Monday, September 14, 2026

AP feed carried locally - "Iran’s nuclear chief not expected to attend IAEA General Conference, official says"

Opening paragraphs -

VIENNA (AP) — The head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization is not expected to attend the annual gathering of the U.N. nuclear watchdog’s member nations in Vienna for the first time in years because he is banned from international travel, an official briefed on the matter said.

Mohammad Eslami’s exclusion from the IAEA conference is another sign of rapidly deteriorating relations between Iran and the West. The United States and Iran have resumed fighting, on and off, after a fragile ceasefire collapsed in July.

Austria sought a waiver of the travel ban on Eslami with the U.N. sanctions committee but it was not granted, the official said. The official wasn’t authorized to comment on the sensitive matter and spoke on condition of anonymity.

As host of the United Nations in Vienna, Austria can request exemptions from travel bans to enable sanctioned officials to attend international conferences at the U.N.

Since Israel and the U.S. struck Iran’s nuclear sites during the 12-day war in June 2025, Iran hasn’t given IAEA inspectors access to nuclear sites that were affected by the strikes — even though Tehran is legally obliged to cooperate with the watchdog under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.

The IAEA has also been unable to verify the status of a stockpile of near weapons-grade uranium since the June bombing. [...]

 

 

 

Pure Bullshit. Not in the headline, but clearly apparent in the opening paragraphs. (It's about Trump)

https://www.twincities.com/2026/09/14/trump-dismisses-ai-guardrails/ 

- headlining - an AP feed, carried locally -

Trump dismisses new AI guardrails, says there is a ‘SICK conspiracy’ against AI and data centers

Trump pushed back against calls by tech leaders at Anthropic, OpenAI, Microsoft and others to have greater regulation of AI to ensure it is developed in ways that promote safety, address legal liability and preserve national security

- opening text -

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump said Monday that he would be a sufficient guardrail against rogue artificial intelligence, claiming that any efforts to limit the technology was part of a “SICK conspiracy.”

Trump was pushing back against calls by tech leaders such as Anthropic’s Dario Amodei, OpenAI’s Sam Altman and Elon Musk to have greater government oversight of AI. Their goal is to ensure the technology is developed in ways that promote safety, address legal liability, feed economic growth, advance science and preserve national security.

The president maintained that his presence in the Oval Office should assuage any fears about AI, which has become a source of controversy after a series of hacks in recent months that showed AI agents could be working to deceive humans.

“The only control or ‘guardrails’ that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT, and the U.S.A. has that, in spades!” Trump posted on social media.

No point belaboring the obvious. Readers choice of what to fault.

 

IMPORTANT FEDERAL CRYPTO LEGISLATION PENDING = Strib has local coverage, "Small banks, including those in Minnesota, at forefront of battle against crypto bill -- The Senate is set to take up the Clarity Act this week as it returns from recess. - Small banks say the legislation puts them at a competitive disadvantage." By Christopher Vondracek The Minnesota Star Tribune

 https://www.startribune.com/cryptocurrency-clarity-act-community-bank-opposition-tom-emmer/601868360

Because of Strib's paywall, only a brief excerpt, and then looking to other sources. Beginning paragraphs in Strib's coverage -

A push by the cryptocurrency industry to pass a monumental piece of federal legislation has run into a small, but loud, foe: an army of rural community banks.

Randy Dorn, who leads My Kind of Bank in the small northwest Minnesota town of Battle Lake, is among them and said the legislation as written will create unfair competition for banks like his.

He says he’s not anti-cryptocurrency but he is opposed to a bill that cruised through the House of Representatives — with Minnesota Republican Tom Emmer, the House majority whip, as one of its biggest supporters.

Right, Emmer does not mind screwing community banks, given his crypto ties and such. I use a local community bank based in Elk River, MN, and like it and do not want the Wells Fargo type of game.

There is that bias. Also, full transparent disclosure, I immensely dislike Tom Emmer. Why not?

Strib continues with a clear note of what the dissatisfaction with the bill is about. 

The bill, called the Clarity Act, sets guardrails for cryptocurrency companies. Both large and community banks say the bill does not put the same regulatory standards on crypto as it does traditional financial institutions.

Critics cite a loophole in current law that allows crypto companies to offer an interest-like reward that could entice people to move their money out of banks and into digital assets. They want senators to add language to the Clarity Act to repeal that loophole.

The legislation lands in the Senate as members return from recess this week, and will face some opposition because of the bankers’ campaign and an ethics provision some senators want because of President Donald Trump’s family ties to the industry.

Without a level regulatory playing field, small bankers see the cryptocurrency industry as an existential threat — to them and the small businesses and towns they support.

Full disclosure, I dislike crypto touts, Zhou with his Trump pardon, (search = binance money laundering and other offenses) where Zhou had to step aside and Binance payed billions in settlement, crypto having its seamy side (remember - Sam Bankman- Fried).

With crypto touts, including Emmer and Trump, (whose offspring has family grifting operations in crypto; "grifting" being an ethics-aware circumstantial inference -- there are no pending indictments or such); what's to like?

That sets the table. U.S.News carries a Reuters report - no paywall so readers can check it out -

By Hannah Lang

Sept 9 (Reuters) - A fight over major cryptocurrency legislation has spilled into the congressional summer recess, with the crypto industry ⁠and ⁠the banking sector mounting a final lobbying blitz in senators' home states ⁠ahead of a vote on the bill next week. 

The industry has spent hundreds of millions of dollars campaigning to advance the Clarity Act, which it says will put crypto ​companies on a solid legal footing. The Senate will take a procedural vote on September 15 that could determine the fate of the bill, but with Democrats and some Republicans warning the bill has insufficient safeguards and could destabilize the banking system, its chances look slim, ‌according to analysts.

During the recess, which began on August 8, the crypto ‌industry and banking groups have taken their fight to senators' home states, deploying op-ed pieces, letter-writing drives and in-person events to rally grassroots support and sway lawmakers, according to executives and public materials. 

"Our strategy during recess is ... about demonstrating the presence and enthusiasm of ⁠our community, in every state ⁠and every congressional district," said Mason Lynaugh, executive director of Stand With Crypto, an advocacy group backed by crypto company  Coinbase. 

[...] Republican U.S. President Donald Trump courted crypto cash on the campaign trail by pledging to promote policies friendly to the $2 trillion cryptocurrency market, and the White ​House has strongly backed the Clarity Act. The bill would address what the crypto industry says is legal ambiguity by defining which tokens qualify as securities versus commodities, and which regulators oversee them.

Crypto companies are anxious ⁠to ⁠pass the bill this year because polls favor Democrats ⁠to retake the House of Representatives in the November ​midterm elections, likely extinguishing what many see as a once-in-a-generation legislative opportunity. [...]

The Blockchain Association, a Washington group representing crypto companies, in late July launched the website clarityforamerica.com to help individuals and firms write to their senators to urge them to vote for the bill. [...]

BANKING INDUSTRY PUSHBACK

[...] Democrats, whose support is needed to clear the Senate's 60-vote threshold, say the bill lacks robust money-laundering and ethics safeguards. Some Republicans, including senators James Lankford of Oklahoma and Mike Rounds of South Dakota, have also expressed concerns that the bill would allow certain digital tokens to compete with bank deposits, potentially hurting lending.  

The Independent Community Bankers of America, which has been fighting the stablecoin-related provision in Washington, has likewise been mobilizing its members across the country to meet with senators in their home offices to raise their concerns.

They are focused on senators beyond the 24-member Senate Banking Committee, which led the bill and voted to advance it in May, said Paul Merski, ICBA's executive vice president of congressional relations. 

[...] Spokespeople for senators Paul, Rounds and Lankford did not respond to requests for comment. A spokesperson for Dodson referred Reuters to Stand With ⁠Crypto.

GROUP TARGETS WARNOCK IN GEORGIA

Tia Williams, president of the Stand With Crypto Georgia chapter and founder of blockchain-based software platform DocuHero, said she met with staff in the field office of U.S. Senator Raphael Warnock, a Georgia Democrat, during recess to discuss the bill.

[...] The Georgia chapter is arranging for local college students ​enthusiastic about crypto and blockchain technology to visit Warnock's office too. The group has also held advocacy events in Athens and Augusta, Williams said. 

There is more, and no paywall. One more -

President Donald Trump endorsed the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act on Sunday as Senate Republicans published what they called the legislation's final text, even as banks and the crypto industry remained at odds over stablecoin provisions ahead of a Tuesday procedural vote.

Senators Cynthia Lummis, John Boozman, and Tim Scott said the updated text incorporates 126 substantive changes requested by Democrats, including ethics language drawn from a proposal by Senators Thom Tillis and Ruben Gallego. Trump agreed to ethics restrictions that would cover the president, vice president, members of Congress, judges, and their spouses, the senators said. The new version also gives the Treasury secretary authority to restrict stablecoin rewards if deposit outflows from community banks reach a substantial level — a measure designed as an emergency brake for community lenders.

That's Yahoo, which runs a series of related items on the crypto bill (No Paywall).

Related - CNBC, decrypt.com -- 

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/3633/all-actions?overview=closed&q=%7B%22roll-call-vote%22%3A%22all%22%7D

 Crabgrass did not locate the markup of the package before the Senate for a floor vote on cloture.

If the Republicans somehow get 60 votes there likely will be voting on possible amendments, and a final vote. If the 60 votes on cloture are not there the bill dies; or there could be further negotiations.

Coverage did note that with Dems expected to do well in midterm voting, the Republicans and their crupto lobbying allies will push hard to get what they want now. In quoting sources, there was some Republican coverage saying "it's time" but readers interested in that line of thought should follow up on the linked items and if motivated, do their own further web research. 

Again, Crabgrass favors killing the bill until after the midterns, and seeing where that leads.

 

 

 

Sunday, September 13, 2026

AJ, two topics. Houtis and War on Terror.

 Houtis

Red Sea nations watch as Houthis seize Bab al-Mandeb strait 

Will the Houthi attacks activate the Mecca Pact? 

 War on Terror

9/11 at 25: How the ‘War on Terror’ helped mainstream Europe’s far right 

The dystopian legal architecture of the ‘war on terror’ must be dismantled 

 The links are given without excerpting or commentary, beyond the Mecca Pact means little unless tested to mean a lot; and the War on Terror was a Republican thing, invading Iraq?? And now a war on Uranium Enrichment, or worded that way in untrustworthy posturing. 

4 weeks the dude said. Who trusted that? Hegseth? JD? Bibi? Trump, himself?

Perhaps "nobody" works as good as an answer as any. 

 

 

The Internet of Things, IOT, awaits you.

https://blog.boerzel.de/de/blog/operation-smart-kettle

 

Politics in the local sense is a normal narrowing of focus, as an election day gets closer and closer.

 https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/61e598971a0fa753c382bcb2/c42445f4-2738-4c8c-b046-50a10a8a68af/Niska051726-0155av.jpeg?format=1000w

https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/61e598971a0fa753c382bcb2/c42445f4-2738-4c8c-b046-50a10a8a68af/Niska051726-0155av.jpeg?format=1000w
a reposting, not an any way whatsoever an endorsement - the mood actually being the opposite

 They both have nice teeth.

Beyond that, minnreformer.com has published:

Demuth proposes teacher performance pay, wants changes to free school meals

By -

Education is the word we use for preparing the next generation for the real world without their committing suicide the senior year of high school. Something like that. The private prep schools to of course train leaders, the public schools to train followers, mortgage holder studen debt facing individuals.

Generating a citizenship spirit is a thought. Wtf that means being a mystery but we know being "woke" is wrong and we can expect demuth or niska to remind us of that if the more strident Republicans fail the task, they remain there wanting our vote and ready to backstop any doub of "woke" whatever that means..

Minnreformer publishes in part-

Demuth, the GOP nominee for governor, cited her decade of experience on her local school board — prior to serving in the Legislature — as a needed qualification for getting student achievement back on track.

“We’ll be focusing on the fundamentals of reading, math and science. We want to make sure that we are spending wisely with fewer mandates. We’ll provide safety for all students in all schools,” Demuth said at a Capitol press conference Thursday.

Demuth is facing Democratic U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar in November. Klobuchar has pledged to raise student achievement, ban cell phones in classrooms and work with school districts to limit screen-time. Demuth said she would encourage school districts to limit screen-time, rather than a blanket ban.

Demuth said the state will also implement teacher performance pay, because “better teachers deserve better pay.” She was unable to say what metric would be used for teachers to receive additional pay. Some states and districts use student academic performance or classroom observations to determine a teacher’s pay, in part.

Minnesota already has a teacher performance-linked payment program, and over 100 school districts participate in it. It’s unclear how Demuth’s proposal is different from what the state already offers.

Education Minnesota, the state’s teachers union, has endorsed Klobuchar for governor.

First paragraph a decade of experience is distinct from a decade of getting it right. The two might be congruent, but they might be a distance apart, depending upon much that is subjective. 

What might objective getting it right look like? That's a thinking trap if you are fair minded, since goals can be configured to aims in a tortured way, or even dishonestly characterized.

Then, teacher "performance pay" perks. That is a thicket of belief that standardized testing and class average performance means something independent from some people are smart and some dumb and in private schools you can harvest the low hanging fruit, based on a pseudo-genetic argument the wealthy parents are smarter, and kids they have will be, so private school them, and public school teachers take what they get, skill and insight capability varying. There are religious schools and Niska and his voucher liking is grounded in that, he went to one, his kids go to the same one, and his spouse Jen at one point chaired the managing board of that one. It seems to be a shaping experience, that kind of private school where you pay for it for your children, or you jigger up vouchers so that the public pays for private schooling. Back to Minnreformer -

Asked whether she would continue Minnesota’s free school meals program passed during the Democratic-Farmer-Labor trifecta in 2023, Demuth said children from wealthy families shouldn’t be eligible.

“When a family is making six- and sometimes seven-figure incomes, their kids do not need free meals,” Demuth said.

Means testing where six figures these inflationary Trump days is not that big a thing as it was - and you do means testing and what, some kids get meal vouchers, some don't and you have administering costs.

Demuth said as governor she would opt into more federal education funding, like the new $1,700 tax credit for taxpayers who donate to scholarship-granting organizations. The tax credit was passed last year in President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act, and it allows nonprofits to use the money donated to offer scholarships for public or private school programs.

Crabgrass did search =  big beautiful bill $1700 tax credit is just vouchers tarted up

Surprisingly, my doing that search - biased in its phrasing - and under my generic profiling got top three hits

Democrats try to repeal tax credit from 'Big Beautiful Bill' 

Private schools have benefited from vouchers. Now public schools aim to cash in 

10 things to know about Trump’s new school voucher program

Under my profiling alone, search =  $1700 tax credit voucher

returned top three

The $1,700 Loophole: How the New Federal School Choice Tax Credit Lowers Private Tuition Bills

 Fact Sheet: President Trump Delivers Affordable School Choice Options
Through Education Freedom Tax Credit
(a federal executive branch item)

School Vouchers Explained: What the New Federal Program Means

Crabgrass views any film-flam or direct rerouting of tax money (or provision of biased tax credits) which down funds public education as a burden on some to finance arbitrary depletion of public education money to elsewhere and hence a bad thing. Clearly, opinions vary. Minnreformer continues - 

The Minnesota Department of Education has said the tax credit, which is a circuitous form of a private school voucher program long championed by conservative activists, would disproportionately help wealthier Minnesotans.

Demuth’s education plan also says she will remove “‘woke’ standards adopted by the Walz status quo.” Asked what standards the plan refers to, Demuth said her administration will do an evaluation of the state’s education mandates and remove standards that “are pushing our kids away from the basics of reading, math and science.”

Is that side stepping the question, or what? 

Demuth’s plan also includes changes to the state’s teacher licensing board to ensure the board is working to “prepare the next generation of workers and not the next generation of activists,” referring to conservative assertions that the schools are being used to indoctrinate Minnesota students in progressive politics.

That's just pure horseshitting and telling something, by her characterization. 

So, the opening image, Demuth and Niska together, fits their congruent voucher outlook. Crabgrass has no knowledge of Demuth's offspring, if any, and how their schooling was, but she had a decade on the school board, so public schooling is most likely. Readers can search out the question. Niska, a private religion based school for the kids and spouse a part of running the adventure.

https://educationminnesota.org/ is worthwhile. Professionals with experience - and the idea you'd not want brain surgery done by auto mechanics, nor auto repair by cardiologists - matters.

 UPDATE: Demuth wants safe schools. Does she think Klobucher wants unsafe ones? That's not worth even saying, as a given of politics. Safe home, safe streets, safe schools, safe supermarkets, safe sex.

Why say it into the item more than once?? Safe schools can be via National Guard permanant 1:1 guardsman to student ratios, or by some lesser, ideally specified, measures. 

As to specificity, Demuth is specific about the $1700 voucher plan, and little else. D-

Not that Klobuchar would score highter on any realistic specificity scoring range. 


All I really know about current events and moves is from reading Internet text and watching Internet video. What of the vast content you select will bias what you know and think? So, do the periodic check on ZeroHedge, and include a look at sidebar listed other sites.

 https://www.youtube.com/@misesmedia

We kind of know vaguely what to expect from 

Breaking Bessent

 We learn that three pundits are better than one, since a conversation seems more popular than a lecture.

Also, facial hair is now accepted on a wide scale.

What interests from that 3/4 hr item, criticism without answers begs the question of what the answer could be to a bollixed situation. An interesting "interest" opening discussion, bond yields, all that.

An interesting side effect of going to that item, the YouTube rec. list goes in a direction that is uncommon for it, at Crabgrass, given Google profiling algorithms and wisdom.

The item linked above was reached when ZeroHedge came to mind, somehow, from AJ early morning reading, BRICS summit 2026: What are the key takeaways?

  That brought to mind the BRICS effort to distance a bit from IMF and U.S./Europe banking hegemony, and a search = brics alternative to world bank

Try that. The return list seemed to suggest that the distancing from Western banking policy and norms is not really showing traction, with 2014 mentioned as the BRICS start of that alternative banking policy.

While thinking in that direction ZeroHedge came to mind, one item there being "China's 70% EV Target Deals Another Blow To Oil Demand."

 Then, the sidebar links ZeroHedg offered, one other looked at, https://www.christophe-barraud.com/blog/

In closing, none of the things explored say whatever, and what they say is their's, not Crabgrass's.

But seeing "Econ-thought" where the offered check-this-next recommender system output drifts from the normal profiled stuff - that is interesting to see, as a pathological look at profile channeling as done by Silicon guru lists of "have a look here." It seems a web exists which channels an awful lot, and each of us should try to jiggle the profile every so often to not be in the regular wagon rut return protocol.