And it is not just MSNBC. But they deserve being under the microscope, and when there, they earn scorn.
Are such mainstream media outlets marching on a "narrative" sales effort, or just being fair umpires? Is inviting a pair of indistinct women to join a show host to trash Bernie as if pundits of some kind, is that in any way fair? Not to me.
To me, BS from pundits - even in chorus - when on TV shows owned by BIG corporations, cannot negate truth:
YOUR CHOICE, BOTTOM LINE: Believe seeing the crowds, or believe hearing a handful of paid propagandists tell you the crowds don't matter?
And they want to sell you Kamala Harris, no less; Harris, who has beeen an unspectular prosecutor? Wanting more glory is separate from earning it, and what has Harris done to earn trust? You tell me. "That little girl was me" is a crock, and while Biden and not Bernie was the target, it was a tawdry move, not presidential.
___________UPDATE___________
Distrust of institutional media has also earned attention in the original English speaking nation; e.g., MediaLens, see, here, here, here and here as examples, (as well as being interesting for themselves and not just as examples of something separate).