Tuesday, March 15, 2022

Hunting and killing sleeping homeless men takes a special kind of warped snake to go about doing such a thing. Yet it is an ancillary aspect of something bigger in our nation.

 Strib, carrying an AP feed:

NEW YORK — Police said early Tuesday they arrested a suspected gunman who has been stalking homeless men asleep on the streets of New York City and Washington D.C., killing at least two people and wounding three others in less than two weeks.

Law enforcement arrested the suspect in Washington, D.C., and he was being interviewed by police, the Metropolitan Police Department said on Twitter.

Police in the two cities earlier released multiple surveillance photographs, including a close-up snapshot clearly showing the man's face, and urged people who might know him to come forward.

"Additional information will be forthcoming" the statement on Twitter said. "Thanks to the community for all your tips."

[... ] Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser and New York City Mayor Eric Adams, speaking together at a news conference Monday, had urged anyone living on the streets to go to city shelters where they might be safer.

"We know that our unsheltered residents already face a lot of daily dangers and it is unconscionable that anybody would target this vulnerable population," Bowser said.

Adams said New York City police and homeless outreach teams would focus on finding unhoused people in the subways and other locations to urge them to seek refuge at city-owned shelters.

[...] Investigators in the two cities began to suspect a link between the shootings on Sunday after a Metropolitan Police Department homicide captain — a former resident of New York City — saw surveillance photos that had been released Saturday night by the New York Police Department while scrolling through social media.

The man in those photos looked similar to the one being sought by his own department.

D.C. Police Chief Robert Contee credited the quick coordination between departments, saying that without that officer making the connection, "It could have been months," before the link between the attacks was discovered.

The earliest known shooting happened at around 4 a.m. on March 3 in Washington D.C., police said, when a man was shot and wounded in the city's Northeast section. A second man was wounded on March 8, just before 1:30 a.m.

At 3 a.m. the next day, March 9, police and firefighters found a dead man inside a burning tent. He was initially thought to have suffered fatal burns, but a subsequent autopsy revealed that the man had died of multiple stab and gunshot wounds.

The killer then traveled north to New York City, police said.

At 4:30 a.m. Saturday, a 38-year-old man sleeping on the street in Manhattan not far from the entrance to the Holland Tunnel was shot in his right arm as he slept.

The victim screamed and the gunman fled, police said.

About 90 minutes later, the gunman fatally shot another man on Lafayette Street in SoHo, police said.

"He looked around. He made sure no one was there. And he intentionally took the life of an innocent person," Adams said.

The man's body was found in his sleeping bag just before 5 p.m. Saturday.

[...] The latest attacks were reminiscent of the beating deaths of four homeless men as they slept on the streets in New York's Chinatown in the fall of 2019. Another homeless man, Randy Santos, has pleaded not guilty to murder charges in those attacks.

A year ago, four people were stabbed in New York City, two fatally, by a man who randomly attacked homeless people in the subway system. That assailant, who was also homeless, is awaiting trial.

New York City's mayor has been criticized by some anti-poverty advocates for his plan to remove homeless people from the city's subway system by deploying police and mental health workers to keep people from sleeping in trains or stations.

Adams, on Monday, defended the policy, saying it was designed to protect the safety of both commuters and homeless residents.

"There is nothing dignified about allowing people to sleep on subway platforms," he said.

We who may not be wealthy influencers of politicians, nor wealthy politicians so influenced, but who have food, shelter and a morning coffee brewer are fortunate compared to those denied those fundamental things. For that we should feel gratitude, while also feeling "it could be me" kinship to those denied such basic human rights in the wealthiest nation the world has ever known. 

It is shameful that we have homelessness allowed by our politicians, and it becomes more a shame when sick people murder or otherwise prey on the less fortunate who we - via our politicians in our wealthy and prosperous nation - allow to be homeless and vulnerable. That offense against humanity should be ended. The problem is not those homeless, the problem is the politicians. Particularly the most cynical of them who see homelessness as a goad to make visible, in public, to the rest of us to motivate us not to stray out of line. It is similar to how student debt is used - get 'em on payments and they will be more pliant. Nasty money can do, and does, very nasty things.

Monday, March 14, 2022

Public money - spent. That's a lot, for so little.

 Two million per month. Read all about it.

Well. There is a lot of Pompeo to protect. Still. Didn't they teach being in shape - at West Point, back then?

When, exactly, did heroin addiction become "opiate use disorder?" Or is that just Seattle Times indulging in jounalistic euphemism? As political correctness, it sucks.

 Link. Heroin addiction was a suitable explanatory name for being addicted to use of heroin. Now, not so?

"Journalistic euphemism?" That is now the suitably correct term for use in place of "sugar coating."

Give me a break.

Issue One has an expansive blipartisan membership list. On it's "latest" is a link to a Feb. post of The Hill, on politician stock trading.

 Issue One, homepage.

Many people in the Reformers Caucus: https://issueone.org/projects/reformers-caucus/

After seeing that page online, checking links, the site's "latest" page links here::

https://thehill.com/policy/finance/594895-congressional-stock-trading-ban-must-include-spouses-lawmakers-say 

That item went online Feb. 18, 2022.

My oh my, it seems Ukraine days later took over the news.

In ending, The Hill's item includes a sensible Pelosi observation, inconsequential unless there is follow-up, and continuing focus -

Earlier this month, Pelosi said that she would be open to a stock trading ban after previously opposing the effort. She directed Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), chairwoman of the House Administration Committee, to get started on a stock trading bill that would include increased transparency around Supreme Court justices’ financial transactions.

Spanberger said Friday that while she is supportive of government-wide reforms, she doesn’t want the bill to have a “poison pill” that would slow down the process. She and Roy called on House leaders to allow a vote on their bill and give members an opportunity to offer amendments.

“Let's police ourselves first, let’s hold ourselves to the highest standard first, and then we take the next look at who comes next,” Spanberger said.

Pelosi might want an expansion to where all of DC has scrutiny, the more the merrier. But - what's that about no poison pill? 

And what's new in Ukraine? The invasion was launched Feb. 24, 2022

I.e., within a week of The Hill noting that freshman Reps were keen on "Let's police ourselves first." 

Since Feb. 24 - what's the news been about putting legislative feet to the fire over trading trends? Gee. Preempted. Ukraine suffers. Trading continues?

UPDATE: Same day as the item about the Spanberger-Roy bill, "On The Money — Fed puts strict limits on trades by top officials." 

If a cabal of bankers running a game for the benefit of bankers can at least pose as responsible, what is delaying Congress? Weak will? No such will at all, as a majority rule? What?

MN CD1 Special Election - Strib identifies Carnahan as a candidate. As of date/time of this post, the SoS site does not list Carnahan. Tomorrow is the filing deadline.

SoS special election page. Many, but not yet Carnahan.

Strib.

This has to be some kind of a joke. Vegas should be taking bets on who she dredges up as "Campaign Manager." 

Name recognition? Yes. Cred? You decide.

Strib wrote:

While Carnahan is a well known name in the Minnesota GOP ranks, her candidacy comes with significant baggage. Calls for her resignation as the state party's leader started last August after a major GOP donor she was close with, Anton "Tony" Lazzaro, was arrested on federal sex-trafficking charges.

In the days that followed, allegations emerged about a toxic work environment and unchecked sexual harassment under her watch. Carnahan resigned as party chair under pressure that same month and was set to receive around $38,000 in severance.

Do you suppose that is how Carnahan's Linked In page reads?

Ending its post, Strib wrote:

Voters have two chances to send someone to Washington, first in an August special to fill the remainder of Hagedorn's term and then again in November's general election for a full term under the new redistricting lines. A primary for the special election is set for May 24.

Other candidates on the Republican side include former United States Department of Agriculture official Brad Finstad, state Reps. Jeremy Munson and Nels Pierson and attorney Matt Benda.

Democrats who've filed to run for the special election include Richard Painter, an ethics lawyer who worked for the George W. Bush administration, former political consultant Sarah Brakebill-Hacke and former Hormel Foods CEO Jeff Ettinger.

 Is there a massive outcry, "Jennifer - Do It!"? Seemingly not.

This news awaits seeing, for certain, that a timely filing with the SoS follows the announcement. 

Campaign Treasurer?

A possibility - Carnahan defers on the special election, aiming instead at the November full term election rather than jumping into a contest to finish the Hagedorn term. That is ambiguous, given Strib's opening paragraphs -

The former chair of Minnesota's Republican Party is running for Congress just months after fellow GOP leaders helped force her from power.

Jennifer Carnahan announced Monday she is running in the First District Congressional race in hopes of winning the southern Minnesota seat her late husband Jim Hagedorn held.

The report does not state whether she'd seek the special election nod, or defer and go for the seat in November. Do we care? 

UPDATE: Opening PiPress' homepage, searching = Carnahan

Nothing. 

Minn Post's Glean, here, with a pic of the widow, references Politico as its source.

Politico 3/11/2022 headline

"House GOP winces as Hagedorn's scandal-plagued widow eyes his empty seat"

Text from Politico:

The late GOP Rep. Jim Hagedorn’s widow is laying the groundwork to try to seek his old seat in Minnesota, according to multiple well-placed Republicans who are already raising alarms about her polarizing background.

Republicans are preparing for Jennifer Carnahan to launch her campaign for Minnesota’s 1st District as early as Friday, entering a special election already shaping up to be crowded and competitive with a vow to carry on her late husband’s legacy. Carnahan would bring more than ties to Hagedorn, who died last month after battling kidney cancer since 2019 — she’s a former state GOP chair.

But Carnahan resigned the Minnesota Republican chair position last summer amid a scandal that began when a donor got charged with multiple counts of sex trafficking. She’s starting her Hill outreach early: House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy confirmed to POLITICO that he and Carnahan spoke by phone this week, a day after Hagedorn’s Tuesday memorial service in Virginia.

Whether that effort gets her past the GOP’s privately held anxiety over her checkered record is another matter.

“I think she has a lot of unresolved political baggage that will put the congressional district in play for the Democrats,” said Michael Brodkorb, a former deputy chair of the Minnesota GOP who also spoke out after her resignation. He added that a Carnahan bid “will also bring an unnecessary level of drama and resurface some unresolved issues” that the party would otherwise like to leave in the past.

When asked whether Carnahan expressed her intent to run for her late husband’s seat during their call, McCarthy didn’t answer yes or no. She also spoke Wednesday to Pennsylvania Rep. GT Thompson, the top Republican on the House Agriculture Committee; Hagedorn previously served on the panel, an assignment critical to his district. Thompson said Carnahan did not mention plans to run for the seat. He’s already endorsed Brad Finstad, another Republican in the race with an agriculture-heavy resume.

Asked for comment on her potential plans to run, as well as closed-door GOP anxiety over her bid, Carnahan also didn’t confirm a bid — but did push back at her critics.

“Strong leaders frequently end up with enemies. You could pick almost any Member out of the Congressional register and come up with similar attacks,” Carnahan wrote to POLITICO. “I suggest you look at the history of Michael Brodkorb and his credibility as an accuser. I made and maintain many great friendship[s] from my service in the Republican Party of Minnesota.”

She did not respond when pressed for specifics about her claims of Brodkorb’s past. Carnahan also pointed to laudatory remarks that South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem offered for a Minnesota GOP dinner in March 2021.

“What I love about Jennifer is, she’s not a poser. She’s not a fake,” Noem said in a video recorded for the event. “She is leading your state with grace, dignity and a lot of grit in her belly.”

Asked for comment on her previous remarks about Carnahan, made before the Lazzaro scandal, Noem said in a statement: “I’ll let the people of her district decide if she is qualified to serve them.” Noem is not expected to endorse any candidates in the race.

"Grit in her belly." There are meds you can take for that. 

With grace and dignity. 

Making the MN GOP Great Again? A developing story.

FURTHER: FOX clarifies, quoting in pieces what appears to be a complete Carnahan press release. Below, as a single item, per FOX 

"I am proud to announce my candidacy to represent Minnesota’s First Congressional District. Though my heart is still heavy after Jim’s passing, the encouragement I have received from throughout southern Minnesota has inspired me to carry on his legacy by running to complete the remainder of his term," Carnahan wrote in a news release first provided to Fox News Digital. 

"In the final weeks before his passing, Jim told me to keep forging ahead, to keep reaching my dreams, and to win this seat," Carnahan added. "Jim was my best friend and the love of my life, and it is his blessing that strengthens me for the challenges ahead. I am committed to continuing my husband’s legacy of fighting to secure the border, defending conservative values, safeguarding the integrity of our elections, and serving the people of Minnesota’s First Congressional District."

"During the Trump administration we saw economic and regulatory reform, US energy independence, trade deals like the USMCA - initiatives that created jobs and provided opportunity to people across the country - including right here in southern Minnesota," Carnahan added. "Jim and I saw the rest of President Trump’s conservative vision stonewalled by the left and some in the Washington establishment. While DC insiders are lining their pockets; hard working Minnesotans are languishing beneath record inflation, a lawless border and higher input costs for agriculture, impacting all of America."

"I am running to disrupt the status quo and get Washington working for the people again," she said.

"Like President Trump, I am a businesswoman and fighter," Carnahan declared. "Here in Minnesota, I disrupted the status quo and brought the Republican Party back to relevance. Now, I ask for the support of southern Minnesota to do the same in Washington."

". . . to complete the remainder of his term . . ." FOX wrote, quoting the lengthy press release. Meaning a final filing days candidacy submission to the SoS.

The dead man said it should be me, that theme just seems jangley and inappropriate. Running out of personal ambition, okay. Riding coat tails of Trump and the dead Rep - too much, or not?

One has to guess whether the thirty-eight grand's been spent, or whether all or a major part will finance the candidacy. It and an inheritance. 

FURTHER: As part of things, Salon, Aug 27, 2021. Times during Carnahan's being pressured to step down were tense and accusations existed. Four prominent Republican activists did write a joint letter.

FURTHER: There is much still online about the buildup and circumstances of the Carnahan resignation; e.g., this. After all that happened then, Carnahan has chosen to seek the CD1 seat, now, in what is a short time distance from the turmoil. The paycheck is good, the approbation and attention a member of Congress gains is an ego boost. Carnahan's press release mentions a will and desire to serve the district as her motivation, along with a will to continue things she says Jim Hagedorn priortized. The guess here is her candidacy will trail other GOP people seeking the seat. All for now.

Ramsey, Anoka County: If it snows on Pi Day, that means two more months of winter weather.

 Keep your groundhog. This is Pi Day. And it snows, as these words are typed.

Sunday, March 13, 2022

Clarence Thomas is as bad as it gets. Having had a play in Gore v. Bush, he talks of politicization of the Supremes. Curiously, he seems to have little to say against spousal influence peddling. Perhaps, an outlook may be voiced there, another day.

 Anita Hill came across as trustworthy and believable. I have always felt she was telling the truth. That was yesterday.

Today - John Danforth's backed nominee, vetted by a committee chaired by Joe Biden, must be the longest tenured seat holder on the Court.

Today - Thomas continues to sit the seat previously held by Thurgood Marshall. Marshall was the first black person to be on the Court, and was universally respected as of a fair opinion. Marshall had a distinguished legal career before being nominated by President Johnson, having been an NAACP appellate litigator. He argued and won Brown v Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas. Thomas was a Republican-appointed EEOC head before Danforth moved to advance his career, and while at EEOC Thomas was accused by Anita Hill, (and three other witnesses Joe Biden did not schedule to testify in the Thomas hearing), of sexual harassment while Hill was employed at the Thomas-led EEOC, the federal organization intended to police employment misconduct. 

Today - Strib's carry of an AP feed is titled, "Justice Thomas slams cancel culture, 'packing' Supreme Court". Opening paragraph:

SALT LAKE CITY — U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said he's concerned efforts to politicize the court or add additional justices may erode the institution's credibility, speaking Friday in Utah at an event hosted by former Republican U.S. Sen. Orrin Hatch's foundation.

Really. "The institution's credibilty." Thomas. Him. Saying that. 

Strib continued -

"You can cavalierly talk about packing or stacking the court. You can cavalierly talk about doing this or doing that. At some point the institution is going to be compromised," he told an audience of about 500 people at an upscale hotel in Salt Lake City.

"By doing this, you continue to chip away at the respect of the institutions that the next generation is going to need if they're going to have civil society," Thomas said.

Anita Hill had earned respect. Respect does not attach to where you sit, it attaches to who you are and have been. When people accord respect, it is a subjective thing. It is not because you sit in a high chair with a robe on.

After those three opening paragraphs - I read no further. The link has been provided in opening this post. Read as much of the linked item as you care to read.

Perhaps this post merits an update. About the spousal thing. Or something else. However, all for now.