Sunday, June 16, 2024

Briefly, after providing transcripts and allowing Congressional testimony by a Special Prosecutor, enough is enough - or not?

Tapes are at issue, where trancripts have already been provided to the Republicans.

Here, online is the DoJ letter declining to see any crime in DoJ relying on the Executive Branch's citing executive privilege. Citing precedent.

Mike Johnson says the Republican House majority in Congress will attempt to judicially undermine the Executive Branch, in this political matter. Would it surprise you if they went judge shopping? To find a favored Trump appointee.

Lawfare has published an analysis

It's shabby politics out of the House Republicans. Per usual.

Those links are believed to be sufficient to set an understanding of things. For those caring about whatever is being cooked up in the House Republican cauldron. Rather than saying business as usual and moving on. Crabgrass did not study beyond reading the DoJ letter.

An unimpressive House Repub originating letter was noted in an earlier post.

Wasting time is a DC hobby. This time the Repubs started it.

Why in the world, having transcripts, would the Repubs suggest they need tapes? 

Go figure.