I did a first draft email, to help:
To: Gov. Scratch
From: AG
Re: Funding unavailability
I read in the newspaper [Strib online] that you wanted to interfere with my job.
You want my already overworked staff to get into your political dinkings.
Why not stay in-state, and do your job? We each were elected. I stay in state and work. You?
Here's my thought. You want an unfunded political football in my life. Fund it.
Molnau. Cut her paycheck unless you can tell me a single thing she's doing for her monthly dole. If not, put the money in my account and I will produce a white paper on the issue you propose.
Otherwise, take a long walk off a short pier, with your own silly little political anvil tied around YOUR neck.
Rome is burning. Put the fiddle away and work.
vty
Lori
That should prove helpful in moving along the GOP agenda.
________UPDATE_________
Strib posted the letter sent Swanson. Pawlenty is an embarrassment to the State of Minnesota. Here you can click on the thumbnail images to read the silly little Nero item.
Strib posted the Swanson response. I like my version better, but Swanson is a polite person.
The legislation in question still has to be signed by the President and reconciliation has yet to be passed by the Senate. The individual mandate does not go into effect until 2014. Our Office has not yet read and analyzed the 2,400 page bill that passed the House yesterday. The Attorney General’s Office operates in the legal arena and we are not going to make any legal comments until we have had the opportunity to review the 2,400 page bill.
This in emailing from Dennis Kucinich:
Health Care is a Civil Right
Each generation has had to take up the question of how to provide for the health of the people of our nation. And each generation has grappled with difficult questions of how to meet the needs of our people. I believe health care is a civil right. Each time as a nation we have reached to expand our basic rights, we have witnessed a slow and painful unfolding of a democratic pageant of striving, of resistance, of breakthroughs, of opposition, of unrelenting efforts and of eventual triumph.
I have spent my life struggling for the rights of working class people and for health care. I grew up understanding firsthand what it meant for families who did not get access to needed care. I lived in 21 different places by the time I was 17, including in a couple of cars. I understand the connection between poverty and poor health care, the deeper meaning of what Native Americans have called "hole in the body, hole in the spirit." I struggled with Crohn's disease much of my adult life, to discover sixteen years ago a near-cure in alternative medicine and following a plant-based diet. I have learned with difficulty the benefits of taking charge personally of my own health care. On those few occasions when I have needed it, I have had access to the best allopathic practitioners. As a result I have received the blessings of vitality and high energy. Health and health care is personal for each one of us. As a former surgical technician I know that there are many people who dedicate their lives to helping others improve theirs. I also know their struggles with an insufficient health care system.
There are some who believe that health care is a privilege based on ability to pay. This is the model President Obama is dealing with, attempting to open up health care to another 30 million people, within the context of the for-profit insurance system. There are others who believe that health care is a basic right and ought to be provided through a not-for-profit plan. This is what I have tirelessly advocated.
I have carried the banner of national health care in two presidential campaigns, in party platform meetings, and as co-author of HR676, Medicare for All. I have worked to expand the health care debate beyond the current for-profit system, to include a public option and an amendment to free the states to pursue single payer. The first version of the health care bill, while badly flawed, contained provisions which I believed made the bill worth supporting in committee. The provisions were taken out of the bill after it passed committee.
I joined with the Progressive Caucus saying that I would not support the bill unless it had a strong public option and unless it protected the right of people to pursue single payer at a state level. It did not. I kept my pledge and voted against the bill. I have continued to oppose it while trying to get the provisions back into the bill. Some have speculated I may be in a position of casting the deciding vote. The President's visit to my district on Monday underscored the urgency of this moment.
I have taken this fight farther than many in Congress cared to carry it because I know what my constituents experience on a daily basis. Come to my district in Cleveland and you will understand.
The people of Ohio's 10th district have been hard hit by an economy where wealth has accelerated upwards through plant closings, massive unemployment, small business failings, lack of access to credit, foreclosures and the high cost of health care and limited access to care. I take my responsibilities to the people of my district personally. The focus of my district office is constituent service, which more often than not involves social work to help people survive economic perils. It also involves intervening with insurance companies.
In the past week it has become clear that the vote on the final health care bill will be very close. I take this vote with the utmost seriousness. I am quite aware of the historic fight that has lasted the better part of the last century to bring America in line with other modern democracies in providing single payer health care. I have seen the political pressure and the financial pressure being asserted to prevent a minimal recognition of this right, even within the context of a system dominated by private insurance companies.
I know I have to make a decision, not on the bill as I would like to see it, but the bill as it is. My criticisms of the legislation have been well reported. I do not retract them. I incorporate them in this statement. They still stand as legitimate and cautionary. I still have doubts about the bill. I do not think it is a first step toward anything I have supported in the past. This is not the bill I wanted to support, even as I continue efforts until the last minute to modify the bill.
However after careful discussions with the President Obama, Speaker Pelosi, Elizabeth my wife and close friends, I have decided to cast a vote in favor of the legislation. If my vote is to be counted, let it now count for passage of the bill, hopefully in the direction of comprehensive health care reform. We must include coverage for those excluded from this bill. We must free the states. We must have control over private insurance companies and the cost their very existence imposes on American families. We must strive to provide a significant place for alternative and complementary medicine, religious health science practice, and the personal responsibility aspects of health care which include diet, nutrition, and exercise.
The health care debate has been severely hampered by fear, myths, and by hyper-partisanship. The President clearly does not advocate socialism or a government takeover of health care. The fear that this legislation has engendered has deep roots, not in foreign ideology but in a lack of confidence, a timidity, mistrust and fear which post 911 America has been unable to shake.
This fear has so infected our politics, our economics and our international relations that as a nation we are losing sight of the expanded vision, the electrifying potential we caught a glimpse of with the election of Barack Obama. The transformational potential of his presidency, and of ourselves, can still be courageously summoned in ways that will reconnect America to our hopes for expanded opportunities for jobs, housing, education, peace, and yes, health care.
I want to thank those who have supported me personally and politically as I have struggled with this decision. I ask for your continued support in our ongoing efforts to bring about meaningful change. As this bill passes I will renew my efforts to help those state organizations which are aimed at stirring a single payer movement which eliminates the predatory role of private insurers who make money not providing health care. I have taken a detour through supporting this bill, but I know the destination I will continue to lead, for as long as it takes, whatever it takes to an America where health care will be firmly established as a civil right.
Thank you.
HR676, Medicare for All, aka the Conyers Bill is the answer. Unless and until it is law, the answer for Minnesota is the Minnesota Health Plan.
Swanson should write that last paragraph back to Pawlenty. It is the bottom line truth in all the smoke and mirrors the White House, Pawlenty, Pelosi, Big Pharma, the provider-industrial complex and the insurer-industrial complex are putting out; along with the reprehensible conduct of Boehner and the rest of the GOP, Joe Lieberman and Bart Stupak and all the Blue Dogs included. They are technically not GOP, instead, they are GOP-lite. Watered down GOP.
There's a depression in the land. Pawlenty's party eight years in the White House precipitated it. Tail end of the second term they loaded the fan. It's been hard times and bad karma ever since. Rush loves it because it has hateful people listening to him. Bachmann can draw a crowd of a few thousand deluded ones every time, but no more, yet for her that's sufficient. The ego would want more but the ego grooves enough on what's available as facilitation for her self esteem trip and validation of her view of herself as having made it as an important person.
You doubt? Here, here, here, here, here and here. Tawdry? Crass? Divisive? A carnival barker? A Gingrich? A Pawlenty of the other gender?
Form your own opinion.
Vote accordingly in the general election if you live in Minnesota's Sixth District.