Thursday, September 10, 2026

As noted in an earlier Crabgrass post, Timmer has been writing of Repub candidate Demuth.

 The earlier Timmer post is here, his new item links to it. The Crabgrass notice coverage, here. The UPDATE part of the Crabgrass item is the part about Timmer's earlier post.

Timmer now writes -

Even Claude recognizes Lisa’s bullshit

 In the item Timmer quereys Claude about detail of immigrant gang and crime as part of the waves that happened, and he extols the AI as good at list generation, see that link and its detail.

Bottom line - Somali immigrants are recent and seen as discordant by those not attuned to immigration history Timmer discusses. It is a good read.

Another item Timmer posts is per its opening executive summary paragraph -

There was a spirited discussion last evening on X about the Hennepin County Attorney race. I am very pro-Cedrick Fraizer; there were others in the discussion who were pro-Folk, some of them rather spittle-flecked. Now Tommy wasn’t spittle-flecked; he’s a friend. I am going to pick out one of his tweets posts, though, to get this story going [...]

Being ignorant of candidates and issues there, I leave the link and tout it as Timmer always writes well.

All politics is local, and Crabgrass has posted its own very local news on occasion. You have to. It matters. Of the most general interest, the two Timmer items about Demuth.


There is promising. There is delivering. It being Sept. 10, an aniversary and knowing what of, a trip to Breitbart land.

The Alex Marlow Show, hosted by Breitbart Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow, broadcasts coast to coast on weekdays from noon to 1 p.m. Eastern on the Salem Radio Network stations. You can listen to the radio show online here. The show also airs at 9 p.m. Eastern on the Salem TV news channel. Marlow’s podcast, The Alex Marlow Show Presented by Breitbart News, is released weekdays at 9 p.m. Eastern. You can subscribe ---

 or not.

 The headline with that above footer and a bit of the text - 

Exclusive — Blake Neff on Alex Marlow Show: Charlie Kirk Was ‘Special’ as He Tried to Implement Solutions

Charlie Kirk was “special,” in part, because he tried to implement solutions instead of just identifying the problem, Blake Neff, co-host of The Charlie Kirk Show, said during an appearance on  The Alex Marlow Show. 

Marlow spoke to Neff as part of his series of speaking with people who were close to Kirk one year after his devastating assassination. Marlow noted that Neff has an interesting story, as he was canceled from his job at Fox News when old anonymous online posts resurfaced. But Kirk quickly elevated him.

“I would say it was – it’s just that three years of working with him, it was just a steadily escalating process of admiring him more and more, seeing all the different ways he was a tremendous person for our country, for our movement, and that he was a consistently growing person,” Neff said. “He was always someone looking to become better, and I think that’s what really struck me in as we got into 2025.”

“Just seeing this is a guy who — he was a profoundly talented person when I first started working for him, but he’d become so much better at podcasting, at speaking, at organizing, at leading a movement of people, and he just endlessly impressed me. And as we hit this one year mark, it still hurts; not just knowing that I lost a great friend and a great boss, but that we lost this great leader and a person who was only reaching the peak of his — who hadn’t yet reached the peak of his tremendous potential,” Neff said, discussing all that Kirk did for him and the movement.

As if the Neff guy would lick the bottom of Charlie's boots. But it was not only just Charlie being Charlie, the Great. There is more to say -

“I took a lot of pride that in ’23 and ’24, when he’s building out Turning Point Action’s ballot chasing operation, when he’s making the pitch to donors, when he’s making the pitch at events why people should vote early, he was using — he was proud to use talking points that I’d hashed with him, and then that won people over, and we saw the result in ’24,” Neff said, noting that Kirk was “very proud that of all the swing states, Arizona, the one he put the most work into, that they built the most operation in, that was the one that moved the most towards President Trump.”

“I think seven or eight points when the nation moved three or four, and I was very glad that I could play a role with him on that, on messaging about the border and immigration, about DEI, so many things,” Neff said.

Jeez, dancing my dance, on Charlie's grave. Sad stuff. And they could not stop there. Headline another.

“I think those people have lost power,” Marlow said of conspiracy theorists. “But it happened, and it’s still happening.”

“As we’re having this conversation, we’re watching a huge chunk of the country run to the defense of a woman who we know slaughtered her children,” Marlow added, referring to the Lindsay Clancy case. “It is very dark, and I just wonder if something snapped in this country.”

The Breitbart News editor-in-chief then asked Kolvet for his take on the way society has behaved in the aftermath of Charlie’s assassination.

“I do believe that we are, as a culture, experiencing some amount of a mass psychosis event,” Kolvet replied. “It’s the crime junkie culture. It’s the TikTok brain. It’s the therapy brain.”

“And I love that you said they’ve lost power,” he continued. “Because I think what people are realizing over time is the lines get clearly drawn.”

“At the very beginning, in the immediate aftermath, I was skeptical of everything,” Kolvet said. “I wanted every lead down — but, eventually, you kind of have to get to the point where, ‘Hey, I have no evidence for any of those things.'”

After being asked to share something from Robinson’s trial that he feels “is not coming through” and that he would want people to understand, Kolvet replied, “I was in the courtroom for the bind-over hearing and it was remarkable being in that room and seeing the process of the legal system play out and feeling the emotions.”

“You can feel the energy of both the state and the defense counsel — the energy of his family, Tyler Robinson’s family. You can feel the energy of Erika and her family,” he added. “And it’s wild when you’re in that room how all that conspiracy nonsense just fades away.”

“It has zero credibility. It has zero currency in that room,” Kolvet asserted. “You have to be based in facts and logic. And that was something that struck me — when you’re in that room, you realize that you’re hemmed in by the process of justice.”

The Turning Point USA spokesperson added, “When you just put it all together, it’s really one of the more remarkable open-and-shut cases,” before revealing that many prosecutors, trial attorneys, and judges have reached out to him to say “this is the most open-and-shut case that they have ever seen just in terms of sheer amount of evidence.”

Kolvet also said he “wasn’t surprised” when Judge Tony Graf ruled last week that Robinson can stand trial for aggravated murder and six other charges.

Robinson, who could face the death penalty if convicted, will appear for a court hearing again on October 23, at which point a trial date is expected to be set.

In responding to conspiracy theorists having noted that Robinson pled not guilty, Kolvet explained that the defense attorneys’ “one goal in all of this” is to “keep the death penalty off the table.”

“The state’s not offering them a deal. They want to go for the death penalty,” he said. “You would never plead guilty if there wasn’t a deal on the table. And the state’s not offering one.”

“So, the only way you can get him off death row is you got to take this thing to trial and try and whittle away a jury’s perception of the aggravating factors,” Kolvet added. “Him pleading not guilty was a procedural move that keeps his leverage to get him off death row. That’s all it was.”

Near the end of their talk, Marlow praised Kolvet and others on staff for continuing on with The Charlie Kirk Show, stressing, “This is how you keep Charlie’s voice alive.”

“A lot of people thought that after Andrew Breitbart died, we should shut down breitbart.com. How do you think Andrew would be feeling now, knowing what Breitbart accomplished?” Marlow asked, to which Kolvet replied, “He would be really proud of you guys.”

Yes. We could have shut it down but there was money on the table, etc. Just like when Andrew died, money on the table is money on the table and you do not just walk. You take. 

And on the anniversary, That Tyler guy did it, nothing else to see. Convincing, isn't it? Almost a too easy buy.

UPDATE: Mourning Charlie Day is not the only news at Breitbart. There is this -

The Credit Card Competition Act (CCCA) was first proposed by Durbin and Marshall in 2022 before they reintroduced it in January, arguing that it would “increase competition in the credit card market and put an end to the Visa-Mastercard duopoly.” Originally, the legislation was cosponsored by then-Sen. JD Vance (R-OH), and Sens. Peter Welch (D-VT), Josh Hawley (R-MO), and Jack Reed (D-RI). 

Under the current system, merchants who accept credit cards get locked into whatever payment system that card runs on, and pays whatever fee that network charges. Visa and Mastercard dominate over 80 percent of the market. 

If passed, the CCCA would require banks with more than $100 billion in assets to offer merchants a choice of at least two networks over which a credit transaction can be processed, including one that is neither Mastercard nor Visa. 

While proponents argue that the legislation would benefit merchants by lowering operational costs associated with accepting Visa or Mastercard so they could pass on those savings to consumers, opponents of the bill say that those stores will just keep those savings for themselves, and that credit cards companies may take away rewards to make up for their lost revenue. 

On top of that, critics of the CCCA have also raised concerns about security risks that consumers could face if merchants use cheaper payment systems. 

Okay, let's see the spin on that one. 

Speaking with Breitbart News economy columnist John Carney during a Tuesday policy event in Washington, D.C. with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Simpson highlighted vulnerabilities in payment systems that could harm consumers as a result of the bill. 

“A lot of people are worried about fraud and cybersecurity, and this could impact the ability of issuers to be able to, especially I think credit unions, but all issuers to be able to deal with fraud and cybersecurity,” Carney said 

Simpson replied, “Yeah, that’s what the interchange system is built for — is to establish contracts with the American consumers and reliable protection. Well, that protection comes at the expense of the issuer”

“We look at the biggest data breaches in the history of our country and they tend to come from retailers because they don’t have incentives,” Simpson continued. “They’re not incentivized by the system to protect that data, and so it gives us zero confidence as issuers.”

Hundred billion dollar banks cannot put an alternate secure system together so let's just status quo things? That is kind of like Tom Emmer saying the banking system is insecure and fraught with threats and risk, so crypto is the answer. Not a CBDC. Put it, at least a portfolio part, in crypto. 

Emmer in turn rings as true as having credit card profiteer employed folks defend the bona fides of credit card giants, to help and protect you. To keep you secure, always with your best interest in mind. The higher that interest, the better.

And -- Isn't it interesting how Brietbart can get all those excusives? They do wonderful work. Full of wondering. Enough, but if you go to their site, Southcom blew up another Caribbean fishing boat. That's how many now. Excuse, it was a high performance boat on a drug smuggling route. They tell you so. My error.

 

 

BRICS op-ed in AJ

https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2026/9/8/brics-summit-may-be-the-only-place-another-iran-ceasefire-can-be-built 

Beginning:

Western commentary has already filed the summit under photo opportunity, a bloc too broad to agree on anything. That reading skips an awkward fact about the past six months. Every ceasefire this war has produced was assembled by BRICS members and their partners. Not one was assembled in Washington.

Look at the sequence. On March 31, Beijing and Islamabad issued a five-point initiative calling for an immediate ceasefire and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. A week later, Iran accepted a two-week truce. Direct American and Iranian delegations then sat down in Islamabad on April 11, the highest-level contact of the war, in talks run by Pakistan’s Shehbaz Sharif, with his army chief Asim Munir shuttling to Tehran twice. What came out of it was the Islamabad Memorandum, signed on June 17 by Trump at Versailles and Pezeshkian in Tehran, with Qatar, Oman, Turkiye, Saudi Arabia and Egypt carrying pieces of it. Fourteen points. Sixty days of toll-free passage. A pledge to lift the naval blockade within 30 days. A plan for at least $300 billion in reconstruction and economic development. It expired on August 17 after the two sides read Articles 1 and 5 differently and no mediator could force a common text.

The document failed. The machinery that built it did not. It is the only machinery this war has produced and most of it will be inside one building in Delhi on September 12.

China’s share of that record deserves more than the shrug it usually gets. Beijing buys more than 80 percent of Iran’s exported crude. It also buys heavily from the Gulf states Iran has been shelling and its Gulf imports fell 25 percent year on year in March. No other major power is losing money on both sides of this war at once. That exposure is what made its proposals legible in Tehran and tolerable in Abu Dhabi.

None of which makes Beijing clean. Chinese firms have supplied Iran with dual-use components, radar and navigation equipment, and a commercial reconnaissance satellite; Washington says the list runs longer and Beijing denies the sharper items.

Like it or love it, that kind of coverage is absent in NYT or WaPo, which are more North American slanted in choice of "news" vs what to not even publish. Parochial, is perhaps the term? 

 

What has Trump promised? To loud applause and chants of “USA, USA”, he said: “I will issue a dividend to every adult citizen in the United States of America for $5,000,” as long as the Republican Party keeps its majorities in both the House of Representatives and the US Senate. “If the Republicans win, you win with us,” he declared. Trump did not elaborate on how or when the payments would be made – or how they would be funded – stipulating only that people would be required to spend it in the US. “We don’t want you going to Canada to spend the money.”

 The man can grift, if that's a proper verb for a grifter. The purpose of the post is the explain why AJ is a fovored site of Crabgrass for "news." Where the word news is substituted for good stories about people and places for which Crabgrass has no direct experience.

The headline is from AJ's story featuring the earlier posted video (from YouTube there), of the five grand big lie. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/10/trump-promises-5000-payouts-if-gop-wins-midterms-can-the-us-afford-it 

There are AJ short video segments: https://www.aljazeera.com/video/newsfeed/2026/9/10/calls-grow-for-investigation-after-ice-attacks-protesters#flips-6404869988112:0 That is similar to TikTok for adult news junkies. As best as Crabgrass understands TikTok, not being a fan.

How Ukraine’s deepest attack in Russia, on Arctic gas, signals new reach tells you a story about Russia at war with Ukraine, a strung out thing being reported, but where we take the pundit word on things because of no direct knowledge.


Houthis, Yemeni forces engaged in fierce battles: Why each front matters together with Houthis capture Yemeni town of Mocha: Why it matters tell you what is going on and why you a world away should know of it.

Algeria says cutting diplomatic ties with UAE -- Relations have been strained for years, as the two countries took differing positions on several regional issuesThat tells you something most people worldwhide had not known of, a tension between two nations distanced from each other but viewed by AJ as having "regional issues." Meaning, within the greater Arab world, issues, which AJ then explains.

That is a sampling of today's AJ content. How can you not find it a top site? It tells good stories, and seems credible in the telling. Finally, how can you not like a site posting:

LINK - click image to enlarge and read

Fitting image selection. 

 

After posting as below, it seemed appropriate to tell the search engine: show me something interesting

 After futzing a bit with returns, I got this which to me is interesting.

Besides the music being good for state of mind, it amazed me, having finger limitations with touch typing on a laptop. The video does upstage my typing. I am not too proud to deny that.



This morning, after coffee, a question, we have a Web, so what on it is real and what is speaking to us on a level of unreality, slanted, or are we really this bad off?

 Start with an image, from the web, with its attached but here unstated context. It's multisourced, but I give where I got it.

https://arc.stimg.co/startribunemedia/DJA2QTUDZNG2XBIQGB6DJDQWMA.jpg?&w=1080
https://arc.stimg.co/startribunemedia/DJA2QTUDZNG2XBIQGB6DJDQWMA.jpg?&w=1080

 

 I believe this is fair use, since it is used only to begin and anchor a general post about "Is this real?"

Two heads of state looking as if normally conversant, while insanity is afoot between the two nations.

The unreality begins with the kitsch gold trim, and the unburned wood in the fireplace, there, likely, since Trump 45, unburned. The 747 coffee table trinket, and then the one Qatar supplied, huh?

Now, video on the web, sampled not randomly, but to show a ghost of uncertainty, "Is this real?"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hs6K_SYCRi0 - AJ video, but the Dallas -it really happened - story widespread. Seeing is believing?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRHqRWINWFQ - technocrat conversation over aspects of a part of technology.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEQZo27IGHU - this one I watched several seconds and wondered why anyone would view more.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGNvSK6vSxk - politician politicking, again only tuned in the first half minute of so, then - okay, get it, you are the loyal opposition, and who might care?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdTR2tmU1aY - once you see enough of HCR you get the drift about what the next one might say, and her video - each seems longer than necessary. Better than most, for certain, but still needing to be in the sampling to establish hints of reality or hints of the other possibiliity.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ApHPZPBdKE0 - one I watched longer before including it in this post because Musk is an interesting subject, and the documentary film form is clearly opinionated, almost always if not totally so, and you need to get enough to be able to guess about how the documentary will be scripted and put together to tell IT'S story, which will be unique, and subjective. I mentioned Leni Riefenstahl in another post, and she's known for the intended story style of documentary. Not even the slowest mind would fail to see intent, and question to her stuff.

That is the sample. WTF is real and worth attention these days when the web, years and years ago, was termed a vast ocean, one inch thick.

What of rational judgment, in the web world? What of level civility, on a yes/no basis more oftent, content wise, than a matter of degree. The screed below this one, then this item, together suggest morning coffee is a leavening thing. That's not an apology for the screed below this item. An explanation perhaps, but the below three or four posts show a personal flaw, possibly that, of intolerance of stupidity and false posturing, where the wonder and scorn is in, "Is this for real? Are these thing not deliberate shows of disdain for our opinions and sensibility. Deliberate provocations, because if not that, how can these peope be so - tainted.

And the above is posted first draft, typos and all, if any, not proofread for any purpose. Raw that way.

Crabgrass is but a web voice, that being worth mentioning, although obvious in context. 

 The "This bother me" post update below being perhaps too judgmental. But sincere.

That is said as a prelude to --- I cannot state too strongly how I hope Doug Chapin wins the upcoming vote for Minnesots Sixth District House Rep, given Tom Emmer, and his faults.

It is a mini-situation of Western Culture historically intact vs something else, disliked. That being a subjective thing where votes could disappoint.

UPDATE: After completing the above I checked Google Analytics to find, ignoring absolute numbers, that people from four nations other that the U.S. were hitting the blog in numbers above U.S hits. That is posted wholly as a fact, without any interpretation placed to it. Readers, your attention is appreciated. 

Trump is being a real pig toward Canada. I hope the Canadians hand him his ass.

The headline captures the opinion. More is not needed. The whole world is watching.