Monday, August 31, 2026

Who might be missing from within this photo, but be part of the story? [UPDATED]

Trump, the US and a Blackout: What Cut Off Venezuela's Grid?

Experts Say Grid Disruption Amid Venezuela Operation Signals Cyber's Expanding Role

 

Trump, the US and a Blackout: What Cut Off Venezuela's Grid?

 Guessing Hint One.

Guessing Hint Two.

All I can do is guess. Might there be recent news perhaps touching those two Wiki items? That consideration would be for another post. After a day or two where readers might look online on their own first. Might Marco Rubio be running a [fuguratuve] prostitution ring from Miami? Recruiting [figurative] whores? Involving whoever. With ties to where ever? And [figurative] usage suggests that Rubio's portfolio is Foreign Policy, so that's then speculating what's Trump aims and actions toward Valenzuela these days which might guide Marco? As to what relations in particular he'd want his friends to have in that nation, friends from inside it, friends from outside it, what ties? 

What current news might one look toward?

Again, we're all just guessing, each as we might. 

 _________________UPDATE______________

This firm was mentioned in one of the Wiki hints: https://www.proenergyservices.com/news-and-events/press-room/ 

It seems a technical consultancy and infrastructure provider for turbine generation development, which might be lower capital cost for an installation but higher operating cost. What might appeal to nations short on capital but with turbine-firing energy sourcing. And if an intermediary "negotiation" firm might be short on technical expertise, long on personal connections, it would be backup on the tech end.

Not to imply or suggest that ProEnergy has any tie to the post's opening story line, in its engineering of third-world power solutions. And while DOJ had a look, per the one wiki, no charges were filed. 

It goes on doing business good for the USA.

 ___________FURTHER UPDATE__________

ProEnergy has a wiki entry, which mentions " involvement in developing plants with Derwick Associates in Venezuela." Also, "ProEnergy Services is an American, Missouri-based energy company that provides third party services for energy and manufacturing firms, including construction, management, operations, maintenance, and repair services for energy generation facilities, and equipment in several industries. ProEnergy offers over 200 energy and industrial related services with clients in forty nations around the world, including Argentina, Venezuela, Brazil, Panama, Pakistan and Angola." 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/report-controversial-billionaire-brokers-venezuelas-214857424.html 

https://www.facebook.com/financialtimes/posts/alejandro-betancourt-the-man-who-would-be-trumps-viceroy-in-venezuela/1482300387276667/ 

https://en.cibercuba.com/noticias/2026-08-29-u1-e199894-s27061-nid339011-trump-anuncia-mayor-acuerdo-petrolero-historia-eeuu 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alejandro_Betancourt_L%C3%B3pez 

All for now. 

FURTHER: Accessing Crunchbase a bit, this

The owner of ProEnergy Services is Energy Capital Partners, which acquired the company on September 5, 2024. ProEnergy Services is an American energy company that provides third-party services for energy and manufacturing firms, headquartered in Sedalia, Missouri, United State 

Earlier through Crunchbase, the privately held ProEnergy Services firm seems, through intermediary Provate Equity, to trace ultimately to a UK entity. Possibly beyond?

Old news. Last December. 

Current news. Aug. 27, 2026. 

And Venezuela oil is viscous and sour, not North Sea Brent Crude. We'll see. But that's a step away from how did the US War Machine know how to shut down the Caracas power while snatching Maduro.

Several steps. 

FURTHER: Try another step, make it the last step = guess who - 

Oil in Venezuela, research in Cuba: Inside Epstein’s ties to Latin America

May 28, 2026 by Shirsho Dasgupta Miami Herald (TNS)

[...]

During a Nov. 19, 2012, lunch meeting with Epstein, D'Agostino discussed a business opportunity with him -- oil.

The correspondence and a copy of a nondisclosure agreement reviewed by the Herald show that the discussion was about Venezuelan company Derwick Associates' joint venture with PDVSA to explore the oil fields along the Orinoco River in the southern part of the country -- the largest petroleum reserves in the world.

Derwick Associates' chairman is Alejandro Betancourt López, whom D'Agostino introduced to Epstein.

The records suggest that one of the topics of discussion at D'Agostino's meeting with Epstein was the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a federal law aimed at preventing the bribery of foreign officials for business gain.

Two years later, the Wall Street Journal reported that the Justice Department was probing Derwick's business dealings in Venezuela for potential corruption -- an allegation that Derwick has denied. The Manhattan district attorney's office was also investigating the company for potential violations of New York banking laws, the report said.

In 2017, the Venezuelan regime, having passed into Maduro's hands after Chávez's death, also announced an investigation into the company for the "spectacular overpricing" of Orinoco oil contracts, according to Reuters.

[...]  

Earlier - 

A ‘fun’ friendship: Emails in Epstein files detail his links to Venezuela’s elite By Antonio María Delgado and Ana Claudia Chacin February 17, 2026 1:25 PM

[...]

In another email, D’Agostino outlined a series of introductions he could arrange for Epstein during a proposed trip to Venezuela — a list that reads like a cross-section of the country’s power structure at the height of Chávez’s influence. 

He proposed meetings with Baldo Sansó, described as a financial advisor to PDVSA and brother-in-law of then–oil minister Rafael Ramírez; General Alejandro Andrade, head of Venezuela’s treasury and a close Chávez ally; and Jorge Hernández, whom he characterized as “one of Chavez closest friends.” 

He also mentioned Yuchi Chen, described as the Chinese government’s representative in Venezuela overseeing bilateral agreements — a key role at a time when Beijing was extending billions of dollars in oil-backed loans to Caracas. 

Beyond political insiders, D’Agostino suggested introductions to major private-sector figures, including telecom executives Eduardo Stigol of Intercable and Oswaldo Cisneros of Digitel — whom he described as “probably the wealthiest Venezuelan” — as well as banker José María Nogueroles, owner of BNC, the institution D’Agostino indicated they were interested in acquiring. 

He also highlighted Alejandro Betancourt, co-founder of Derwick Associates, noting that the then-34-year-old businessman had secured more than $3 billion in government contracts and calling him a “very very interesting kid.” 

[Screenshot of e-mail correspondence sent to Jeffrey Epstein from Francisco D’Agostino, included in the Department of Justice’s release of the Epstein files. Screenshot of e-mail correspondence sent to Jeffrey Epstein from Francisco D’Agostino, included in the Department of Justice’s release of the Epstein files.] 

The breadth of names — spanning oil, finance, telecommunications, banking, the military and Chinese state interests — underscores the level of access D’Agostino was signaling he could provide as he courted Epstein’s business. 

In a Nov. 6, 2012, email, he wrote: “Alejandro Betancourt, my business partner, and I are available to meet you Monday November 19th. Shall we have lunch? Your place?” 

Though they floated several dates for possible meetings in Caracas, it remains unclear whether Epstein ever made it.

[...] In 2019, both D’Agostino and Epstein came under scrutiny from U.S. authorities. The U.S. Treasury Department sanctioned D’Agostino for allegedly operating in Venezuela’s oil sector and materially assisting PDVSA after Washington imposed sweeping restrictions on the industry. 

“D’Agostino was designated today for operating in the oil sector of the Venezuelan economy and because he has materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for goods and services to back PDVSA,” Treasury said at the time. 

Epstein was arrested the same year by federal authorities for charges related to alleged sexual abuse years earlier at Epstein’s homes in Palm Beach and Manhattan.


Coincidental circumstances exist, according to web info, including Trump telling Bondi friends would get trouble if full Epstein files were released. No online source seems to indicate any such "friends" by name. 

Although there has been speculation, no "Epstein List" has been found. Epstein's hanging death, happened, and MTG and others thereafter made Epstein matters a cause to explore.

FURTHER: Betencort and Derwick are mentioned here.

Derwick Associates’ chairman is Alejandro Betancourt López, whom D’Agostino introduced to Epstein. 

The records suggest that one of the topics of discussion at D’Agostino’s meeting with Epstein was the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a federal law aimed at preventing the bribery of foreign officials for business gain. 

[image omitted]

Two years later, the Wall Street Journal reported that the Justice Department was probing Derwick’s business dealings in Venezuela for potential corruption — an allegation that Derwick has denied. The Manhattan district attorney’s office was also investigating the company for potential violations of New York banking laws, the report said. 

In 2017, the Venezuelan regime, having passed into Maduro’s hands after Chávez’s death, also announced an investigation into the company for the “spectacular overpricing” of Orinoco oil contracts, according to Reuters. 

The U.S. imposed sanctions on D’Agostino in 2021 for coordinating the trade of Venezuelan oil on behalf of PDVSA, which it accused of being the Maduro regime’s “primary conduit for corruption to exploit and profit from Venezuela’s natural resources.” The Trump administration lifted the sanctions against D’Agostino last year. 

“I met Mr. Epstein only a few times to discuss business opportunity in Venezuela oil sector that did not materialize [sic],” D’Agostino said in a statement to the Herald. “I decided not to engage in any dealings with Mr. Epstein subsequently.” 

Betancourt’s Miami-based attorney told the Herald that D’Agostino had introduced his client to Epstein but that Betancourt never did business with him and did not attend the November meeting. 

“After the initial introduction, Mr. Betancourt never spoke to or corresponded with Epstein, nor did Epstein ever invest with my client,” he said. “Mr. Betancourt had no relationship with Epstein, business or personal.” 

The Justice Department and the Manhattan district attorney’s office did not answer the Herald’s questions about whether Epstein was also part of their probes into Derwick.

Federal officers arrested Epstein in July 2019 on sex-trafficking charges. He was found dead in federal custody in Lower Manhattan a month later on Aug. 10, 2019.


[links in the original were lost in doing a text copy]

So Epstein was disavowed by the Betencort camp. Nothing Crabgrass found online contradicts the disavowal.

Betencort is now a focal part of the vehicle by which Trump is artfully dealing in Venezuelan oil ostensibly for the benefit of the USA. Epstein remains dead. End of story.

 

Friday, August 28, 2026

An isolated thought about Trump's trade war on Canada; its effect on Joe Public.

 They, the Canadians, export toilet paper to the USA. Food prices up. Now Trump piles tariff shade on you more ways than you might have thought. With Food and TP he gets you coming and going.

 

 

Putting toxic chemicals on the grassroots.

 Below, I write a bit about Jarad Kushner + Hakim Jeffires doing a meet and greet over common ground.

A perfectly expected thing, that some cluck about. Always, there will be a dissatisfied few. There are disquieting voices, that's been known for some time.

Then it seems video turns up that has no connection to why they'd meet, and now, two more, here and here. I must be really bad at searching for meaningful video content. Probably best to stick with mainstream coverage, because of its diversity and depth of communication of ideas and causal speculation you find there.

Lesson learned. My bad.

And then there is my incomprehension of the motives of critics of Ken Martin. Compare his money tree chops with the other party, it's an eye opener of what's wrong with Martin. Isn't it obvious? Not something two busy people would be taking time to discuss. But, for each, Jeffires and Kushner, it touches, possibly, their common ground. They do I believe know who Martin is.

I just wish I understood the world better.

 

 

I admit to my own limitations as an elderly person, facing death soon enough, after having lived different places and seen different things. So, readers, help me to understand.

 There is an arguably interesting video, here, and I fail to see it relating in any way to the meeting between Hakeem Jeffries and Jarad Kushner. Which is why I mention the two in a single post. No connection whatsoever.

Some people expressed outrage, two people, one in government, one without any express governmental official title or specified duties. One needing his paycheck the other connected to a monarch, Saudi, and a would-be monarch, USA. And the video, talking of liberal and fascist meeting of minds.

And then that video, a skeptic and an idealist, wholly diffeent from Kushner and Jeffries where no idealism was involved. 

Both sides of the aisle! 

ABC - with an image - and "COMMON GROUND" the headline says but they differ, the two

Jeffries told ABC News in a statement, "Throughout this Congress, Republicans have adopted a my-way-or-the-highway approach to governing that has failed the American people. To stop the madness, we have repeatedly made clear that an extremist approach will not work and will be met with forceful opposition. The American people want bold change and that’s what House Democrats will deliver. In every conversation that we have with the Trump administration, we will continue to make it explicitly clear that the affordability crisis is not a hoax and nothing short of transformational policy change is acceptable. We are fighting for an affordable America. The question is whether Republicans will join us."

The timing of the talks is striking. The midterms are less than 75 days away and Republicans are facing headwinds in recent polls. Democrats feel cautiously optimistic about their chances of taking the House and Jeffries would be in line to be the next speaker.

MSN carrying CNN - with an image

House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries is defending himself after facing some criticism over his meeting with Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump’s son-in-law and close adviser.

Jeffries recently met with Kushner privately in New York to discuss ways the White House can collaborate with Democrats on key issues, such as immigration, housing and the cost of living, a source familiar with the meeting told CNN.

The minority leader said Tuesday on CNN’s “The Situation Room,” “We have a responsibility to solve problems and sometimes that means meeting with people on the other side of the aisle to figure out what the opportunities will be in order to address the things that the American people definitively want us to address, which from our standpoint, is the reality that the cost of living in this country is way too high.”

When asked by Wolf Blitzer if anything was accomplished in the meeting, Jeffries said, “No, it was just a high-level, topical conversation.”

Having differentiated coverage of events in our nation is a benefit of our having multiple recognized news outlets of merit. We can see that. And from having two reports with images, we can see a pattern that Kushner ties his tie tighter.

He does. Check the two differing images in the links. It is a clear difference. The images prove what's there to see. You cannot miss the difference.

 

Thursday, August 27, 2026

QCTV has posted MN SD 31 and SD 34 candidate forum video. Which includes the House Districts A and B for each SD.

 https://qctv.org/elections/

 Readers in Norway or Singapore may enjoy seeing how politics is local and handled in the Minnesota Twin Cities north metro area. Peoplers living there who will vote to decide who will represent their interests in the state legislature, in turn, need to see what's there to choose from. 

It is how it works.

It is praisworthy that candidate forum events are held, and then available for home viewing by QCTV.

People of many kinds always say transparency in government is a good thing. But those really believing that will take the time to view candidate foura. (forums?) They are imperfect but better than nothing.

Later but before the general election the LWV - League of Women Voters - will keep up their tradition of holding pre-election candidate forums, so this is not a one shot thing but rather multiple chances to see people wanting our votes answer the questions being asked. 

It is better the more events of this kind are held. There are too few, not too many.

================================= 

One thing, concerning the Republican "fraud" song and dance - where did that $9 billion claimed number come from that the one HD 31B candidate glibly sang out as if it were some kind of FACT? 

Nobody has yes stood up to a microphone and tried to justify that absurdly high fictional number. 

We'll see. Somebody at some point will loudly and publicly call that Emperor as butt-naked, so to speak

I await that heppening.. 

Where will the glib Republicans then find themselves repeating the number and then when called for proof having to say, well a federal prosecutor said that number once, a couple did, and we're running with it as if true. We have little else to tout. A bad war and high prices? And attacking Canada? Tariff mischief that consumers end up paying? Let's try to sell "fraud."

 

Monday, August 24, 2026

MN Senate District 31 candidates will debate, in Andover, MN, this evening - tonight. QCTV will broadcast it.

 The notice was by email today. 

See our Candidates in Action Tonight!

(August 24th)

North Metro Mayors Legislative Forum

Andover City Hall

5:30 PM

The North Metro Mayors Association candidate legislative forums continues on Monday. The series of forums starts at 5:30 p.m. on Monday, August 24, at Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, MN 55304. Arrive at 5:00 p.m. It's a great opportunity to hear directly from our legislative candidates before the November 3rd, Election Day.

SD31A, House at 5:30. Brian Walker (D) and Harry Niska (R)

SD31B, House at 6:00. Jen Bloomquist (D) and Peggy Scott (R)

SD31, Senate at 6:30. Gadisa Berkessa (D) and Calvin Bahr (R)

The public is invited to attend in person.  Please come to Andover City Hall to support our 3 great candidates!

The forum will also be broadcast live on QCTV, and will be recorded, and will stream live on their YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/@qctv?si=q95LiD3SRVsOmXAq

THANK YOU-- See you there!

SD31 DFL Communications

sd31dfl@gmail.com

While the email was from being on the DFL mailing list the guess is that SD 31 Republicans will be getting the word out also, to those on their mailing list.

It will be good to see Niska and Walker talking. Each is a clear and direct mind, each seeing things differently in ways they should clearly delineate. Ditto, for the other candidates.

UPDATE: Related, a site that says nonpartisan, but about Minnesota's candidates:

https://election2026.net/minnesota-2026/ 

related: https://quarex.org/  

FURTHER: Many a slip twixt cut and lip. No QCTV live broadcast, at 5:30 pm

wtf, I don't know. The hope is that QCTV  is there, and recording, but not doing a live broadcast.

For that we wait until tomorrow morning to see. 

NOT MY FAULT. SOMEBODY'S FAULT. NOT MINE 

Next Morning, 8-25-2026 - Strike out - not posted at QCTV - worth another look mid-day. 

 

 

MinnPost covers the Walz BWCA protective executive order (whatever he calls it that's what it is).

 https://www.minnpost.com/state-government/2026/08/walz-halts-state-action-on-mine-near-boundary-waters-but-federal-process-stays-on-track/

 The U.S. is a Constitutional federal power among the several states, each of which has its own power.

Hence a balance of power, or a two-horse carriage, however you view it. In the two-horse analogy, the carriage does not go smoothly if the horses each is of its own mind, and do not pull together.

MinnPost wrote: 

Gov. Tim Walz’s decision to use his authority to halt all state permitting of a proposed Twin Metals copper-nickel mine in the Boundary Waters will not stop the federal government from considering new permits for the project.

That’s because the proposed mine site is on federal land in Superior National Forest and Congress in April lifted a federal moratorium on any sulfide mining in that area.

So, Twin Metals can pursue a restoration of federal leases that were cancelled by the Biden administration, and if they are obtained, the federal government can move forward with its environmental review of the project.

“The state government cannot prevent the federal government from issuing leases and conducting an environmental review,” said Becky Rom, the national chair of Save the Boundary Waters. “And you might see these leases issued without consideration of science.”

Yet, the plan Twin Metals has to mine copper and nickel in the Boundary Waters is a two-track process. On the state’s track, Walz, in his waning days in office, used his executive powers to put down a clear marker of where the state stands on the issue of nonferrous mining in the Boundary Waters’ watershed.

Brad Karkkainen, an authority on environmental and natural resources law at the University of Minnesota, said Congress voted to end a moratorium on mining that had been established by a rule issued by the U.S. Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management.

“The congressional action removed federal impediments to mining development in or near  the Boundary Waters,” Karkkainen said. “It does not compel mining development, nor does it override the state’s concurrent and independent authority to issue or deny permits for any new mines within the state of Minnesota.”

Julie Lucas, executive director of Mining Minnesota, an industry trade group, called Walz’s executive order “a political decision dressed up as an environmental one, and Minnesotans deserve to know the difference.”

The difference is political rhetoric, when the reeach of the power is the question. More: 

“The governor’s own Department of Natural Resources concluded a six-year legal review that considered more than 4,000 public comments and the most current science available, and ruled definitively that Minnesota’s nonferrous mining regulations are strong enough to protect the Boundary Waters and its watershed,” Lucas said in a statement. 

Walz’s order also instructs the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to draft legislation to be considered by the next session of the state legislature that would ban sulfide mining in the watershed.

Legislation aimed at protecting the Boundary Waters has failed to win approval in the past. 

Still, the governor’s actions, which included halting all state government work on environmental reviews or permitting work on mining proposals while litigation over state mining regulations is ongoing, is a new chapter in a continuing battle over the future of copper-nickel mining in the state. 

The two carriage horses will not pull together. 

Sarah Strommen, commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, acknowledged the federal government is moving on a different track. But she said the state would not cooperate with the federal government’s review in any way. 

“It’s important to note that while the federal government cannot unilaterally authorize a mine to begin construction, it can begin its environmental review process and may ask DNR to be what is referred to as a cooperating agency … it would not be prudent for the DNR to participate as a cooperating agency in any federal environmental review” she said. 

At a press conference Tuesday in Ely, Walz said he is confident his executive order will  withstand any challenge.

“This is solid,” he said. “As I said, we’ve done the legal work.” 

Joshua Huder, an expert on separation of powers at Georgetown University, said this is likely a case “where state law and federal law overlap, meaning Walz may be able to put in place a ban even if Congress has prohibited the Department of Interior from keeping its ban on the books.”

Nevertheless, Walz expects a blustery and hyperbolic response from the Trump administration, which he threw a zinger at in his press conference Tuesday. 

“These people can’t manage a reflecting pool, so why would we think they could manage this mine?” he said.

The bottom line, he added, is “there’s nothing they can do about it.” 

The state is using its "nuclear option" for the remainder of the Walz term. Ramsey's former mayor, Strommen, is in tune with her boss. And will serve as DNR head until a new person may be appointed. 

Rep. Pete Stauber, R-8th District, who sponsored the legislation to lift the  federal moratorium on mining in the watershed, said in a statement that it order [sic] is “radical” and “job killing.”

“Simply put, the governor’s executive order is an outright war on Northern Minnesota and our way of life,” he said.

They are special up there on the Iron Range, you do know that? 

Walz’s successor will decide whether to keep the executive order, which sunsets 90 days after the governor leaves office, or scrap it.

[...] Environmental groups and tribal leaders, meanwhile, applauded Walz’s  announcement.

“Walz made it clear that federal overreach will not decide the fate of Minnesota’s waters,” stated Chris Knopf, executive director of Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness. “He defended what is best about this state. This is the kind of action a governor is remembered for.”

At the very least, Walz’s order pauses what was already going to be a lengthy timeline for copper-nickel mine permitting in Minnesota. Even proponents of the project have said they expected years or even more than a decade to pass before mining got up and running.

So. Stalemate. Restart the tournament with this stage being neither for nor against a contestant. Just like a stalemate in chess.

Pop the popcorn, while Tofoya and Lisa Demuth each articulates her crystal clear governing heart-felt position on the question of protecting the drinking water, the outfitter economic bloc up north, and tribal treaty rights where the fishing and wild rice harvesting are mooted by poisoned water.

Each will of course be eager to be detailed and specific and to not leave policy positions to guesswork. Sure. 

No equivocating or gaslighting. Pure and simple answers, eagerly given. Sure. 

Klobuchar too, must not try a straddle. We know already Flanagan, wanting to be the first female tribe member in the Senate feels the land beneath her feet, and sees the water as of critical importance.  Amy, however, will need at some point to respond without equivocation. When, that's her call, but election day is her deadline.

 

AP reports on latest Scott Bessant news regarding Iran and expansion of sanctions against it.

 Strangely, China is mentioned only once, in passing, while China clearly is a factor.

https://apnews.com/article/iran-rial-currency-bessent-trade-august-24-2026-e367634d8853c8fa4a341132cd577f31 

In part:

“We are level-setting with every country to tell them our expectations. We know who they are. They know who they are,” Bessent told a news conference. “So when the hammer of U.S. Treasury actions falls upon them, they will have no one to blame but themselves.”

Washington has promised the new sanctions would put even more pressure on an Iranian economy already battered by previous sanctions and a U.S. naval blockade. But the announcement Monday provided little detail and did not name which countries could face secondary sanctions. China, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates are Iran’s largest trade partners.

Bessent said Trump has been “making phone calls to world leaders with specific requests to cease their interactions” with Iran and has already seen results. The UAE announced last week that it was suspending all trade, commercial exchanges and financial transactions with Iran until further notice after a reported missile attack on the Gulf country.

“I am confident the president, as you all know, is quite persuasive,” Bessent said, adding that the UAE decision was “not a coincidence.”

Arm twisting China is unlikely. Others might step into line because they know Trump is an SOB of unequaled magnitude. Not that Bessant is any better. More excerpting -

Pakistani delegation visits Iran

Pakistan, which played a key role in brokering a 60-day ceasefire in June, sent a high-level delegation to Iran on Monday to encourage the U.S. and Iran to return to negotiations, two senior officials said. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media on the record.

The military confirmed only Field Marshal Asim Munir’s visit, saying it was aimed at de-escalating tensions in the region.

Trump spoke with Munir ahead of the army chief’s visit to Iran, according to a person familiar with the discussion.

So, will it be another bluff, or will there be teeth to the threat? Iran has weapons which could reach regional U.S. oil company assets, and they are the closest of cronies to Trump, so a threat of retaliation there should be expected to affect things.

Last, does Trump really want the current economic situation to change? His oil buddies are gaining record profits, and that's something Trump can chew on before rocking the current stalemate boat.

The guess here, nothing of consequence will result. More bluff and buff, no real will toward any short term change. China needs oil and Iran is positioned to yield China a favorable discount per barrel.

The Carney - Canada situation is more interesting. Canada, long term, will have to reach out, and new Canadian alliances will not dissolve later just because Trump must exit the White House. Trust is a factor and once Canada has formed what it sees as trustworthy new dependencies, it will not come back.

The bridge has been burned. There will still be cross border trade, but Canada will diversify, and like it. 

UPDATE: A Crabgrass bet, it will be a while before robotaxies of Teslas will be operational in Vancouver, Winnipeg, Toronto, or Montreal. In part because of winter climate and battery chemistry, a matter affecting Minnesota too, but then also, China could look to Canada as it has to Mexico and South America, as a potential foreign plant locale. Jobs to Canada, via a trade war from Trump.

Why not? 

 

AOL is still alive, and it seems sometimes has an interesting perspective on events as they happen.

 https://www.aol.com/articles/republicans-turn-trumps-canadian-tariffs-122628000.html

 Trade with that long contiguous border, and then Trump thinks he's hot shit, and pulls tariffs from where?

Republicans turn on Trump's Canadian tariffs as businesses forced to 'pass on' cost to residents

The Mirror
Maria Villarroel

 In part:

Tensions among Republicans are on the rise as many question President Donald Trump's economic agenda, such as launching a trade war with Canada over the weekend. Some fear the move could impact the GOP’s chances of winning big in November.

The U.S. and Canada fell deeper into a trade war on Saturday, as each side blamed the other for the collapse of negotiations in Washington, leading the U.S. to impose 50% tariffs on $20 billion worth of Canadian goods and Canada setting Sept. 8 as the start of its retaliatory penalties.

The move almost immediately sparked concerns among congressional Republicans, as many fear mistakes made by the president could severely affect the ongoing affordability crisis, and as a result, the outcome of the November elections.

Mark Carney's scathing attack on Trump as Canada hits back with retaliatory tariffs on US

Mark Carney's ominous warning to Donald Trump as he says Canada going to war with US over tariffs

“If the administration proceeds with these tariffs, they will increase costs for Maine families, as most businesses will have no choice but to pass on the tariffs to their customers through higher prices,” Maine Sen. Susan Collins wrote on X.

Collins also urged both sides to “return to the negotiating table” and “reach a fair agreement.”

Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) speaks with the news media outside the Kittery Trading Post, the first stop of a weekend re-election campaign bus tour of the state of Maine, on August 14, 2026 in Kittery, Maine
The move almost immediately sparked concerns among congressional Republicans, as many fear mistakes made by the president could severely affect the ongoing affordability crisis, and as a result, the outcome of the November elections -Credit:Getty Images

Similarly, adding to Republicans’ concerns is President Trump’s plan to reduce beef prices. The president announced last week that he would allow more beef to temporarily be imported into the U.S. without triggering higher tariffs.

The deal, Trump said, allows up to 300,000 metric tons of ground beef to be imported into the U.S. for the next 90 days without activating an “out of quota” tariff, which is a tax that goes into effect once a certain quantity of that product enters the country.

“We all want lower grocery prices, but as I’ve said for months, we cannot do it at the expense of American producers,” Sen. Deb Fischer, R-Neb., said in a statement. “Flooding the market with foreign beef hurts our livestock industry and undermines the long-term solution: growing the U.S. cattle herd to meet demand.”

Similarly, Sen. Tim Sheehy, R-Mont., said in a social media post just hours after Trump announced the deal that the president’s “heart is in the right place,” but importing beef will “harm our ranching families who feed the nation.”

 And Sen. Pete Ricketts, R-Neb., said that while he appreciates the administration’s focus on grocery prices, “short term policy shifts do not equal long term solutions.”

[...] President Donald Trump’s import taxes will hit about 5% of what Canada ships to the United States every year, ranging from hockey sticks to tongue depressors. Prime Minister Carney said Ottawa would respond with targeted tariff protection for industries exposed to the new U.S. duties, including some steel products. He also mentioned the dairy, appliance, agricultural equipment, pulp and paper and electronics sectors.

No further talks were planned. Whatever the eventual outcome, a loss of trust seems one of the earliest casualties.

Carney accused Washington of using “economic integration as a weapon” and [...] “You’re at war when you get attacked,” he said, adding that Canada had the reserves, resilience and plan to respond.

But to Trump’s chief trade negotiator, Jamieson Greer, the U.S. was compelled to act after a year of retaliation by its longtime partner.

Some of my friends think Trump's right, some think Carney's right. I agree with my friends. Lore on that comment attributes it first to Hubert Humphrey, but what do I know other than Susan Collins has skin in the game, and wants a game stacked to favor her, which seems to not impress Trump one iota.

 

 

Charlie Kirk just won't stay dead in peace. Things keep apace with who he was.

 MSN carrying a FOX item: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/washington-post-ordered-to-reinstate-columnist-karen-attiah-after-being-terminated-over-charlie-kirk-posts/ar-AA2aOTdB

Washington Post ordered to reinstate columnist Karen Attiah after being terminated over Charlie Kirk posts

 In part:

"Refusing to tear my clothes and smear ashes on my face in performative mourning for a White man that espoused violence is… not the same as violence," Attiah wrote at the time. In a separate post, she wrote, "Part of what keeps America so violent is the insistence that people perform care, empty goodness and absolution for White men who espouse hatred and violence.’"

Critics also slammed Attiah for misquoting Kirk in another post, attributing to him saying, "Black women do not have the brain processing power to be taken seriously. You have to go steal a White person's slot."

On a July 2023 episode of "The Charlie Kirk Show," Kirk actually said, "If we would have said three weeks ago [...] that Joy Reid and Michelle Obama, and Sheila Jackson Lee, and Ketanji Brown Jackson were affirmative-action picks, we would have been called racist. But now they're comin' out and they're saying it for us! They're comin' out, and they're saying, 'I'm only here because of affirmative action.' Yeah, we know. You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a White person's slot to go be taken somewhat seriously.

Have you heard the expression, a distinction without a difference?

That was an asshole statement by Kirk, who's made others. At the end of the carried post, MSN adds:

Original article source: Washington Post ordered to reinstate columnist Karen Attiah after being terminated over Charlie Kirk posts

Related Links:

 Criticizinng Kirk looks to be a profitable cottage industry. Not that the man was above criticism. Not that speech is a First Amendment thing.

 

My brother-in-law told me of the Krugman substack post. Searching, there's been online linking to it already. So let's have a look.

https://x.com/WalterAppling/status/2091878049151148218

https://bsky.app/profile/crof.bsky.social/post/3mttioh34e22i 

The pundits value the Krugman item as noteworthy.

Krugman, "The Moose that Roared," begins with how Trump tariff bully-aim led Canada's Conservative Party to lose an election, then -

Carney currently has 60 percent approval and 31 percent disapproval — almost exactly the opposite of Trump’s numbers.

Yet a bully refuses to learn that his actions are counterproductive and instead doubles down. So Trump persisted, most recently by imposing steep new tariffs on Canadian exports, invoking a never-before-used section of the 1930 Smoot-Hawley tariff act as legal justification. In an effort to head these new tariffs off, Canada entered negotiations with the United States, talks that for a while seemed on track to ramp down the tensions. But on Friday Canadian negotiators walked out — and the U.S.-Canada trade war is now on.

Why did the talks break down? According to U.S. officials, the Canadians made additional last-minute demands, although they offered no specifics on what these demands were. According to the Canadians, it was the Americans who suddenly changed the terms. According to the Toronto Star, Carney

was faced with a trade agreement that was suddenly transformed into an attack on Canadian sovereignty, an attempted psychological annexation that could have turned Canada into an American client state, a sort of North American Belarus.

Does anyone seriously doubt that Canada, not the Trump administration, is telling the truth?

Anyway, the trade war is now on. Who will win it?

On the face of it, the opponents — I still have to rub my eyes at the idea of Canada as an enemy — appear extremely unevenly matched. The U.S. economy is a dozen times larger than Canada’s. We buy three-quarters of their exports, while they buy only about a sixth of ours. Surely they must have much more than we do to lose from trade conflict.

Yet one clear lesson from a year and a half of Trumpian trade war is that when trade conflicts become extreme, access to crucial imports is more important than the ability to export to another country’s markets. In the case of Trump’s tariffs on China, they have been little more than an inconvenience to the Chinese economy. But China’s threat to cut off exports of rare earths is an existential threat to Western technology industries.

And the U.S. economy is far more dependent on Canadian goods than most Americans realize.

 - read the Krugman original

After a few paragrapsh highlighting examples showing the dependence, Krugman continues:

 The point is not that Canada has “escalation dominance” — the ability to retaliate to every U.S. action with an even more damaging counterreaction — in a trade conflict with the United States. Rather, the point is that an all-out trade war would create a lot of pain in the U.S. in addition to inflicting severe damage to the Canadian economy. And all indications are that the Canadians will be much more willing to bear the pain of a trade war than Americans will – especially given that the great majority of Americans are already dissatisfied with Trump’s economic management.

Despite Trump’s best efforts, only a minority of Republicans — and nobody else — has been persuaded that the Canadians are acting badly

[image omitted - see original]

On the other side, Trump has managed to convince Canadians of all political stripes that the U.S. can’t be trusted:

So, does Trump have any chance of winning his trade war with Canada?

That insight into pain and who can take it seems the focus of the balance of Krugman's pondering. With his asking, "does Trump have any chance of winning" showing a further intent to show he has none. 

Bottom lines are always nice endings of screeds, Krugman ending: 

The bottom line is that Trump is going to lose his trade war with Canada as thoroughly as he has lost his shooting war with Iran. But because he won’t face reality, trade with our northern neighbor will probably be disrupted until the narcissistic bully in the White House no longer controls trade policy.

MUSICAL CODA

Who says Canadians don’t get angry?

[ Krugman does a tune time MUSICAL CODA, the item on youtube ]

========================================== 

. . . the mess you left when you went away . . . the lady sings, Krugman doing a good tune fit 

Crabgrass suggests another video, of how Trump the bully left Canada high-and-dry to suffer

This

  TRUMP SURE KNOWS HOW TO MAKE CANADA SUFFER

*************************

Giant hat tip to Krugman and those online who posted of it and/or linked to it. For anyone not a Peter Sellers fan and unknowing Krugman's headlining thing, here

 

Minnesota's multi-term Dem AG, Ellison, wants to keep the job. Republicans have found some guy, some lawyer since that's a job requirement, to oppose another Ellison term.

 A Strib item carried non-paywall by MSN:

Story by Allison Kite, Star Tribune

The headline gets fleshed out in the text, but the headline should read, "Keith Ellison wants to run on his record of Dem AGs fighting Trump. Pepublicans want to make it about outrageous claims about fraud in billions of dollars."

And Ellison does have that record. Fraud? There's been some in a subsidizedchild feeding program the federal Ag Dept started to handle surplus Big Ag production - Big Ag thus getting more demand and a higher price subsidy, while feeding kids is a good, proud idea.

The fraud there is years-old history. It was found out. Perps were prosecuted, federally since it was fraud on a federal program. Ellison was not chasing fraud, nor was it his duty. Some clawback happened, much was lost. Millions. Not billions. That $9 billion, or $19 billion stuff from the Republicans is "speculative" at best, and made up, in truth.

How much fraud, in Minnesota, in total? It's a guess, and the Republicans are hot to allege, reluctant to prove any claimed total. In effect, they are making up a non-issue, since Ellison's done a good job and has been in office several terms because the Republicans have run absurd people. Ideological fascists, as well as unappealing stiffs. Anti-choice, anti-welfare except corporate, Big Pharma, Big Ag, and you get the picture. Reagan's "welfare queens" still get waved about, as much a lie now as when Reagan lied about it.

So, vote for Keith or some idiot who wants to help Trump and Blanche take away your Social Security. Perhaps argued differently, but that's the Republican constant pulse-beat aim, since even before Social Security was started. Tenterhook stretching is better for forming pliant prols, or whatever the thinking, Republicans are consistent on it.

In short, Ellison gets reelected since he's tried with Dem state AGs collectively to temper Trump's being Trump, to the detriment of little guys, who Trump campaigned to, professing love. And otherwise, he's done a fine job, including his best possible effort to tamp down the ICE invasion.

Hold Ellison up against Bovino, and then reelect the guy. While Bovino has gotten into whatever mischief he's into now after photo ops tossing tear gas cannisters, the only unmasked guy in and among the ICE goods.

Michele Bachmann's mentee, her being an early mentor, Stephen Miller (and his ICE whiteman passions) have not yielded Minnesota Republicans anything but grief, and the need to tout grossly enlarged assertions of fraud allowed and boys in girls locker rooms, while a stinking bad war and tanked economy are facts against GOP wannabes.

Miller is a white supremacist, in part, at heart, and that is not selling when people saw neighbors chased by masked gunmen in unmarked cars, calling themselves "police." and masked-up to avoid identification while killing folks. (Because, what else is a handgun for, anyway?)

If wondering why no story excerpt is given, what's needed after the headline tells it? Readers have a link, should they wish to follow-up. 

Ellison will be reelected, that's not in the story, but what will happen.

UPDATE: Whatever Republicans grasp at as "issues," the big 2026 issue is Saving the BWCA and Minnesota's pristine northern watersheds from sloppy toxic sulfide mining aimed at profiting multinational mining giants.

Repubicans - for the mining giants. Dems - for the waters being preserved. Guess how that plays out. 

And, sideline Susie. Sometimes the network will even show the field while the ditz rattles on, sometimes not. But put one of them on a high stakes ballot? Don't you have anything else, guys? Really.

FURTHER: A not paywalled original item, and not a current horse-race scripted and focused thing aimed at selling newspapers:

https://spokesman-recorder.com/2025/10/18/ag-ellison-minnesota-trump-overreach-lawsuits-2b/ 

That item frankly tells the story of Ellison being forced to keep going to court because Trump was pulling funds due the State in the budget that Congress gave to Trump, and Trump doing that out of meanness because Minnesota votes Dem more than voting Republican. 

Forced to litigate, Ellison did, and won some money due the State but viciously withheld from the State, by Trump, out of spite. Trump being Trump, he made things harder to be correct. A retaliatory outlook atop the federal executive branch made Ellison's job all that much harder. And consumed time, since funds due are funds needed. Do not forget that. It matters.

Early paragraphs of the Spokesman Recorder item:

In every corner of Minnesota, Attorney General Keith Ellison’s office has become a bulwark in what he casts as a constitutional struggle, one state-led lawsuit at a time. 

Across rural counties and in the halls of state agencies, his team is quietly but persistently pressing back against a federal administration he argues is attempting to override lawful norms. With more than 40 cases filed to date, Ellison says the stakes are not abstract — they are billions of dollars in funds Minnesota is entitled to, as well as the protections of civil rights he vows to defend.

“We’ve recovered money for the state…well ahead of $2 billion,” Ellison told me. He paused, then added, “We’re north of $2 billion right now.” That sum comes from forcing the federal government to release withheld funds without the sweeping conditions the administration attempted to impose.

Under conditions he calls unconstitutional overreach, Minnesota, he says, has been asked to convert local law enforcement into de facto immigration agents, or lose emergency management money. He refused and says he is winning in court.

But the legal drama is not confined to dollars. Ellison describes being part of a broader coalition with 23 other state attorneys general waging parallel fights over issues ranging from birthright citizenship to education funding cuts. He frames it as a clash over the 14th Amendment and the principle that no president is above the law. 

The ending paragraph - 

“I don’t wake up in the morning just to sue Trump,” he said. “I’d rather not sue Trump. I wish he’d just obey the law.” But for now, he says, suing is the work that must be done.

Jasmine McBride welcomes reader responses at jmcbride@spokesman-recorder.com.

 

 

Sunday, August 23, 2026

Trump is who he is, and it's ugly as ever.

 https://dukeskorich.substack.com/p/trump-blames-biden-for-high-priced

 

Make of this as you want. A proposal from a person - a U.S. Senator - for years over which years we never got Medicare for All. Not even near to it. For reasons that can be explained to me. Having to do with money talks.

Klobuchar proposes Minnesota tax credit to assist with rising healthcare premiums

If the federal government fails to extend federal subsidies that offset healthcare premiums, Sen. Amy Klobuchar, as governor, would create a state tax credit to help with those skyrocketing costs.

Most Republican U.S. senators late last year blocked a Democratic bill to extend Affordable Care Act tax credits, essentially driving up healthcare premiums for millions of Americans.

The extra federal subsidies that Republicans blocked are known as “enhanced premium tax credits,” because they raised the income cutoffs at which people can receive subsidies.

 

They never called her the "Big Vision Lady." A brief Obama-era trifecta, executive, senate, house, and we got Romneycare-rebranded. Romneycare was a Heritage Society idea.

But I have no general election choice, do I? 

  

 

MinnesotaReformer has not been silent in criticising sulfide mining and the proponents of doing it. Instead, they have been helpfully risk averse in their published thinking. Most recently, they question the integrity of the process and players over time, while suggesting just start over. Kind of.

https://minnesotareformer.com/2026/08/22/after-20-years-of-failure-a-risky-mining-plan-doesnt-deserve-the-benefits-of-its-past-permits/ 

That self explanatory item ends with links to three earlier items the outlet has published. One, 

https://minnesotareformer.com/2023/10/10/stop-the-risk-of-damage-to-the-boundary-waters-watershed-with-a-permanent-ban-on-sulfide-ore-mining/ 

Or as Nancy Reagan, (different context), said, "Just say no." 

On balance, MinnReformer editorial-think is sulfide mining proposals are bad policy ideas.  

Or as Crabgrass summarizes, the safest most risk averse outlook, is leave the ore where nature placed it.

So why not do that? I await Harry Niska and Tom Emmer to show what could be wrong with that. If they have any real ideas at all. Besides vouchers for their kids' school (Harry and Jen there, not Emmer).


Below, an earlier letter written by Arne Carlson was reported. Crabgrass had heard a more current Carlson item is online, apparently a LTE to Strib. Here, it is reportred.

 Strib has a paywall but an individual posted two places, here and here, and the substack item is sourced by Crabgrass. Both items appear to be openly public access.

Just Ask Yourself.....

Former Minnesota Governor Arne Carlson sent this letter to the Minnesota Star-Tribune earlier this morning over its coverage of Governor Tim Walz's executive order on the Boundary Waters Wilderness.

Thank you for a well written and detailed article on the Walz directive to temporarily protect the BWCA. As you know, this controversy has been a continuing story since October, 2013 when State Auditor, Rebecca Otto, forcefully opposed opening the state to copper-nickel mining and was the lone vote in the state’s Executive Council against it. From that point on , she was pilloried and the office stripped of many of its powers. And those acts of retribution were led by her own party.

In July of 2016, former Vice President Walter Mondale wrote a commentary in MinnPost warning that the BWCA could not be saved unless we were willing to protect the entire Lake Superior watershed. In another commentary published in the Minneapolis Star Tribune , he wrote that “ sulfide ore mining has never-never been undertaken without serious environmental consequences. “

Additionally, the Minnesota medical community , including members from the Mayo Clinic and the University of Minnesota, have been publicly petitioning the state for well over a decade to include a Health Impact Assessment ( HIA ) study as a requirement for a mining permit. However, the Dayton and Walz administrations chose to do nothing, absolutely nothing except make false promises. Just read Walker Orenstein’s article on this in MinnPost (August, 2019 ).

This policy of stonewalling the public was, in fact, the policy of our state government and fully embraced by both parties and all too accepted by the media. Consider this: the Governor and Legislature have refused for well over a decade to hold a single public hearing on ANY legislation that would update our antiquated mining laws in order to protect our state’s drinking water.

And , for the past eight years, my colleagues and I have been writing commentaries published in a variety of newspapers around the state with a simple message - large campaign donors are driving our policy decisions. Interestingly, not a single elected official has publicly protested our declarations.

Just ask yourself:

“ Why is the State of Minnesota processing a mining permit for one of the world’s most corrupt companies, Glencore? “

This is not a trivial or minor concern. Rather, take notice that the discharges from Glencore’s proposed New Range Copper Nickel Mine will flow south of the Laurentian Divide into Lake Superior and the Great Lakes thereby contaminating the drinking water of some 30 to 40 million people with arsenic and mercury. This will be cataclysmic.

Wikipedia has some 27 paragraphs on Glencore’s illegalities and yet there has not been a single legislative or executive public hearing on this. Not one. How is it that an international mining conglomerate that pled guilty to bribery of public officials and market manipulation in a United States Federal District Court and agreed to a fine of $1.1 billion can be so welcome in Minnesota?

What is even more perplexing is that candidates for our state’s leadership positions can plead for more time to think about this. What precisely do they need to think about?

No, the future of our drinking water must be a very public issue and fully aired throughout our state. Certainly, all sides should be able to at least agree on requiring an independent Health Impact Assessment on all endeavors that threaten our dwindling supply of healthy drinking water.


Subscribe to Duke Skorich

Launched 8 months ago
Former television news anchor/news director, national news editor, talk radio show host, owner of Zenith Research Group, political consultant and scratch golfer.

Crabgrass opines: There is no threat of copper or nickel shortages now or in the future if the proposed sulfide mining in Minnesota is permantly barred. Chile has the world's largest reserves, and has massive operating mining ventures within its borders.

So, why Minnesota? Nobocy has offered any good statement of why here, other than ore was found and somebody wants profit. It is that simple. If water considerations exist, Carlson suggests that's enough to put the kibosh to any plan but leaving the undisturbed ore where nature placed it.

If that does not make sense to you, sorry, but at Crabgrass it's all the sense that's needed.

In closing, what this letter shows most is Carlson's ongoing concern that we could do wrong.

He is correct in that worry. His earlier correspondence from after leaving office, below, shows the ongoing nature of Carlson's concern. As in: Why risk it?

UPDATE: What is lost in all this one expert says X, another says Y, a third weighs X and Y; is that risk aversion is subjective, not objective, and in an instance of long term risk into an uncertain future, strict risk aversion makes sense. If you don't know, and it's guessing at probabilities and event severity, the safest thing is - other places might involve less risk, and the current opinionating has had no comparative location-objective discussion whatsoever. A better phrasing of the question is not here, yes or no, but here vs somewhere else, with worldwide reserves in mind, and thorough exploration being helpful.

Bottom line: It does not have to be, there are risks that are guesswork, so bag it and mine sulfide ores elsewhere while continuing to mine as safely as feasible Minnesota's vast remaining taconite, which mining supports the Iron Range now, and onward. 

Why gamble it, just so multinational giant mining firms can extract a local profit? Fuck 'em.

  

 

An open letter on sulfide mining from Gov. Arne Carlson, R, (who governed back when R was still decent) to the Walz administration.

 

 

 

For over four years, the Walz administration has refused to answer very basic questions that deal directly with the public’s access to healthy drinking water.

Those questions become increasingly important with the recent announcement of Teck Resources Ltd partnering with PolyMet — owned by international mining conglomerate Glencore. They are seeking to enlarge their mining operations, which are in close proximity to the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness and Lake Superior. 

The people of Duluth and the Fond du Lac Indian Reservation draw their water from Lake Superior and the adjacent area. Overall, 35 million people depend on the Great Lakes for their drinking water, and harm to one lake affects them all.

Any government — regardless of party control — owes its full allegiance to the people and not to any special interests. 

With that in mind, the question again arises:

Why is the state of Minnesota doing business with an international corrupt company such as Glencore, and why is it being permitted to partner with a Canadian mining company in Teck Resources — 10% owned by the China Investment Corporation and possessing a lengthy record of environmental destruction? 

Now we have one mining conglomerate in Glencore with a lengthy list of environmental degradation and international corruption — fined $1.5 billion by the Justice Department last May for price fixing and bribery of public officials — joining forces with another foreign mining operation with a similar history of illegal exploitation of natural resources, including its role in polluting the celebrated Columbia River. To this point, officials of Teck Resources admitted in a federal court that they had polluted the Columbia River in Washington state for more than a century.

And these two partners are now to be trusted with this state’s most valuable water resources, including Lake Superior, which holds 10% of the world’s fresh surface water?

Where are the state’s standards? Where is the vetting? Where is common sense? 

Our supply of drinking water is diminishing while our demand is increasing, and the state’s leadership is silent.

On top of this, the Minnesota health community — including the Mayo Clinic — requested of the governor that a health study be done of the waters that would be affected by the discharge of waste from the PolyMet mine. This effluent includes mercury and arsenic. This too has been completely ignored.

[...] Specifically, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency is “committed to insuring that every Minnesotan has healthy air, sustainable lands, clean water, and a better climate” (emphasis mine).

The Department of Natural Resources states that its mission is “to work with Minnesotans to conserve and manage the state’s natural resources.” This includes our drinking water. 

Partnering with Glencore and Teck Resources violates department pledges and severely compromises the integrity of public service.

I implore you to protect the well being of the people you serve.

And, now, two governors, each party, agree. In the twilight of his two terms of service, Walz is doing exactly as Carlson advocated, in issuing his executive order for the 90 day protective order, until sane and sagacious steps can be taken without anybody pounding on the table saying, "Now, now, you have to give what I want, now. Start the clock running, the process moving, now." 

It is best to move with deliberate caution. Time has already passed with no dire straits arising. Mistakes in haste are easy to make. Good management of resources is less easy.

 

 

"Cal Warwas is a native of the Iron Range and a Republican state legislator. He is a union steelworker and a third-generation miner, and has worked for over 30 years at Minntac, a taconite mine in Mt. Iron, Minn.". Moreover, he is a whining Iron Ranger of which the State of Minnesota has too many.

 The quoted part is the footer from an op-ed he submitted to Strib. The "Moreover . . ." part is Crabgrass opinion. He writes a hit piece on the Walz move to protect the Rainy River Watershed and Boundary Waters from rapacious foreign-owned toxic sulfide mining. He's got his long-running union job, in taconite which carries the Iron Range without sulfide mining's super-pollution threats, but he whines anyway. It is tiring. Save the BWCA for the future of the entire state and nation. And let the whiners whine. Bless them.

https://www.startribune.com/greater-mn-economy-mining-jobs-walz-bwca-order/601880747 

Somebody should tell the guy Walz is not running and Klobuchar is. 

https://www.lrl.mn.gov/legdb/fulldetail?ID=15648

 

How he got elected in the first place astounds. The Iron Rangers collectively seem to feel themselves more entitled than the remainder of the State. and will put toxic mining jobs ahead of outfitter jobs, where the outfitters are the long term future of northern Minnesota. Tunnel vision. is a problem with the Rangers. Likely why they these days are more Republican than Democrat.

This guy seems to like Trump. While the economy sucks and the Iranians are winning, this guy:

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=122187882482774602&set=a.122093579006774602 

Go figure. Emmer could be an honorary Iron Ranger.