Tuesday, February 17, 2026

"WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senators Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Ranking Member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Chris Coons (D-DE), Chris Murphy (D-CT), Tim Kaine (D-VA), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) and Jacky Rosen (D-NV) released a comprehensive report detailing how the Trump Administration’s secret deportation deals are undermining U.S. interests and coming at great cost to taxpayers."

 The headline is the opening paragraph: https://www.foreign.senate.gov/press/dem/release/ranking-member-shaheen-major-new-report-on-true-cost-of-trump-administrations-third-country-deportation-deals

After fleshing out the theme of the headline, links were given to the full 30p Committee Minority Report  and to a single page executive summary (both in pdf format). 

From the report press release, per the headline and the opening link above:

The 30-page report, titled “At What Cost? Inside the Trump Administration’s Secret Deportation Deals,” is the first Congressional report examining the issue of third country deportations under the Trump Administration and is informed by a ten-month review of agreements, known deals and third country deportations through January 2026, staff travel to relevant countries and meetings and communication with current U.S. officials, foreign government officials, human rights organizations, deportees and attorneys. This report finds that the Trump Administration has expanded and institutionalized a system in which the United States urges or coerces countries to accept migrants who are not their citizens, often through arrangements that are costly, wasteful and poorly monitored. It catalogs the costly and ineffective operations, waste of taxpayer funds through unnecessary removals, concerning lack of oversight on U.S. funds to foreign governments and secret deals that do not serve American interests. Taken together, these actions have created an expensive and dangerous form of shadow diplomacy that prioritizes the appearance of toughness over the security of Americans.

“This report outlines the troubling practice by the Trump Administration of deporting individuals to third countries—places where these people have no connection—at great expense to the American taxpayer and raises serious questions,” said Ranking Member Shaheen. [...]  

The report comes as the Administration is aggressively seeking to strip hundreds of thousands of migrants of legal status in the United States through the ending of temporary protected status and humanitarian parole, among other avenues, increasing the risk of expanded third country deportations.

This report identifies six central ways in which the Administration’s use of third country deportations has undermined U.S. interests:

  • Expensive and Ineffective Operations: The Administration has spent tens of millions of dollars to move a relatively small number of migrants to third countries, in some cases paying more than one million dollars per person, with little measurable impact on its deportation agenda.

  • Needlessly Wasting Taxpayer Funds: In many cases, migrants could have been returned directly to their home countries, avoiding costly third country deportations. As of January 2026, more than eighty percent of the migrants sent to third countries paid by the United States to take them in have already returned to their country of origin or are in the process of doing so. [...] 
  • Providing Money to Corrupt Governments Without Oversight: The United States has sent more than thirty-two million dollars to foreign governments in direct connection with third country deportation deals, including those with records of corruption, human rights abuses and human trafficking, without monitoring how the money is used or whether taxpayer funds are being used to facilitate corruption, human rights abuses or human trafficking. It is unclear how much additional U.S. funding is being redirected to indirectly support these deals.

  • Failure to Monitor and Enforce Agreements: The State Department is not tracking foreign government compliance with diplomatic assurances or enforcing agreement terms, [...] 
  • Secret Deals That Do Not Serve American Interests: Third country deportation agreements have become a central feature of U.S. bilateral relations, involving cash payments, political concessions and coercion, without transparency about the full extent of what the United States is giving in return or the pressures it is exerting. In addition, the Administration is making secret deals with adversarial regimes such as Iran, to accept their nationals back. 
  • Circumventing U.S. Immigration Law: Evidence suggests the Administration is using third countries to carry out removals that U.S. law would otherwise prohibit, such as sending protected individuals onward to countries where they may face persecution or death.

See, also, AP reporting, here and here. I would not like to be a wrongly deported citizen to Cameroon.

 I do not even know the major language there. Or how I'd be accepted. Kicked off a plane, "Fend for yourself, Charlie." It is an unsettling thing, done in secret.

 

PiPress has an interesting op-ed, a unique take on the teachings within the Epstein Files.

Jonathan Zimmerman: Epstein files reveal affirmative action for the rich and powerful

 As in if you think meritocracy is the only thing at play, then you must believe that being offspring of the rich = merit.

Check it out. 

 

 


Orban in Hungary faces an election challenge to his continued opportunities to out-trump Trump.

 https://apnews.com/article/hungary-opposition-campaign-orban-f4e2d7a7cc73a19cc0dbb18a7286835d  -- opening excerpt:

BUDAPEST, Hungary (AP) — Hungarian opposition leader Péter Magyar launched his party’s election campaign in Budapest on Sunday, vowing to restore Hungary’s Western orientation just eight weeks before he faces Prime Minister Viktor Orbán in a pivotal vote.

Magyar, a former insider in Orbán’s nationalist Fidesz party, burst onto Hungary’s political scene in 2024 after breaking with his political community and quickly forming the center-right Tisza party.

After taking around 30% of the vote in European Parliament elections in June 2024, he has grown Tisza into the most formidable political force Orbán has faced during his 16 years at Hungary’s helm. Most independent polls show Tisza with a significant lead before the April 12 vote, an advantage which has held steady for more than a year.

“We’re standing on the threshold of victory with 56 days left to go,” he told supporters [...]

Responsible for more people dying than the number Kristi Noem is responsible for her goons having killed. Far more. Far, far more.

 The blatent ignoramus - https://newrepublic.com/article/205954/kennedy-maha-anti-vaccine-flu

Viral Load

How RFK Jr.’s “MAHA” Quackery Is Making Flu Season Worse

Across the country, the staggering costs of vaccine denialism are piling up, to deadly effect. 

 Last month, cases of flu reached their highest levels in the United States in 25 years. Many hospitals were unprepared for the surge; as emergency wards filled with flu patients, health care workers were left to weather the impacts. As of February 6, there have been at least 22 million reported cases, 280,000 hospitalizations, and 12,000 deaths from flu so far this season, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Many of those afflicted are being hospitalized due to severe postviral complications, such as pneumonia, antibiotic-resistant staph, and even fatal brain swelling.

And while rates have since subsided, we’re not out of the woods yet, with flu B now on the rise. As epidemiologist Marisa Donnelly said, “We’re still in the thick of the season.”

What explains why recent flu seasons have been so severe? There are several factors.

In this political climate, the first thing that may come to mind is the anti-vaccine policy coming from Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Department of Health and Human Services, which has sown confusion around vaccines, leading to lower rates of vaccination for the flu and other diseases—not to mention massive preventable measles outbreaks. But it’s also true that the dominant strain of flu may not be well matched to the existing vaccine.

However, a less discussed aspect behind the high rates of flu and disease severity is a slew of recent research finding that prior Covid-19 infections can damage immune responsesand most Americans have been infected with Covid at least once by now.

“It is clear that at least some of what we’re seeing right now is likely related to that immunity problem from Covid-19 infections,” Dr. Ziyad Al-Aly, a clinical epidemiologist at Washington University in St. Louis, and co-author of a study on the subject, told The New Republic.

He’s not the only doctor to connect these dots. According to Dr. Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez, chair of the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine at the University of Texas, El Paso, “Prior Covid-19 infection can lead to persistent immune dysfunction, which may increase susceptibility to subsequent influenza infection and severity of disease.”

Despite this, there is a “pervasive nonchalance” about the surge in flu and spread of other respiratory viruses like Covid among the public, as Al-Aly put it—and RFK Jr.’s moves at HHS are in part to blame, he said. On top of that, hospitals are refusing to adequately staff their wards or protect health care workers from infection, increasing the burden of disease and putting the public at risk. And this week, the FDA decided not to consider Moderna’s application for a new mRNA-based flu vaccine—a decision handed down by the agency’s notorious anti-vaxxer Vinay Prasad.

Overall, under Kennedy’s watch, there has been more chaos, more confusion, and less vaccination—and the consequences have been deadly.

And, the ultimate responsibility? Trump's. He appointed the quack. Knowingly, Trump did it because Kennedy Jr. dropped his Presidential run and endorsed Trump. It had nothing to do with anything else, and ignored Kennedy's incompetence for the job.

Trump only thinks "Trump" and  that is a dark area of thought.

(In fairness, the "far, far more" of the headline is an expectation, a guess, without second-source pinning down any numbers. Crabgrass does not even know if, under Kennedy, reliable numbers have been tabulated or released, but in the opening paragraph above, 12,000/month is highlighted. The item did start out stating "record numbers" of flu cases, suggesting it likely the 12,000 deaths resulting from infections also is peaking to a 25 yr high. Also, Noem's goons actions, prior to their publicized invasion of Democrat cities, are not reliably publicized, or believed not to be. How many deaths along the border were caused by Border Patrol, i.e., what their kill rates were in non-public contexts without phone video documentation - make your guess. The guess here is greater cruelty and license taken along the border, and Bovino's consistency is a fact. As a guess, it is presumed that the border area Noem death-rate is in the thousands, However, flu whacked 12,000 in a month, so make your own guesses. Crabgrass stands on the far, far more headline. Prove me wrong.)

Monday, February 16, 2026

The charm of ambiguous prior referents.

 Politico - https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/15/massie-lost-confidence-pam-bondi-00782632

 


 Okay, is it a case of "What took you so long," or not?

Did he loose faith in Bondi, only after the hearing; or did he say he's lost faith after the hearing, while having lost any/all faith well before the hearing when he had to cosponsor a bill to force the intransigent official off the dime to FULLY release the Epstein Files. 

You could read it either way, but really, having to blast that bill through is an indication of loss of faith prior to the point of bill sponsorship.

The screen capture shows the ambiguity in the headline and in the part of the opening paragraph shown.

What is certain, the "he said" was after the hearing, that's as reported, but the Crabgrass bet is that any/all faith ever in Bondi was error.

If you pay attention often there is an ambiguous referent in online content, but where one reading fails, in context, to make sense. Crabgrass feels that's almost the case here. Massie's bill cosponsorship is clearly from months before the hearing, since the Bondi banter was a stupid event, but well after any sentient person would have held a "no faith" opinion in Bondi from the Trump University monkey-business, i.e., from the start, beyond belief in the troubling fact she is/was/will be a Trump syncophant to the grave.

It pays her bills. It enlarges her narcisstic self-esteem. She needs that sycophancy as a fundamental part of being Pam Bondi - The AG of the USA. Whoopie!

It feeds her several ways.

=========================================

Worth noting, the Politico report main body adds -

Bondi sent a legally required report to Congress on Saturday in compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which mandated the DOJ supply lawmakers with a summary of all redactions made, including the legal basis for doing so, and a list of government officials named in the documents.

In the letter, Bondi cited “deliberative-process privilege” as one justification for redacting certain documents, a common-law principle that allows the federal government to withhold documents revealing internal decisionmaking.

“The problem with that is the bill that Ro Khanna and I wrote says that they must release internal memos and notes and emails about their decisions on whether to prosecute or not prosecute, whether to investigate or not investigate,” Massie said on ABC. “It’s important they follow that, because then we could find why they didn’t prosecute Leslie Wexner. What was the decision tree there?”

The release of unredacted prosecutorial and investigative documents could also shed light on the 2008 plea deal under which Epstein avoided severe federal charges and pleaded guilty to lesser state charges in Florida, Massie added.

The Kentucky Republican also criticized Bondi for refusing to face several victims of Epstein’s abuse who attended the hearing. When Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) asked Bondi to turn around and apologize to the victims for what the Justice Department had put them through during the hearing, Bondi replied: “I’m not going to get in the gutter for her theatrics.”

At one point, Jayapal also asked the victims if they had not been able to meet with the Justice Department to share their stories, and each of them raised their hand.

In short, Bondi is a heartless and mean spirited blond dragon, as well as AG of the USA! 

 

 

Arguably the sack of Rome was a bigger event for the Western Empire than the Siege of Minnesota has been for U.S. hegemony. But there are parallels. Ill behaved outsider barbarians raising havoc with a peaceful scene, there is most certainly that. As with saying the Siege and the DHS gulags are like the Holocauset, we see overstatement clearly - while hyperbole has a place.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0d/Genseric_sacking_rome_456.jpg -- 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sack_of_Rome_(455)


Wiki excerpt:

The Sack of Rome in 455 and the Visigothic sack of 410 shocked the Roman world and symbolized the decline and impending fall of the Western Roman Empire, marking a pivotal moment in European history.

Background

Since its founding in 395 AD, the Western Roman Empire was in a prolonged state of decline. One of its major issues was a mass migration of Germanic and other non-Roman peoples known as the Migration Period. [...]

Rome had ceased to be the capital of the empire by the beginning of the 4th century and a multitude of cities served as the capital of the western empire.[7]

Sack

The Vandals landed at Ostia, located at the mouth of the Tiber only a few miles southwest of Rome. Maximus tried to flee Rome, but was spotted by an angry mob and stoned to death before being thrown into the Tiber.[11] Before approaching, the Vandals knocked down the aqueducts that supplied water to the city.[12] Pope Leo I was able to convince Gaiseric to spare those who did not resist, protect buildings from fire, and to not torture captives.[13] [...]

The Vandals sacked the city for two weeks[13] before returning to Africa, during which the imperial government of the Western Roman Empire was effectively paralysed. They marched south through Campania, devastating the region, and attempted to sack Neapolis but failed as the city had better defences.

Aftermath

[...]  The two-week Vandal sack of 455 is generally considered more destructive than the three-day Visigoth sack of 410.[18] Victor of Vita records that several shiploads of slave captives arrived in Africa from Rome, who were then divided between the Vandals. Deogratias, the Bishop of Carthage, bought the freedom of some of the Romans by selling all of the valuables from his church. Deogratias hosted and fed them in larger churches in Carthage until they could be repatriated back to Rome.

So, a bare two week siege, not what Minnesota suffered, two months in length. 

Slaves taken. Transported. Some church actions lessened the plight of some of those seized.

Moving on, PiPress carried an NYT post about the mess after, and, what goals of the marauding Vandals were met. (No paywall.) See, also, carried postings here and here.

The main focus of this post now shifts to another PiPress AP carry:

Minneapolis left to decide future of streetside memorials to 2 people killed by federal officers

The public grieving spots echo the community-driven memorial to George Floyd, who was murdered in 2020

Crabgrass does support such two monuments to what was done, with a suggestion. Each should include a bronze plaque, headlined, "TRUMP KILLED - THEN LIED" and then being followed by detail, including a clear statement that it was a naked act of politics to invade Minnesota with barbarians because Minnesota at the time was a Democratic State and had voted each of three times for whoever was running against Trump; 2016, 2020 and 2024. Beyond that, further detail is less essential. But it should include the fact that Trump lied about the deaths and citizen observation proved the lie beyond any doubt; and that JD in particular said egregious things

The fucking bastards . . . NEVER FORGET


Sunday, February 15, 2026

Pam Bondi, Erika Kirk, which is the more puke-worthy?

Bondi is more aggressive, Kirk is the more vapid. 

Bondi is even harder to listen to than Kirk. That takes a special talent.

Bondi wins on the shut-the-fuck-up index, but it is close.

Then there is Mackenzie Scott, a wonderful human. Who says little and is not disliked.

The three seem about the same age.Bondi is the savage of the three. She comes across as warm and human and bright as Stephen Miller.

The Republicans should run a Bondi - Miller ticket.