This is crazy.

 Tucker Carlson and some shouting idiot. Poor white people. And lawless failure to support ICE agents. Pure bullshit.

 __________UPDATE__________

Is this, however, sane?

What to conclude? There is a vast sea of some kinds of web content, one inch deep.

Not my saying, someone else said it first and I don't remember who. But it is true.

FURTHER: Third video, fit it into a pattern. Propaganda without shouting, since these are people with power and money and have no cause to shout about things. But their question is, "How is our world to be run?" Diogenes was not there.

FURTHER: RT here and here. You can go to their website and see more. 

FURTHER: CNN: 

New ICE policy allows officers to enter homes without a judge’s warrant. Here’s what experts say

Michael Williams - Updated Jan 22, 2026

 

With an Immigration and Customs Enforcement memo that allows officers to enter homes without a judicial warrant, the Trump administration is seeking to usurp guardrails that are enshrined in the Fourth Amendment and have protected Americans’ civil liberties for centuries, experts in constitutional law and immigration policy told CNN.

Even in an administration that has always pushed an expansive vision of its law enforcement authority, the directive is notable for the way it tosses aside longstanding prohibitions against warrantless searches on private property — a legal concept that predates the creation of the United States and is among the country’s most foundational principles.

“The Bill of Rights, we thought, were the first 10 amendments,” said Mark Graber, a constitutional law scholar and University of Maryland professor.

With the newly discovered memo, he said: “I guess now we’re down to nine.”

Immigration officials had typically sought the arrests of undocumented people through two means: a judicial warrant, which is signed and authorized by a judge, or an administrative warrant, which is signed by people who work in the executive branch and fall under the purview of the president.

A critical difference between the two is that judicial warrants allow law enforcement to enter and search a person’s home or a non-public area of a business, while administrative warrants do not.

Most immigration arrests are carried out under administrative warrants because they require a lower bar to issue, and Trump administration officials have long harbored frustrations over limitations on officers pursuing targets on private property.

So, in fairness, as a question of reality being faced, how hard is it, really, to get a judicial warrant? You have one party making a case, the victim of the potential warrant search cannot make a counterargument. Do you find a judge not on a calendar but in chambers, go in, and say we need a warrant? That would be open to judge shopping, but find the process online. Yelling propagandasts, plenty. How actually are judicial warrants done, find it.

It seems the difference is judges know the game and are a bit skeptical, but you shop around there's one not tied up who can be approaced and wheedled.

So, the question is it's easier to have the administrator - boss of ICE or a designee rubber stamp something than to risk a judge not delivering, and it takes time and initiative to go to the courthouse rather than to the  boss.

Find online that question, how hard, really, to get a judicial warrant, to see how citizens are actually are, or are not at great risk if you require a judge to sign off.