Thursday, November 12, 2026

Spanish news.

 https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/11/11/i-pay-500-for-5-square-metres-spains-protesters-in-their-own-words

‘I pay $500 for 5 square metres’: Spain’s protesters, in their own words

Young people are trapped in the family home or forced to pay high rents for cramped accommodation, at the mercy of landlords.

 It is the bankers at fault for the landlords. The landlords, they get the credit, at the bankers' pricing, the interest rate that tracks the central bank, and they charge rent to clear a profit. Or to at least service their mortgage, since failure there is foreclosure and going broke.

But the bankers are responsible. New, affordable housing cuts into supply/demand mechanics to where high rents cannot be sustained if there is a surplus of housing, or if the supply/demand equilibrium price exceeds what landlord can charge as at least sufficient to service the landlord's loan. 

Banking is a mean and greedy thing. There used to be a site, "Hang The Bankers" which title had charm.

That said, as Crabgrass economic theory, the bankers in opposition to housing expansion and wanting a surplus of renters rather than a surplus of housing, or a supply/demand balance favoring their greed, by a plethora of unhoused people. Such a latter surplus has the additional banker-perspective of quelling expressions of dissent among the prols. Figure it better, get data and plug in numbers, massage the data, and there might be a counterargument, just as tabacco firms arguing the science was smoking was independent of lung cancer frequency, other things being responsible.

But - the bankers. When housing availability pinches, always blame the bankers first, before the landlords who the bankers have hold of and are squeezing. Not that landlords are a good bunch, just that they have to pay regularly as their tenants do.

Now an excerpt of the item cited at the start of the post:

Madrid, Spain – Tens of thousands of young people have protested across Spain in recent weeks, rallying against the country’s acute housing crisis. On Wednesday, many have gone on strike, heeding calls by Spain’s biggest unions for a nationwide walkout under the slogan: “Salarios, vivienda y precios” – or “wages, housing, and prices”.

Anger grew last month after the forcible eviction of 87-year-old Maricarmen Abascal from the Madrid flat where she had lived for the past seven decades. Her corporate landlord had raised the rent to a level above her means. As the public outcry worsened, she died in hospital the day the property owners who had evicted her agreed to allow her to return to her home.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 items

To protect vulnerable renters, the government presented two emergency decrees to parliament, but these were defeated by right-wing parties.

So, the bankers, might they perhaps favor such right wing parties? Might they be a part of the propaganda that motivates otherwise sane voters to vote strangely against their own interests and vote for what the bankers, landlords, and corporate powers are financing and selling? As a part of the propaganda machine the wealthy, of Spain, manufacture and disperse via establishment media? Why deviate from what works so well in the U.S. of A. where finance and not manufacturing runs the show? The item continues -

Spain’s left-wing coalition government called a snap election for November 29, hoping to capitalise on anger over the housing crisis to rally voters as Socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez had trailed in the polls to the conservative People’s Party and the far-right Vox party.

Against this backdrop, the Bank of Spain has said the country has a shortage of 750,000 homes, but this figure could rise to 1 million by next year.

 AJ, today, offers related coverage of unrest in Spain -

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/11/11/spains-first-general-strike-in-14-years-begins 

Workers across Spain stage first general strike in 14 years

Strike disrupts public transport as housing reform takes centre stage ahead of the November 29 national elections. -- 

Millions of workers across Spain are striking to demand government action over the country’s housing crisis, less than three weeks before a national election that could bring the far right to power.

The 24-hour walkout, which began at midnight on Wednesday, disrupted public transport and forced businesses, factories and shops to scale back operations or close entirely across the eurozone’s fourth-largest economy. It’s Spain’s first general strike in 14 years.

Minor incidents were reported in the first hours, including roadblocks with burning tyres in Barcelona, the second-largest city in the country. There were also scuffles between picketers and police near the country’s main wholesale market on the outskirts of the capital, Madrid.

The two main unions that called the strike, UGT and CCOO, reported widespread participation in the early hours “with significant work stoppages in strategic sectors”, including 90 percent in the automotive and port sectors, according to a statement posted on social media.

 The CEOE organisation, which represents business leaders, said in a statement that the impact varied by region and area of work, with a “low participation” in most sectors.

The UGT and CCOO unions called the strike following a wave of nationwide protests over access to housing, sparked by the eviction in September of Maricarmen Abascal, an 87-year-old Madrid pensioner who died several days later.

The demonstrations included a five-week occupation of Madrid’s central Puerta del Sol square, where hundreds of tents were pitched, sparking imitations in other cities.

The average rent in Spain has almost doubled over the past 10 years, eating into household budgets and angering voters.

Spain’s socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez called a snap election for November 29 after his minority government failed to secure parliamentary approval for a package of housing measures proposed in response to the protests.

“This is not a strike against anyone, but rather one in favour of a common response from all levels of government to a real problem, which is access to housing,” he said in an interview published Sunday in the daily newspaper La Vanguardia.

The mentioned organizations are unfamiliar to Crabgrass, but the mood is resonant, RIGHT ON!

Some unrest is a good thing, and general strikes are a show of solidarity which are kept short in time to not cause any great harm or distress to the people, but to clearly make a point of organized dissatisfaction. 

Doubtlessly other web-wide coverage exists, but a bet is the Spanish out on general strike is underreported in the U.S. of A. Don't give the North American prols any ideas of what the French an Spanish are feeling and doing. Who knows whether the mood could spread, so mainstream media here might be motivated to downplay European moods and actions. Reporting in a they do such-and-such, we, fortunately, are more restrained way, not too obvious, but there.

 

 

Wednesday, November 11, 2026

Jensen and the spy. [UPDATED]

 The US has Nvidia, which is the current leader in chips for AI data centers, where number crunching the AI models grows in capability with the chip power. China has rare earth elements. There can be trade, where the Chinese rare earth advantage is not challenged or not as intensively challenged as if China were to embargo its rare earth elements. Nvidia chips, in turn might see less intensive Chinese effort put into competitive chip development if we allow the state-of-art Nvidie chips to be traded. Nvidia has competition not only potentially from China, but from Intel, and AMD. And other potential entrants, worldwide, i.e., in the U.S. and other nations as well as China. 

Cutting some past deal had its pluses and minuses. Presume Jensen fucking the spy was known, and kept quiet for negotiation pursposes. Jensen is happy, the rare earth users in the U.S. would be happy, and AliBaba would be happy. And add into it, data center Nvidia chip usage was permitted in other Asian nations, Thailand perhaps, where Chinese firms could rent time on the processing power. Why own it if the rental is priced reasonably?

All that, and awareness that other chips besides data center GPU chips might have as much or more military competitive value, and that adds to an incentive to cut a deal on data center GPU trade, at the governmental as well as the industrial levels, and keeping it quiet might be seen as advantageous, i.e., no leaked knowledge, no questions from the public pinching those generating terms and conditions of some state-to-state deal.

So, why Jensen Huang's dalliance with a spy is now released publicly as "news" when it was know at national intelligence levels since early 2024? Why the timing? What's real now is Anthropic and OpenAI planning IPO effort while Musk's SpaceX already got first tracked. What does that mean, along with popular NIMBY objection to data center siting while Musk took in a money haul and now talks of data centers in space - with no objecting neighbors there. How is that a factor or not?

Then this vidio, raising concern about the deal appears to have been Nvidia getting chip sales to China to boost income, but with a 15% take to the U.S. government coffers. Was there some DARPA advanced tech involved, yes or no? It is all up for grabs in terms of speculating why drag Jensen over the rocks now, but not earlier?

Crabgrass does not pretend to have answers. Questions, and guesses, yes, but answers will have to come from elsewhere. The new Congress will investigate, and one question = was the matter elevated to public news and speculation now, to divert investigative energy from other muckraking tasks? It's a real ball of thread.

A Gordian knot. To be cut through rather than unwound? Time being of the essence now that Jensen's conduct has been injected into the pubic domain? Who is scheduling what, you tell me? And, why now? 

 UPDATE: Two video items - https://www.youtube.com/live/D7MDU0DUIBY

https://www.youtube.com/live/D3WOxwC7GsI 

FURTHER: ZaroHedge republished a complete item behind a substack subscription wall, raising concerns:https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/why-nvidias-nightmare-may-be-just-beginning  

With lawsuits coming out of the woodwork like vermin, there will be discovery, and this item says Nvidia's books and accounting should be squeaky clean with intensive scrutiny increasing.

 FURTHER: More ZeroHedge: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/one-short-seller-flagged-jensens-alice-huang-ties-mayand-pointed-out-multiple-other-nvidia linking to a May 2026 analyst report:https://culperresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Culper_NVDA_5-13-2026.pdf 

Is it possible the matter hits now because short sellers want to maximize cashing out positions before the calendar year's end, and NYT sources might include such motivations? 

See, also: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/detonator-set-right-cue-why-washington-seized-jensen-huang-scandal-draw-its-sword 

FHRTHER: Latest, MSN carrying a CNBC item - Jensen Huang second extramarital affair, this second one with an Nvidia employee, Kimberly Powell, who reported to him =

Title: Nvidia prepares to oust Jensen Huang, WSJ reports — stock sinks -- Story by Ashley Capoot

Shares of Nvidia fell more than 7% in after-hours trading on Wednesday after The Wall Street Journal reported that the company's board is preparing to oust CEO Jensen Huang.

The news landed minutes after The New York Times reported that Huang had an extramarital relationship with another executive at the company.

The alleged relationship was with Kimberly Powell, vice president of health care at Nvidia, according to the report. Powell's bio on the Nvidia website says she's "responsible for the company's worldwide healthcare business, including hardware and software platforms for accelerated computing, AI, and visualization that power the ecosystem of medical imaging, life sciences, drug discovery, and healthcare analytics."

Huang and Powell were reportedly captured on camera being affectionate with one another at a hotel in San Jose, California in March, according to the Times.

Five people independently sourced the latest infidelity story with NYT.

See, also: https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/other/nvidia-plot-thickens-as-details-emerge-on-alleged-spy-s-husband-who-fell-foul-of-chinese-laws/ar-AA2hccbK 

https://www.msn.com/en-in/money/general/kang-wei-and-alice-huang-the-money-marriage-questions-and-jensen-huang-controversy/ar-AA2hcfff 

If the Nvidia board ousts Jemsen Huang, what they do to keep a going concern is up to them, but should prove very interesting. No successor CEO has been named per any online source Crabgrass has read. 

 

Tuesday, November 10, 2026

Readers who value tight informative posting might want to skip this post. It expands in its own way on a link in the directly below post.

 It started with the sentence, "Creativity amazes. One need not have Jensen and the spy as a theme to sue."

After completing the post the thought formed, the source linked was unfamiliar, and about a strange lawsuit - strange to me - that I hadn't second sourced. The link:  https://magica.com/news/nvidia-shareholder-derivative-ai-training-data-lawsuit suggested by experience as if some marginal AI outlet and AI is known to "halucinate." In particular, the web has stories about legal briefs citing non-existant cases.

That started a string of links, where the thought process might interest some readers. First, check that site.

search =  magica PRICING, since if it is someone's AI product, pricing would pin it down. That search got https://magica.com/pricing so this -

Black Friday only. Not sold the rest of the year.

Lifetime

$499

Pay once for Lifetime access. No recurring subscription fee.

That said to me, remember there was a "lifetime" gym club offering which proved to be for the lifetime of the promoting LLC, not for any buyer lifetime. Lifetime being elastic that way. The thought is magrinal AI stuff is now out in droves, beyond Anthropic, OpenAI or Grok, which are market share leaders.

 https://theravenstack.com/magica-ai-pricing/ gave pricing info, and said that site was based on catalog of price info for different offerings, but that was not explored. Ditto: https://filipkonecny.com/blog/magica-ai-pricing/ Beyond HuggingFace. Ditto: https://ai-alternative.com/ and https://ai-alternative.com/tool/magica

So, interesting that web niche. Now, on to second sourcing - was the magica case real or hallucinating?

search = JESSICA BERLINER FEDERAL LAWSUIT AGAINST NVIDIA DIRECTORS 

The case is real, but several sources for legal case searching were identified. Good to know that.

https://dockets.justia.com/docket/illinois/ilndce/1:2026cv09153/505282 = helpful.

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/66013782/Berliner_v_Huang_et_al  leads to a service, Pacer, wanting to SELL users its product. A story to itself. https://www.pacermonitor.com/pricing

 There is what looks like an AI service for lawyers not wanting to submit a brief with bogus links, and telling you about a case. https://trace.law/monitor/cases/berliner-v-huang-df5a12bedecd7dd6 

And Google Scholar does exist presenting free caselaw, not a paid service. Intuitive to use, with the main G.Scholar use being for tech literature searching, what's online, what's not.

Opening Google Scholar - federal cases - search =  Berliner v. Huang --- Try it. Since the action has not yielded any published case by that name, you get stuff. Google Scholar - case law is for finding online text of published cases. Not for docket and/or filings.

Going back to search = Berliner v. Huang -- one item, https://news.bloomberglaw.com/securities-law/nvidias-board-is-latest-sued-by-shareholders-over-ai-scraping

Great. Except Bloomberg is paywalled, all its web presence. You get a blurb, for free.

One free access returned item: https://www.thebrief.news/en/standard/article/8267/nvidia-shareholder-sues-jensen-huang-and-board-over-use-of-copyrighted-works-to-train-ai deserves mention. It is descriptive, including

What makes this case unusual is who is suing. Most AI-training copyright disputes to date have been brought by creators — authors, musicians, artists — who say their work was taken without permission. Berliner's suit turns that logic inside out: she is arguing that by exposing the company to that very legal risk, Nvidia's leadership failed the shareholders they are supposed to protect.

Nvidia has faced a steady stream of such copyright claims. Three authors sued the company in March 2024, alleging it used their copyrighted books without permission to train its AI. Reuters In March 2026, a 3D artist filed proposed class actions against Nvidia, Meta and Roblox, alleging the companies misused millions of 3D models. Reuters In June 2026, music company Jamendo sued Nvidia, claiming it used Jamendo's music and data to train its Fugatto and Audio Flamingo AI models. Reuters

Berliner's complaint reframes those earlier suits not as separate grievances from outside parties but as evidence that Nvidia's own leadership created a liability for the company it runs. Bloomberg Law

The case is at its earliest stage. No trial date has been set, and Nvidia has not yet filed its response in court.

The implication is bookmark that site if you anticpate any future legal case search, in hope it gives worthwhile descriptive returned output. It's a better bet than Bloomberg's blurbs, and that site showed up in the initial search page - the first returned stuff w/o having to scroll further. 

BOTTOM LINE: = the case is real, and not near to any resolution. Nvidia, being sued, has no choice but to appear and defend. Or settle on some shakedown terms. It is interesting some plaintiff/lawyer combo came up with the idea of filing a lengthy shareholders derivative action using original author litigation against AI training on web scraped data w/o paying a thing to copyright holders.

Value to following the thinking steps in searching and second sourcing a single link source where the source is unfamiliar, likely AI, and possibly AI hallucinating. Not the tightest Crabgrass posting, but there online for anyone who cares.

 

 ___________________UPDATE_______________

Peeling more facts from web content -

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/66013782/Berliner_v_Huang_et_al  notes a filed paper

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jessica Berliner by David Wissbroecker (Wissbroecker, David)

in the Jessica Berliner lawsuit. Searching the name >> https://www.bottinilaw.com/attorneys  and the firm's homepage: https://www.bottinilaw.com/ >> https://www.bottinilaw.com/sites/default/files/nvidia-v-huang.pdf - the 104p federal suit item filed in Chicago

https://www.bottinilaw.com/node/194 is of interest since it is a parallel filing against Adobe to the filing against Nvidia:

On June 16, 2026, BOTTINI & BOTTINI, INC. filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit on behalf of Adobe Inc. shareholders seeking to hold certain current and former officers and directors accountable for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and related misconduct arising from Adobe’s artificial intelligence strategy and public representations concerning its AI products.

The case -- Hirschberger et al. v. Narayen et al., Case No. 5:26-cv-05882 -- is pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

The complaint alleges that Adobe and certain of its senior executives repeatedly represented to investors and customers that its AI products, including Firefly, were trained exclusively on licensed and public-domain content and were therefore “commercially safe” for enterprise use. According to the complaint, Adobe’s AI-development efforts allegedly relied on datasets that incorporated unauthorized copyrighted materials, exposing the Company to significant legal, financial, and reputational risks.

The complaint further alleges that despite public assurances regarding responsible AI development and respect for creator rights, Adobe failed to implement adequate oversight and compliance controls to prevent the use of allegedly infringing training data. The lawsuit contends that these practices contributed to copyright infringement litigation against Adobe and caused substantial harm to the Company.

According to the complaint, Adobe repurchased approximately $26.89 billion of its own stock between March 2024 and February 2026 at allegedly inflated prices while the market was unaware of the full extent of the Company’s exposure to copyright-related claims and risks associated with its AI strategy.

The complaint also alleges that investor concerns intensified following the filing of multiple copyright infringement lawsuits against Adobe and the subsequent resignations of the Company’s CEO and CFO in 2026, events that contributed to significant declines in Adobe’s stock price.

Frank A. Bottini, Jr. of Bottini & Bottini, counsel for plaintiffs, stated: “Adobe repeatedly assured investors and customers that its AI products were developed responsibly and trained only on content for which the Company had the necessary rights. This action seeks to hold Adobe’s officers and directors accountable for the substantial harm allegedly caused by their failure to ensure that those representations were accurate and that appropriate compliance controls were in place.”

The complete complaint can be downloaded from the link below.

CONTACT:

BOTTINI & BOTTINI, INC.
Frank A. Bottini, Jr.
7817 Ivanhoe Ave., Suite 102
La Jolla, CA 92037
(858) 914-2001
fbottini@bottinilaw.com

That pdf shows, with study, that it is not a cookie-cutter cause of action theme, but clearly parallel

Suing a shareholders derivative action that insider failure to respect and deal correctly over content copyright has damaged the firm in some recoverable damages amount

It is a clever theory of the case, and other firms are ripe for similar litigation.

The firm's landmark won lawsuit? As cocounsel, https://bottinilaw.com/other-case/twitter-inc 

All neater stuff than chasing ambulances. How in a specific instance Crabgrass enlarged upon a single search return, to second source, and to find a very neat theory of the case derivative action approach.

Also - search = Hirschberger et al. v. Narayen et al., Case No. 5:26-cv-05882 -- is pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California

That search string was from one of the Bottini firm's pages >> https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73490781/hirschberger-v-narayen/ 

When cases are found to have had courtlistener.com pages produced online, that is about as good as you can get to follow how the litigation unfolds without having to pay a price for Pacer access. 

 


Readers should try search = shareholder derivative suit possibliity and Security Fraud actual filing rosen against Nvidia and/or Huang

 In Africa an unfortunate antelope or gnu may be killed by lions, with hyenas and jackals later moving in for a share of the kill. Nvidia and Jensen - think of that African analogy. The lions and scavengers seek meat. It is the way of predation. As natural as an oak tree growing. There is content online already on point, which the headline search should return.

Also, readers can try a simple search = Nvidia Huang lawsuits 

Some items: 

https://techcrunch.com/2026/11/09/the-race-is-on-to-sue-nvidia/

https://www.firstpost.com/world/nvidia-jensen-huang-shareholder-lawsuit-china-spy-links-divorce-speculation-14058878.html 

https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/courtside/can-nvidia-shareholders-sue-a-ceo-over-an-alleged-spy-affair/ 

 https://www.politico.com/news/2026/11/09/nvidia-sued-jensen-huang-alleged-spy-affair-01157660

 https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/11/kistemacher-vs-nvidia-complaint.pdf 

https://www.courthousenews.com/nvidia-shareholder-sues-over-ceos-undisclosed-affair-with-purported-spy/ linking to a filed item in LA

Predation makes the world go 'round. It's called "rule of law" in general. 

UPDATE: Creativity amazes. One need not have Jensen and the spy as a theme to sue. All you need to sue Nvidia is a lawyer to file, and the filing fee. And a thought, not necessarily a good one, but a thought of some basis to avoid ouster via a Rule 12(b)(6) motion. (Or per Rule 56 Summary Judgement.) Get the claim to a jury, who knows, it's wilder than a bench trial.

And don't take that as legal advice. It is only an opinion about the law. Anyone can have opinions about the law. Good, bad, or awful. You don't need expertise or a license to have an opinion. You've got the First Amendment after all. 

FURTHER: I was once given an opinion on the law, as, "You can do anything you want until a judge tells you to stop." 

FURTHER: A source Crabgrass found helpful; https://finance.yahoo.com/video/jensen-huang-affair-impacts-trump-220800564.html Despite that, the story is still evolving, and no non-paywall source better than the finance.yahoo item has been seen by Crabgrass.

FURTHER: https://www.dw.com/en/megaspeed-and-the-battle-to-go-high-end-nvidia-chips-into-china/a-79909129 states -

The US government investigation began in 2024. The Commerce Department initially began looking into Megaspeed, but the US Justice Department has since taken over. According to the New York Times, this switch came about after an Nvidia executive directly contacted the Commerce Department about the investigation.

And despite that timing, the fan is only loading up now? 

FUERTHER: EmptyWheel has a follow up post which Crabgress finds a bit confusing: https://emptywheel.net/2026/11/10/the-investigation-of-nvidia-is-about-something-else/  

 

 

Guardian this morning has two interesting items. A challenger to Fetterman in 2028 announces, and the Knesset will have a new nominee for speaker, in Israel.

 The Fetterman challenge.

The Knesset speaker. 

 

Monday, November 09, 2026

AP on YouTube: LIVE: Rep. Thomas Massie files resolution to impeach Pete Hegseth

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KIddSUUWOo

Massie enters Articles of Impeachment, 1hr 51min - posted today, hours ago, apparently.

 

 

Hegseth video posted on youtube, make of it what you feel it deserves.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUd0i9drgL4 

 ___________UPDATE___________

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/117576401180733840 

There seems to be a paranoia sickness going around, or to be precise, being cooked up with venom.

This stuff is ugly, and Republicans having been hammered by the electorate does not deserve this shit in return.

Or am I wrong?

 FURTHER: What this level of dumb stuff ssuggests - along with Stephen Miller being promoted - is that the Trump strategy is to try to provoke the Congressional Dems into a mean and viscous pissing match where things get so partisan that the people are turned off against both sides. Both Parties. Where an assertion of Congressional preeminence being the heart of the Constitution will play out like two hostile mobs fighting each other. 

The answer appears to be, pass legislation as the people's vote has favored, and have the Creep in Chief be forced to sign or veto. Do not get into a partisan swamp fight. Take the high road, to keep the public awareness that the aims people have are being stymied by the wealth-mongers of the Republican vanguard. That but for Trump, things would be fixed quickly, but * * *

It just seems sensible to not get sucked into a king sized pissing match, because --- No Kings!