https://libertyprosperityblog.blogspot.com/2024/11/bill-kristol-hates-america-heres-proof.html
Giving the link and the headline, and having the immediately below post giving a quite different link -
Hope the Democratic Party does not take the wrong lessons from the Trump win.
And where now will they get their money?
Both parties will realign. Where will the GOP oldguard corporatists go? The Democrats will, hopefully, not want them - not moving more toward finance uber alles. (The Trumpists might nor care to even ask that "where will they go" question.)
In addition, Breitbart has three interesting posts. I am not suggesting the opening link is related, as I have cause to believe that author discounts Breitbart as an information source. To the best of my knowledge. That said:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/11/08/jack-smith-asks-judge-tanya-chutkan-to-end-january-6-case-against-trump/ (No fucking link to a definitive pleading which a real news outlet would give, trust their version, and instead keep you on their site??)
https://web.breitbart.com/videos/trump-transition-takes-shape-and-what-what-susie-wiles-brings-to-the-white-house-guest-matt-boyle (So - a subscription wall???)
Yes, one Breitbart item had a link over to that closed content thing. They edit and update, so they may have changed things, but this is the first indication they are playing with open/closed output that Crabgrass has seen. Why? To monetize the site, or to get a subscriber list? Two Breitbarts now, open to the public, and open by subscription only? Crabgrass has no idea what the content is, obviously declining to subscribe.
Read this: https://www.npr.org/2024/11/08/nx-s1-5111947/trump-transition
Make of that what you will - no transition team notice given yet. Who from Project 2025's resume pool, and staff, are to be included, if/when names get named?
One other Breitbart item: https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2024/11/08/report-kamala-harris-blew-20-million-on-election-eve-concerts-with-lady-gaga-katy-perry-in-swing-states-where-trump-beat-her/
That seems to be ill-advised campaigning. Expensive window dressing. Win or lose.