The JD screed - absent corruption as a theme - rings as if skirting around truth, with limited truth. Go figure. It is JD after all, so total truth cannot really be expected. Nobody eating pets in the thing, but, still, JD.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
One comment -
You didn’t lose because of the war. You lost because you’re part of a regime that’s been acting like an authoritarian group of fascists for the past two years. And America fucking hates it. Fuck you.
There always will be critics. St Cloud, MN blogger Gary Gross opines. With a final paragraph some might disagree with.
AJ opines in mixed reporting of JD tweeting. Crabgrass word searching all three - none use the word "corruption" as if Trump's being the biggest thief since Jesse James did not matter. That is a point to debate.
Do the Jarad phone hack search as headlined and find out about slush funds, Arab top dogs set up for Jarad in Trump 45, and how Qatar bought the Kushners out of 666. Sordid? You tell me.
Moving on - https://minnesotareformer.com/2026/11/04/senator-elect-peggy-flanagan-calls-for-new-leadership-of-senate-democrats/ titled: Senator-elect Peggy Flanagan calls for new leadership of Senate Democrats --- By Max Nesterak - November 4, 2026 2:17 pm
That would be a progressive looking at a six-year term with the next two years in focus. In part:
All those new voices need a new leader, Flanagan said.
“I am tremendously grateful for Chuck Schumer’s leadership … and I think it is time for new leadership,” Flanagan said, repeating a campaign promise to support an alternative.
She did not say who she thinks should replace Schumer, the soon-to-be 76-year-old senator from New York who has led the Democratic caucus in the upper chamber for the past decade and first arrived in Congress in 1981.
Yes, gratitude given a nod, but get the fuck out of the way, dude. More -
All are eager to push the party to use their new majorities in Congress to advance sweeping economic proposals: Medicare for All, universal childcare, raising the federal minimum wage.
Flanagan also said there’s opportunity to pass popular legislation with Republican support, which will generally be necessary to overcome the Senate filibuster, such as forcing an end to the war in Iran, banning prior authorization in health insurance, guaranteeing farmers the right to repair their equipment.
“We are going to pass some pretty bold legislation. If the president decides that he wants to screw over the American people and veto those bills, I guess that’s his choice,” Flanagan said.
Grade school recess had lines drawn with a toe, and with a dare to step over the line. Next, a key paragraph about media -
Polls showed Flanagan in a tight race with Michele Tafoya, a retired sports broadcaster whom Republicans saw as their best chance in years of winning statewide. Unofficial results from the secretary of state, however, show her winning by 10 percentage points, nearly matching the margin of victory of moderate Gov.-elect Amy Klobuchar’s victory.
The pattern of wanting a horse race when a blowout seems coming is to sell media, and not to be truthful. It was enough to have Crabgrass worried that a potato like Michelle Tafoya had a chance, which was never, thankfully, true. Sideline Susie, all that, Tafoya was a mess of a candidate, with a name people knew and no ideas to go with it. More, getting to Trump -
That will fuel Flanagan’s argument that Democrats must show they’re not just “nibbling around the edges” in order to continue building momentum to retake the White House in 2028.
She said Democrats also have a mandate to investigate the Trump family’s sprawling business empire that’s grown markedly since Trump took office in 2025, including crypto, international real estate and mineral deals, defense contracts and presidential pardons for campaign contributors.
And, she said, Democrats must hold the Trump administration accountable for its violent immigration crackdown that left two American citizens dead in Minneapolis.
“There’s a long list of things that this administration needs to answer for,” Flanagan said. “In Minnesota, Renee Good’s family and Alex Pretti’s family deserve justice.”
That arguably says we will grab him by the balls and squeeze hard for the whole of his lame duck two years, relentlessly - and the fucker deserves every moment of grief we'll give him. Which is true.
Trump has much failed hubris and chutzpah to answer for - with the NO KINGS events being well themed. Keep up the pressure. Do not ease up. Give him what is deserved, ditto, his grubbing greedy offspring and others.
Why JD could not name corruption as a factor likely has many explanations, but mainly JD is a wuss. One distant from a ton of truth. Turn them each inside out and upside down, as much as each deserves.
Progressives are the only future the Democratic Party has, and if the corporate establishment Dems deny and fight that, it will be error of an enormous magnitude. Yes deep pocket Dem donors might rebel, but fuck them, they have gotten away with crass class warfare for decades and it is time they be forced to stop and pay up a fair share for all to prosper.
The Republicans have a short list future per the St Cloud blogging - Rubio and DeSantis. Crabgrass sees that as a narrow wish list, not a reality. Some other Republican sophists will show up to lie.
End of story. Let it be.



