Monday, February 20, 2023

Four Clowns. Each a Republican. One elected by other voters in the Senate District in which I live.

Description

Parents Bill of Rights
Authors (4)

    Gruenhagen
    ; Bahr
    ; Lucero
    ; Mathews 

A bill for an act relating to families; creating a parent's bill of rights; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 260C.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA::
Section 1. [260C.009] PARENT'S BILL OF RIGHTS.
Subdivision 1. Short title.

This act is known as the "Parent's Bill of Rights."
Subd. 2. Definitions.

As used in this act, unless the context otherwise requires:

(1) "minor child" means a person 17 years of age or younger; and

(2) "parent" means the natural or adoptive parent or legal guardian of a minor child.
Subd. 3. Parental rights reserved.

(a) This state, any political subdivision of this state, or any other governmental entity or institution granted authority to act on behalf of the state shall not infringe on the fundamental right of a parent to direct the upbringing, education, and physical and mental health care of the parent's minor child. All parental rights are reserved to a parent of a minor child without obstruction or interference from this state, any political subdivision of this state, or any other governmental entity or institution including but not limited to the right to:

(1) direct the education of the minor child, whether it be public, charter, private, or home education;

[... more of the same ]

The Minnesota Constitution mandates

ARTICLE XIII
MISCELLANEOUS SUBJECTSSection 1. Uniform system of public schools.
The stability of a republican form of government depending mainly upon the intelligence of the people, it is the duty of the legislature to establish a general and uniform system of public schools. The legislature shall make such provisions by taxation or otherwise as will secure a thorough and efficient system of public schools throughout the state.

[...]

Square peg. 

Round hole. 

And they get paid good money for that level of clown stuff.

IMAGINE: Ms. Ann, don't bother about little Billy's report card. I'll write it. Why not, I'm his dad. I go first. The wife writes the next one. Never mind anything else. I voted for Cal Bahr.

OR: Sorry what happened to Little Billy. But Danny's dad thought his son's education included taking a handgun to school, and Danny's dad has the right to make that decision, because . . . 

OR: Sally's reached fourth grade already and you've not taught her a thing about Jesus, Marx, the genome, Protocols of the Elders, or quantum mechanics. Do your job . . .

AND YOU CAN SAY, WELL, THEY DON'T MEAN THAT . . .

OF COURSE NOT!

What they mean is biased and ignorant parents should have a right to assure offspring is as biased and ignorant of things as they are, the rest of the world be damned. 

__________UPDATE__________

Try this out with your thinking bonnet on: That was the start of subsection (a) of the provision, set out above. Subsection (d) then adds:

(d)  This section does not authorize or allow a parent to abuse or neglect a minor child in violation of state law. This section shall not be construed to apply to a parental action or decision that would end life. This section does not prohibit courts, law enforcement, or a government agency from acting in an official capacity within the reasonable and prudent scope of their authority and these rights.

So, no abuse. Good. The daughter cannot get an abortion becase we four sponsors believe an embryo is an alive human. Cops are okay. Agencies acting as we four think they should, that's okay too.

What else does it altogether mean than fuck the schools, we know best?

How could such a level of  people be voted into an office of responsibility over the laws of the State? It boggles the mind.

Read that over and over, that proposal of new law. Think about it. 

Somebody elected these four.