Sunday, September 20, 2026

Six Dollar Diesel. [UPDATED - better ways exist, smarter leadership chooses better paths]

Link. Beginning -

Cue another milestone in your favorite president’s forever war-you’re-not-allowed-to-call-a-war in Iran! The average price of diesel across the country is now $6 a gallon, with no end to the trend in sight.

This is the third time this week diesel has set a record. At least five gas stations in California surpassed $9.999 a gallon for diesel on Thursday, GasBuddy analyst Patrick de Haan tweeted. That’s the maximum price their signs can display. Crude oil futures are now in the $102.48 a barrel to $107.63 a barrel range, according to Reuters.

Nearly everything gets more expensive when diesel does—food, consumer goods, cars, electronics, you name it. According to a Brown University tracker, increased diesel prices alone have cost U.S. households a cumulative $46.61 billion, or around $355. That’s not much less than gasoline, which is $56.42 billion.

“In a span of five months, we’ve seen diesel prices more than double. It has rocked our cash flows,” Oasis Energy’s Alex Ryan told Reuters. “There’s gotta be a tipping point, I just don’t know when or where it’s going to be.”

The ongoing war with Iran and U.S. naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz that Donald Trump kicked off in late February 2026 has put a stranglehold on oil prices. Bob McNally, president of Rapidan Energy Group, recently offered the plausible theory that it’s taken so long for oil prices to rise in part because markets adopted an “optimism bias” that Trump would reach a deal sooner rather than later.

Regular readers already know Crabgrass reads the tealeaves as Trump serving the interests of his fossil fuel 2024 donors, in dragging things out while they profit like bandits, but saying otherwise as his intent being a quick resolution, that, gee, did not happen. Iran's fault, he'd tell you.

It is a best guess from how things have dragged out, and other circumstantial inferences are possible.

________________________UPDATE________________________

Better than blowing shit up to inflate world oil prices so Trump cronies can make record profits while having the Military Industrial Complex making new munitions on government money to replace munitions used to blow shit up -- instead, do something useful. The Aussies are doing that, but we've got an Asshole in Chief. And it's the old Econ 101 Guns and Butter story which we all know too well.

https://electrek.co/2026/09/18/tesla-megapack-australia-first-8-hour-battery-rwe-limondale/#more-484745 

Australia just switched on its longest-duration grid battery, and it runs on 144 Tesla Megapacks.

RWE’s Limondale battery in New South Wales can discharge for a full eight hours — four times longer than the two-hour batteries that dominate the Australian grid. It’s the first project of its kind in the country.

The battery sits at 50 MW / 400 MWh, near Balranald in the state’s south-west, right next to RWE’s existing Limondale solar farm. It’s now registered and operating on the National Electricity Market after getting its final operational sign-off from grid operator AEMO earlier this year.

Charging twice as fast as it discharges

Limondale is built to charge at roughly 100 MW but discharge at only 50 MW. Most grid batteries charge and discharge at the same rate. This one doesn’t.

That asymmetry is the whole point. The battery can fill up in about four hours — soaking up the midday solar glut when NSW is drowning in cheap renewable power — then stretch that energy back out over eight hours to cover the evening peak and into the night. Charge fast, discharge slow.

It’s a neat answer to the “duck curve” problem that every solar-heavy grid runs into: too much power at noon, not enough at 7 PM. Pairing the battery directly with a solar farm makes the arbitrage even cleaner.

Why 8-hour storage is the new frontier

Australia has plenty of big batteries. What it hasn’t had is long ones.

The first wave of grid storage, including Tesla’s landmark Hornsdale project, was built for fast response and one-to-two hours of duration, great for grid stability, useless for shifting bulk solar into the evening. Four-hour batteries are now becoming the norm. Eight hours is the next step up, and Limondale is the proof of concept.

RWE didn’t build it on spec. Limondale was the only winning bid in NSW’s first long-duration storage tender under the state’s Electricity Infrastructure Roadmap, backed by a Long-Term Energy Service Agreement, essentially a government revenue floor that makes financing a long battery bankable. Two more LTESA-backed 8-hour batteries are moving through the NSW pipeline behind it.

“RWE’s investment decision and signing of supplier contracts for the Limondale BESS project is an exciting step forward,” RWE Renewables Europe & Australia CEO Katja Wünschel said when the project was greenlit. Tesla supplied the Megapacks; Beon Energy Solutions handled the balance of plant.

Top comment by Stephen Wilcox

Liked by 7 people

So… if the inverter was upgraded to export 100 MW to the grid instead of 50, this project would be downgraded to just another 4 hour battery? Is that the right way to think about grid-scale batteries?

View all comments

For Tesla, it’s another flagship win in a market it helped create. The company has been stacking up grid deals worldwide, from a 500 MWh Megapack battery that just went live in Texas to a 1 GWh project in the UK, and its Megapack energy business is now one of its fastest-growing segments.

Electrek’s Take

Two-hour batteries proved storage could stabilize a grid. Eight-hour batteries are what actually let you retire coal, because they can carry solar generation through the entire evening ramp instead of tapping out at dinnertime. [...]

Now, we just need a lot more of them.

Home batteries are quietly changing the economics of residential energy the same way grid batteries are reshaping the wholesale market, and pairing one with rooftop solar is the best way to squeeze the most value out of both. With electricity rates up almost 10% last year and expected to keep climbing, going solar is one of the best ways to protect yourself against rising costs. [...]  If you want to find the best deal, check out EnergySage. It’s a free service with hundreds of pre-vetted installers competing for your business, so you save 20 to 30% compared to going it alone. No sales calls until you pick an installer. Get your free quotes here.

Ramsey has recently added solar on unbuildable land adjacent to a closed landfill. The landfill cap is off limits, but the nearby land can carry solar but not structures. Whether it includes battery is not known to Crabgrass. Already Ramsey's co-op power provider offers off peak overnight discounted rates so that hybrid or electric vehicle owners can charge at a discount when existing grid sources and loads in the energy market allow more operating of gen-co resources via the discounted charging operation.

The Aussies are pioneering solar - battery 8hr via this reported item. It seems better than murdering Iranians, sanctioning them because Bibi wants it, and popping Caribbean boats because we can.

Hegseth is Hegseth, Trump is Trump, and the Aussies are plain sensible. Bless them. Palentir is flush enough in earnings and engineering talent that it needs no growth. In fact less is more, in a sense at least the Aussies understand. Blowing shit up is just kind or really stupid.  Giving Bibi free stuff to blow up stuff is about the only thing stupider. Trump/Hegseth, both paths, dumb and dumber.

FURTHER: The question of maintaining a standing army, pro or con, was alive at the start of the Republic, e.g., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalist_No._24

The question of how big is too big remains preeminent,  especially when maintaining worldwide garrisons leveraged via deficit spending while at the same time giving the rich the tax cuts they lust after and which they buy by buying the politicians we hate and distrust, but suffer because the Constitution gave us what it did, and the Supremes said money talks. That spending it for political purposes is "speech." 

Roberts and chhorts went a step furtner saying corporations are people, just like human people entitled to "speak" with the pocletbook. Small wonder after that crap came out that the rich took over and are fucking everyone else.

U.S. Politics 101, as practiced, explained in a single illustration  -

 

Can you say "Schumer?" Can you say "Jeffries?" Need you say more? 

Perhaps add "Pelosi?" Surely "Gottheimer."

 

U.S. Senate tanks Emmer Cryoto bill on cloture vote. At least for now.

 Using search = Digital Asset Market Clarity Act tom emmer -- you get an early return list item:

https://emmer.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/emmer-reintroduces-legislation-to-provide-regulatory-clarity-for-digital-assets  -- dated March 2025 followed by https://emmer.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-emmer-voices-support-for-the-clarity-act -- dated June  2025

Emmer being a very active cryoto booster in the U.S. House.

In session, he reads, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skj0tK_gk7M wherein he argues against certain liability exposure as bad policy.

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/119/hr3633/text/ih is an online bill trcker.

search = clarity act cloture vote -- provides links reporting the recent cloture vote. Readers can find links to read there. 

Quoting Gizmodo - the source Crabgrass first read of the cloture vote:

The Crypto Industry Wasn’t Able to Buy Congress After All

The crypto industry’s top legislative priority fell short of the 60 votes needed to even reach the Senate floor.

 By

The Senate voted 49-50 on Tuesday against cloture on the motion to proceed to the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, better known as the CLARITY Act. The bill needed 60 votes to reach the floor for debate and a later vote on passage, but it couldn’t even get that.

That outcome is a setback for an industry that has become one of the largest lobbying forces in Washington. Crypto groups spent the past two years pushing for a federal market-structure law, and the Trump administration made digital assets a policy priority from the very start of the president’s second term in office. However, the bill still stalled, and many closely tracking or involved with the legislation argued that ethics concerns around the president’s own crypto businesses were a major reason it failed.

As a quick review, the CLARITY Act is mostly a framework for how crypto assets and tokens would be treated. It would split oversight between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, largely based on how decentralized an asset is perceived to be. Protections for non-custodial developers in the bill would also matter to those who mostly just care about Bitcoin; however, the non-profit crypto public policy research and advocacy center Coin Center indicated those protections were weakened at the last minute. The revised Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act language “would still provide important protections for non-controlling blockchain developers under the Bank Secrecy Act,” the group wrote, “but it removes the BRCA’s explicit protection against criminal liability.”

How CLARITY Fell Apart

Passage looked close to guaranteed at the start of the year. The House had already approved the bill, and the Senate Banking Committee advanced it 15-9 in May. But the coalition did not hold. Banks spent months fighting over how stablecoin rewards might pull deposits out of the traditional system. Democrats, and even some Republicans, spent those same months circling ethics language tied to the billions of dollars the Trump family has made from crypto during the president’s second term.

[...]That said, Trump signed off on last-minute ethics provisions before the vote. A GOP aide told Crypto In America’s Eleanor Terrett that the president had agreed to “80%” of a Tillis-Gallego ethics proposal, [...] The same revised text also stripped explicit criminal-law protections for developers and added a “circuit breaker” that would let Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent intervene if banks faced widespread deposit flight to stablecoins (as they feared).

On the Senate floor, Democrat Elizabeth Warren argued the bill would put the country “at risk of a crypto-fueled economic crash.” She said it would “blow a massive hole in our nearly century-old securities laws” and “drain billions of dollars out of our stock market that families depend on to fund their retirement savings.”

Republican Tim Scott made the opposite case. “If you want everyday, hardworking Americans to have more access to their resources, more options on the table, and you want America to be the leading financial country on the planet, you vote yes,” the South Carolina Republican told Fox Business. Without market structure written into law, he said, “you have the wild, wild West.”

When the roll was called, every participating Democrat voted no, and so did Republicans Susan Collins, Josh Hawley, Jerry Moran, and Thom Tillis. The 18 Democrats who had backed last year’s GENIUS Act stablecoin bill, including original Senate CLARITY co-sponsor Kirsten Gillibrand, voted against this one. Gillibrand had reportedly been gathering yes votes hours before she flipped to no.

Curious behavior from one seemingly image conscious New York Dem Senator (Schumer being the other). That detail about Gillibrand is indicative of something readers can chew on.

 The report continuing:

According to Terrett, Democratic Senator Angela Alsobrooks, who helped negotiate both GENIUS and CLARITY, also accused Republican leadership of “playing a game” by forcing the vote while refusing to hold Trump accountable for crypto “corruption.”

Senator Mark Warner pointed to the same problem: “The president should not be able to use the power and influence of his office to benefit his own crypto holdings while his administration makes decisions that could directly affect their value,” the Virginia Democrat said.

Self-described progressive Bitcoiner Trey Walsh put the politics more bluntly. “Dems are laser focused on Trump corruption. And they know it resonates with voters,” he wrote on X. “So they are a hell no on Clarity as written — there is no ‘crypto voter’ in their minds for the midterms. There is the American voter pissed about affordability, corruption, and AI.”

NYU Stern professor Austin Campbell made a similar point. “I’ve been predicting Clarity would fail for a long time because all of the issues inside of the bill were solvable, but the ethics issue and Trump vs. Democrats were not.”

There is much more to the report, and Crabgrass urges readers to use the source to read it all. Breifly, there is this skeleton outline - 

Crypto Industry Will Still Be Happy for Now

To be clear, the bill is not formally dead. It remains on the Senate calendar, and Tillis switched his vote to no so he could move to reconsider. “This is not the end for the Clarity Act,” Tillis said. “We’ve made substantial bipartisan progress in large part because of the White House. This procedural motion allows us to continue working towards a positive outcome.” Ted Cruz used a similar line. [...]

For now, the calendar is the problem. Congress is heading into midterm recess, and another cloture attempt may wait until a lame-duck session or the next Congress. If Democrats do well in November, they will have even more leverage [...]

[...] Crypto companies have already poured $189 million into the 2026 midterm elections, and crypto-industry affiliated PACs like Fairshake won 48 of 48 races they backed in the last election. [...]

[...] It’s clear the industry will still get favorable treatment for the next couple of years under the Trump administration’s rule. [...]

So Tillis was influential in allowing things "to continue working toward a positive outcome." But Trump and offspring's grift tanked things for now.

Ethics and legal liability considerations clearly exist and the Crypto Industrial Complex wants free rein if it can lobby successfully. 

Emmer's reaction? Not covered in this report. Crabgrass expects he will not be too loud in opining.

Readers are urged to use the earlier mentioned search to find other reporting.

UPDATE: Know that a nonprofit watchdog exists: https://coincenter.org/  They have posted a detailed analysis https://coincenter.org/the-proposed-brca-changes-are-a-tough-pill-to-swallow/ noting early -

The Senate is scheduled for a pivotal vote on the Clarity Act tomorrow, and in an effort to secure the 60 votes needed for passage, the drafters have made last-minute revisions to the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA). The revised language would still provide important protections for non-controlling blockchain developers under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), but it removes the BRCA’s explicit protection against criminal liability under 18 U.S.C. § 1960.

That is an important change to a provision Coin Center has championed for years and that has now, incredibly, reached the point of potential passage into law.

As a reminder, the BRCA would proactively protect developers and service providers like validators against being treated as “money transmitters” when they do not take control of user funds.

In fairness to Emmer, that seemed to echo his concerns in the above linked video segment. 

 

  

 

Friday, September 18, 2026

Readers who are political blog followers likely already know Sally Jo Sorensen has relocated to South Dakota after long blogging in Minnesota prior to the move. She also dropped the blog, in favor of substrack.

She kept the Bluestem Prairie title, https://bluestemprairie.substack.com/  

It is timely to note that, because her most recent post at the time of writing this is about early voting.

Since Crabgrass always votes early at the County Admin and Courthouse complex, linking to Sorensen's Dakota details covers the relevant ground, there is no value to plowing twice.

In particular, anybody worried about ICE or other scoundrel presence at the polling place on election day, or concerned about long lines in bad weather, should do the early vote step and dance.

You pick the convenient time, you drave there, no lines, and an election official witnesses your early ballot. Same ballot as you'd have gotten election day, but you pick the time frame and dodge the lines.

Enjoy early, then wait. You will know that the car breaking down on election day will not keep your ballot out of the count. They are nicer autos now, however. Breaking down seems a past consideration.

In any event, do vote.

UPDATE: https://www.twincities.com/2026/09/17/early-voting-in-minnesota-starts-friday-heres-what-to-know/ 

That is today. If you do not trust Trump's mail, that link says you can, then you can vote in person at your county's election office. You have to trust somebody, and election office personnel are the gold standard. And nobody is rushed and hence more likely to make some mistake, if you go in early.

 

 

Sideline Susie trys a straddle. One foot near the truth. The other foot aligned fully with Donald J. Trump. AND - We all know how distant Trump is from Truth.

https://www.ontheissues.org/Social/Michele_Tafoya_Abortion.htm  That file, in relevant part -

OnTheIssuesLogo

Michele Tafoya on Abortion

 

 


I'm not going to BS you; I'm a pro-choice Republican

Michele Tafoya doesn't believe that her support for abortion rights will hurt her campaign for Senate as a Republican in Minnesota. "Family is incredibly important to me," she said. "But I'm not going to BS you. I'm a pro-choice Republican. There are some of us out there." 

 

 GUESS WHAT. SHE IS BULL SHITTING US. BIG TIME. Or I'll give the evidence, you decide.

5 Things to Know About the Minnesota Senate Candidate Michele Tafoya

Michele Tafoya speaking into a microphone on the sidelines of an N.F.L. game in 2021. 

 Wouldn't you rather see the field of play? See the players you tuned in to watch, instead of some ditz with a mic blathering about nothing worth watching, and taking her time doing that?

At any rate, from that item - after their lead photo, relevant text.

 Her last broadcast was of Super Bowl LVI, in 2022. (The Los Angeles Rams won.) She went straight into politics, serving as a chair of Kendall Qualls’s Republican campaign for governor in 2022.

She supports access to abortion for the first 12 weeks of a pregnancy. Ms. Tafoya has long called herself a “pro-choice” Republican. In an open letter published on her campaign website, she describes enduring five miscarriages and says abortion is the issue she gets asked about most. She writes that she supported the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision to end federal abortion protections and that she believes states should set abortion laws. But she adds, “I do not support an outright ban on abortion, and I believe there should be reasonable access in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy.”

She has embraced an electability argument. Minnesota has not elected a Republican in a statewide race since 2006, but Ms. Tafoya has argued that her approach could help put the state in play in the national Senate battle. [...] Still, she has embraced the Trump administration’s handling of immigration after its deadly crackdown in Minnesota in the winter, which polls suggested was unpopular. Ms. Tafoya’s campaign website says the “American people overwhelmingly agree with President Trump [...]

So, pro-ICE, trying to straddle the abortion issue, and she's big BIG LIE about saying there's been nine billion dollars of fraud when there is absolutely no proof in the public record establishing such a figure. None! 

Former sideline reporter Michele Tafoya, the GOP nominee for senator in Minnesota, told Newsmax Wednesday her state needs Republican leadership.

“We've been going 100 mph in the wrong direction for a long time now,” Tafoya said on “Rob Schmitt Tonight.” “And it's all happened under single party establishment rule in St. Paul. It's led us to this place of $9 billion worth of fraud, a total national embarrassment.

“Crime is going up while test scores go down. And Minnesotans are tired."

“For those of us who love this state, this is heartbreaking,” Tafoya continued.

“I met my husband here. We raised our kids here. I grew my career here, and I'm not going to sit by and let all of these businesses continue to flee Minnesota and have it so unaffordable that our kids can't stay,” she said.

The woman ignores a tariff trade war and a firing-and-bombing acutual war financed on credit, i.e., financed by record deficit bond levels being irresponsibly issued by Trump and Bessent, and that the economy sucks because of the bond market calling bullshit on that, and nothing else impacts the economy as badly as Trump-Bessent ignorant financial policy.

And she's always saying $9 billion as if it were true. It is a number a Republican DOJ prosecutor made up for no good reason, and Susie just repeats it time and again as if saying so makes something so. She did not embellish things as much sidelining because we could see the game and see through any lies about it. 

In what appears to be a non-paywalled Strib op-ed item, she is called out for the lie by, Tim Stanley is chair of the Planned Parenthood of Minnesota Political Action Fund.  (someone who knows what prochoice is, and what's a phony straddle by one who's scrubbed the campaign website, (https://micheletafoya.com/life-letter/) re abortion as a show of character and transparency and bona fide good faith as Republicans understand such things to mean in practice. 

Stanley writes:

Four years after Roe v. Wade was overturned, Minnesotans are being told abortion rights are a settled issue. Michele Tafoya, the Republican candidate for U.S. Senate, has even called it a “moot point,” arguing: “In the United States Senate, we’re not going to be dealing with this issue.”

At Planned Parenthood, we’re not buying it.

Challenges in federal courts still threaten abortion access; lawmakers continue to introduce abortion bans and restrictions in the Minnesota Legislature, and just last year President Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress defunded Planned Parenthood as part of their ongoing crusade to eliminate abortion access in the United States.

The reality is that the U.S. Senate has been and will be dealing with the issue of abortion for the foreseeable future. In fact, since the fall of Roe v. Wade, abortion access can never be taken for granted.

Which is why it’s curious that within days of Tafoya’s becoming the Republican nominee, a previously published page titled “A Personal Letter from Michele Tafoya” was deleted from her campaign site.

A/k/a scrubbing the website. Something a wise and credible politician does not do. The op-ed continues -

The letter clearly suggests that Tafoya supports banning abortion after 12 weeks.

A 12-week abortion ban, like any other ban, is not rooted in science, autonomy, health or safety. It fails to acknowledge some of the most complicated reasons someone would need an abortion after 12 weeks — such as rape, incest or medical complications — and is yet another way to take away people’s power over their own bodies, their lives and their futures.

The letter clearly stated her support of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, the monumental U.S. Supreme Court ruling in 2022 that overturned the fundamental right to abortion.

Since then, bans have eliminated all or some abortions in 20 states. Here in Minnesota, protections exist because leaders have fought for them. [...]

And that's the truth. Something Tafoya might possibly recognize, in passing. That leaders have fought for proper protection of womens' ability to control their own bodies, 12 week arbitrariness being trash.

In short, she was a pain in the ass Sideline Susie, and now lies to us and scrubs her website.

We don't need that in the Senate of the USA. We need quality there. We need a Democrat there.  A truthful one, specifically, a truthful native american woman, Peggy Flanagan. Who is also a progressive. and hence a candidate offering a two-for-one bonus. Vote smart.  Deny U.S. Senate enabling of Trump in the new Senate the November election will give us. Produce a Democrat majority there and in the House.

UPDATE: Sideline Susie is not alone in the Republican Big Lie about $9 billion in fraud. Lisa Demuth trolls that lie also.

https://politiquote.gigafact.org/quotes/lisa-demuth-6a706e/the-9-billion-number-came-from-attorney-joe-842c02

So who the fuck is Joe Thompson, instigator of the Big Lie, and why the fuck should any rational human believe his bogus guess as if it were gospel? It's a GOP lawyer talking pure bullshit. Making up a number.

Nothing else. Republican candidates. Get that fact through your biased thick skulls, and that includes you too, Mr. Harold Niska.In short, Harry, you know better than to state a lawyer's guess at anything without seeing sound evidence. You should affirmatively disavow that number for what it is. 

An ill-informed lawyer's preliminary inflated guess is all that number is! 

Inflated grossly for whatever reason the man can offer. Ask him Harry. He's your Party partner, he'd answer you honestly. You could even submit his answer as a possible op-ed in Strib. 

But, Harry, you know better. And you're trolling fraud as bad as any of the rest. Somalis never did anything to you. You've no reason to demonize them, other than the Feed Our Future situation, where a white woman got the longest sentence for time in prison for here ringleader status (an actual fact in evidence which nobody disputes).

 FURTHER:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0E1q017V03A&t=656s 

To say, well, we are talking about Minnesota, social services fraud, this is not a federal election, well, a Trump enabler, Tom Emmer, is running for national office, and Sideline Susie is running to become a federal Senator.

Go figure. 

FURTHER: https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2026/01/16/trump-pardons-convicted-fraudster-for-the-second-time-in-five-years/ 

 FHRTHER: A Pardon Industrial Complex?  Two last items, here and here.

In Animal Farm all the animals were equal, "four legs good two legs bad" until the pigs started walking on two legs. And the one lady candidate, even a dollar of fraud . . . 

That lacks a perspective of scale.  Fraud is fraud, you can say, but ---- really! 

Show me $9 billion. I have not seen it, not a third, not a half. Kiting the scale is inexcusable. It is lying.


Wednesday, September 16, 2026

News

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkalPSPLlUY

 

 

Spinning out a theme noted earlier in another post.

 https://www.youtube.com/embed/Qe7KB1AqhH4

Watch the video and you do not need to buy the book. Or is that cynical? 

 

UPDATE: 

  https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/61e598971a0fa753c382bcb2/c42445f4-2738-4c8c-b046-50a10a8a68af/Niska051726-0155av.jpeg?format=1000w 

 And the Appocalypse can happen before we understand dark matter. While the space probes are still moving and sending back data.

 

 

https://minnesotareformer.com headline = Minnesota recreational cannabis sales hit $150M one year in

 https://minnesotareformer.com/2026/09/15/minnesota-recreational-cannabis-sales-hit-150m-one-year-in/

The $150 number suggests before the State legalized and taxed and regulated the trade, a hell of a lot of Minnesotans were breaking the law.

It is similar to the nation's experment with Constitutional prohibition of alcoholic drinks, during the early 20th Century. And the repeal because people kept drinking, only it was illegal then to do so.

What the good sign in things is, government nanny state stuff gets ignored, and citizen judgment that way is a solid thing for Libertarians in particular. There today are Flock camera concerns, where readers not familiar with the groundswell objection should search = flock camera unrest

The success in Minnesota of mj legalization is no surprise at Crabgrass, having lived through parallel but earlier legalization in Washington State, with Seattle going from a friendship network thing where someone knew a dealer, to having retail stores. Sanity replacing untaxed, men with guns stuff with licenses and tax income streams. If people do it, legalizing and taxing is best. Tabacco is taxed so high that many have ceased smoking it, with the lung cancer risk being a parallel information channel designed to discourage that practice.

 Having in Seattle cleaned glass bongs with salt and rubbing alcohol to keep the tar down, and thinking that's what bubbles through the water is what you lungs get, was an incentive to quit. But there was a time * * *

One wonders about practices in nations still aggressive in regulating/criminalizing mj, which really is not a gateway drug as the disliking fraction of people may believe, having been propagandized into the belief. 

What the propaganda did, is make a minor gateway effect boost, because people smoking mj said, "They're bullshitting us," and that led to experimentation which likely would have not happened absent propaganda mention of other drugs. 

It is as if there was somebody (CIA or others) motivated to get people to transition  to more dangerously addictive drugs, since the CIA in IndoChina and later Afghanistan needed the drug trade income to finance black-op shenanigans that no sane government financing mechanism would tolerate. MKULTRA and such. That being its own story where much is online about speculation where definitive admissions are absent and unpublished online.

Legalizing mj has been a sane thing, and, from government, no less.  Tune time. Do note the date.