N.Y. Times noting the big resume blacked-out part of a lifetime; see, here and here. The second link is an editorial board op-ed, saying disclose or else people might rightly infer disclosure of the McKinsey payroll activities would be unfavorable to the Mayor's candidacy.
"Trust me," from a person as glib as the mayor just seems to ring a tad untrue. For all we know during his time at McKinsey the mayor might have been a "Russian asset." Where's Hillary to define such things when she's needed? What has she to say about that?
Perhaps she likes the mayor, and only throws the "Russian asset" line at those she wants to undermine, to smear, as if they, not her, were responsible for her losing. To Trump! Not just a regular loss, but colossal. Her and Podesta. Genius level. And Bill and the Foundation. Comey. Russian assets, each and every? At any rate, back to the McKinsey mayor. Who, what, where, when, why and how seem to be McKinsey related questions - and Pete, we're still waiting.
One might wonder why the mayor's several billionaire campaign contributors are not asking.
Maybe at McKinsey he worked for them. Or one of them. He was there a while. Doing something.
