem to be keeping a list too. And for now it looks as if the needy may make Elon's list, wrongly or rightly - because his people are inexperienced and can err.

And what if there is a data error, and a month's assistance is missed. It could pinch. Having to fix things, to fill out more forms. 

And yes, scare tactics are coarse. But scare tactics were used to get your vote.


Monday, February 17, 2025

Bernie substantially ups the rhetoric in a floor speech - but Bernie cannot lift a single Republican above knowing that angering Trump can cause early career death.

And at least Mitch is acting as if he is immune from career uber alles.

Nobody is there to listen in the empty hall when Bernie notes Musk, Zukerberg and Bezos together have more wealth than half the nation, 170 million people. 

In that bottom 170 million, hunger exists. Paycheck to paycheck looks carefully at escalating grocery prices. Elon prancing means count the days before Trump realizes he's in the driver's seat while Elon sets the navigation system route

When that happens, who knows what comes after? Humpty Dumpty, or just more of the same and then some?

Have they set up on the Internet yet a countdown clock for the end of Trump's second term, as they did for warmonger Bush?

Somebody should. 

......................................................

Bernie tries. Bernie is a mensch. The good people hear and agree with Bernie.

A Beshear - Casar ticket might defeat a Vance - Rubio ticket, but let's keep today in focus, not tomorrow. (That Beshear - Cosar is today's Crabgrass good guess at what could win, not at what the Dem Inner Party will churn out. While saying that, Crabgrass likes more a Casar - Beshear option.) Dream on, expect dreck. Schumer and Jeffries are not infected with a giving nature. Nor insight to fight. They have donors who matter more than you. Each has his own career priorities. Power and a paycheck matter.

 

Sunday, February 16, 2025

JD gave a speech in Europe. It has cooked for a few days, so Crabgrass should say something while it is current.

 [UPDATE - The White House posted the speech on YouTube, here.]

Using the web is always of interest.

search =  text of JD vance speech

Straightforward enough, but if you try it with a different search engine, or the same one I used, but with your profile, who knows if what you get is what I got.

It must be a hot search, because for me it came with a bot blurb:

Assist

The full text of JD Vance's speech at the Munich Security Conference can be found in various online sources, including news websites and transcripts. You can search for "JD Vance Munich Security Conference speech transcript" to access it directly.

Auto-generated based on listed sources. May contain inaccuracies.

Show answers more often. (You can also_______________.)

What did not copy ... can also turn them off  - that being a link that was formatted to NOT copy, so I toggled it and the bot blurb vanished! replaced by a thumbs up thumbs down feedback query. The web surprises. Have I forever killed bot blurbs now? More about that at the post's end.

At any rate, the speech is the topic, not finding it would have been a load, although that is a part of the saga because the web is full of reporting of what the speech said, in part, and/or how to interpret it. But I am of the Read-It-Myself school.

One of the bot-returned items is behind a subscription wall, the other, not, at least as to how I have formatted my browser. But both uncommon links for USA readers.

more directly, early hits: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2025/02/14/full_speech_vice_president_jd_vance_addresses_munich_security_conference.html 

https://voz.us/en/politics/250215/21114/the-full-transcript-of-jd-vance-s-speech-that-shook-europe.html

And that one had a stay-with-us link over: https://voz.us/en/politics/250212/20987/virginia-bans-the-use-of-the-chinese-ai-deepseek-on-any-state-government-device-or-network.html (opened in a new tab, read it after the post is finished - DeepSeek is its own news thing and how big is an uncertainty - but it moved the market Nvidia declined briefly)

So the search algorithm surely knew what speech I meant, bingo, right on.

Now, about the speech itself - you have the full text link - it might even be on YouTube so you can track JD's speaking nuance. But its impact, an analysis - who am I to say? All I want is peace in our time.

And the speech was about --- speech, and yet I feel if I were to throw rocks at it that might be noticed by somebody with skin in the game, to where I could be hunted down, cornered, and destroyed as an enemy of someone with power. Who'd want that on themselves? So, read the fucker and handle it in your own mind.

Now, what I said I would end the post with - there was a link in there that landed in the Blogger posting page, saying:

https://duckduckgo.com/settings#aifeatures 

Chat

Chat (via our Duck.ai service) lets you have anonymous conversations with 3rd-party AI chat models, which supports models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and more. Turning this setting off will hide Chat buttons and links on DuckDuckGo Search. However, you can still access Chat when this setting is off by visiting https://duck.ai directly.

Assist

Assist can anonymously generate AI-assisted answers to some searches based on summarizing relevant web content. You can choose how often you want Assist to appear: Never (completely removes Assist UI from search results), On-demand (only shows AI-assisted answers if you click the Assist button), Sometimes (only shows AI-assisted answers when highly relevant), or Often (shows more frequently on a wider range of searches). For now, AI-assisted answers are only available in the U.S. (English) region.

Finally while this post does dwell on web algorithm evolution technology - it is the speech which has leverage and you've been given the full text links that, for now, work.

 

What's good for Minnetonka is good for the U.S.A.

Somebody used to say that about General Motors.

Why Minnetonka? Good question.

An interesting hearing excerpt posted by PBS. Whereby somebody at PBS will be fired. Maybe not. We'll see.

Link. Elon's federal contracts, through his various corporations. pay out $8 M per day.

I had not known that before the gentleman from Texas pointed it out.

Fired Inspector Generals had investigations pending against Musk's empire.

I had not known that before the gentleman from Texas pointed it out - in detail.

It is nice to have that man on a committee headed by Marjorie Taylor Greene, so that truth mixes with bullshit. 

Waste - Fraud - Abuse

Chase it, chase it, chase it. But watch your step or you'll step in it, because the gentleman from Texas had only five minutes, and the dog/pony show lasted fairly longer. They have the SCOTUS, POTUS, and both houses of congress. Enjoy.

And supermarket pricing is going through the roof. Over five bucks for a dozen eggs, at ALDI, in Ramsey, MN, a discount outlet. 

__________UPDATE___________

Keep this guy on your radar. He is being fast-tracked.

He has an issues page. https://casar.house.gov/issues

He chairs the House Progressive Caucus. https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-greg-casar-elected-congressional-progressive-caucus-chair

He is not timid in placing his name with others. https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-warren-whitehouse-casar-lawmakers-slam-35-companies-paying-their 

He got handed that five minute presentation, Casar, show and tell against, not Trump, not JD, but against Elon. We see an advocate having a target, and from the same state that gives us Ted Cruz. And where Elon moved his stuff because California was too strict. With a Wiki page that begins:

Gregorio Eduardo Casar (born May 4, 1989) is an American politician who is the member for Texas's 35th congressional district in the United States Congress since 2023. He served as a member of the Austin City Council from the 4th district from 2015 to 2022.[1] Casar is a member of the Democratic Party and was endorsed by the Working Families Party in his run for Congress.[2] He was first elected to the Austin City Council in 2014, representing District 4.[3] He was reelected in 2016[4] and 2020.[5] He was elected to Congress in 2022.[6]

Casar is chair of the Democratic Congressional Progressive Caucus.[7]

Early life and education

Gregorio Casar was born in Houston to two Mexican immigrants and is a Catholic. His father was a surgeon.[8][9][10] He grew up in the enclave of Bellaire and attended Strake Jesuit College Preparatory, where he ran track.[11][12] Casar then earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in political science and social thought from the University of Virginia in 2011.[13] He began his activism in college, organizing with Students and Workers United for a Living Wage, which called for the university to pay its workers a higher living wage.[14]

Early career

Workers Defense Project

Before running for office, Casar worked as policy director for the Workers Defense Project (Proyecto Defensa Laboral), where he won victories such as rest and water breaks for construction workers, living wage requirements, and against wage theft.[15]

In 2011, he led the Workers Defense Project efforts to require that construction workers be allowed to take rest and water breaks: ten minutes for each four hours worked, and no more than 3.5 hours without a break.[16] Casar also organized against major corporations, including White Lodging,[17] and successfully led the fight to include living wage and other labor protections in an incentives deal the Austin City Council planned to give to Apple.[18]

If the Dems were to run him against JD, two beards, two Catholics, this one a Jesuit trainee, JD a later in life convert. Not all, but much of his Wiki entry:

As an Austin City Council member, Casar led policy efforts on issues ranging from affordable housing, paid sick leave, living wage increases, tenant organizing, immigrant rights, criminal justice reforms (such as "ban the box"), and police accountability. He was the first person to represent Austin's District 4, the city's most diverse district. It has the most young children, and is 70% nonwhite, with approximately 30% non-citizen.[28] Most of its constituents are Latino, and it has the second largest African American population of Austin's ten council districts. It also has the highest poverty rate.[29]

Casar served as the board chair of Local Progress, a project of the Center for Popular Democracy, "the national network of progressive elected officials from cities, counties, towns, school districts, villages and other local governments across the country".[30]

Casar resigned his seat on November 4, 2021, when he announced his run for the U.S. House of Representatives in the 35th district.[citation needed]

U.S. House of Representatives

Elections

Casar at a candidate forum in September 2022

2022

On November 4, 2021, Casar announced his candidacy for Texas's 35th congressional district.[31] During the primary, he was endorsed by prominent national progressives, including senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,[32] as well as Austin officials such as Mayor Steve Adler and Travis County district attorney José Garza.[33]

Casar won the Democratic primary on March 1, 2022, with approximately 60% of the vote.[34] In his victory speech, he linked his victory to the overall progressive movement, saying, "This election was about us, the power of the people and the power of our movement. Let’s celebrate the progressive movement in Texas".[33][32][35] Given the 35th district’s partisan lean of D+21, Casar’s primary victory was considered tantamount to election. The Texas Tribune wrote that he is expected to be "among the most progressive members of Congress ever to serve from Texas".[34]

On November 8, 2022, Casar won the general election, defeating the Republican nominee, former Corpus Christi mayor Dan McQueen, with 73% of the vote.[36]

Tenure

Casar was among the 46 Democrats who voted against final passage of the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 in the House.[37] On July 25, 2023, Casar led a thirst strike advocating for better heat protection after a law passed in Texas overrode local ordinances such as water and rest breaks.[38] The strike lasted for nine hours and Casar took no breaks nor did he eat or drink.[38]

Caucus memberships

Committee assignments

Political positions

Criminal justice reform

Ban the box

In 2016, Casar led efforts at City Hall to "ban the box" through a fair chance hiring ordinance.[41] The ordinance delays when employers can do a criminal background check until after a conditional job offer has been made, in order to help reintegrate former prisoners into the workplace and deter employment discrimination. Austin became the first city to ban the box in the Southern United States.[42]

Freedom City

Because of Texas Senate Bill 4's limitations on sanctuary cities, and in an effort to reduce the impact of low-level interactions with police, Casar initiated policy changes to make Austin a "Freedom City",[43] which discourages the police from making low-level discretionary arrests and requires police officers to inform residents that they have the right to refuse to answer questions about immigration status. During the debate, the Austin Police Association attacked Casar for citing data that Black residents are arrested twice as often as white residents in discretionary arrests.[44] Casar wrote in a Texas Tribune editorial that the Freedom Cities law's intention is to unite immigration reformers and criminal justice reformers to reduce the disparate impact of policing on communities of color.[45] In the first quarter after the policy passed, arrests for ticket-worthy offenses dropped by two-thirds. Racial disproportionality of arrests also improved.[46]

Juvenile curfew

In June 2017, Casar and Delia Garza pushed the council to eliminate criminal penalties for a juvenile to "walk, run, idle, wander, stroll, or aimlessly drive" during curfew hours, out of a belief that kids should not be pushed into the criminal justice system for being young and out in public.[47] Many of these laws, including Austin's, were passed during Clinton Administration's "tough on crime" phase in the 1990s.[48] Ultimately, the council removed the juvenile curfew. Austin became the nation's second-largest city to end its juvenile curfew policy.[49]

Police reform

When the Austin police union contract was set to expire in early 2017, criminal justice activists called for reform, citing examples in the contract that made police oversight difficult.[50] Casar, Jimmy Flannigan, and other Council members indicated their intent to reject the contract and send the union back to the bargaining table unless it was reformed.[51] After the contract was rejected, the police union requested bonus pay without a contract in place, but that was opposed by a divided council.[52] After nearly ten months of negotiations, a new contract was approved, along with the creation of an independent office of police oversight. The new contract made it easier to file complaints, provided more transparency around complaints of police misconduct, strengthened police disciplinary procedures, and increased accountability.[53]

 [...]

It is not hard to see a pro-labor [walking the talk beyond writing a book] progressive, with a more direct and confrontational style than JD. And so far, Francis has not had to correct Casar over doctrine and humane love of one's neighbors and plain decency. 

Don't expect it. Francis is as good as they've had atop that enterprise. And Casar appears to have a future within his party. He could likely unseat Cruz, if both parties put equal money into the contest, but, for now - a voice in the House that PBS put onto YouTube. As a bet, Crabgrass expects Casar has already met with Ken Martin.

You have to move from lukewarm to hotter if you're the party that failed so badly in 2024, and you have to do it with a credible person for the people, who would never share a stage with Liz Cheney or her dad. 

If it means anything to the Catholic insiders, JD is close with the Dominicans, Casar, as Wikipedia noted, was schooled with the Jesuits. Francis, and other Jesuits. As an outsider, I post of it, without knowing enough to know if there's much of a difference.

Keep the name in mind: Greg Casar.

FURTHER: Hat tip to Wall Street on Parade, which linked to the Casar YouTube segment. If not for that post, I'd possibly have missed much having a gravitas within the Democratic Party. But perhaps not flaming high on MSM current fare.

The action seems to be against Elon, as a symbol of very much else, Trumpwise.

And the sacked IGs are suing. MSM cannot down peddle that. Not credibly.

FURTHER: