I would be much more comfortable with Perske working with Pelosi, than Emmer in league with Boehner.
Boehner leaves a room and leaves behind an oil slick. His sole virtue would be making Emmer look less egregious by comparison. Not that much.
Perske on the issues? First, don't expect guns, Mexicans among us, or embryo Angst; instead expect a dose of reality. The things government should be focused upon, for the benefit of the nation and making it work better. Going to the heart of what's really important vs what might be diversionary enough to fool enough of the people enough of the time [get anything you want at Tom Emmer's restaurant - including ultra-high paid servers; let me tell you of a cracker-jack remodeling firm; all that makes up the Emmer persona including a desire for and sponsorship of lax DWI law].
Perske runs marathons, Emmer used to play hockey. Perske has kept trim, Emmer's put on weight since ice rink days, but - a bigtime so what? Really, both of you stop trading at all in such silliness and focus on issues.
Now - Perske on the Issues [real issues, clearly and cleanly presented, not tinsel decorated Tea Party paranoia-pumping or pointless nostalgia fodder]:
click to read, or go to original for better legibility |
The screen capture is from Perske's campaign website:
http://joeperske.com/main/home/
at its "Issues" page:
http://joeperske.com/main/the-issues/
Clean, no-nonsense recognition that there are people who read and think.
No pablum, no hokey image slideshow, substance over fru-fru.
---------------------------------------
In fairness I would present Emmer's issue page, except he has none, preferring a bucolic photo montage instead.
Slideshow style but not too many banner photos, don't confuse the slow folks, kitsch over substance.
With bozo-brained captions:
Bring Everyday Values to Washington
Spirit of Main Street
Stand Up for Individual Liberties
Ensure Economic Freedom
The man would rather insult your intelligence bigtime instead of showing you, directly, his emptiness and lack of conscientious, well-reasoned ideas of what might be pressing issues to reasoning primary voters.
Rhonda on the other hand has enough voter respect to have an issues page, agree or disagree. She has that modicum of decency of spirit. Among Republican primary voters that should matter. She's not simply an empty fuel tank kind of guy, talking loudly, saying nothing.
__________UPDATE___________
photo credit, here |