Monday, February 10, 2020

Messaging to the Billionaires - generic, and individualized.

generically -


individually -
Don't plagiarize. It makes you look too cheap to form ideas on your own when you can steal something from others.

Shabby, shabby, shabby. No doubt of that. It makes you look like shit. It shows you as insincere. (Same thing.) Like some cheap whore, no matter your net worth and self image. Just a whore. With a come-on that only demeans you.

incidentally -
Money can't buy you love. It takes quality to be loved as a politician. And love for the electorate. Gotta have that.

If all you love is yourself and your money then neither counts AND - GET OUT OF THE WAY. STAY OUT OF THE WAY. YOU AND YOUR HENCHMEN. THAT IS A COMMAND, NOT A POLITE REQUEST.

 GET BERNED.

NYTimes - April 16, 2019 - henchmen -
Mr. Brock, who supported Mrs. Clinton’s past presidential bids, said “the Bernie question comes up in every fund-raising meeting I do.” Steven Rattner, a major Democratic Party donor, said the topic was discussed “endlessly” in his orbit, and among Democratic leaders it was becoming hard to block out.

“It has gone from being a low hum to a rumble,” said Susan Swecker, the chairwoman of Virginia’s Democratic Party.

Howard Wolfson, who spent months immersed in Democratic polling and focus groups on behalf of former Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg of New York, had a blunt message for Sanders skeptics: “People underestimate the possibility of him becoming the nominee at their own peril.”

The discussion about Mr. Sanders has to date been largely confined to private settings because — like establishment Republicans in 2016 — Democrats are uneasy about elevating him or alienating his supporters.

The matter of What To Do About Bernie and the larger imperative of party unity has, for example, hovered over a series of previously undisclosed Democratic dinners in New York and Washington organized by the longtime party financier Bernard Schwartz. The gatherings have included scores from the moderate or center-left wing of the party, including Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California; Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the minority leader; former Gov. Terry McAuliffe of Virginia; Mayor Pete Buttigieg of South Bend, Ind., himself a presidential candidate; and the president of the Center for American Progress, Neera Tanden.

[italics, red bolding added]

I make my choices. Bernard Schwartz does not. Clinton surrogates, including small town mayors among them, do not choose for me either. Finally, we all know the press euphemism for crypto-Republicans populating perhaps too big a tent;  "the moderate or center-left wing of the party," There truly is nothing "moderate" at all about a mob of right wing zealots with money and with their ever-ongoing class warfare against middle and lower class folks like us while masquerading as something else. Whores, whether they plagiarize or not. (Some don't have the money yet, but are pliant while lustful for the money that goes to pliant career politicians whether that be as a former mayor or something else).

 ALL OF YOU  CO-CONSPIRATORS -

 MAY YOU END UP GETTING BERNED.

Thursday, February 06, 2020

Pete Privilege, South Bend mayor, and a well written catalog of what galls me about the little guy, by one who writes better of it than I could. [UPDATED]

Link

Pete Privilege is ambitious to a fault, and not nearly as special and spectacular as he believes himself. Getting his ticket punched in the military much as many 2d Lt. types in Vietnam were doing, and all the clawing and sucking up, when well cataloged, is shameful. But read of it per the original exposition, (which is excerpted in the balance of this post). Properly transcribing embedded links into an excerpt is onerous, so figure out I had a reason for doing it, and follow the links for full impact:

[...} When he speaks about education and opportunity, Pete reminds me of my high school guidance counselor. That guy was a jerk. He didn’t want me to go to college when I did. He thought I needed discipline and suggested service work or the military. I didn’t need discipline, but freedom and respect. And money. Mostly, I needed money.

Similarly, Pete says college isn’t for everybody. I agree, in principle. That doesn’t mean I want him—or anyone of his class background, for that matter—deciding who is and isn’t suitable for management, government, and other professions reserved for the literate and educated.

Still, off to college Pete and I both went. After leapfrogging from Harvard to Oxford, Pete quickly (and now infamously) found a job at McKinsey & Company. Though I did well academically, no one taught me how to job-hunt. After college I felt lucky to get accepted by a temp agency. They set me up as a hospital janitor. [...]

[...] But my comrades on the “housekeeping” crew did not need more paperwork, or whatever else Pete is selling. They needed free health care, housing subsidies, and a labor union.

Those aren’t items on Pete’s agenda. [...] Recently The Intercept reported that his campaign was hiring workers through Amazon Mechanical Turk, a nefarious project to crush labor power forever by turning every imaginable job into soul-crushing, ultra-low-wage piecework.

When I look at Pete, I see the face of America’s rotten sham meritocracy, and I know I am not alone.

Like so many bourgeois strivers, Pete takes up space wherever he goes. He never wanted to be a journalist, but he still took a newsroom internship. One of his Harvard professors got him the gig. According to the Washington Post, the reporter Pete ended up working for had been “pushing for her station to find an African American intern—or at the very least, someone who actually wanted to be a reporter.” In short, he used his connections to deprive an aspiring black journalist of an opportunity that might have made their career. Why? Because he wanted to be president one day, and thought it would be useful to see how the media worked.

“I grew up surrounded by crumbling factories and empty houses,” Pete recently said in his endorsement interview with the New York Times. But does he know what it’s like for people who lived and worked in such places? I think not.

[...] I’m not the only person who has noticed how Pete tries, and fails, to slum it. Last month in Iowa, he touted himself as a Washington, D.C., outsider, “somebody who can actually walk from his house to the nearest cornfield.” Golly! Shawn Sebastian, an Iowan and Working Families Party member, tweeted in response that Pete was “the mayor of a small college town dominated by a massive private university. Pete’s dad was a Gramsci scholar and he went to private schools his whole life. Enough of this phony rust belt/rural signaling. Pete walks into wine caves, not cornfields.”

[...] When I surveyed my social media followers for their “Pete peeves,” they offered a laundry list of class cues. “He stands for nothing except his own career,” one person responded. Others noted the “self-righteous smirk whenever he’s criticized,” as well as his “vocal affect where he believes that taking a portentous tone makes his banal statements seem profound.”

[...] When I see Pete tense up and purse his lips, or take a hasty gulp of water when he feels pressured to explain some facet of his paint-by-numbers political career or his regressive, unpopular policies, it makes me want to barricade the street with burning tires and shut down a container port. If Pete is nervous, it means others like him are nervous. They fear that everything they have worked for in life—not in the proletarian sense, mind you, but in the sense of writing ingratiating letters and leveraging connections—is at risk. They’re afraid of the socialist movement. Good. It’s about time.

[...] When Pete was asked at the Vice News Iowa Brown & Black Presidential Forum what he would bring to a potluck, he was stumped. “Is it a breakfast potluck?” he asked. After a clarification from the hosts, Pete said he would bring “chips and salsa.” Chips and salsa! Thanks, Rhodes Scholar Pete. Such stinginess is typical among the upwardly mobile. How about we eat at a restaurant next time, and you can pick up the check?

While we’re on the subject of authenticity, it’s past time for a frank assessment of Pete’s most-touted qualification: his military service.

I’ve never met an enlisted veteran who talks about war or military life in the way that Pete does. I certainly noticed how, in the last debate before the Iowa Caucuses, he spoke of the plight of “enlisted people that I served with,” as though they were a separate species. Even for an officer, Pete seems especially smug.

[...] This goes for all of you, but especially for the presidential candidates. Stop talking down to the working class. Stop stealing our valor as veterans of poverty. Simply say, “I am a professor’s son. I am more conservative than my father was, and here’s why.” And then, Pete, you can start listening. Only then will you understand why your class act falls flat, even though you’ve ticked every box like the good student you always were.


If you did not: go Prep School, Ivy League, secure a Rhodes Scholarship, and step into REMF military ticket-punch acquisition (no Purple Heart, no combat rifle issued); if not born on third base and thinking you hit a World Series game seven walk-off home run; and if you vote for the twit; you are an idiot.

Hat tip to a reader for sending the link, (it fitting thinking here even if the reader might have a kinder regard for the self-inflated little climber).

____________UPDATE_____________
Bern Notice has posted again, disclosing another troubling aspect of the South Bend mayor's wine cave leanings; his real support base not having much at all to do with misguided Iowans. Instead: Billionaire backing and EVERYTHING that rides and guides that stagecoach, feeding hands getting licked and not bitten being the old saying springing to mind. Obsequious boot-licking toward the 0.01%; witty spiel and posturing for the unmoneyed electorate. Unctuousness for everybody, he's on that path. Smooth enough to not make too big show of the boot licking in wine caves and similar closed venues. Hungering for advancement; a lean and hungry look.

________FURTHER UPDATE__________
Between Trump and the three members of the Republican wing of the Democratic party; Biden bought into false touting of WMD hysteria; the mayor is an enigma that way; Trump showed restraint by doing only an assassination, so far, but in four more years a war with Iran becomes more likely with no Trump reelection worry. If the Israelis want a war with Iran let them fight it. We can watch. Trump seems deferential to a fault toward Bibi and Bibi's intentions. Who might see us to a best, peaceful course, of the three conservatives? Klobuchar. She's neither the loose cannon Trump and Biden each represents, nor Pete, who again, is an enigma.

Amy showed a little bit of Wellstone in her, back then.

Medicare for All, if that is an improvement you'd value, there is only either Warren or Bernie. True democracy for all or at least trying mightily to move there against massive DC institutional friction? Ditto. Best of the "same old" crowd? Klobuchar. And that overlooks Bloomberg poised to mislead those most easily misled by the last advertisement they'd seen on TV. Warren at least does not have this to harpy at her, should she, not Bernie, end up the nominee.

FURTHER: Bern Notice originates with a strong Sanders supporter. READ THE LINKED POST ANYWAY. What the post does is give links to regular MSM reporting of the lil' mayor's proclivities to fit in with his wealthy donor crowd. If you believe those MSM outlets back Bernie, go buy the Brooklyn Bridge. Trump or somebody in his cabinet will sell it to you - and what a price, how could you refuse? (Get a piece of paper saying you hold title. What more would you want?) Follow the Burn Notice LINKS! It will be an eye opener.

Wednesday, February 05, 2020

Iowa likes the McKinsey consultancy. Or, it just doesn't know better.

They had optioins. Status quo Joe was one, and flawed, and the less than rabid support for Joe must prove something. PAC, corporate, and big donor Money and inner party endorsements proved inadequate; the candidate was what voters perceived and to which they reacted - with a collective yawn. The Iowa folks identified more with South Bend than with Obama's legacy or Minnesota's Senate

AKlo, an honest civil servant, nonetheless had to see her effort fading. She trailed both the little McKinsey man and ol' Joe among the Republican wing of the Democrtic Party; not making 15%.

Of the three crypto Republicans, she held more promise while sitting on a super secure Senate seat in any event. Joe lost big time. Bernie and Warren each did okay in a state few view as a bastion of progressive thought.

New Hampshire will be its separate story. Biden hangs onto the gambling state's turnout hope. Then onto South Carolina with its Dem inner party set ways; while never delivering a win in the general election, to where it rightfully should be discounted as unrepresentative of any real final value to the convention nominee. No l win that state in the general, come hell or high water.

What we know now - Andrew Yang should stay in. His guaranteed income proposal is now voiced ahead of its time, but robotics marches on, jobs disappearing via that march. In Minnesota, the robots will take over the iron range, the real robots, not just the likes of Stauber and Bakk. The brigands on the range will remain. The work will be robot progress, human whining, until Yang's idea takes hold as sound mid-21st Century reality. Then they'll get in their boats and fish while getting the Yang money. Snowmobiling and ice fishing in winter. In Iowa, robot machinery and labor will farm, with fewer places to fish than land of 10,000 lakes.

Something people should know is pending - a death threat to public education, via the kind of thing Trump wants nationwide (per his latest speech to some congressional members - those not boycotting).

Vouchers by another name: Montana has state-constitutional issues with such mischief, leading to the awfuls having say. Most of them are Catholics, so guess how they'll skew against Montana.

Worth mention, this. Bless that handful of true patriots. (Vigilant and sensible patriotism and elasticized malarkey don't mix.) If a pack of falsehoods is not worth listening to, then don't.

Sunday, February 02, 2020

ZeroHedge posts of Hillary Clinton, viewed through the lens of today. Sore losers are losers.

An embedded video. From an Iowa Bernie rally. At one point dissing, "The tranqulizing drug of Gradualism."

And - somebody gets booed. Which captures more attention than the rest of the Bernie revolution being about more than Bernie. Because that movement has a heart. Unlike an earlier campaign or two, by another. Who held back the olive branch in 2008 until given SoS from the spoils. Critics with their own skeletons rattling loudly lack the necessary gravitas to be viewed as other than losers. We don't want no Gradulism around here!

Yesterday's big Minnesota news - I can contribute to the Senate DFL again, as a collective body again, since it upgraded at the top. The iron ranger who caved in on budget after the range being satisfied, is no longer the impediment to DFL prospects and support statewide, as he was.

MPR is the link given, although there may be other outlets reporting that Bakk has been relieved of top duty; and can you say "Upgrade?"

In honor of the change, a sidebar item set somewhat deeply there has been moved to the sidebar top and will be removed at some point between now and commentary here about the Iowa caucusing after it happens.

Now the DFL Senate is better oriented to retake a majority this November.

Progress is great. Bakk isn't. From the MPR report:

The DFL caucus announced the decision after a marathon six-hour meeting Saturday at a carpenters’ union hall on St. Paul’s East Side, not far from the Capitol, where they were meeting behind closed doors.

Senators declined to offer a vote total or characterize the margin of the election as they walked out. Bakk left the meeting without comment about the change or his political future.

In a statement issued Saturday evening, House Speaker Melissa Hortman, DFL-Brooklyn Park, said Kent “is a progressive champion, and I look forward to working with her as the new Senate DFL leader to improve the lives of Minnesotans. In his many years in the Legislature, Senator Bakk has been a steadfast ally for working people. As my partner and leader of the DFL Senate, he has been a trusted resource and friend. He deserves our gratitude and appreciation for his service.”

Hortman is a true party insider. The insiders will consistently tell you, "Our schmucks are better than their schmucks." True or not, they will tell you that. That attitude defines an inner party person. The MPR item concluded:

The Senate is set to convene for the 2020 legislative session on Feb. 11. All 67 senators will be on the ballot in November, for 2-year-terms, halved by decennial redistricting following this year’s U.S. Census.

UPDATE: In need of an update - please fix it ASAP folks:
https://www.dfl.org/about/elected-officials/minnesota-senate/
With news such as happened, party reform, DFL delay vexes given the goodness of the news.

FURTHER UPDATE: Dan Burns writes of the leadership upgrade:

This also means that in the more-likely-than-not event that DFLers are in charge of redistricting after 2020, Sen. Bakk won't be able to engineer some sort of Iron Range-friendly, pro-sulfides, pro-gun nuts, pro-etc. gerrymander. Or block votes on progressive priorities unless he gets his way on crap like that.

And Kent also lacks the bullying abrasive personality which played well in Bakk's district perhaps, but which galled others in many other places. "Hortman and Kent" seems to have a better ring to it than "Hortman and Bakk." More urbane. The machine may run smoother with taconite tailings grit washed from the transmission.

First US case of the new coronavirus was successfully treated in the Seattle area.

SeattlePI report. NEJM journal report. The NEJM item details progression of the patient's symptoms and how the patient was treated.

Remdesivir, a developmental drug without any published clinical testing, luckily was on the shelf before the outbreak hit the US. Who makes it, availability and pricing are not reported.

__________UPDATE___________
The Economist, reporting, the item uses the current Feb. 1 issue's print-version cover image for opening the report.