Monday, August 24, 2026

MN Senate District 31 candidates will debate, in Andover, MN, this evening - tonight. QCTV will broadcast it.

 The notice was by email today. 

See our Candidates in Action Tonight!

(August 24th)

North Metro Mayors Legislative Forum

Andover City Hall

5:30 PM

The North Metro Mayors Association candidate legislative forums continues on Monday. The series of forums starts at 5:30 p.m. on Monday, August 24, at Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, MN 55304. Arrive at 5:00 p.m. It's a great opportunity to hear directly from our legislative candidates before the November 3rd, Election Day.

SD31A, House at 5:30. Brian Walker (D) and Harry Niska (R)

SD31B, House at 6:00. Jen Bloomquist (D) and Peggy Scott (R)

SD31, Senate at 6:30. Gadisa Berkessa (D) and Calvin Bahr (R)

The public is invited to attend in person.  Please come to Andover City Hall to support our 3 great candidates!

The forum will also be broadcast live on QCTV, and will be recorded, and will stream live on their YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/@qctv?si=q95LiD3SRVsOmXAq

THANK YOU-- See you there!

SD31 DFL Communications

sd31dfl@gmail.com

While the email was from being on the DFL mailing list the guess is that SD 31 Republicans will be getting the word out also, to those on their mailing list.

It will be good to see Niska and Walker talking. Each is a clear and direct mind, each seeing things differently in ways they should clearly delineate. Ditto, for the other candidates.

UPDATE: Related, a site that says nonpartisan, but about Minnesota's candidates:

https://election2026.net/minnesota-2026/ 

related: https://quarex.org/  

FURTHER: Many a slip twixt cut and lip. No QCTV live broadcast, at 5:30 pm

wtf, I don't know. The hope is that QCTV  is there, and recording, but not doing a live broadcast.

For that we wait until tomorrow morning to see. 

NOT MY FAULT. SOMEBODY'S FAULT. NOT MINE 

Next Morning, 8-25-2026 - Strike out - not posted at QCTV - worth another look mid-day. 

 

 

MinnPost covers the Walz BWCA protective executive order (whatever he calls it that's what it is).

 https://www.minnpost.com/state-government/2026/08/walz-halts-state-action-on-mine-near-boundary-waters-but-federal-process-stays-on-track/

 The U.S. is a Constitutional federal power among the several states, each of which has its own power.

Hence a balance of power, or a two-horse carriage, however you view it. In the two-horse analogy, the carriage does not go smoothly if the horses each is of its own mind, and do not pull together.

MinnPost wrote: 

Gov. Tim Walz’s decision to use his authority to halt all state permitting of a proposed Twin Metals copper-nickel mine in the Boundary Waters will not stop the federal government from considering new permits for the project.

That’s because the proposed mine site is on federal land in Superior National Forest and Congress in April lifted a federal moratorium on any sulfide mining in that area.

So, Twin Metals can pursue a restoration of federal leases that were cancelled by the Biden administration, and if they are obtained, the federal government can move forward with its environmental review of the project.

“The state government cannot prevent the federal government from issuing leases and conducting an environmental review,” said Becky Rom, the national chair of Save the Boundary Waters. “And you might see these leases issued without consideration of science.”

Yet, the plan Twin Metals has to mine copper and nickel in the Boundary Waters is a two-track process. On the state’s track, Walz, in his waning days in office, used his executive powers to put down a clear marker of where the state stands on the issue of nonferrous mining in the Boundary Waters’ watershed.

Brad Karkkainen, an authority on environmental and natural resources law at the University of Minnesota, said Congress voted to end a moratorium on mining that had been established by a rule issued by the U.S. Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management.

“The congressional action removed federal impediments to mining development in or near  the Boundary Waters,” Karkkainen said. “It does not compel mining development, nor does it override the state’s concurrent and independent authority to issue or deny permits for any new mines within the state of Minnesota.”

Julie Lucas, executive director of Mining Minnesota, an industry trade group, called Walz’s executive order “a political decision dressed up as an environmental one, and Minnesotans deserve to know the difference.”

The difference is political rhetoric, when the reeach of the power is the question. More: 

“The governor’s own Department of Natural Resources concluded a six-year legal review that considered more than 4,000 public comments and the most current science available, and ruled definitively that Minnesota’s nonferrous mining regulations are strong enough to protect the Boundary Waters and its watershed,” Lucas said in a statement. 

Walz’s order also instructs the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to draft legislation to be considered by the next session of the state legislature that would ban sulfide mining in the watershed.

Legislation aimed at protecting the Boundary Waters has failed to win approval in the past. 

Still, the governor’s actions, which included halting all state government work on environmental reviews or permitting work on mining proposals while litigation over state mining regulations is ongoing, is a new chapter in a continuing battle over the future of copper-nickel mining in the state. 

The two carriage horses will not pull together. 

Sarah Strommen, commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, acknowledged the federal government is moving on a different track. But she said the state would not cooperate with the federal government’s review in any way. 

“It’s important to note that while the federal government cannot unilaterally authorize a mine to begin construction, it can begin its environmental review process and may ask DNR to be what is referred to as a cooperating agency … it would not be prudent for the DNR to participate as a cooperating agency in any federal environmental review” she said. 

At a press conference Tuesday in Ely, Walz said he is confident his executive order will  withstand any challenge.

“This is solid,” he said. “As I said, we’ve done the legal work.” 

Joshua Huder, an expert on separation of powers at Georgetown University, said this is likely a case “where state law and federal law overlap, meaning Walz may be able to put in place a ban even if Congress has prohibited the Department of Interior from keeping its ban on the books.”

Nevertheless, Walz expects a blustery and hyperbolic response from the Trump administration, which he threw a zinger at in his press conference Tuesday. 

“These people can’t manage a reflecting pool, so why would we think they could manage this mine?” he said.

The bottom line, he added, is “there’s nothing they can do about it.” 

The state is using its "nuclear option" for the remainder of the Walz term. Ramsey's former mayor, Strommen, is in tune with her boss. And will serve as DNR head until a new person may be appointed. 

Rep. Pete Stauber, R-8th District, who sponsored the legislation to lift the  federal moratorium on mining in the watershed, said in a statement that it order [sic] is “radical” and “job killing.”

“Simply put, the governor’s executive order is an outright war on Northern Minnesota and our way of life,” he said.

They are special up there on the Iron Range, you do know that? 

Walz’s successor will decide whether to keep the executive order, which sunsets 90 days after the governor leaves office, or scrap it.

[...] Environmental groups and tribal leaders, meanwhile, applauded Walz’s  announcement.

“Walz made it clear that federal overreach will not decide the fate of Minnesota’s waters,” stated Chris Knopf, executive director of Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness. “He defended what is best about this state. This is the kind of action a governor is remembered for.”

At the very least, Walz’s order pauses what was already going to be a lengthy timeline for copper-nickel mine permitting in Minnesota. Even proponents of the project have said they expected years or even more than a decade to pass before mining got up and running.

So. Stalemate. Restart the tournament with this stage being neither for nor against a contestant. Just like a stalemate in chess.

Pop the popcorn, while Tofoya and Lisa Demuth each articulates her crystal clear governing heart-felt position on the question of protecting the drinking water, the outfitter economic bloc up north, and tribal treaty rights where the fishing and wild rice harvesting are mooted by poisoned water.

Each will of course be eager to be detailed and specific and to not leave policy positions to guesswork. Sure. 

No equivocating or gaslighting. Pure and simple answers, eagerly given. Sure. 

Klobuchar too, must not try a straddle. We know already Flanagan, wanting to be the first female tribe member in the Senate feels the land beneath her feet, and sees the water as of critical importance.  Amy, however, will need at some point to respond without equivocation. When, that's her call, but election day is her deadline.

 

AP reports on latest Scott Bessant news regarding Iran and expansion of sanctions against it.

 Strangely, China is mentioned only once, in passing, while China clearly is a factor.

https://apnews.com/article/iran-rial-currency-bessent-trade-august-24-2026-e367634d8853c8fa4a341132cd577f31 

In part:

“We are level-setting with every country to tell them our expectations. We know who they are. They know who they are,” Bessent told a news conference. “So when the hammer of U.S. Treasury actions falls upon them, they will have no one to blame but themselves.”

Washington has promised the new sanctions would put even more pressure on an Iranian economy already battered by previous sanctions and a U.S. naval blockade. But the announcement Monday provided little detail and did not name which countries could face secondary sanctions. China, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates are Iran’s largest trade partners.

Bessent said Trump has been “making phone calls to world leaders with specific requests to cease their interactions” with Iran and has already seen results. The UAE announced last week that it was suspending all trade, commercial exchanges and financial transactions with Iran until further notice after a reported missile attack on the Gulf country.

“I am confident the president, as you all know, is quite persuasive,” Bessent said, adding that the UAE decision was “not a coincidence.”

Arm twisting China is unlikely. Others might step into line because they know Trump is an SOB of unequaled magnitude. Not that Bessant is any better. More excerpting -

Pakistani delegation visits Iran

Pakistan, which played a key role in brokering a 60-day ceasefire in June, sent a high-level delegation to Iran on Monday to encourage the U.S. and Iran to return to negotiations, two senior officials said. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media on the record.

The military confirmed only Field Marshal Asim Munir’s visit, saying it was aimed at de-escalating tensions in the region.

Trump spoke with Munir ahead of the army chief’s visit to Iran, according to a person familiar with the discussion.

So, will it be another bluff, or will there be teeth to the threat? Iran has weapons which could reach regional U.S. oil company assets, and they are the closest of cronies to Trump, so a threat of retaliation there should be expected to affect things.

Last, does Trump really want the current economic situation to change? His oil buddies are gaining record profits, and that's something Trump can chew on before rocking the current stalemate boat.

The guess here, nothing of consequence will result. More bluff and buff, no real will toward any short term change. China needs oil and Iran is positioned to yield China a favorable discount per barrel.

The Carney - Canada situation is more interesting. Canada, long term, will have to reach out, and new Canadian alliances will not dissolve later just because Trump must exit the White House. Trust is a factor and once Canada has formed what it sees as trustworthy new dependencies, it will not come back.

The bridge has been burned. There will still be cross border trade, but Canada will diversify, and like it. 

UPDATE: A Crabgrass bet, it will be a while before robotaxies of Teslas will be operational in Vancouver, Winnipeg, Toronto, or Montreal. In part because of winter climate and battery chemistry, a matter affecting Minnesota too, but then also, China could look to Canada as it has to Mexico and South America, as a potential foreign plant locale. Jobs to Canada, via a trade war from Trump.

Why not? 

 

AOL is still alive, and it seems sometimes has an interesting perspective on events as they happen.

 https://www.aol.com/articles/republicans-turn-trumps-canadian-tariffs-122628000.html

 Trade with that long contiguous border, and then Trump thinks he's hot shit, and pulls tariffs from where?

Republicans turn on Trump's Canadian tariffs as businesses forced to 'pass on' cost to residents

The Mirror
Maria Villarroel

 In part:

Tensions among Republicans are on the rise as many question President Donald Trump's economic agenda, such as launching a trade war with Canada over the weekend. Some fear the move could impact the GOP’s chances of winning big in November.

The U.S. and Canada fell deeper into a trade war on Saturday, as each side blamed the other for the collapse of negotiations in Washington, leading the U.S. to impose 50% tariffs on $20 billion worth of Canadian goods and Canada setting Sept. 8 as the start of its retaliatory penalties.

The move almost immediately sparked concerns among congressional Republicans, as many fear mistakes made by the president could severely affect the ongoing affordability crisis, and as a result, the outcome of the November elections.

Mark Carney's scathing attack on Trump as Canada hits back with retaliatory tariffs on US

Mark Carney's ominous warning to Donald Trump as he says Canada going to war with US over tariffs

“If the administration proceeds with these tariffs, they will increase costs for Maine families, as most businesses will have no choice but to pass on the tariffs to their customers through higher prices,” Maine Sen. Susan Collins wrote on X.

Collins also urged both sides to “return to the negotiating table” and “reach a fair agreement.”

Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) speaks with the news media outside the Kittery Trading Post, the first stop of a weekend re-election campaign bus tour of the state of Maine, on August 14, 2026 in Kittery, Maine
The move almost immediately sparked concerns among congressional Republicans, as many fear mistakes made by the president could severely affect the ongoing affordability crisis, and as a result, the outcome of the November elections -Credit:Getty Images

Similarly, adding to Republicans’ concerns is President Trump’s plan to reduce beef prices. The president announced last week that he would allow more beef to temporarily be imported into the U.S. without triggering higher tariffs.

The deal, Trump said, allows up to 300,000 metric tons of ground beef to be imported into the U.S. for the next 90 days without activating an “out of quota” tariff, which is a tax that goes into effect once a certain quantity of that product enters the country.

“We all want lower grocery prices, but as I’ve said for months, we cannot do it at the expense of American producers,” Sen. Deb Fischer, R-Neb., said in a statement. “Flooding the market with foreign beef hurts our livestock industry and undermines the long-term solution: growing the U.S. cattle herd to meet demand.”

Similarly, Sen. Tim Sheehy, R-Mont., said in a social media post just hours after Trump announced the deal that the president’s “heart is in the right place,” but importing beef will “harm our ranching families who feed the nation.”

 And Sen. Pete Ricketts, R-Neb., said that while he appreciates the administration’s focus on grocery prices, “short term policy shifts do not equal long term solutions.”

[...] President Donald Trump’s import taxes will hit about 5% of what Canada ships to the United States every year, ranging from hockey sticks to tongue depressors. Prime Minister Carney said Ottawa would respond with targeted tariff protection for industries exposed to the new U.S. duties, including some steel products. He also mentioned the dairy, appliance, agricultural equipment, pulp and paper and electronics sectors.

No further talks were planned. Whatever the eventual outcome, a loss of trust seems one of the earliest casualties.

Carney accused Washington of using “economic integration as a weapon” and [...] “You’re at war when you get attacked,” he said, adding that Canada had the reserves, resilience and plan to respond.

But to Trump’s chief trade negotiator, Jamieson Greer, the U.S. was compelled to act after a year of retaliation by its longtime partner.

Some of my friends think Trump's right, some think Carney's right. I agree with my friends. Lore on that comment attributes it first to Hubert Humphrey, but what do I know other than Susan Collins has skin in the game, and wants a game stacked to favor her, which seems to not impress Trump one iota.

 

 

Charlie Kirk just won't stay dead in peace. Things keep apace with who he was.

 MSN carrying a FOX item: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/washington-post-ordered-to-reinstate-columnist-karen-attiah-after-being-terminated-over-charlie-kirk-posts/ar-AA2aOTdB

Washington Post ordered to reinstate columnist Karen Attiah after being terminated over Charlie Kirk posts

 In part:

"Refusing to tear my clothes and smear ashes on my face in performative mourning for a White man that espoused violence is… not the same as violence," Attiah wrote at the time. In a separate post, she wrote, "Part of what keeps America so violent is the insistence that people perform care, empty goodness and absolution for White men who espouse hatred and violence.’"

Critics also slammed Attiah for misquoting Kirk in another post, attributing to him saying, "Black women do not have the brain processing power to be taken seriously. You have to go steal a White person's slot."

On a July 2023 episode of "The Charlie Kirk Show," Kirk actually said, "If we would have said three weeks ago [...] that Joy Reid and Michelle Obama, and Sheila Jackson Lee, and Ketanji Brown Jackson were affirmative-action picks, we would have been called racist. But now they're comin' out and they're saying it for us! They're comin' out, and they're saying, 'I'm only here because of affirmative action.' Yeah, we know. You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a White person's slot to go be taken somewhat seriously.

Have you heard the expression, a distinction without a difference?

That was an asshole statement by Kirk, who's made others. At the end of the carried post, MSN adds:

Original article source: Washington Post ordered to reinstate columnist Karen Attiah after being terminated over Charlie Kirk posts

Related Links:

 Criticizinng Kirk looks to be a profitable cottage industry. Not that the man was above criticism. Not that speech is a First Amendment thing.

 

My brother-in-law told me of the Krugman substack post. Searching, there's been online linking to it already. So let's have a look.

https://x.com/WalterAppling/status/2091878049151148218

https://bsky.app/profile/crof.bsky.social/post/3mttioh34e22i 

The pundits value the Krugman item as noteworthy.

Krugman, "The Moose that Roared," begins with how Trump tariff bully-aim led Canada's Conservative Party to lose an election, then -

Carney currently has 60 percent approval and 31 percent disapproval — almost exactly the opposite of Trump’s numbers.

Yet a bully refuses to learn that his actions are counterproductive and instead doubles down. So Trump persisted, most recently by imposing steep new tariffs on Canadian exports, invoking a never-before-used section of the 1930 Smoot-Hawley tariff act as legal justification. In an effort to head these new tariffs off, Canada entered negotiations with the United States, talks that for a while seemed on track to ramp down the tensions. But on Friday Canadian negotiators walked out — and the U.S.-Canada trade war is now on.

Why did the talks break down? According to U.S. officials, the Canadians made additional last-minute demands, although they offered no specifics on what these demands were. According to the Canadians, it was the Americans who suddenly changed the terms. According to the Toronto Star, Carney

was faced with a trade agreement that was suddenly transformed into an attack on Canadian sovereignty, an attempted psychological annexation that could have turned Canada into an American client state, a sort of North American Belarus.

Does anyone seriously doubt that Canada, not the Trump administration, is telling the truth?

Anyway, the trade war is now on. Who will win it?

On the face of it, the opponents — I still have to rub my eyes at the idea of Canada as an enemy — appear extremely unevenly matched. The U.S. economy is a dozen times larger than Canada’s. We buy three-quarters of their exports, while they buy only about a sixth of ours. Surely they must have much more than we do to lose from trade conflict.

Yet one clear lesson from a year and a half of Trumpian trade war is that when trade conflicts become extreme, access to crucial imports is more important than the ability to export to another country’s markets. In the case of Trump’s tariffs on China, they have been little more than an inconvenience to the Chinese economy. But China’s threat to cut off exports of rare earths is an existential threat to Western technology industries.

And the U.S. economy is far more dependent on Canadian goods than most Americans realize.

 - read the Krugman original

After a few paragrapsh highlighting examples showing the dependence, Krugman continues:

 The point is not that Canada has “escalation dominance” — the ability to retaliate to every U.S. action with an even more damaging counterreaction — in a trade conflict with the United States. Rather, the point is that an all-out trade war would create a lot of pain in the U.S. in addition to inflicting severe damage to the Canadian economy. And all indications are that the Canadians will be much more willing to bear the pain of a trade war than Americans will – especially given that the great majority of Americans are already dissatisfied with Trump’s economic management.

Despite Trump’s best efforts, only a minority of Republicans — and nobody else — has been persuaded that the Canadians are acting badly

[image omitted - see original]

On the other side, Trump has managed to convince Canadians of all political stripes that the U.S. can’t be trusted:

So, does Trump have any chance of winning his trade war with Canada?

That insight into pain and who can take it seems the focus of the balance of Krugman's pondering. With his asking, "does Trump have any chance of winning" showing a further intent to show he has none. 

Bottom lines are always nice endings of screeds, Krugman ending: 

The bottom line is that Trump is going to lose his trade war with Canada as thoroughly as he has lost his shooting war with Iran. But because he won’t face reality, trade with our northern neighbor will probably be disrupted until the narcissistic bully in the White House no longer controls trade policy.

MUSICAL CODA

Who says Canadians don’t get angry?

[ Krugman does a tune time MUSICAL CODA, the item on youtube ]

========================================== 

. . . the mess you left when you went away . . . the lady sings, Krugman doing a good tune fit 

Crabgrass suggests another video, of how Trump the bully left Canada high-and-dry to suffer

This

  TRUMP SURE KNOWS HOW TO MAKE CANADA SUFFER

*************************

Giant hat tip to Krugman and those online who posted of it and/or linked to it. For anyone not a Peter Sellers fan and unknowing Krugman's headlining thing, here

 

Minnesota's multi-term Dem AG, Ellison, wants to keep the job. Republicans have found some guy, some lawyer since that's a job requirement, to oppose another Ellison term.

 A Strib item carried non-paywall by MSN:

Story by Allison Kite, Star Tribune

The headline gets fleshed out in the text, but the headline should read, "Keith Ellison wants to run on his record of Dem AGs fighting Trump. Pepublicans want to make it about outrageous claims about fraud in billions of dollars."

And Ellison does have that record. Fraud? There's been some in a subsidizedchild feeding program the federal Ag Dept started to handle surplus Big Ag production - Big Ag thus getting more demand and a higher price subsidy, while feeding kids is a good, proud idea.

The fraud there is years-old history. It was found out. Perps were prosecuted, federally since it was fraud on a federal program. Ellison was not chasing fraud, nor was it his duty. Some clawback happened, much was lost. Millions. Not billions. That $9 billion, or $19 billion stuff from the Republicans is "speculative" at best, and made up, in truth.

How much fraud, in Minnesota, in total? It's a guess, and the Republicans are hot to allege, reluctant to prove any claimed total. In effect, they are making up a non-issue, since Ellison's done a good job and has been in office several terms because the Republicans have run absurd people. Ideological fascists, as well as unappealing stiffs. Anti-choice, anti-welfare except corporate, Big Pharma, Big Ag, and you get the picture. Reagan's "welfare queens" still get waved about, as much a lie now as when Reagan lied about it.

So, vote for Keith or some idiot who wants to help Trump and Blanche take away your Social Security. Perhaps argued differently, but that's the Republican constant pulse-beat aim, since even before Social Security was started. Tenterhook stretching is better for forming pliant prols, or whatever the thinking, Republicans are consistent on it.

In short, Ellison gets reelected since he's tried with Dem state AGs collectively to temper Trump's being Trump, to the detriment of little guys, who Trump campaigned to, professing love. And otherwise, he's done a fine job, including his best possible effort to tamp down the ICE invasion.

Hold Ellison up against Bovino, and then reelect the guy. While Bovino has gotten into whatever mischief he's into now after photo ops tossing tear gas cannisters, the only unmasked guy in and among the ICE goods.

Michele Bachmann's mentee, her being an early mentor, Stephen Miller (and his ICE whiteman passions) have not yielded Minnesota Republicans anything but grief, and the need to tout grossly enlarged assertions of fraud allowed and boys in girls locker rooms, while a stinking bad war and tanked economy are facts against GOP wannabes.

Miller is a white supremacist, in part, at heart, and that is not selling when people saw neighbors chased by masked gunmen in unmarked cars, calling themselves "police." and masked-up to avoid identification while killing folks. (Because, what else is a handgun for, anyway?)

If wondering why no story excerpt is given, what's needed after the headline tells it? Readers have a link, should they wish to follow-up. 

Ellison will be reelected, that's not in the story, but what will happen.

UPDATE: Whatever Republicans grasp at as "issues," the big 2026 issue is Saving the BWCA and Minnesota's pristine northern watersheds from sloppy toxic sulfide mining aimed at profiting multinational mining giants.

Repubicans - for the mining giants. Dems - for the waters being preserved. Guess how that plays out. 

And, sideline Susie. Sometimes the network will even show the field while the ditz rattles on, sometimes not. But put one of them on a high stakes ballot? Don't you have anything else, guys? Really.

FURTHER: A not paywalled original item, and not a current horse-race scripted and focused thing aimed at selling newspapers:

https://spokesman-recorder.com/2025/10/18/ag-ellison-minnesota-trump-overreach-lawsuits-2b/ 

That item frankly tells the story of Ellison being forced to keep going to court because Trump was pulling funds due the State in the budget that Congress gave to Trump, and Trump doing that out of meanness because Minnesota votes Dem more than voting Republican. 

Forced to litigate, Ellison did, and won some money due the State but viciously withheld from the State, by Trump, out of spite. Trump being Trump, he made things harder to be correct. A retaliatory outlook atop the federal executive branch made Ellison's job all that much harder. And consumed time, since funds due are funds needed. Do not forget that. It matters.

Early paragraphs of the Spokesman Recorder item:

In every corner of Minnesota, Attorney General Keith Ellison’s office has become a bulwark in what he casts as a constitutional struggle, one state-led lawsuit at a time. 

Across rural counties and in the halls of state agencies, his team is quietly but persistently pressing back against a federal administration he argues is attempting to override lawful norms. With more than 40 cases filed to date, Ellison says the stakes are not abstract — they are billions of dollars in funds Minnesota is entitled to, as well as the protections of civil rights he vows to defend.

“We’ve recovered money for the state…well ahead of $2 billion,” Ellison told me. He paused, then added, “We’re north of $2 billion right now.” That sum comes from forcing the federal government to release withheld funds without the sweeping conditions the administration attempted to impose.

Under conditions he calls unconstitutional overreach, Minnesota, he says, has been asked to convert local law enforcement into de facto immigration agents, or lose emergency management money. He refused and says he is winning in court.

But the legal drama is not confined to dollars. Ellison describes being part of a broader coalition with 23 other state attorneys general waging parallel fights over issues ranging from birthright citizenship to education funding cuts. He frames it as a clash over the 14th Amendment and the principle that no president is above the law. 

The ending paragraph - 

“I don’t wake up in the morning just to sue Trump,” he said. “I’d rather not sue Trump. I wish he’d just obey the law.” But for now, he says, suing is the work that must be done.

Jasmine McBride welcomes reader responses at jmcbride@spokesman-recorder.com.

 

 

Sunday, August 23, 2026

Trump is who he is, and it's ugly as ever.

 https://dukeskorich.substack.com/p/trump-blames-biden-for-high-priced

 

Make of this as you want. A proposal from a person - a U.S. Senator - for years over which years we never got Medicare for All. Not even near to it. For reasons that can be explained to me. Having to do with money talks.

Klobuchar proposes Minnesota tax credit to assist with rising healthcare premiums

If the federal government fails to extend federal subsidies that offset healthcare premiums, Sen. Amy Klobuchar, as governor, would create a state tax credit to help with those skyrocketing costs.

Most Republican U.S. senators late last year blocked a Democratic bill to extend Affordable Care Act tax credits, essentially driving up healthcare premiums for millions of Americans.

The extra federal subsidies that Republicans blocked are known as “enhanced premium tax credits,” because they raised the income cutoffs at which people can receive subsidies.

 

They never called her the "Big Vision Lady." A brief Obama-era trifecta, executive, senate, house, and we got Romneycare-rebranded. Romneycare was a Heritage Society idea.

But I have no general election choice, do I? 

  

 

MinnesotaReformer has not been silent in criticising sulfide mining and the proponents of doing it. Instead, they have been helpfully risk averse in their published thinking. Most recently, they question the integrity of the process and players over time, while suggesting just start over. Kind of.

https://minnesotareformer.com/2026/08/22/after-20-years-of-failure-a-risky-mining-plan-doesnt-deserve-the-benefits-of-its-past-permits/ 

That self explanatory item ends with links to three earlier items the outlet has published. One, 

https://minnesotareformer.com/2023/10/10/stop-the-risk-of-damage-to-the-boundary-waters-watershed-with-a-permanent-ban-on-sulfide-ore-mining/ 

Or as Nancy Reagan, (different context), said, "Just say no." 

On balance, MinnReformer editorial-think is sulfide mining proposals are bad policy ideas.  

Or as Crabgrass summarizes, the safest most risk averse outlook, is leave the ore where nature placed it.

So why not do that? I await Harry Niska and Tom Emmer to show what could be wrong with that. If they have any real ideas at all. Besides vouchers for their kids' school (Harry and Jen there, not Emmer).


Below, an earlier letter written by Arne Carlson was reported. Crabgrass had heard a more current Carlson item is online, apparently a LTE to Strib. Here, it is reportred.

 Strib has a paywall but an individual posted two places, here and here, and the substack item is sourced by Crabgrass. Both items appear to be openly public access.

Just Ask Yourself.....

Former Minnesota Governor Arne Carlson sent this letter to the Minnesota Star-Tribune earlier this morning over its coverage of Governor Tim Walz's executive order on the Boundary Waters Wilderness.

Thank you for a well written and detailed article on the Walz directive to temporarily protect the BWCA. As you know, this controversy has been a continuing story since October, 2013 when State Auditor, Rebecca Otto, forcefully opposed opening the state to copper-nickel mining and was the lone vote in the state’s Executive Council against it. From that point on , she was pilloried and the office stripped of many of its powers. And those acts of retribution were led by her own party.

In July of 2016, former Vice President Walter Mondale wrote a commentary in MinnPost warning that the BWCA could not be saved unless we were willing to protect the entire Lake Superior watershed. In another commentary published in the Minneapolis Star Tribune , he wrote that “ sulfide ore mining has never-never been undertaken without serious environmental consequences. “

Additionally, the Minnesota medical community , including members from the Mayo Clinic and the University of Minnesota, have been publicly petitioning the state for well over a decade to include a Health Impact Assessment ( HIA ) study as a requirement for a mining permit. However, the Dayton and Walz administrations chose to do nothing, absolutely nothing except make false promises. Just read Walker Orenstein’s article on this in MinnPost (August, 2019 ).

This policy of stonewalling the public was, in fact, the policy of our state government and fully embraced by both parties and all too accepted by the media. Consider this: the Governor and Legislature have refused for well over a decade to hold a single public hearing on ANY legislation that would update our antiquated mining laws in order to protect our state’s drinking water.

And , for the past eight years, my colleagues and I have been writing commentaries published in a variety of newspapers around the state with a simple message - large campaign donors are driving our policy decisions. Interestingly, not a single elected official has publicly protested our declarations.

Just ask yourself:

“ Why is the State of Minnesota processing a mining permit for one of the world’s most corrupt companies, Glencore? “

This is not a trivial or minor concern. Rather, take notice that the discharges from Glencore’s proposed New Range Copper Nickel Mine will flow south of the Laurentian Divide into Lake Superior and the Great Lakes thereby contaminating the drinking water of some 30 to 40 million people with arsenic and mercury. This will be cataclysmic.

Wikipedia has some 27 paragraphs on Glencore’s illegalities and yet there has not been a single legislative or executive public hearing on this. Not one. How is it that an international mining conglomerate that pled guilty to bribery of public officials and market manipulation in a United States Federal District Court and agreed to a fine of $1.1 billion can be so welcome in Minnesota?

What is even more perplexing is that candidates for our state’s leadership positions can plead for more time to think about this. What precisely do they need to think about?

No, the future of our drinking water must be a very public issue and fully aired throughout our state. Certainly, all sides should be able to at least agree on requiring an independent Health Impact Assessment on all endeavors that threaten our dwindling supply of healthy drinking water.


Subscribe to Duke Skorich

Launched 8 months ago
Former television news anchor/news director, national news editor, talk radio show host, owner of Zenith Research Group, political consultant and scratch golfer.

Crabgrass opines: There is no threat of copper or nickel shortages now or in the future if the proposed sulfide mining in Minnesota is permantly barred. Chile has the world's largest reserves, and has massive operating mining ventures within its borders.

So, why Minnesota? Nobocy has offered any good statement of why here, other than ore was found and somebody wants profit. It is that simple. If water considerations exist, Carlson suggests that's enough to put the kibosh to any plan but leaving the undisturbed ore where nature placed it.

If that does not make sense to you, sorry, but at Crabgrass it's all the sense that's needed.

In closing, what this letter shows most is Carlson's ongoing concern that we could do wrong.

He is correct in that worry. His earlier correspondence from after leaving office, below, shows the ongoing nature of Carlson's concern. As in: Why risk it?

UPDATE: What is lost in all this one expert says X, another says Y, a third weighs X and Y; is that risk aversion is subjective, not objective, and in an instance of long term risk into an uncertain future, strict risk aversion makes sense. If you don't know, and it's guessing at probabilities and event severity, the safest thing is - other places might involve less risk, and the current opinionating has had no comparative location-objective discussion whatsoever. A better phrasing of the question is not here, yes or no, but here vs somewhere else, with worldwide reserves in mind, and thorough exploration being helpful.

Bottom line: It does not have to be, there are risks that are guesswork, so bag it and mine sulfide ores elsewhere while continuing to mine as safely as feasible Minnesota's vast remaining taconite, which mining supports the Iron Range now, and onward. 

Why gamble it, just so multinational giant mining firms can extract a local profit? Fuck 'em.

  

 

An open letter on sulfide mining from Gov. Arne Carlson, R, (who governed back when R was still decent) to the Walz administration.

 

 

 

For over four years, the Walz administration has refused to answer very basic questions that deal directly with the public’s access to healthy drinking water.

Those questions become increasingly important with the recent announcement of Teck Resources Ltd partnering with PolyMet — owned by international mining conglomerate Glencore. They are seeking to enlarge their mining operations, which are in close proximity to the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness and Lake Superior. 

The people of Duluth and the Fond du Lac Indian Reservation draw their water from Lake Superior and the adjacent area. Overall, 35 million people depend on the Great Lakes for their drinking water, and harm to one lake affects them all.

Any government — regardless of party control — owes its full allegiance to the people and not to any special interests. 

With that in mind, the question again arises:

Why is the state of Minnesota doing business with an international corrupt company such as Glencore, and why is it being permitted to partner with a Canadian mining company in Teck Resources — 10% owned by the China Investment Corporation and possessing a lengthy record of environmental destruction? 

Now we have one mining conglomerate in Glencore with a lengthy list of environmental degradation and international corruption — fined $1.5 billion by the Justice Department last May for price fixing and bribery of public officials — joining forces with another foreign mining operation with a similar history of illegal exploitation of natural resources, including its role in polluting the celebrated Columbia River. To this point, officials of Teck Resources admitted in a federal court that they had polluted the Columbia River in Washington state for more than a century.

And these two partners are now to be trusted with this state’s most valuable water resources, including Lake Superior, which holds 10% of the world’s fresh surface water?

Where are the state’s standards? Where is the vetting? Where is common sense? 

Our supply of drinking water is diminishing while our demand is increasing, and the state’s leadership is silent.

On top of this, the Minnesota health community — including the Mayo Clinic — requested of the governor that a health study be done of the waters that would be affected by the discharge of waste from the PolyMet mine. This effluent includes mercury and arsenic. This too has been completely ignored.

[...] Specifically, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency is “committed to insuring that every Minnesotan has healthy air, sustainable lands, clean water, and a better climate” (emphasis mine).

The Department of Natural Resources states that its mission is “to work with Minnesotans to conserve and manage the state’s natural resources.” This includes our drinking water. 

Partnering with Glencore and Teck Resources violates department pledges and severely compromises the integrity of public service.

I implore you to protect the well being of the people you serve.

And, now, two governors, each party, agree. In the twilight of his two terms of service, Walz is doing exactly as Carlson advocated, in issuing his executive order for the 90 day protective order, until sane and sagacious steps can be taken without anybody pounding on the table saying, "Now, now, you have to give what I want, now. Start the clock running, the process moving, now." 

It is best to move with deliberate caution. Time has already passed with no dire straits arising. Mistakes in haste are easy to make. Good management of resources is less easy.

 

 

"Cal Warwas is a native of the Iron Range and a Republican state legislator. He is a union steelworker and a third-generation miner, and has worked for over 30 years at Minntac, a taconite mine in Mt. Iron, Minn.". Moreover, he is a whining Iron Ranger of which the State of Minnesota has too many.

 The quoted part is the footer from an op-ed he submitted to Strib. The "Moreover . . ." part is Crabgrass opinion. He writes a hit piece on the Walz move to protect the Rainy River Watershed and Boundary Waters from rapacious foreign-owned toxic sulfide mining. He's got his long-running union job, in taconite which carries the Iron Range without sulfide mining's super-pollution threats, but he whines anyway. It is tiring. Save the BWCA for the future of the entire state and nation. And let the whiners whine. Bless them.

https://www.startribune.com/greater-mn-economy-mining-jobs-walz-bwca-order/601880747 

Somebody should tell the guy Walz is not running and Klobuchar is. 

https://www.lrl.mn.gov/legdb/fulldetail?ID=15648

 

How he got elected in the first place astounds. The Iron Rangers collectively seem to feel themselves more entitled than the remainder of the State. and will put toxic mining jobs ahead of outfitter jobs, where the outfitters are the long term future of northern Minnesota. Tunnel vision. is a problem with the Rangers. Likely why they these days are more Republican than Democrat.

This guy seems to like Trump. While the economy sucks and the Iranians are winning, this guy:

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=122187882482774602&set=a.122093579006774602 

Go figure. Emmer could be an honorary Iron Ranger.

 

Saturday, August 22, 2026

Quebec facing Trump tariffs. Separatism moods are dashed by cold water. Ties to the remainder of Canada now appeal more.

Reuters.

 

Are the world's copper oligarchs good worldwide citizens, or are they just too NIMBY when their own backyards are the fullest in the world of the resource they seek to extract while imperiling Minnesota's Boundary Waters - Rainy River Watershed.? What is international justice in the situation?

The headline asks good questions. And there are longstanding federal treaty tribal rights to wild rice harvests in Minnesota waters. What's that worth if the wild rice gets poisoned?

Every voter in Minnesota should know the facts of this clear online site ---

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/copper-reserves-by-country 

 The message - there's more ore elsewhere. So do it in your backyard or somebody else's backyard, not ours. Not in the Rainy River Watershed. We don't want your mess where you copper oligarchs do not mine sulfide minerals safely. 

Disaster Prone is a mere euphemism for your recent oligarchic record

Go away. Exploit others. Not us. Said simply -

Oligarchs in Chile and Switzerland: Don't go away mad, just go away. 


________________UPDATE________________

After the screed, some links. Steve Timmer at left.mn has published much on the subject of sulfide mining history and expectations, safety-wise, and it is scare packed coverage. He knows more of the issue than I do. Crabgrass did search = left.mn sulfide mining

Much showed up beyond that site's posting alone. For that site, recently, here and here. Those two posted by Dan Burns, not Timmer. Two Timmer posts from earlier, here and here. Posts there have sidebar links allowing readers to unravel the full thread on topic.

That search returned two waterlegacy.org posts, here and here

Our Water is Our Strength


Local View: Sulfide-ore mining a lose-lose for Minnesota
,


Sulfide-Ore Copper Mining and the Risks


Science Desk: How Sulfide-Ore Copper Mines Pollute
 


Toxic sulfide Mining Near the BWCA
 

Do your own research, and you might even hit on mining oligarch propaganda.

 It is not simply Crabgrass bloviating, it is argument from multiple outlets urging caution.

Urging avoidance of too rapid a possible decision bias leading to possible long term disaster. 

A "measure twice before cutting" message. Something like that. There is no urgency. Those saying move now seem to show false prophet motivation. 

Striking while a partisan iron is hot is an aim some show. 

 

 

What a weasel quote. Career politician speak for certain. A pablum dog whistle, if I may mix my cliches. Niska, either you are for protecting the Boundary Waters, the Rainy River watershed, or not. Don't shade us.

 Axios does Twin Cities specific coverage from time to time. Regarding the pristine northern Minnesoa waters attraction that the outfitters there love and annually profit from, the unique Boundary Waters Wilderness national public asset, Harry Niska, stow the waffle and be for its due protection or not, on the record, clearly and without evasion, as we in MN House District 31A consider an upcoming vote.

https://www.axios.com/local/twin-cities/2026/08/19/boundary-waters-ban-mining-walz-twin-metals 

Walz moves to ban copper-nickel mining near Boundary Waters

 [... to the money quote"Removing any opportunity for these mining projects to even start through Minnesota’s incredibly rigorous environmental review and permitting process is short-sighted [and] will damage the fragile economy in Northern Minnesota," House GOP Leader Harry Niska said.

Fucksakes, Harry, everyone knows the rapacious foreign owned mining giants have been held at bay for long enough that 90 days more will be an inconsequential amount of time but that Stauber wants to press a cramdown now against the better judgement of the State, his way, and that statement Axios quotes about pseudo urgency or pseudo efficiency is not going to wash. 

Ferrous mining, iron ore, is the heart of Iron Range economics, you know that too, Harry, and this is a nonferrous mining caution at issue having nothing to do with actual Iron Range actions, today, on the ground. 

Harry. In your heart you know what you're saying is trash. Give up being a politician for at least 90 days, to allow the Walz effort to reach deliberation in the State's legislature, (where you are hoping to stay), where the next legislative session can function without any biased clock running against them. So that ordered and deliberate representation procedure may carry the day.

The Axios quoted Niska non-statement is so transparently politician-speak that you, Niska,  should be ashamed of it. And in turn you should come forth with a legitimate statement, for or against protecting the national treasure the Boundary Waters is, to define who you are to voters on the eve of reelecting you or voting you out for a non-wafflle of the other party. 

That said, the Axios item is broken down into explanatory items, and clearly lays out the situation.

All Crabgrass readers, international or more local to the U.S. and to Minnesots, should read the item. It is a classic of greed to exploit a U.S. locale, by giant international mining firms headquartered in Chile and Switzerland, with it our Minnesota land at risk.

Once the watershed protection is lost, it cannot be regotten. It's Humpty Dumpty, and Walz is keeping the egg on the wall for a mere 90 days more of prudent considerations. 

Harry, give up being a politician for 90 days, and be a Minnesotan concerned with what is best for the entire state, long term, including a future distant enough to be after giant international mining firms would have exhausted profitable ore and left a mess behind for Minnesota to clean, if cleanable at all.. 

Be a statesman this time, if you would.

No photo description available.
They inherit what you do and decide. Asset or cleanup mess. Show due care.

 

 ________________UPDATE_________________

Things are partisan this close to the year's general election. We cannot and should not hide that. There is  choice, and Crabgrass is touting the Dem agenda:

https://www.walkerforward.com/

 AND - There is https://www.walkerforward.com/news/endorsement-alert-save-the-boundary-waters-action-fund

There is much to Brian Walker's campaign site, e.g., https://www.walkerforward.com/news

Trust me. Check the site. He is no waffle. And, yes, this POST AND UPDATE is showing partisanship. So what? It's good for people to know alternatives when a choice is at hand. It's being fair to disclose partisanship, when it's already apparent anyway. 

Crabgrass wants Walker to replace Niska. As an upgrade. Know that in your own thinking.

 

 

Thursday, August 20, 2026

Julian Reese a Timberwolve? It could be.

 He hits the boards. And does okay on free throw perecentage. 

6' 9", 230lb. Passing, stamina and speed, and defense have been incompletely analyzed online, from the search Crabgrass did. 23yr old, and not long in the league. Good hands on the lob? We'll see.

 

Quickly, AJ has some new posts which are multiply interesting. Mention is posted now. If any additional posting happens here, it would be tomorrow.

Readers may wish to front-run any new Crabgrass posting about AJ content.

The link to do that: https://www.aljazeera.com/ 

Particularly, AJ posts an EXPLAINER about the U.S. hitting the $40 trillion debt figure. 

While yet to read it and other content, that EXPLAINER link is given to goad Crabgrass readers to seek it out.


.

 

Sometimes you search and find a new site that seems both impressive and sound. This post is about that.

 Many organizations list their board and staff. Not the case here, so a qualified shout-out.

https://couragefordemocracy.com/ 

https://citizensimpeachment.com/ 

Allied efforts. Web searching for news about Doug Chapin and his Dem candidacy in my Minnesota district, among returns was: https://couragefordemocracy.com/candidate/doug-chapin/   

The quality of the Chapin bio published there was striking. Causing this post. They should post their peoples identity, staff and board. That said, the links stand as they do.

 

"Freedom's just another word for money running things ...". That's what Rhoades Scholar Kris Kristofferson wrote and Janis sang, the line from Me and Bobby McGee? Yes/No?

 Remember that Reagan said stand in fear, when the man says, "I'm from the government and I'm here to help you?" Weigh that Harry Niska is saying, "I'm in the government and I'm there to help you."

Intrepid. Repeatedly saying things to the microphone - for you. For your Freedom. 

Fighting to help you; your values. It's a contest. As if the legislature is Fight Club. Cut taxes and spend. What then? The man changes suits and ties and microphones, to be in the government to help you.

The ever prudent fight against the Dragon. We slay the Dragon. Dragons - The Harder they Come!

https://www.harryniska.com/ 

 

His website didn't really mention dragons. That's editorial content. Nonetheless -  

Tune time. In honor of actual Republican will toward "values." And, yes, Harry is only a local man, not even in Congress like Emmer, who's now House party whip. Shepherding Partywide cut tax, then spend priorities to the floor and whipping the troops to action.

This link

And I am not making this Partywide gross mismanagement story up. It's on your backs. Not letting go. The reporting is fresh.

A reach? Harry's fault? Only indirectly. That's true. HOWEVER - Harry, and Emmer even more, coattail on the White House big ego spender man who's largely doubled that trouble since his first inauguration. 

Facts are facts and coattails are only so reliable, then truth enters the scene and it becomes, "What coattails?"

Again -- a reach? Go figure. 


Luigi Mangione is still interesting news, as pundits and others judge him, now that he's pled before a judge.

Luigi Mangione fangirl ‘reporter’ lashes out at Brian Thompson’s widow with vile comments, social media posts

The widow is a multimillionaire, given that her spouse the year of his death had multimillion compensation for making a claims section of that firm's insurance business a profit center, by deny, etc.

It's not the way risk shifting for a fee is supposed to behave. It's vile, instead.

 

A fault some may have noticed without this mention is that Crabgrass too often picks up notice of "an item" a day or two later than others. Sometimes that is bad. Other times it's fortuitous. Natalie news, has gotten through.

Fortuitous. Fortuiousity, if there is such a word. Natalie Harp. Seems she's a story.

And - no need to reinvent the wheel, because of EmptyWheel -

Natalie Harp Is the Unsupervised Gatekeeper to the Man with the Nuclear Buttons

It is done there so well that an attempt at posting here would be an insult. Be warned, however, the comment thread there is somewhat unkind to the pair, Trump and Harp. 

Yet cause is there to find within that item useful links, thought, and critique. Go for it.

(Just think. Had Crabgrass diligently tried a post earlier, lassitude would have gone unrewarded.)

Fortuitous is when merely having to tout a fine posting, and give the link, takes minutes. 

 

Boundary Waters in the News.

 Every Minnesotan likely knows that our Boundary Waters Wilderness is the most visited National Park in the Nation; unique in ways too vast to describe. Research it if you are a reader who cares.

Two items - and please give each your attention, here and here

There also is this

 

 

Just saying. Thick as thives. And decidedly on the Donald J. Trump credibility bandwagon of "America is Back! No more endless war."

 

Bombastically, Niska is the lesser politician. Jen is quiet too. Then, Emmer is his fumbling self. 

Politically, they are "family." 

Trump is their glue. Their first cause. Their ebb and flow. 

Their 2026 downfall. You can watch that as it happens.

Hitch your wagon to whoever, but take what you get when dumb war goes sour. When bombast fails. When Epstein will not go away and "Boys in girls lockerooms" fails to chase him.

When their management of the economy really really sucks. When Bibi is Bibi. When gas costs too much. When you see a hundred bucks buying too little at the check-out counter. And medical bankruptcy is the fate of your neighbor. Or your fate tomorrow. 

When paycheck to paycheck does not cut it. And will not, absent big change.

Vote smart. Or more of the same. Call out falsehood. Truth is as simple as, "Back up your manufactured  $9billion-in-fraud fantasy claim, or stfu." 

Nine billion is a lump to prove. So - prove it down to the last dollar. Or stfu. Truth is that simple. 

 

 

 

Tuesday, August 18, 2026

An AJ item about the UK providing weaponry to Ukraine, while interesting in itself, presents the question of reported depletion of US weapons stock being fake news. Fake reason for down-scaling the incivilities with Iran while each side calls the other untrustworthy snakes.

 https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/18/why-is-russia-threatening-uk-with-consequences-over-ukraine-drones

The item is lengthy but when mentioning munitions being provided Ukraine, the notion is the UK has a fraction of the war-making manufacturing capacity of the U.S. yet a claim is U.S. stockpiles are being dangerously depleted. Hence, less sorties, but still an oil strangulation situation on the world in general.

The U.S. claims vessel interdiction of Iranian commercial trade, with effectiveness of that claim hard to substantiate. Trump says the U.S. can take over the Strait, and Iran says that is all bluster. But is much fire being interchanged while Iran and Oman are discussing long term Hormuz tolls, whatever they may be called in documents? From rhetoric alone, one would think such talk, excluding apparently U.S. participation, would conflict with stated aims of Trump and company. 

Stated aims are only that, statements, and standing strong on both sides saying we are winning and will impose our will - with little hostilities - seems as if a regime change has in fact happened where Iran has much invested in making it look otherwise, and the U.S. plays along. 

Meanwhile Trump U.S. oil cronies are making record profits. Trump clucks some about that, but what's real and what's for propaganda leading away from actual things?

Who do you trust? In this situation, should you trust Iran, much less should you put any trust in Trump and his BS campaigns? If the actual outcome of things is Straits can be subject to toll impositions by bordering nations, despite UN understandings, where does that lead and who might benefit?

 

AJ has an interesting juxtaposition of Strait stories. Kind of. Hormuz, and then there is the Bering Strait. If toll charging there ever is an issue, we in the States would know it.

 AJ first in its ongoing daily summary item opens, "BREAKING --Mediators waiting for Iran-Oman Hormuz deal, Qatar says"

In a sense, that is old news, updated. A new spin, (remember it's a globe we live on) --

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/18/can-chinas-new-arctic-sea-route-to-europe-replace-middle-east-chokepoints 

That item, in part -

Shipping companies have become increasingly interested in alternative trade routes through the Arctic in recent years as conflicts, such as the US war on Iran, restrict vital routes like the Red Sea and the Gulf. 

One answer may be China’s new “Ice Silk Road”, which begins at Ningbo on China’s east coast, cuts through the Arctic Circle by running along Russia’s Northern Sea Route and then heads south in the North Sea, terminating at Felixstowe in eastern England.

In recent weeks, the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, the key transit point to the Red Sea off the coast of Yemen, has become a no-go route for many ships as the Iran-backed Houthis target shipping linked to Saudi Arabia. That has disrupted traffic heading to and from the Suez Canal, the vital waterway connecting West Asia to Europe.

So could China’s new shipping route be a sustainable alternative, and what would it mean for the balance of power in international trade?

Here’s what we know:

Where is the new Chinese sea route through the Arctic?

Last week, the Chinese container shipping company, Sea Legend, which specialises in international trade with North Africa and Turkiye, formally announced the new route it has named the “Ice Silk Road” after China’s historic Silk Road route with Europe.

The company carried out a test voyage along the route last October. According to a report then by China’s Xinhua news agency, the voyage took 20 days, offering an advantage over other routes through the Suez Canal, which take about 40 days; or around the Cape of Good Hope in Southern Africa, which takes about 50 days.

Following the test run, Li Xiaobin, Sea Legend’s chief operating officer, said the new route is particularly suitable for heat-sensitive and time-critical cargo, such as lithium-ion batteries and photovoltaic products (which convert light into electricity using semiconductors) because of the low temperatures and relatively short distance.

This image, imagine if not now soon, Norwegian North Sea oil, to China, that route. It is but one idea. Also, there would be the alternate route to Europe, through Canadian waters, past Greenland - which likely is a part of Trump getting an erection every time somebody says, "Greenland."

 


 Global Warming being real and not stopping, China has its two route options, but either must pass through the Bering Strait.  If Oman and Iran cut a deal that sticks, re Hormuz, would not a Russia - US deal on the Bering Strait be a matter of time? Perhaps that may be why Trump, loud on most things, is relatively quiet about the Oman - Iran talks? No big sabre rattling on that being out of character. If Hormuz goes the route of tolls, Bering might be a payoff to US following suit.  

Search = strait of malacca deal -- is suggested by where the bottlenecks are, and what's up with them.

That searh returned:

US has left Malaccan states no choice but to charge tolls

By destabilizing Hormuz and bullying Panama, US has shattered maritime order that kept Malacca’s shipping lanes free for decades