Saturday, February 05, 2022

Another sulfide mine being promoted. Rio Tinto wants it. Minnesota does not need it.

 Dan Burns, posting here. He hedges a bit on sulfide-mining characterization, but the Talon firm's promotional material from last year clearly says: sulfide (however, per British alternative spelling "sulphide" - e.g., here and here). This one - unlike Polymet and Twin Metals - is not on federal lands within the State of Minnesota.

Curious readers can web search = Inco Sudbury

It appears that shaft mines are anticipated by the "Talon" firm, as in Sudbury, and on-site processing of the sulfide ore is planned.