RT asserts Israel will be left on their own, and suggests some terms - here, here and here.
It looks as if Iran could get nuclear weapons but say now they will not try to. Obama's deal was better - with inspections. Nothing is currently being published about inspections this go 'round.
Whether Iran's strikes against Israel are having any success is not being reported in US media, the impression being they are not.
UPDATE: Things seem Israel has nukes, Iran says for now no intention that way, but they are two nations still with Hezbollah a hot war but the two poised to be in an ongoing cold war posture, with the Arabs in between. Two hegemon, ostensibly opposed, but the bulk of Gulf oil held by the Arabs squeezed in between. It seems convenient for China, Russia or the US to have it that way. None of those three need directly stand between Israel and Iran. Let the two yell at or fight with each other.
The Saudis will want to gain nuclear weapon status. To buy it. There will be dancing around that situation.
Will the Arab Gulf states be pressed to choose sides, i.e., siding with one regional war-locked hegemon or the other? As with the cold war "choose sides" pressure when the USSR existed in a cold war lock with the USA? A mini-show standoff from now on, of the prior bigger one? A regional cold war in west Asia?