Tuesday, June 29, 2021

At age 76, I am a pediatric case next to some of the aged Democratic Congress critters. DWT citing and quoting a Politico item, on point.

 

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/85ddae_bb82b683cb424493876c6cfbb7862d0e~mv2.jpg/v1/fit/w_487,h_427,al_c,q_20/file.jpg
image from DWT, this link, the focus of this post

Quoting DWT opening thoughts - with Crabgrass adding - don't call Congress a fossil bed, because that is too cruel:

This morning's Democratic retirement story at Politico by Ally Mutnick and Sarah Ferris doesn't mention senility or even that of the 62 members of the House over 70, 47 are Democrats. Nor that because Pelosi has enforced an absurd, outdated and dysfunctional seniority system, Democratic leadership has proven to be incapable of effective 21st Century leadership. Of the 12 members 80 or above, all but 2 are Democrats-- and that includes the Democrats' 3 top leaders, Hoyer (82), Pelosi (81) and Clyburn (81 next month). Their Politico piece refers to a different Democratic Party retirement problem-- but that is their-- and our-- retirement problem. [...]

When Alcee Hastings-- who had been functionally dead all year-- finally kicked the bucket in April (age 84), Republican Governor Ron DeSantis was able to manipulate the system to prevent the heavily black/heavily Democratic district from replacing him, thus making the Democratic majority in the House more precarious. One younger Democrat running for his seat told Caputo that "The older generation does not want to pass the baton. You don’t have to die in your seat. Pass the baton on... I want to make sure that I’m not stepping into ageism, but we have a bench problem. We have so many good young elected officials, but they’re on the bench."

From there, DWT quotes extensively from the above linked Politico item, in part:

The issue has taken on an increased urgency given the party’s tenuous hold on Congress. The loss of just one Democrat would tip the balance of power in the Senate, which has heightened scrutiny of its oldest member, California Democrat Dianne Feinstein, who has faced recent questions about her fitness for office. She turned 88 on Tuesday. Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy-- now 81 and running for reelection to his ninth term-- had a brief hospital scare in January that alarmed activists.
“It was one of the few wake-up calls: Holy shit, we are one stroke or car wreck or Me Too scandal from not having a Senate majority,” said Julian Brave NoiseCat, vice president of policy and strategy for the liberal think tank Data for Progress. “It is the thinnest majority you can have.”
Democrats have a slightly larger margin in the House, but that advantage has been whittled down in recent months by Hastings’ death and other departures.
That’s led to mounting frustration with the old guard, as well as a feeling of dread that the party is just a heartbeat away from losing control of at least one chamber of Congress.
Progressive activists like NoiseCat are increasingly concerned that issues important to Generation Z and millennial voters-- such as climate change, voting rights and criminal justice reform-- are stalled in the hidebound Senate, where the lack of action could depress turnout next year and flip control of one or both chambers of Congress.
“There’s a generation of young progressives energized by politics, and a big question in front of the Democratic Party in terms of its ability to channel that energy is whether or not they can deliver on issues that matter to young people,” NoiseCat said.
...In 2018, then-state Sen. Kevin de León, 54, unsuccessfully challenged [Dianne Feinstein, disturbingly senile] from the left in California, saying it was time for a change. But the powerful senator still managed to hold on to win a fifth term.
“There is always going to be an expiration date on the value of seniority,” de León, now a Los Angeles City Council member, told Politico. “Instead of holding power hostage to our very last days, let’s use every ounce of it to help the next generation cut a path to strong leadership both within our party, and in the halls of power.”

Old people often have old ways, which they treasure, as valid or best. Why Feinstein stays, and why voters chose her in a primary contest with a younger Dem option are questions which confound many. A bonus image:

https://www.bing.com/th?id=OIP.q0_kXHcoIml2FNyclusVVwHaFy&w=360&h=320&c=8&rs=1&qlt=90&pid=3.1&rm=2
Vigor and youth gets there before the building's burned down.



Saturday, June 26, 2021

Elizabeth Warren wants Biden to get off the dime and do something about student debt burden and Angst.

 COVERAGE OF WARREN AND THE DEBT ISSUE:

Start HERE, and that item contains links of related interest.

 .......................................

Warren wants Biden to do something he should have done already, since he won the Presidency with young voters being a bloc that "got out" and voted. He owes. 

Failing on that, for whatever cause, and being tone deaf and unhelpful will threaten his party's midterm elections position in both Houses of Congress. (Already, Schumer's picking losers - and/or Biden having no 2020 coat tails - has put the Senate on the razor's edge. Bless Manchin, who could switch parties any time now. And then there is Senator Sinema being her own ego-centric person doing her own thing. With friends like those two Biden does not need enemies.)

But Biden has to get off the dime, and years ago he was a force on legislation screwing students out of bankruptcy access for school loans, damage done, where he has to reverse that stance into something less bloodthirsty and more civilized. Something showing he recognizes smart educated people are a national asset, a treasure needing attention and nurture. They are essential to counter zombie-Trumpsters, of which the nation has many. If the young stay home during the mid-terms, Biden will have his day of reckoning; which will not help anyone.

Warren is fighting the good fight, for the good cause, and Biden's intransigence in ignoring the issue will be great error unless he learns and moves.

Fat chance? It has to get better, else it gets worse. Per the midterm elections.

Biden seems to not care. Hunter is doing okay, but there's more to the nation's situation needing attention and rectification. Joe giving Hunter a good kick in the ass and saying the "art" grift does nobody any good would be positive "executive action." Unlikely as that is. But that is one mere detail in the big picture.

Thursday, June 24, 2021

Mid-pandemic Zoom tips might be aged, but this quote rings my bell enough to post.

 Link. Key paragraph in context.

The default Zoom settings are similar to speed dating. You’re sitting across the table from someone who’s analyzing everything they can about you in a limited time. Except with Zoom it’s you vs a dozen people at the same time in hour-long segments.

Here’s what I’ve found works best.

But, before getting to this list, here’s the most important Zoom tip I’ve seen: If the same information can be communicated in an email, do that instead. Email isn’t perfect for every type of communication but it works great for things that can be summarized, put into lists, or need to be retrieved later.

With vaccinations on the upswing Zoom may recede or, at very best, perish.

If it is worth communicating, use email. There is a tangible record. There is thought into what is communicated. Not so with some (most?) Zoom horseshit better avoided. 

Opinions can differ.

Devil in the details: Strib locally authored content: Low-income families in Minneapolis could tap into "guaranteed income" of $500 per month - Mpls. mayor releases his plan for spending portion of federal relief money. By Katie Galioto - Star Tribune June 4, 2021 — 6:13pm

 A key paragraph in context:

The city of Minneapolis would pay about 200 low-income families $500 a month for two years as part of a guaranteed income program that Mayor Jacob Frey wants to fund with American Rescue Plan dollars.

 [...]

A growing cohort of local governments across the country have launched modest programs of guaranteed income in the past few years in attempts to make a case for statewide or federal policies.

"The whole concept is that people know what they need — whether that's food or housing or fixing your car or assistance at day care. People are best equipped to determine how to use resources that are made available to them," Frey said in an interview Friday.

Low-income families that live in Minneapolis and are referred to the city by its nonprofit partners would be eligible for the program.

Frey proposed spending $3 million to cover the monthly payments and associated administrative costs.

"Non-profit partners" surely sounds as if politically connected poor people, those knowing the ward healer community, get five hundred bucks a month. Equivalent needy folks suck eggs. Great idea, if implemented greatly. Sick pork to friends of friends, if not. 

Deets matter

And "families" ignores "individuals" in need but alone not familied. Their lives matter. The narrowness of focus is another deet worth contemplation.

And - pet project advocacy suggests politics rules uber alles - Strib local content, again. If people are not skeptical, officials can do mischief unabated by intense "sunlight" scrutiny.

At least Strib reporting waves a flag of notice. However, local politics will need the attention of public interest watchdogs who are not "nonprofit partners" with spending agendas and friends elected or on staff, but are instead independent, curious, listened to, and effective. 

Good luck! Expect little. Hope to be surprised. Favorably.

Wednesday, June 23, 2021

Nina Turner for Congress. Ohio's 11th District. Even if Ohio is not in your home state, it is a campaign progressives should flock contributions to, since money in politics reform is a distant goal that can be pursued one trustworthy official at a time.

 DWT's link. That post mentions those who've endorsed Turner.

Who she is

What issues she embraces. How to contribute.

She is not Pelosi. She is not Schumer. She is not Tom Perez. She is better.

And it is Nina. Not Tina. Although Tina would be a cut better if in Congress than any House Republican if she ran and was elected, and better than far too many of the Democrat conservatives.

From the DWT item:

Turner is way ahead in the polls but the corrupt Democratic establishment is rallying around their own candidate, Shontel Brown, not so much because they want her rather than because they want to stop Nina Turner who they fear as an incorruptible and compelling agent of change. The DC lobbyist contingent and Hillary Clinton are frantically trying to raise money for Brown. Every single Democratic state senator from Cuyahoga County-- where Brown is the Chair of the local Democratic Party-- has endorsed Turner. Clinton's move to back Brown is mostly seen as part of her never-ending anti-Bernie psychosis. Grotesquely corrupt payday lender advocate Joyce Beatty from Columbus has also endorsed Brown, not unexpected.

Do you need more, or is that convincing enough? (If you need more, forget it!)

ArsTechnica has recently posted some interesting stuff that hasn't made the Strib homepage news.

Alleged Iranian disinformation. Robotics ownership. Rust in the Linux Kernel

This is not to fault Strib. The two info outlets have differing clienteles.

Some of the best of Strib is when locally authored content is posted, while Strib's editorial choice of which web feeds (e.g., AP, NYTimes) to feature is helpful.

"John McAfee Found Dead In Prison Cell After US Extradition Approved" - by Tyler Durden - Wednesday, Jun 23, 2021 - 03:36 PM"

This ZeroHedge link

How is Assange doing? High profile prisoners are sitting scapegoats to show US something about power being exercised, embracing discomfort maximization, something un-pretty.  

Croaking in custody is too common for high profilers.

To paraphrase, "Yes They Can!"

________UPDATE________

Terror by one nation's running dogs? Yes They Can.

Anything short of calling out the running dog status and applying force in sufficient measure on the dog owners is pissing upwind.

Breitbart sending signals of preferential featuring? Pompeo Rex?

About the great Pompeo, here, here and here in Breitbart featuring. Nikki Haley gets less stellar treatment in straw poll "news" (where show-betters on Pompeo would not have had a ticket to cash in). Absent from that last straw poll report, Matt Gaetz, Marjory QAnon Greene, and - big surprise - Liz Cheney.

 In a field of both conservative and liberal candidates, Haley fell to the back of the pack of Republican personalities, with 19.14 percent approving of her running.

Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) and former President Donald Trump overwhelmingly garnered the most support among respondents — 74.12 percent and 71.43 percent, respectively. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) garnered the third greatest amount of support (42.86 percent), followed by former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo (39.35 percent), Sen. Tim Scott (35.58 percent), Gov. Kristi Noem (29.92 percent), Sen. Tom Cotton (29.92 percent), Sen. Rand Paul (27.76 percent), Donald Trump Jr. (24.80 percent), former Vice President Mike Pence (21.56 percent), Sen. Josh Hawley (20.22 percent), Rep. Dan Crenshaw (20.22 percent), and Haley, with remaining candidates — nearly all of which are Democrats, garnering less than three percent. Former Ohio Gov. John Kasich, who spoke at the Democratic National Convention, is the only Republican who saw a lower approval than Haley:

In case percentages exceeding 100% aggregate confuses you, the detail Breitbart omits telling us (except via a link); is that the question polling respondents addressed was: "Vote for all candidates [on a list] that you approve of for President in 2024." (371 respondents voted) 

I think they should run Mitch McConnell as their 2024 candidate. Absent a Sherman statement from McConnell, his name should be in play. How about a McConnell-Gaetz ticket. There'd be some geographical balance to such a one.

 

Tuesday, June 22, 2021

I could not make this up. It has to be true because it's on the web. Sad.

 This local news link:

 

Anoka County tells libraries not to use Pride, Black Lives Matter in messaging

Library employee sees the move as part of a pattern of censorship

That County Board is a real prize.

It appears the only socio-political things they left the librarians to feature is Jesus or insurrectionism. Each In its multiple ways and means, persons and affiliations.

You think? 

This as a backhanded hat-tip for Orwellian board-think (touching both suggested topics):

 


_________UPDATE________

Make that Rhonda, and the County board, interlocking prizes. 

From the reporting it appears the board's official fingerprints are, for now, absent, with one board member wanting clarity:

Commissioner Mandy Meisner wrote on Facebook that ignoring the comments in the memo is not an option. She believes the County Board should discuss the issue, because the board gives direction to the county administrator, who gives direction to the library staff.

“To my knowledge, the full board has never discussed what words, history or events are allowed for our Libraries to use,” Meisner wrote

Hot time in the old town, if Mandy gets her wish. Have 'em dig the hole deeper.

How many planners does it take to change a light bulb? Ramsey, MN, news from where I live: Tim Gladhill, Planner, will be moving to Stillwater's staff. Still in Metro, still locked into Met Council's requirement of having Comp Plans to fudge around. Busy work, or essential? You decide.

Link.

First report, 56,000 people, then Breitbart picked it up yesterday as 66,000+. Latest report this morning "more than 70,000 people" signed on. It looks to be shifting from a good idea to a movement.

First,  

BusinessInsider-India reporting online

More than 56,000 people have signed petitions to stop Jeff Bezos from returning to Earth after his trip to space next month
Kate Duffy - Jun 21, 2021, 16:02 IST

 .............

Breitbart yesterday-  

66,000+ People Sign Petition to Stop Jeff Bezos from Returning to Earth After Spaceflight

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 09: Jeff Bezos, owner of Blue Origin, introduces a new lunar landing module called Blue Moon during an event at the Washington Convention Center, May 9, 2019 in Washington, DC. Bezos said the module will be used to land humans the moon once again. (Photo by …
Mark Wilson/Getty Images
Lucas Nolan

More than 66,000 people have signed two petitions calling to Amazon founder Jeff Bezos to not return to earth after he leaves the planet on a Blue Origin rocket next month.

More than 70,000 people have signed petitions to stop Jeff Bezos from returning to Earth after his trip to space next month -

It becomes a movement, millions may sign on. The entire public might cry out:

JEFF! JEFF! TAKE TRUMP WITH YOU!

But Jeff being Jeff, auctioned a second seat to some ANON for $28 million bucks, instead.

Anybody who'd sign onto being blasted into space in the company of Bezos also deserves a non-return invitation. Perhaps - no - likely not, but - possibly -

Bloomberg? 

________UPDATE_______

Two thoughts - The earliest report of the growing petition found by Crabgrass online: 35,000 petitioners were reported, then. (After modest search.)

Second, - merchandise - they offer one, or a couple looking like Trump, but Bezos' petition popularity suggest one looking like him would sell, sell, sell.

There could be exponential signature growth, the whole world watching. Pinning.

______ FURTHER UPDATE______

A FOX outlet from June 19 might have been the trend-setter; reporting 25,000 signatures. Chasing history back any further is left to reader initiative.


Tuesday, June 15, 2021

Steve Timmer has been writing about the proposed Minnesota Constitutional amendment private school advocates have been trumpeting

 Only one cite needed.

Timmer includes back-links to earlier left.mn posts on public education and the Minnesota Constitution's public education requirement. 

Follow the opening link, and learn and weigh Timmer's facts, interpretations and beliefs.

Saturday, June 12, 2021

Oregon's House expelled a Republican legislator. AP reported and Strib carried the report.

 The item is online here. While Strib may have edited the AP feed, let us concentrate on what Strib choose to print (which may be the full AP item).

Reading it, it seems longer than needed with statements of different people reported. Below are the opening paragraphs.

SALEM, Ore. — Republican lawmakers voted with majority Democrats in the Oregon House of Representatives to take the historic step of expelling a Republican member who let violent, far-right protesters into the state Capitol on Dec. 21.

Legislators said on the House floor that this could be the most important vote they ever cast. They then proceeded Thursday night to expel an unapologetic Rep. Mike Nearman with a 59-1 vote, marking the first time a member has been expelled by the House in its 160-year history. The only vote against the resolution for expulsion was Nearman's own.

"The facts are clear that Mr. Nearman unapologetically coordinated and planned a breach of the Oregon State Capitol," House Speaker Tina Kotek, a Democrat, said after the vote. "His actions were blatant and deliberate, and he has shown no remorse for jeopardizing the safety of every person in the Capitol that day."

Rep. Paul Holvey, a Democrat who chaired a committee that earlier Thursday unanimously recommended Nearman's expulsion, reminded lawmakers of the events of Dec. 21, which were an eerie foreshadowing of the much more serious Jan. 6 assault on the U.S. Capitol.

"On the morning of Dec. 21st, a couple hundred protesters — some of them heavily armed and wearing body armor — arrived at the Capitol for a protest, with the intent to illegally enter and presumably occupy the building and interrupt the proceedings of the Oregon Legislature," Holvey said. "Staff and legislators were terrified. We can only speculate what would have happened if they were able to get all the way in."

That is largely the story. You can access the item and read more.

Try a word search for the item, "white." 

In fairness, search "black."

AP and Strib may think the expelled Republican's race is immaterial. I do not.

Do you?

Word search for "Trump" shows one instance in the item.

Is this good or bad reporting, leaving an arguably key fact out but dancing "white" by implication throughout the item where some of the legislator's characteristics - Republican, unapologetic, are reported?  The name, "Mike Nearman" indirectly hints non-Hispanic, not Hmong, not Somali, etc., again narrowing implicit reporting, but what would be wrong with being explicit? 

Is there some unwritten rule, the AP nurtures?

________UPDATE________

Mike Nearman has a Wikipedia page, confirming likelihoods one might infer from the AP item. An old white guy with a McConnell neck from Independence, OR.

Likely outside of the Portland metro area, possibly east of the mountains, if you check it out via an online map search. 

Interestingly, nobody dropped the ball in getting the wiki updated, with the opening paragraph:

Michael J. Nearman[2] (born 1963 or 1964) is an American politician who served as a member of the Oregon House of Representatives from the 23rd district from 2015 until 2021, when he was expelled for his role in the incursion of the Oregon State Capitol in December 2020.

Not metro. A map of Oregon's legislative districts shows the 23rd district north of Eugene, "Corvalis" shown there per the map. Rural.

That webpage with the map is yet to be updated. It lists Nearman, 23rd District; no asterisk or "former" indicator.

________FURTHER UPDATE_________

Nearman opening the door, YouTube, 3.2 million views. Dec. 21, last year.

It, interestingly, took half a year to throw the bum out. Legislative speed.

Half a year, then the expulsion, with AP quoting this and that from a few people, without identifying him as an old white guy from a rural Oregon district. 

Great job, AP.

______FURTHER UPDATE_____

Independence, OR, has a Wikipedia page. Under Demographics:

As of the census[3] of 2010, there were 8,590 people, 2,857 households, and 2,021 families residing in the city. The population density was 3,146.5 inhabitants per square mile (1,214.9/km2). There were 3,168 housing units at an average density of 1,160.4 per square mile (448.0/km2). The racial makeup of the city was 73.3% White, 0.4% African American, 1.8% Native American, 1.2% Asian, 0.2% Pacific Islander, 19.1% from other races, and 4.1% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 35.3% of the population.

There were 2,857 households, of which 42.0% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 51.6% were married couples living together, 12.7% had a female householder with no husband present, 6.5% had a male householder with no wife present, and 29.3% were non-families. 18.6% of all households were made up of individuals, and 5.9% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.99 and the average family size was 3.45.

The median age in the city was 28.3 years.

Guns per household would be an interesting demographic that the census seems to not quiz. It would be interesting to know, but could you trust reporting from households? 

Nearman's Ballotpedia page is current, as of his House expulsion. He has not updated his Facebook page about his expulsion, although somebody has assured his FB posts are captioned,

Former State Rep. Mike Nearman

. From within the Ballotpedia entry:

On June 4, 2021, Oregon Public Broadcasting published a December 16, 2020, YouTube video of Nearman telling a group of people to text him if they wanted access to the state capitol. According to the video, Nearman said, "There might be some person’s number which might be [his cell phone number], but that is just random numbers... that’s not anybody’s actual cell phone. And if you say, ‘I’m at the West entrance’ during the session and text to that number there, that somebody might exit that door while you’re standing there."[14]

This video seems to be the "Operation Hall Pass" presentation by Nearman days before the door breach confrontation.

Also within the Ballotpedia entry, Nearman in the past has run as "a man of his word." He said somebody might exit a particular door, and true to his word, somebody did.

Representative government is not without flaws; he was elected and reelected. Best and brightest in the district? A "deplorable" per Clinton-speak? Both?



 

Wednesday, June 09, 2021

January 6 seems to have faded into yesterday's news. There was an investigation/no investigation question kicked around a bit about a week ago. But let's see who recalls or has to web search what some called an icolnic image.

 File:Josh Hawley salute.jpg

That is the image. Who is pictured? Do you know, or do you look it up? 

Or do you not give a rip? In any event, a white guy in a suit in front of a white building, wearing a watch. A chain of black SUVs behind him.

A hint - likely a give away of who: The gentleman is a U.S. Senator. The photo was taken Jan. 6

Some may claim Jan 6 has entered our collective unconsciousness, for all of us, as an avatar if not in factual detail. We all do know indictments are pending. We know there were a lot of photos and video segments online. We all know The Q Shaman was in the Capitol on Jan 6, or at least most of us know that. Q Shaman was not wearing a suit (was he wearing a watch, if you can remember?)

Another hint, this white gentleman Senator has not been indicted, nor sanctioned by the Senate for anything he did Jan 6. There was some bleating. But he is not sensibly accused of anything unlawful. ("Sedition" is a word easily bandied, against another, yet, with some even saying the Trump Jan 6 rally was sedition-free.)

_________UPDATE________

What did this Senator say he would do on Jan 6, which he in fact did do as he said he would? (Hint: He did it after darkness had fallen Jan 6.)

________FURTHER UPDATE________

The man has a lean and hungry look.

The ACA - David Sirota's posting about it is truth. ACA boosters are either profiteers of Big Insurance or thralls of Big Insurance, and either way are liars when they say the ACA works. It is better than nothing, perhaps, but being worth a bucket of warm piss rather than not worth it falls short of being a bell ringer.

 Sirota and co-author Andrew Perez wrote a lengthy, damning analysis. Hence, readers are urged to follow the link to read the entire item. Yet, some excerpting:

In fortifying for-profit health care companies, the Affordable Care Act became a cautionary tale about the political supremacy of an insurance industry that many Americans hate. But it has now become something even more profound: The ACA's modest popularity, forged in desperation, proves that an initiative can now be considered a political “win” even as it preserves a problem, steamrolls alternatives and makes a crisis more difficult to fix.

[...] This past weekend, winning and hope were the big messages from the White House, where President Joe Biden and former President Barack Obama released a video celebrating the news that a record 31 million Americans are now getting their health insurance coverage through Affordable Care Act exchanges and an expanded Medicaid.

There’s a lot of laughing and yukking it up in the video — it has the corny vibe of a ‘90s buddy-reunion comedy flick, and in this case, the intent is to gaslight. You’re supposed to walk away from the Instagram-optimized clip feeling like everything is going in the right direction — and most importantly, feeling like “the ACA works,” as Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., triumphantly declared.

Now sure, the ACA has been working to boost insurance industry profits and executive pay — indeed, as millions of Americans lost their health insurance last year, six health insurance CEOs were paid a combined $120 million. Those winnings are also working for politicians — some of those riches have been recycled into more than $150 million of insurance industry campaign donations funneled to Democrats since Obamacare was first enacted.

[...] Amid all the triumphalist rhetoric about the ACA, consider a few data points:

• The uninsured rate in America has steadily increased over the last several years. Nearly 30 million Americans were uninsured in 2019, according to Census data.

80 percent of Americans told Gallup that they have not seen their health insurance premiums decline since the passage of the ACA — and 50 percent say they fear being medically bankrupted.

• Medical claim denial rates have been skyrocketing. Insurers reject more than one out of every six health insurance claims made by patients on ACA exchange plans.

Reuters recently reported that while the uninsured rate is lower than it was two decades ago, “the proportion of adults unable to afford doctor visits climbed from 11.4 percent to 15.7 percent.”

• “Annual family premiums for employer-sponsored health insurance rose 4 percent to average $21,342” in 2020, according to data from the Kaiser Family Foundation.

• Among those with employer-based health care coverage, “About one in five say that someone in their household has been contacted by a collection agency in the past 12 months because of medical bills, and 9 percent say they have at some point declared personal bankruptcy because of medical bills,” according to a 2019 Los Angeles Times/KFF study.

[...] Put it all together, this data shows the ACA works in the same way a train robbery works — it works really well for the thieves, but not so well for the passengers.

[...] Of course, the ACA has helped make sure more people are able to get ripped off on medical care rather than get completely cut off from the entire medical system. In that sense, the ACA is better than nothing at all, just like a train robbery is better than being thrown off the back of the caboose.

[...] For a decade, the Democratic Party and its allied liberal groups in Washington have been able to to beat back discussion of universal health care by pretending they support a public option to compete with private insurers — and then they have inevitably cast aside the proposal when they regain power. This is what happened in 2010, and what is now happening again after Biden abandoned his public option promise in favor of a health care policy quite literally written by insurance industry lobbyists.

[...] The same dynamic is at play with proposed Medicare expansion and full-fledged Medicare for All. Like a public option, those policies may be conceptually supported by a majority of Americans, but it’s been a half century since the creation of Medicare.

[...] Regardless of slick White House videos or football-spiking tweets from senators, we don’t have to believe it is some enormous victory that millions of people were thrown off their employer-based health care but at least some of them were able to get crappy coverage on for-profit insurance exchanges that involve high out-of-pocket costs and high claim denial rates.

The lie ripens in the summer sun. Regardless of how those two, Obama and Biden, have pitched their all too willing capitulation to big money as a success the very sad truth is what we've got involves a gulf between words and actuality, while the rest of the world's prospering nations have better. Possibly that is because other populations have been less docile and deluded than ours, or possibly because their politicians have been less the tools of greedy insurance gougers. 

GOUGERS WHO BUY WHAT THEY WANT. 

SO, WHO ARE THE SELLERS?

TOOLS. 

NOT FOOLS for pretending. Always remember that, if nothing else.

Tuesday, June 08, 2021

There is no justifiable reason the U.S. Marshals Service refuses body cam usage. It is the best evidential record of an encounter with a member of the public. The citizens deserve a reversal. FBI too should wear and activate body cams, whenever they intereact with a member of the public. Every time, create a record.

 It is Orwellian what happened in Mpls Uptown, a shooting of a black man in his auto, without a single body cam video record. Body cams, without exception and, as a matter of course, always, has to be the rule to protect the public from police abuse, or at least to quell the incentive of cops to lie and cover up. It is insane the Marshal's Service does not use body cams and quells local police assistance from usage in joint operations. 

It is sick.

Strib reports:

Bodycam policies spark dispute with no video in Uptown shooting

Ramsey County Sheriff Bob Fletcher said Monday that he's pulling his agency from a federal task force whose members shot and killed Winston Smith Jr. during an arrest operation in Uptown Minneapolis last week, saying they were forbidden to use body-worn cameras during the encounter and that the U.S. Marshals Service "has been misleading" in public comments suggesting otherwise.

The move comes amid increasing scrutiny of the lack of any known video of the encounter, whether from body cameras, squad-car dash cameras or parking ramp surveillance where the arrest occurred.

Smith, 32, of Minneapolis, was killed Thursday afternoon; authorities say he fired a gun from his vehicle as the task force attempted to arrest him on a warrant from Ramsey County [...]

The Ramsey County Sheriff's Office initially said Monday that it would now have its members equipped with body-worn cameras while on these federal assignments. But in a follow-up statement later Monday, Fletcher said the federal agency "has been misleading in their public comments to the media."

"In Minnesota, the Marshals office has refused to allow us to wear body cameras since the advent of the technology, and any new policy has not been implemented," he said.

Fletcher said local law enforcement has made many requests to use the technology only to be denied. He said he was denied a request as recently as May 25 for his deputies to use body cameras on the task force, and that U.S. officials said they were "working on the problem."

[...] "However, much to my surprise, I received a voice mail [Monday] from U.S. Marshal Mona Dohman, in which she explains, 'It could take awhile for this to be approved ... so, your deputies still won't be allowed to use their body cameras ... until the onboarding process goes on,' " Fletcher said in a statement. "As a result of her voice mail, I have made the decision that Ramsey County Sheriff's Deputies will not participate with the Marshals Fugitive Task Force until body cameras are actually authorized."

Messages left for Dohman and U.S. Marshals Service spokespeople were not immediately returned.

[...] Meanwhile, Minnestota Rep. Sydney Jordan, DFL-Minneapolis, was briefed by state officials over the weekend and learned that Gov. Tim Walz's office was in contact with the White House and the U.S. Justice Department about Smith's death.

Walz spokesman Teddy Tschann confirmed what Jordan wrote and said, "The Governor's Office reached out to both the White House and the Department of Justice over the weekend, and has been pushing the federal government to provide Minnesotans with as much information as possible."

[...] In a telephone interview late Monday, Jordan said that she wants federal task force members and "every officer in the state of Minnesota to have a body camera."

Amen.

 The lack of tangible body cam evidence of the event unfolding is Orwellian! 

Particularly, in our day and age, misconduct being the currently well known problem it is. And with body cams being now the norm, nationwide, as best practice.

Klobuchar and Tina Smith might do something useful for a change, along these lines. It would add effectiveness if people everywhere were to pile on the Justice Department to rein in its cowboys. 

A simple short Justice Department rule can be written requiring body cams, with dismissal from service being the penalty for wilful rule violation.

BOTTOM LINE: It should never have happened! What excuse is Marshal's Service using for not using body cams in each and every instance? So they can lie and obfuscate? What? How can they say the current practice is anything besides an ill-motivated Orwellian mood toward duty and obvious good sense?

A closing Hat Tip to Sheriff Fletcher for taking the correct stance, now. Forceful opposition earlier would have been best; but hindsight is 20/20, and Fletcher deserves the benefit of doubt, this instance.

Lindell TV.

Link.

It has been a while and I have not seen Biden do one fucking thing to lessen student debt burden.

He would have if he'd wanted to. The impression is he does not want to. Status quo Joe wants two-year trade schools. Staffed by Jills, not scholars. How that man has advanced himself says far too much about all that is wrong in our nation. Yes, better than Trump. So what? I am supposed to cheer that? Son Hunter is a paradigm of the well-raised educated man?

Better than Trump and nasty political shenanigans got him the White House, but not respect. Since getting the White House . . .

Taking care of nasty Neera Tanden, he's done that. She has a White House staff paycheck. A position where Senate confirmation was NOT required. Beyond that, what?

Better than Obama, or just a bit different at the edges? We wait and see. 

Obama did nothing to lessen student debt burden. They serve the wealthy. They want all of us other folks on payments.

Josh Hawley is a more interesting politician. Likely more dangerous, but more interesting. Possibly less dangerous.

Sunday, June 06, 2021

Alan Grayson is a bona fide progressive. He will be running for the Senate seat now held by Marco Rubio. Former police chief Val Demings will be Grayson's primary opponent.

 I had to look up spelling of "Demings" because since having to live within a Congressional district occupied by Michele Bachmann, I now have trouble being certain about doubled vs single consanants. A Demings related websearch.

Grayson-related online coverage, here and here. He got piled on. Believing that web reporting of truth vs negative hyperbole, there has been a smear campaign against Grayson, on two fronts, whoever you believe was involving in the smearing.

It is good to recall that the GOP Minnesota Attorney General campaign folks will know a smear campaign when they see one (or engineer one, or see some PAC, fully independent of the campaign of course, do engineering).

Were I living there, Grayson would have my primary vote, no doubt to that; and the Dem primary winner my general election vote - liking Grayson, Deming the lesser evil in a general election (by light-years, considering Marco Rubio and his ego). 

NRSC, the GOP Senate incumbancy-first-expansion-second machine, already is trashing Grayson. Whether also trashing Demings would require web searching, but Marco does fear Grayson which is why NRSC is in fighting posture already, before the Dems have a primary.

If wanting to know establishment DC Dem "wisdom" (a/k/a anti-progressive bias) The Hill issued its story (MSM ran the feed).

Demings being the focus with Grayson mentioned eleven paragraphs into the item, dismissively, with no further mention of him in the post - a pattern emerges. The Hill itself did not anoint a pre-primary winner between Grayson and Demings. 

News presenters do not do that other than on the editorial page. Yet, there is this:

 © The Hill Demings raises Democrats' hopes in uphill fight to defeat Rubio

Notice of what's copywrited - it is what it is when it is by the item headline, a headline which carries implications of further item content and from major DC media. 

Two parties, two suggested general election candidates. This early. So, all that, but The Hill did not manufacture the news nor shade its reporting of prospects. They are honorable. There was an osmosis of outlook, somehow.

You know, however, The Hill did its soundings and talking to sources, polling review and such, and within their shop finding and reporting some consensus, perceived by them, that Deming's the one. As if the will of leadership has spoken to them.

Welcome to the Val Demings Show? The DC Dem institutional leadership prior to this icing of Grayson had stood Demings up as one of its presenters in the Trump  Senate trial. The one had after the first House Impeachment vote. On that "big stage" where only fools would have watched it without knowing the GOP nose count had a GOP Senate majority and the outcome therefore was known in advance. The acquittal fix was in.

Cramdown Deming? Much as Dem inner party forces slugged outsider people with its Biden cramdown four years after its Clinton cramdown disaster,  we are getting to know a cramdown when we see one and we're seeing a pattern emerge.

Florida -- DWS, Epstein, Gaetz -  and besides them, Florida has other great people who elected Rubio already. Demings may have a substantial law and order bloc, but still a questionable chance to win against GOP power and bias in the geriatric fixed-income or comfortably cushioned retiree state; while Grayson might give a more-spirited fight than Impeachment presenter Demings will put into play, if once past Grayson in the primary.

Realism often is sad. Realism in Florida, hard to define, since Al Gore won there, but didn't after the votes were never fully recounted and the candidate against Gore, the one who started Iraq warfare and left Obama a bag of bailout, which Geithner and Obama handled as they did. If any voter or politician is really gung-ho over Val Demings as Senator, it would be surprising. This is the calculus of lesser evil for certain, and it will lose since Florida's shown a penchant for greater evil, Epstein getting his plea deal there (but then later not in New York) being an example. Trump prospering there being another.

The guess here is Rubio defeats either.

Neither Dem will try to poison the other's well in pursuit of a primary win, Demings having the war chest. There even could be at least one also-ran primary contestant besides the two. However, if you read that Hill item, do you need a weatherman? 

If a Dem primary also-ran tries to poison both Dem wells, you will be able to speculate to yourself, depending on your politics, and judgment, "GOP stalking horse again."


 


Friday, June 04, 2021

Cheryl Reeve is a Minnesota treasure.

 June 1, 2021, Strib sub-headline, "Layshia Clarendon, the first WNBA player to openly identify as transgender and non-binary (not identifying exclusively as a man or woman), took charge of the Lynx in Sunday's game despite never having played with them." Excerpting:

What was most striking about Clarendon's [Minnesota Lynx WNBA] arrival is how routine it felt. Remember, the NFL, with all of its wealth, power and market dominance, was afraid to give a job to a talented quarterback who took a knee during the national anthem to protest the extrajudicial killing of Black people.

Yes, afraid. Terrified that the NFL might lose a few bucks or sponsors, or have to answer difficult questions.

The WNBA fearlessly has protested injustice and turned its activism into political power, particularly during the recent Senate races in Georgia.

Fearlessness is invaluable, whether you're running a team or changing the world.

"Incredible human being," Reeve said. "I've had a chance to be around Layshia with USA basketball. When I think about Layshia Clarendon, I think about all that is right with the WNBA and I think about courage, with Layshia as a nonbinary athlete, and the things that they would have to go through."

[...] "Layshia evolving to where [they are] now, to be seen and feel more comfortable in your own body, that's been quite the journey for them," Reeve said. "I'm just super proud. And I know the WNBA is super proud. And that's not the reason why Layshia is getting an opportunity with the Lynx.

"I needed a guard."

Reeve has won several recent WNBA championships and clearly knows how to demonstrably pick up a technical, per a few seasons ago.

Trump disrespected the league; and vice versa; with some within the NBA in concert about what a visit to the Trump White House was worth.

Colin Kapernick was in a league dominated by colusive white men in suits owning franchises, and got iced out. For taking a knee during playing of the anthem, in protest against black men dying with frequency during police encounters. Too bad he'd not been into basketball. It's a better sport.

Back to Cheryl Reeve, she'd be successful as a head coach in the NBA if given the chance, and especially if she had a men's game equivalent of Maya Moore on her team (coaching only reaches so far). 

But, bottom line, have we ever seen a head coach coat-throw in the NBA? Bobby Knight once threw a folding chair, but that was in the college game - and it was Bobby Knight, not a normal person.

 

"The former president is now trying to pretend he was a finance industry critic, even though he was Wall Street’s biggest cheerleader and enabler."

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgi8fM7QkVLPTVFoyXbVqUfJX3ITs8dfKth1kd3TUpcsf_7KuDpAZYH4NPzHgROGtPOKJ6ZpLFZtv7ajUWXJefsCwmY5fR1zPe0OgEbSwwUhWMU5cGaKFujEwe6nSDNrUmII3LykQ/s1600/three+stooges.png
Which one? Link

 

Thursday, June 03, 2021

Does this make either of the pissing-match politicians look more, or less, Presidential?

 HuffPo, here. Another question, does HuffPo publishing of this kind of stuff enhance or lower its reputation as a source to follow because of meaningful content? 

Gossip content - so what?

Billions for Bezos' Blue Baby?

ArsTechnica, here, describing Maria Cantwell and Bernie Sanders having differing views about what surely looks like a Cantwell effort to horn in on NASA decision making; where the specialists - not Cantwell, not Bezos, not Bernie - know best.

Please, politicians, let the agency try its best to do its job without Blue Origin getting any multi-billion dollar free money for a big billionaire's latest hobby.

Space exploration now is a troubled field in seeing Billionaire Musk and Billionaire Bezos wanting to capture the pole position in Space as Our Future money-making and horizon pushing New Frontier - via private capital space venturing. 

When you see only one news outlet touching an issue, there always can be doubt. On the other hand Ars is not Breitbart; where prejudice is baked into the operating Gestalt. Ars is niche journalism, but seemingly unbiased in its tasking of its writers, and in whatever reporting or opining it chooses to publish.

_______UPDATE_______

PROPAGANDA - right before your eyes. Bezos = Seattle. In light of that, Seattle Times, an editorial, never mentioning SpaceX beyond the subtitle, but getting the crying towel out:

Washington suppliers may get left behind on moon lander program
June 2, 2021 at 1:25 pm
Jeff Bezos’ Kent-based rocket company, Blue Origin, is contesting NASA’s decision to award the Human Landing System contract for a lunar lander to competitor SpaceX, founded by Elon Musk. Pictured is an illustration of the Blue Origin National Team integrated lunar lander vehicle. (Blue Origin)
By Emily Wittman
Special to The Times

 

In April, NASA took one step closer to the moon, announcing the $2.9 billion Human Landing System contract that delivers American space boots back to the lunar surface in 2024. But the decision leaves some Washington space suppliers’ feet firmly on the ground.

Kent-based Blue Origin, owned by Jeff Bezos, has been working directly with more than 20 companies in Washington state in support of its Human Landing System during the program’s “Base Period.” Selection as an HLS provider represented approximately $100 million in near-term contract work with Washington companies, according to the company. Blue Origin’s national team HLS partners Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman were also anticipating millions in contract opportunities for their nationwide supply chains.

[...]

Poor Jeff. Poor Lockheed. Poor Northrop. Business as usual, not being usual.

A more efficient private sector competitior offers taxpayers more bang for the buck. How much more unfair can you get?

You can read more but Cantwell, Jeff, Lockheed, and Northrop have an argument - a redundancy argument as with too many Pentagon weapons systems, spread the pork, it's tax money after all, so our place at the trough is justified by redundancy.

We've been there before and want there again - is a form of redundancy.

For those not reading the item, the footer:

Emily Wittman is president & CEO, Aerospace Futures Alliance, Washington State Space Coalition.

 Informed minds can disagree, but Ars coverage strikes me as objective, this Wittman editorial, subjective. She writes:

Unfortunately, NASA has chosen just one provider — SpaceX, founded by Elon Musk. By selecting a sole provider, NASA is potentially jeopardizing the safety and reliability of the new lunar lander. In April, NASA’s own Office of Inspector General stated that NASA officials have “expressed concern that selecting a single contractor would result in a lack of redundancy and potentially higher, less sustainable future HLS costs due to a lack of competition.”

Selecting only one provider — particularly one that manufactures virtually all its components in-house — also endangers our broad-based nationwide supplier network. It cuts most of the space industrial base out of NASA exploration, impacting jobs, the economy and NASA’s own future supplier options. Importantly, it puts Washington jobs at stake.

We are concerned about this change of approach, which eliminates essential competition and negatively impacts the space industrial base. Our concern is shared by members of Congress, including U.S. Sen. Maria Cantwell, who deserves great credit for raising this important question directly with Bill Nelson, a former astronaut and newly appointed NASA administrator, during his nomination hearing. She noted the importance of competition in the program and asked him to review the decision.

We are encouraged by the Senate Commerce Committee’s unanimous vote to mandate a second HLS provider and authorize $10 billion in new funding for the program. This amendment to the Senate version of the U.S. Innovation and Competition Act preserves the SpaceX award while providing enough funding for NASA to contract with a second HLS provider.

This is important progress, but Washington suppliers are still far from liftoff.

 This websearch returns only one item, that item referencing Wittman, earlier, in 2019, online at Yahoo, beginning:

 

SpaceX employees in Redmond, Wash., give a cheer during the countdown to a Falcon 9 rocket launch that put dozens of Redmond-built SpaceX Starlink satellites in orbit on Nov. 11. (SpaceX via YouTube)
SpaceX employees in Redmond, Wash., give a cheer during the countdown to a Falcon 9 rocket launch that put dozens of Redmond-built SpaceX Starlink satellites in orbit on Nov. 11. (SpaceX via YouTube)

Seattle may not be the best place to put a launch pad, but the region is turning into one of the most prolific satellite production centers in the United States.

“How many of you know that Washington state is actually one of the world’s leading satellite manufacturers?” Roger Myers, a longtime aerospace executive who is currently president-elect of the Washington State Academy of Sciences, asked during a session of the Pacific Northwest Economic Region’s Economic Leadership Forum on Monday.

In terms of sheer mass and revenue, Colorado-based Lockheed Martin and Boeing’s satellite operation in California still have bragging rights.

But when you tally up how many satellites have been launched in the past couple of years, it’s hard to beat SpaceX’s satellite development and manufacturing facility in Redmond, Wash.

Last week, SpaceX added another 60 satellites to its nascent Starlink broadband constellation, bringing Redmond’s count to 122. That includes the 60 satellites launched in May, plus two prototypes sent to orbit last year.

So, the editorial explained - SpaceX is one of Wittman's chickens, so let them keep their three billion taxpayer dollars they've already locked in on (and look at all the jobs in that opening pic); but also cut ten billion bucks more for the other Wittman chickens too. They also want to be fed.

A "Spread the size of the trough" argument? 

Make Jeff a happier billionaire. Makes sense to me. Makes more sense to Jeff.

Link.


Wednesday, June 02, 2021

It is hard to let go of this. The DNC bastard joining an anti-labor law firm - Tom Perez, that one, who "served" as OBAMA'S LABOR SECRETARY !

 Obama and Perez are kindred lost souls, or make it kindred frauds. Were you, now knowing recent history, to expect either CHANGE or HOPE from either, you'd be idiot enough to have some other con sell you the Brooklyn Bridge.  

This is a topic hard to let go. Crabgrass already posted, here, linking to Jacobin's post about the sleaze bucket. Because the Perez segue says so much about the true nature of the pack of Democratic Party nationwide bosses, who seem to hate the people as much as Trump does, it foreshadows the furture strangle any chance the Party will become people friendly rather than Moloch friendly, Mammon friendly, while whoring with lies, to US.

That said, moving next to online commentary and reporting (beyond Jacobin's) of the SOB finally showing his true colors by taking the job at a labor-undermining law firm. 

But one more thing to add, before that:

TOM PEREZ MIRRORS ALL THAT IS WcRONG WITH THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY - PEREZ, WHOSE LAST NAME SHOULD BE CHANGED TO CLINTON, ARGUABLY IS WORTH A PINCH OF SHIT, BUT NO MORE THAN THAT.

Now online commentary, of note: 

SLUDGE first:

 

After a four year tenure as chair of the Democratic National Committee, Tom Perez has taken a job as partner at Washington D.C. law and lobbying firm Venable LLP. 

“When assisting clients with legal, legislative, and regulatory matters across a broad range of subject matter areas, Tom Perez brings to bear decades of experience leading government organizations at the federal, state, and local levels,” Venable’s website says.

Venable advertises services defending employers against labor unions, including collective bargaining negotiations, refuting unfair labor practices allegations, and offering advice during union organizing campaigns and petition drives. 

“We regularly counsel and train clients on union avoidance,” Venable’s website reads. 

Perez took charge of a beleaguered DNC in 2017, after an election cycle where the group was accused by some of its most influential figures of rigging the nominating process against grassroots candidate Bernie Sanders and in favor of establishment favorite Hillary Clinton. But rather than reckoning with how the organization funneled $82 million to the Clinton campaign and patching up relations with the grassroots elements of the party, Perez elevated establishment figures to positions where they could vote down reforms like instituting a conflict of interest policy and banning corporate lobbyists from being superdelegates. 

As Sludge has covered extensively, Perez purged key DNC committees of members who had supported Sanders or his chairmanship opponent Keith Ellison, and replaced them with corporate lobbyists and Clinton allies. For example, Perez appointed multiple corporate figures to the DNC Executive Committee in 2017, including state oil and gas lobbyist Tonio Burgos, lobbying firm principal Minyon Moore, and finance industry and casino gaming consultant Susan Swecker.

- and more -

 “His investment in state parties was almost non-existent, his Rural Desk consisted of a single person, and he even managed to screw up the 2020 Iowa caucuses,” said political consultant Matt L. Barron. “All in all, Perez has to be one of the worst DNC chairs ever.”

 A context for that last sentence is that Debbie Wasserman Schultz was his predecessor; making it necessary to have to write "one of." More:

Department of Defense contracting giant Lockheed Martin employs Venable to lobby on the defense appropriations bill provisions related to its contracts and tax issues involving foreign-derived income. Eagle LNG, a Texas natural gas company with operations throughout the Caribbean, pays Venable to lobby Congress on energy infrastructure issues, marine fuel, and fuel bunkering. Other Venable lobbying clients include American Airlines, hedge fund Citadel LLC, utility trade association Edison Electric Institute, and McAfee LLC. 

Perez is not yet a registered lobbyist, but his Venable bio page lists services including “legislative and government affairs,” which can include lobbying visits with officials as well as work like monitoring regulatory proceedings and preparing research and other materials to influence the government. 

In August 2020, toward the end of Perez’s stint as DNC chair, the DNC Rules Committee voted down a resolution from a Sanders delegate to amend the DNC charter to ban it from accepting corporate PAC donations and prohibit lobbyists for for-profit corporations from serving as members. Many of the Rules Committee members who led the opposition to the resolution were Perez appointees with background in corporate lobbying, Sludge found.

 Then the coup de gras for the credibility of the Democratic Party, national level, by SLUDGE:

Perez has been replaced as DNC chair by Jaime Harrison, a former lobbyist and floor director and counsel for House Majority Whip Rep. James Clyburn (D-S.C.). Harrison worked for Podesta Group as a lobbyist from 2008 through 2016, representing 68 clients including Boeing, Bank of America, BP America, Wells Fargo, and Wal-Mart.

Clyburn and the Podesta brother ties suggest the above noted "one of" comment is super relevant, given successor, as well as predecessor. Shit running DNC makes it hard to vote Dem, with only Trump, McConnell, Paul Ryan and such suggesting it could be worse. 

DNC's kind of "leadership" transitioning (in light of the alternative) should make an "independent" out of every cogent soul in the nation. 

There's another relevant online analysis from 2020, i.e., from before this latest backstabbing of labor by an Obama administration insider; context being right after the Iowa caucus SNAFU on the Dem side of things, working against Bernie's popularity.  American Prospect having then posted:

Tom Perez Should Resign, Preferably Today -- He represents an establishment that has put its own position in the party above the party’s success. It’s time to go.

by David Dayen - February 7, 2020

 

Tom Perez should never have been DNC chair. He was used as part of a proxy war between Barack Obama’s faction of the establishment and the rest of the party, which was fully ready to move on after the 2016 mess. Both Harry Reid and Chuck Schumer had embraced Keith Ellison, one of Bernie Sanders’s top surrogates in 2016, for the position, a show of unity that might have helped rebuild broken bonds within the party. Just as Howard Dean’s elevation to DNC chair in 2005 brought insurgents within a broader circle of power, Ellison’s victory would have at least attempted a rough union between the Sanders and Clinton forces, and given the party’s left wing more of a shot at creating a strong and legitimate message to counter Donald Trump.

Obama couldn’t handle it. He pressured Perez, who was musing about running for governor in Maryland, into the race, and bore down on the establishment to break with the Ellison unity shtick and accept his preferred candidate. This eventually succeeded, with the help of a party coup in Puerto Rico that delivered Perez all of that delegation’s votes.

Obama, now a movie studio boss and occasional public speaker, had no personal reason to force Perez on the party. The most logical reading of his rationale would be that he did it for the blob, the network of consultants, strategists, pollsters, lobbyists, policy mandarins, and media figures for whom politics is their business. They didn’t want the spigot to close on the hundreds of millions of dollars that flow through campaigns, and they needed to eliminate the threat of a gatekeeper like Ellison, who might have different ideas. So Perez was installed.

The disastrous past week of Democratic politics is the result, deeply damaging the perceived competence of a party that is attempting to ask the American people to put them back in power to engage in activist government. The Iowa results weren’t just one snafu but part of a pattern of self-dealing and stupidity within a party elite that’s more concerned with staying in power than taking power. And so, for the second straight cycle, like Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a DNC chair needs to step down before the end of their term. Tom Perez must go.

 He didn't. Until now. Replaced by dreck. The bulk of the remainder of that 2020 American Prospect item dealt with how Perez led a biased and abominable fuck-up in the 2020 Iowa caucusing, one which, however, disadvantaged Bernie. 

Of all things?

 

.......................................................

Finally, for readers who ignored urging in earlier Crabgrass posting to access the current Jacobin item, excerpting next, from it's beginning:

Tom Perez announced on Thursday that he’s joining the law firm Venable LLP, whose website boasts that its lawyers “regularly counsel and train clients on union avoidance.”

Perez, who was the Democratic National Committee (DNC) chair until January, joins a growing number of Obama officials who cashed in their government experience with jobs at union-busting companies. That list includes press secretaries Jay Carney, who became the top flack at Amazon, and Robert Gibbs, who spent several years as a top flack for McDonald’s. Obama senior advisor David Plouffe served as policy chief at Uber, while former senior adviser Valerie Jarrett has a board seat at Lyft.

Rather than avoid issues he oversaw as labor secretary, Perez said in a press release he will be working specifically on those issues.

“Venable’s attorneys are at the forefront of helping clients navigate dynamic regulatory, policy, and labor and employment issues,” Perez said in Venable’s press release announcing his hiring. “I look forward to joining them in this important work.”

Michael Volpe, a cochair of Venable’s labor and employment practice group, said that Perez’s “unique background and insights on workplace matters will be invaluable to our clients.” Volpe’s firm biography notes that he has “broad experience representing corporate interests in union organizing efforts and campaigns.”

With that record of former Obama flunkies cashing in anti-labor, what else needs to be said? How from ordinary beginnings you get a Martha's Vineyard waterfront mansion estate is not via a people friendly legacy, but something you can HOPE for if you CHANGE things in ways favored by Mammon. Just move to the dark side of The Force. Then, Mammon rewards.

 

_________UPDATE________ 

 Two items more, NYT hinting at the politics from before Perez formally put his name into the contest to succeed DWS as DNC head; and this current image from DWT

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/85ddae_958947f72fe941ee91712aba093e9d3d~mv2.png
click the image to enlarge and read

 

Interestingly, the NYT item mentions, "Jaime Harrison, the chairman of the South Carolina Democratic Party" as a voice in things back then; while the DWT item speaks for itself, (the image headlining this DWT post). 

In Minnesota, DFL people in office and in support are clearly better than the Minnesota Republicans, who now fawn over Trump. 

Nationally, both parties suck. Biden in place getting nothing done but posturing well, with Manchin as an excuse for nothing getting done; Harris in waiting - depressing at best. Republicans, a joke, but with a rabid base and effective GOTV, despite their being who they are. Lindsey Graham arguably being a prototypical Trump stooge.

Lindsey Graham additionally whoomped Harrison in the last Senate election to remain in Congress, tons of money failing to buy that seat for Harrison. Harrison then was the Clyburn-Biden choice to head DNC, much as Ms. Harris was the Clyburn-Biden choice for VP.

Progress suffers, unless and until . . . CHANGE

If ever.


https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhwjBxpZUvB3MAzuBBuw-w9ruPk1S-fk-haMEmH7ZwmHSELis_LUZbDtXBH1QExoi-K8G9mP3HUTVJkMhYT0QTnXOdeecGVh2NWlSXzwExUiz344rWHGh8suqZlD7TSXzvF52OfLA/s1600/Screenshot-Haim+Saban+Ponders+Future+of+Democratic+Party.png
click the image to enlarge and read