The word "donors" was not mentioned.
Schumer, lose one blue collar gain two in the burbs. Get rid of that shit, meaning if you still have Schumer you are no different a loser than you were when it was Hillary's turn.
Phony shit, clear because they say it. Trump lied and his popularity is going down.
The black guy, Obama, ran on HOPE and CHANGE. Delivered neither, and they come back, same creeps, same shit.
They discussed Mamdami.
Martin mentions Wellstone more than once. Schumer and Jeffries are not as authentic as Wellstone. That thought could be expanded, but saying it that way is enough, Where are the Wellstones, and are they suppressed by the Schumers?
Martin not talking both parties sucking billionaire donors means Great Again will not happen, Trump or the suck-up Dems, Great Again requiring more. Martin seemed to truly project wanting authentic candidates to win by being authentic, and then to deliver. Simply put. Martin mentioned Hubert Humphry and loss of the Dixiecrats. The Dixiecrats were the Schumers of their day. In a different orientation, but dinosaurs. Keep them, and lose elections, because you lose trust.
Do you trust Schumer to give a shit about you?
Answering that honestly, what's the next step? AOC taking on the task, or liking where she is, Potomac Fever or whatever?
What Martin did say was the DNC is not to decide who candidates are, it is to let primaries happen, and then to fight as smartly as possible balancing donor and voter, to win. No more Hillary's turn, Joe's turn.
But they haven't done that, Joe's second turn, etc. They are Carlin's one big club and you're not in it.
Obama upset Hillary's first "her turn," so they fucking had to give her the next one??? Who are these people? Letting Bloomberg poison Bernie's well, not standing against that, because they wanted it?
Martin was correct that Hogg had an agenda of favoritism and not neutrality, with the DNC needing to be neutral and not Debbie Wasserman Schultz redux, so Hogg had to be bounced from DNC, properly so. But that means the strategy is to hope Wellstones show up from somewhere, and win primaries and general elections. And allow it, don't suppress it. Don't Schumer on chances to win. A verb, to Schumer - meaning to have lots of intelligence and no brains, as Heller phrased it.