Saturday, February 21, 2026

Some SCOTUS and Trump presser corrections. And thoughts.

 
The PBS link to Trump's presser is -

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-live-trump-holds-news-conference-after-supreme-court-strikes-down-his-global-tariffs 

An online transcript -

https://globalnews.ca/news/11676133/donald-trump-tariffs-supreme-court-reaction-transcript/

Possibly the transcript was AI generated. It is linked above without having read it. It is there for readers. AI transcription tools are fairly good, if not perfect. 

My initial reaction is/was grounded in my dislike of the man, his actions, and his style of speaking. With that clear, he was, in a personal view, as cogent as ever, which is not very cogent, as a personal opinion. Online opinion of dementia may be overstated or a hope more than a reality.

Having never thought much of the Trump delivery, but admitting it got him votes from somewhere, some part of the electorate, I found his reaction an abomination, but not different in style and delivery that he's used in his political career.  He simply said SCOTUS be damned, he liked the Kavanaugh part about other stuff he could pull as an argued basis to keep doing as he's been doing. Tariff war still on as it's been.

It was not ambiguous. It was a clear statement, much of it delivered from prepared text. With interjections related to what he'd just said, saying it, in effect, again, but that's been Trumpspeak since he came down the escalator.

So the day after the SCOTUS presentation, the following Trump presentation leaves ambiguity, but an impression he's not going to alter any conduct. And it's not been steady policy, it's been peicemeal disjointed and tuned to daily things that riled the man to make up numbers in response, with no rhyme or reason.

Leave it there for now. It was a DC Friday, (which is not a compliment). 

UPDATE: The SCOTUS/POTUS sequence is a reminder, another NO KINGS rally is due, or even arguably overdue. 

 

Friday, February 20, 2026

The SCOTUS opinion on Trump's tariff trade war will have uncertain consequences. The best quick reporting that way, CNBC.

 https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/20/supreme-court-trump-tariff-decision-illegal-refunds.html

It would be easy to say, no excerpt - it speaks for itself.

THE TRUTH: No excerpt - I have to go to the toilet and vomit after watching the Trump presser on the SCOTUS opinion where he said he liked the Kavanaugh part and intends to not change a thing but might. In a more aggressive/stupid way or set of ways.

Retch on in uncertainty, nation and world. It will be as it turns our. Reason subverted to - you name it. 

Citizens of the USA paying more at the store. And then some. Ain't it is not over until 2028, when JD gets a due comeuppance.

____________UPDATE____________

There's a link in the EmptyWheel reporting where you follow it and get full access to an item behind a subscription wall, but where the pre-wall teaser says enough.

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/dont-be-fooled-by-the-corrupt-courts-tariff-decision 

The pre-wall teaser cuts the Gordian knot. The gifted full item is an untying attempt.

With a long bullshit opinion mish-mosh, don't waste time. Cut the fucking knot.

Trump ignores the opinion, saying Kavanaugh is a patriot, others less so. Not in those specific words, but by actions promised in his presser's words. 

 ______________FURTHER UPDATE______________

What is interesting, chasing that TPM stuff (and tweets) discovered - https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/lutnick-family-angling-to-make-astronomical-sums-off-court-nixing-tariffs noting:

NEW YORK, NY - SEPTEMBER 12: (L-R) Brandon Lutnick, Chairman and CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald, Howard Lutnick, US Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, and Daniel LaVecchia attend Annual Charity Day hosted by... MORE
This is not new. But I at least hadn’t heard any of these dots connected. I wasn’t even aware of the dots. A friend mentioned to me over the weekend that he’d heard about Wall Streeters buying up the rights to tariff refunds from big corporate importers. So the idea is that a Wall Street firm goes to an importer and says, you’ve now paid $10 million in tariffs. I’ll pay you $2 million right now for the right to collect the refund if courts ever end up deciding the tariffs were illegal. My friend had also heard that one of the most aggressive buyers was Cantor Fitzgerald, the firm until recently headed by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and now run by Lutnick’s sons. Twenty-something Brandon Lutnick, pictured above on the left in a 2016 photo, is the current chairman of Cantor Fitzgerald. (He must be hella talented!)

Damn, I thought: That’s a hot story, crooked as the day is long. But I’m not sure how I or we would track it down without better finance world sources. Still, it was worth some quick googling. It turns out this is happening and Cantor’s role has already been reported. Wired and others reported this more than a month ago.

In mid-July, according to Wired, Cantor was buying up the rights to your potential tariff refund at between 20 and 30 cents per dollar. [...]

Business as usual, among some. If you think it stinks, how did you vote, 2024; Harris or the other of the two party candidates?

For me it was another of those lesser evil elections and I went with Harris. When I say "those" I mean every presidential election since I reached voting age. Each time going Dem. Clinton, Obama on those two even thinking it a positive choice - at least for the first term, each, but not the second term, each, where it was good old lesser evil one more time. It has been where at some point I came to fully understand the low approval values citizens in polls gave to Congress. Gave, give, and will give.

 FURTHER: I also came to think Malcolm was a stronger voice than King, and was proven right by the fact he was shot dead sooner.

Conservative Democrats are a big problem. They'd delude you away from progressive reform, by saying conservative Dems can win, progressives cannot. That's not a DHS level of lying. It's not, however, having one's mind right.

 In Texas, Jasmine Crockett will try to win and push through true reform, including healthcare reform. With the guy Colbert boosted, you get Jesus reform, a dump on the Christian nationalists, but nothing else but same old insurance company love of the old cash flow.

That said, weigh Carville as correct on sniping at Trump when he does that, but wrong on same-old do nothing Dem candidates being best for you. Know your casual friends from your true friends who want the best for you. The casual ones want the best for themselves, and make good money from it. Think of it that way.

SCOTUS pulled the plug on the tariff bullshit.

 EmptyWheel has the story, with a comment thread already started.

https://emptywheel.net/as-expected-scotus-rules-against-trump-on-tariffs/?unapproved=1129144&moderation-hash=8d7c30bffa05ea076f6de9493e3ed32a#comment-1129144 

Tightly analytical, so who'd think to reinvent the Wheel? It links, with further linking already in the commentary thread, so go there, read about it. 

____________UPDATE___________


WATCH LIVE: Trump holds news conference after Supreme Court strikes down his global tariffs

Says he's not a TACO, more or less. We suffer. He reads his speech. Did Stephen Miller write it? Who? 2028 is a number with promise. 

He seems to be saying the citizens getting the pass through hurt from his mischief is something he intends to continue under a repaint. We take it in the gut, gut punched by a fraud in the White House, while the importers await their lawsuits outcomes.

He says "billions that have come into our country." That's us, via the pass through, taking the hit. Not overseas people, they mark up the goods. Not the importers, they mark up the goods. Go figure what the bloviating reduces to. Why can't we buy Chinese electric cars that a better and cheaper than an Elon Musk Tesla. Figure that one out, as to whether Elon and Trump are anything but tight like-minded fascists, left hand washing the right.


 

 


When Trump dies, do you think his will, when read, may be found to require a graveside eternal flame? Bigger than JFK's?

 He'll be his own Albert Speer. Already there with the White House stuff. Jackie's rose garden done in, and the ballroom-envy thing he has after dining with the Brits.

And internal gold-plated White House super-kitsch. 


Thoughts on the separation of church and state. And of loud objections to a church having a pastor also being a local head of ICE.

 Don Lemon, and others were arrested, per a doctored image:

image from: https://emptywheel.net/demonic-godless-un-american-harmeet-dhillons-own-misconduct-will-be-an-issue-in-don-lemon-case/

For suitable background context; See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qe875iKBmrw --- That YouTube statement fleshes out time and place, of a key church/ICE protestor speaking about the issue of the protest and it's motivating factors, in her view.

Lemon contends he was not part of any planning of the event, but had prior notice and hence reported it, as news. As contending freedom of the press, set that apart from Levy Armstrong, solely contending freedom of speech.

In the past a bill was passed in Congress, against impeding access to abortion clinics and some congress critters tacked on "Churches too."

That's the bill the "conspiracy to disrupt" prosecution of the protesters is based.

IS IT CONSTITUTIONAL TO PUT CHURCHES ABOVE ANY OTHER PLACE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, SUCH AS A RESTAURANT?

That likely will be the key question arising from the protest of the ICE pastor's being protested inside the church. Had it been outside picketing the church without impeding entry, on the sidewalk, not inside, it would have gotten less coverage and likely would have not been prosecuted - picketing peacefully outside an abortion clinic without impeding entry (churches too?) is allowed. Free speech.

Now, presume ICE pastor whats-his-name was inside a restaurant, where he dined, and many entered the restaurant and chanted and interrupted his diner and were arguably a nuisance to other diners under local law, chanting and milling about in large numbers. Nothing to make a federal case about it, local nuisance law would be at play.

So if church and state are to be separate, that fucking church was no different than a publicly open restaurant. No notice of "members only" an unlocked door, no posting of "MEMBERS ONLY - TRESPASSERS WILL BE PROSECUTED." A public facility. (Not open 24/7 but when open, open to the public in all appearances even if not so open in fact.)

But A CHURCH!  Well, so what? The First Amendment gives me freedom from religion, it's nothing to me but something others do, and they're free to do so, as long as they don't force themselves onto me and don't think themselves special over having a religion I don't, be it Hindu, Christian, Judaism, Mormon, or Islam or whatever. The Native American Church with Peyote rites; Rastafarians with their herb.

Freedom of religion means there is no State religion. Nothing imposed. Nothing curtailed. But it's also freedom from religion having any special status, or rights they have but I would not have if believing in the divinity of a redwood tree. (Since tree worship is not a recognized religion - lacking critical mass, such as that numerically behind the Mormon church - which historically been persecuted as a cult when with lower numbers and headquartered in the Midwest when Joseph Smith lived).

If it goes to the Supreme Court, they gave us Hobby Lobby, a public place for shopping I would never enter to buy a thing there, but somehow special because of Jesus or whatever. Bad law. Bad Court. But a precursor suggesting the type of opinion to expect if Ms. Levy Armstrong takes her case that far and cert is granted.

And - if Levy Armstrong wins at District and Circuit level, cert will be granted, whereas if she loses it's uncertain. This bunch, cert would be granted if she wins and has the Church part of the abortion clinic protection law held Unconstitutional by lower courts.

Because of separation of church and state. In it's logical form an opinion should take. Nothing special, it was a church and not a restaurant, nuisance and trespass local law covering both equally. This SCOTUS pack, rogue as it is, enough said.


 

WTF is a Tohey request/demand, in the context of: " 'Hiding evidence and obstructing our investigation is unacceptable and it indicates a total lack of confidence in their agents' own actions,' Moriarty said.' We are prepared to take further legal action should the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice fail to meet our deadline and continue to obstruct our investigations.' "

So, the headline quote is from: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/hennepin-county-attorney-mary-moriarty-demands-evidence-in-2-shootings-from-federal-authorities/ar-AA1WBJH2 

See, also,

Minnesota prosecutors are demanding that federal officials share evidence in the killing of Alex Pretti and the shooting of Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis by federal immigration agents in Minneapolis.

Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty announced she issued the “Touhy” demands, which she compared to subpoenas in state court, during a news conference on Wednesday.

The demands, filed with Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, come on the heels of the FBI formally notifying the state Bureau of Criminal Apprehension that it would not share evidence into the Pretti killing with local investigators.

“Hiding evidence and obstructing our investigation is unacceptable and indicates a total lack of confidence in their agents’ actions,” Moriarty said.

Moriarty said they gave the federal government until March 3 to meet their demands for information, including the names of the federal agents involved; videos and photographs recorded by federal agents; statements by federal agents; medical records and physical evidence, including firearms, cartridge casings and uniforms.

“We are prepared to take further legal action should the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice fail to meet our deadline and continue to obstruct our investigations,” Moriarty said.

Moriarty’s office has already issued a demand for evidence in the killing of Minneapolis resident Renee Good by an ICE officer but has not received anything from federal officials despite giving them a deadline of Feb. 17.

Emails to the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security were not immediately returned.

The BCA has historically investigated shootings by law enforcement officials but has been blocked from participating in the investigations of federal immigration agents killing Pretti and Good, both U.S. citizens, and shooting a Venezuelan national in the leg, in three separate January incidents in Minneapolis during “Operation Metro Surge.”

The lack of cooperation from the feds hinders local prosecutors in weighing whether criminal charges against the agents are warranted, leading Moriarty and Ellison to begin collecting evidence themselves with the BCA.

https://minnesotareformer.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/P1230828-2048x1394.jpg
 

They, the locals, have the published video evidence, both murders, and available experts to go frame by frame to a jury. They also have put out a public request for witnesses and any publicly held additional evidence, so a good guess is they know the individuals to prosecute, and could without federal involvement get convictions.

Things like Bovino's emails, that would be nice to get, but are not essential. The video publishing has already convinced Congress critters and the general public that the administration lied like a rug and failed to get away with it, because of the video proof of big-time lying. Crabgrass is unaware of online copies of any specific local Touhy request papers.

======================================

Touhy

Readers can do search = Touhy demands requests 

Crabgrass did that search, and the initial returned item explains things: https://www.thefederalcriminalattorneys.com/touhy-request 

Credit Eisner Gorin LLP - https://www.thefederalcriminalattorneys.com/home 

for putting online a reasonably clear and detailed explanation, which speaks for itself.

From that .../touhy-request link, above, you can gain as much knowledge as Crabgrass has about such a request being the chosen method at law to blast stuff from a federal agency, such as DHS and/or DOJ. Subpoena power is superceded by a body of law on Tohey requests, and as noted in excerpting, Moriority has been stiffed on the Good murder, and will have to litigate to get federally withheld evidence, so it is likely her office will be stiffed too on the Pretti murder.

Your federal government. Trump's minions. I sure as fuck had no roll in putting that bunch of bastards into power, I bit the bullet and voted Harris, but they now hold the power and act as bullshit as they do. Elections are coming soon

FURTHER:There is an LII entry: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/39/230.10 

That item is for how the Postal Office handles requests for info -- § 230.10 Demands for records or testimony. It is representative enough to show that each agency may have a CFR posting of procedural and substantive Rules it has promulgated - CFR = Code of Federal Regulations, for those not already aware of the abbreviation.

 Readers should be able to find online similar DOJ and DHS stuff via reasonable search skills. Crabgrass did not take that further step of slogging through the CFR, where the LII site is where it would have been done.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text is where search online may begin, for those caring enough to pursue things. Lawyers get paid good money to know and search all that stuff. Helpful, https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=3%2C24&q=touhy%20requests

That last link is from search of Google Scholar, case law, federal courts . . .

 

Wednesday, February 18, 2026

Second rate propaganda. Guess who? Paying agents in the field too much, and not paying the propagandists enough. Penny wise, Pound foolish.

 This one by screen capture. It speaks for itself.

click for full size to make reading easier

 A government website designed by the least skilled of government folks. Join Ice.

An hour of Heather Cox Richardson where if you've not the hour it takes to view, you are a short-sighted slob. And you don't deserve the vote you have. Give it up and follow Erika Kirk, or dig a hole and then fill it up.

 Link = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zp6q6sT0HQQ

Or if you've not the time, you've not a mind. You can find somebody's boots to lick. 

Fair notice, the final part of this hour has been separately posted on YouTube and has been linked to, in that exceprted form, in an earlier post about the Talerico candidacy in Texas. When you hit that, you will notice.

But the advice, watch it all in context, and see if what you may be feeling is touched by HCR's survey.

__________UPDATE__________

HCR begins her analysis by mention of a Marco Rubio speech in Munich. It is online here

Rubio has always seemed to me to be a pompous bullshitter and sophist. That speech cemented the view and I could only take less than four minutes of it.

However, for those caring to see the item HCR analyzes, the link is given.

I really have no tolerance for pompous bullshitters and sophists.

Rubio would not be my first choice for anything. Nor second, nor third. 

 

 

Rachel Maddow continues to broadcast, and her recent insights are on YouTube.

 Link = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joqiTf0rZNg

It is her Presidents' Day braodcast, so, quite recent.

It is a serious and informative look at a number of things, and she mentions neither, Stephen Miller, Kristi Noem, JD Vance, nor Hegseth. Just, reporting things.

She does mention Trump.

 

On YouTube for your enjoyment/edification = ICE & DHS: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)

 Link = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-KDUOHEZFk

 

James Talarico Pulled From Airing on Colbert

Colbert aired the stiffled segment on the Internet, and the easiest thing is to link there to show it, right up front, top of this post.

 Hence, do it differently. We are each as we are, so first, Heather Cox Richardson.

For context. Link =  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=encd88MywEg

She gives context, then at 4 min into it, Talarico!! Discussed, not a guest.

Why Trump administration is more concerned about James Talarico, Texas Dem US Senate candidate, than being concerned about Jasmine Crockett. She dissects that "Why?" 

Talarico - my word how anti-Trump/Hegseth narrative - disses Christian Nationalism as un-Christian.  Enough to make Trump load his pants. Blasphemy. Ask Hegseth, he'll show you his Jerusalm Cross Tattoo and say, "See!" So - what next?

MSNow, not yet Colbert, wait, be patient. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vawt9DsW3yk  = more table setting. "MS NOW's Lawrence O'Donnell discusses why it would be impossible for Talarico's appearance on 'The Late Show' to trigger the FCC equal time rule." That's from the blurb YouTube puts under the video, before viewer commentary. It's part of the context of the story of Trump's FCC lackey's HS leaning on CBS, with its merger hopes, to stiffle Talarico's dissing Trump's Christian Nationalist exploitation as fundamental MAGA base, wear-the-hat folks, need-that-vote after the ICE/Border Patrol Minnesota approval rating kill.

Okay - the link we've all been waiting for - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiTJ7Pz_59A 

And if you think, why did Trump so fear this that he had his FCC lackey murder the segment on network viewing to where it had to YouTubed to the masses, it's not that big a thing - join the list. Trump is TACOing again, chickening out of letting Talarico be seen, except there was a bit of blowback. The blurb under the video said. as of the time I accessed it where the number might climb, 

5,453,340 views
Feb 16, 2026 #Colbert #Comedy #JamesTalarico
Stephen Colbert hosts Texas State Rep. James Talarico for an online-exclusive interview that touches on the issues raised in Talarico's campaign for the Democratic nomination for Senate including the separation of church and state, the dangers of consolidated corporate-owned media, and the fabricated culture wars pushed by Republicans in states like Texas. If you're curious why this interview with James Talarico was an online-exclusive, click here to watch Stephen Colbert explain:    • Why CBS Didn't Broadcast Stephen Colbert's...  .

Yeah, a real brain fart to make a big thing of it. But it's Trump, you know, and there are the mumblings about dementia. Plus, dementia aside, he's a classic asshole.

So enough words. Watch the video troika series linked to above, and decide, who'd be dumb enough to have a toady try to silence such an innocuous thing. (It was Trump, possibly with Stephen Miller's advice, who was that dumb, really.)

 Bless the stupid, when they step on their own body part.

But, you know, the other Texas Dem US Senate candidate IS Jasmine Crockett, and there's a lot of reason for Trump/toady choosing to not give her a boost, so is the phrase "dumb like a fox" at play? We'll have to watch there, to see who wins that Dem primary. And, be good, Love thy neighbor.

_______________UPDATE____________

Telarico is a formidable person, but the Crabgrass choice is Crockett. That said, Telarico appears better placed as a white male to win Texas, where a black woman has a bigger push to do it. One thing about Crockett, when James Clyburn of South Carolina pushed Biden to put a black woman on the second spot, it is a crying shame that Crockett was not yet a person with national credibility established. The Crabgrass view is that Crockett is a more appealing person than Harris. The Crabgrass view is that Clyburn and Willie Brown did a disservice to the breaking down of racial bias by advancing careers of exceptionally talented and appealing people. The idea of a black woman on a Presidential ticket is now not solely a hypothetical, but choices of winners and losers is a fundamental requirement. 

Harris was the choice in 2024 when Biden quit, but not the best among black women for the role. Crockett is a progressive, and well spoken in being that. The Harris campaign never grounded itself for what it's vision and standards were. 

Crockett would not have any such problem, or has shown a lot to base that outlook upon. What you see is what you get. A committed woman who is clear on what-where her politics are grounded. No waffle.  

 

Tuesday, February 17, 2026

"WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senators Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Ranking Member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Chris Coons (D-DE), Chris Murphy (D-CT), Tim Kaine (D-VA), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) and Jacky Rosen (D-NV) released a comprehensive report detailing how the Trump Administration’s secret deportation deals are undermining U.S. interests and coming at great cost to taxpayers."

 The headline is the opening paragraph: https://www.foreign.senate.gov/press/dem/release/ranking-member-shaheen-major-new-report-on-true-cost-of-trump-administrations-third-country-deportation-deals

After fleshing out the theme of the headline, links were given to the full 30p Committee Minority Report  and to a single page executive summary (both in pdf format). 

From the report press release, per the headline and the opening link above:

The 30-page report, titled “At What Cost? Inside the Trump Administration’s Secret Deportation Deals,” is the first Congressional report examining the issue of third country deportations under the Trump Administration and is informed by a ten-month review of agreements, known deals and third country deportations through January 2026, staff travel to relevant countries and meetings and communication with current U.S. officials, foreign government officials, human rights organizations, deportees and attorneys. This report finds that the Trump Administration has expanded and institutionalized a system in which the United States urges or coerces countries to accept migrants who are not their citizens, often through arrangements that are costly, wasteful and poorly monitored. It catalogs the costly and ineffective operations, waste of taxpayer funds through unnecessary removals, concerning lack of oversight on U.S. funds to foreign governments and secret deals that do not serve American interests. Taken together, these actions have created an expensive and dangerous form of shadow diplomacy that prioritizes the appearance of toughness over the security of Americans.

“This report outlines the troubling practice by the Trump Administration of deporting individuals to third countries—places where these people have no connection—at great expense to the American taxpayer and raises serious questions,” said Ranking Member Shaheen. [...]  

The report comes as the Administration is aggressively seeking to strip hundreds of thousands of migrants of legal status in the United States through the ending of temporary protected status and humanitarian parole, among other avenues, increasing the risk of expanded third country deportations.

This report identifies six central ways in which the Administration’s use of third country deportations has undermined U.S. interests:

  • Expensive and Ineffective Operations: The Administration has spent tens of millions of dollars to move a relatively small number of migrants to third countries, in some cases paying more than one million dollars per person, with little measurable impact on its deportation agenda.

  • Needlessly Wasting Taxpayer Funds: In many cases, migrants could have been returned directly to their home countries, avoiding costly third country deportations. As of January 2026, more than eighty percent of the migrants sent to third countries paid by the United States to take them in have already returned to their country of origin or are in the process of doing so. [...] 
  • Providing Money to Corrupt Governments Without Oversight: The United States has sent more than thirty-two million dollars to foreign governments in direct connection with third country deportation deals, including those with records of corruption, human rights abuses and human trafficking, without monitoring how the money is used or whether taxpayer funds are being used to facilitate corruption, human rights abuses or human trafficking. It is unclear how much additional U.S. funding is being redirected to indirectly support these deals.

  • Failure to Monitor and Enforce Agreements: The State Department is not tracking foreign government compliance with diplomatic assurances or enforcing agreement terms, [...] 
  • Secret Deals That Do Not Serve American Interests: Third country deportation agreements have become a central feature of U.S. bilateral relations, involving cash payments, political concessions and coercion, without transparency about the full extent of what the United States is giving in return or the pressures it is exerting. In addition, the Administration is making secret deals with adversarial regimes such as Iran, to accept their nationals back. 
  • Circumventing U.S. Immigration Law: Evidence suggests the Administration is using third countries to carry out removals that U.S. law would otherwise prohibit, such as sending protected individuals onward to countries where they may face persecution or death.

See, also, AP reporting, here and here. I would not like to be a wrongly deported citizen to Cameroon.

 I do not even know the major language there. Or how I'd be accepted. Kicked off a plane, "Fend for yourself, Charlie." It is an unsettling thing, done in secret.

 

PiPress has an interesting op-ed, a unique take on the teachings within the Epstein Files.

Jonathan Zimmerman: Epstein files reveal affirmative action for the rich and powerful

 As in if you think meritocracy is the only thing at play, then you must believe that being offspring of the rich = merit.

Check it out. 

 

 


Orban in Hungary faces an election challenge to his continued opportunities to out-trump Trump.

 https://apnews.com/article/hungary-opposition-campaign-orban-f4e2d7a7cc73a19cc0dbb18a7286835d  -- opening excerpt:

BUDAPEST, Hungary (AP) — Hungarian opposition leader Péter Magyar launched his party’s election campaign in Budapest on Sunday, vowing to restore Hungary’s Western orientation just eight weeks before he faces Prime Minister Viktor Orbán in a pivotal vote.

Magyar, a former insider in Orbán’s nationalist Fidesz party, burst onto Hungary’s political scene in 2024 after breaking with his political community and quickly forming the center-right Tisza party.

After taking around 30% of the vote in European Parliament elections in June 2024, he has grown Tisza into the most formidable political force Orbán has faced during his 16 years at Hungary’s helm. Most independent polls show Tisza with a significant lead before the April 12 vote, an advantage which has held steady for more than a year.

“We’re standing on the threshold of victory with 56 days left to go,” he told supporters [...]

____________UPDATE___________

Bootlicking per word to do so from Trump, or an epiphany on the way to Damascus?

 

Responsible for more people dying than the number Kristi Noem is responsible for her goons having killed. Far more. Far, far more.

 The blatent ignoramus - https://newrepublic.com/article/205954/kennedy-maha-anti-vaccine-flu

Viral Load

How RFK Jr.’s “MAHA” Quackery Is Making Flu Season Worse

Across the country, the staggering costs of vaccine denialism are piling up, to deadly effect. 

 Last month, cases of flu reached their highest levels in the United States in 25 years. Many hospitals were unprepared for the surge; as emergency wards filled with flu patients, health care workers were left to weather the impacts. As of February 6, there have been at least 22 million reported cases, 280,000 hospitalizations, and 12,000 deaths from flu so far this season, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Many of those afflicted are being hospitalized due to severe postviral complications, such as pneumonia, antibiotic-resistant staph, and even fatal brain swelling.

And while rates have since subsided, we’re not out of the woods yet, with flu B now on the rise. As epidemiologist Marisa Donnelly said, “We’re still in the thick of the season.”

What explains why recent flu seasons have been so severe? There are several factors.

In this political climate, the first thing that may come to mind is the anti-vaccine policy coming from Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Department of Health and Human Services, which has sown confusion around vaccines, leading to lower rates of vaccination for the flu and other diseases—not to mention massive preventable measles outbreaks. But it’s also true that the dominant strain of flu may not be well matched to the existing vaccine.

However, a less discussed aspect behind the high rates of flu and disease severity is a slew of recent research finding that prior Covid-19 infections can damage immune responsesand most Americans have been infected with Covid at least once by now.

“It is clear that at least some of what we’re seeing right now is likely related to that immunity problem from Covid-19 infections,” Dr. Ziyad Al-Aly, a clinical epidemiologist at Washington University in St. Louis, and co-author of a study on the subject, told The New Republic.

He’s not the only doctor to connect these dots. According to Dr. Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez, chair of the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine at the University of Texas, El Paso, “Prior Covid-19 infection can lead to persistent immune dysfunction, which may increase susceptibility to subsequent influenza infection and severity of disease.”

Despite this, there is a “pervasive nonchalance” about the surge in flu and spread of other respiratory viruses like Covid among the public, as Al-Aly put it—and RFK Jr.’s moves at HHS are in part to blame, he said. On top of that, hospitals are refusing to adequately staff their wards or protect health care workers from infection, increasing the burden of disease and putting the public at risk. And this week, the FDA decided not to consider Moderna’s application for a new mRNA-based flu vaccine—a decision handed down by the agency’s notorious anti-vaxxer Vinay Prasad.

Overall, under Kennedy’s watch, there has been more chaos, more confusion, and less vaccination—and the consequences have been deadly.

And, the ultimate responsibility? Trump's. He appointed the quack. Knowingly, Trump did it because Kennedy Jr. dropped his Presidential run and endorsed Trump. It had nothing to do with anything else, and ignored Kennedy's incompetence for the job.

Trump only thinks "Trump" and  that is a dark area of thought.

(In fairness, the "far, far more" of the headline is an expectation, a guess, without second-source pinning down any numbers. Crabgrass does not even know if, under Kennedy, reliable numbers have been tabulated or released, but in the opening paragraph above, 12,000/month is highlighted. The item did start out stating "record numbers" of flu cases, suggesting it likely the 12,000 deaths resulting from infections also is peaking to a 25 yr high. Also, Noem's goons actions, prior to their publicized invasion of Democrat cities, are not reliably publicized, or believed not to be. How many deaths along the border were caused by Border Patrol, i.e., what their kill rates were in non-public contexts without phone video documentation - make your guess. The guess here is greater cruelty and license taken along the border, and Bovino's consistency is a fact. As a guess, it is presumed that the border area Noem death-rate is in the thousands, However, flu whacked 12,000 in a month, so make your own guesses. Crabgrass stands on the far, far more headline. Prove me wrong.)

Monday, February 16, 2026

The charm of ambiguous prior referents.

 Politico - https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/15/massie-lost-confidence-pam-bondi-00782632

 


 Okay, is it a case of "What took you so long," or not?

Did he loose faith in Bondi, only after the hearing; or did he say he's lost faith after the hearing, while having lost any/all faith well before the hearing when he had to cosponsor a bill to force the intransigent official off the dime to FULLY release the Epstein Files. 

You could read it either way, but really, having to blast that bill through is an indication of loss of faith prior to the point of bill sponsorship.

The screen capture shows the ambiguity in the headline and in the part of the opening paragraph shown.

What is certain, the "he said" was after the hearing, that's as reported, but the Crabgrass bet is that any/all faith ever in Bondi was error.

If you pay attention often there is an ambiguous referent in online content, but where one reading fails, in context, to make sense. Crabgrass feels that's almost the case here. Massie's bill cosponsorship is clearly from months before the hearing, since the Bondi banter was a stupid event, but well after any sentient person would have held a "no faith" opinion in Bondi from the Trump University monkey-business, i.e., from the start, beyond belief in the troubling fact she is/was/will be a Trump syncophant to the grave.

It pays her bills. It enlarges her narcisstic self-esteem. She needs that sycophancy as a fundamental part of being Pam Bondi - The AG of the USA. Whoopie!

It feeds her several ways.

=========================================

Worth noting, the Politico report main body adds -

Bondi sent a legally required report to Congress on Saturday in compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which mandated the DOJ supply lawmakers with a summary of all redactions made, including the legal basis for doing so, and a list of government officials named in the documents.

In the letter, Bondi cited “deliberative-process privilege” as one justification for redacting certain documents, a common-law principle that allows the federal government to withhold documents revealing internal decisionmaking.

“The problem with that is the bill that Ro Khanna and I wrote says that they must release internal memos and notes and emails about their decisions on whether to prosecute or not prosecute, whether to investigate or not investigate,” Massie said on ABC. “It’s important they follow that, because then we could find why they didn’t prosecute Leslie Wexner. What was the decision tree there?”

The release of unredacted prosecutorial and investigative documents could also shed light on the 2008 plea deal under which Epstein avoided severe federal charges and pleaded guilty to lesser state charges in Florida, Massie added.

The Kentucky Republican also criticized Bondi for refusing to face several victims of Epstein’s abuse who attended the hearing. When Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) asked Bondi to turn around and apologize to the victims for what the Justice Department had put them through during the hearing, Bondi replied: “I’m not going to get in the gutter for her theatrics.”

At one point, Jayapal also asked the victims if they had not been able to meet with the Justice Department to share their stories, and each of them raised their hand.

In short, Bondi is a heartless and mean spirited blond dragon, as well as AG of the USA! 

 

 

Arguably the sack of Rome was a bigger event for the Western Empire than the Siege of Minnesota has been for U.S. hegemony. But there are parallels. Ill behaved outsider barbarians raising havoc with a peaceful scene, there is most certainly that. As with saying the Siege and the DHS gulags are like the Holocauset, we see overstatement clearly - while hyperbole has a place.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0d/Genseric_sacking_rome_456.jpg -- 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sack_of_Rome_(455)


Wiki excerpt:

The Sack of Rome in 455 and the Visigothic sack of 410 shocked the Roman world and symbolized the decline and impending fall of the Western Roman Empire, marking a pivotal moment in European history.

Background

Since its founding in 395 AD, the Western Roman Empire was in a prolonged state of decline. One of its major issues was a mass migration of Germanic and other non-Roman peoples known as the Migration Period. [...]

Rome had ceased to be the capital of the empire by the beginning of the 4th century and a multitude of cities served as the capital of the western empire.[7]

Sack

The Vandals landed at Ostia, located at the mouth of the Tiber only a few miles southwest of Rome. Maximus tried to flee Rome, but was spotted by an angry mob and stoned to death before being thrown into the Tiber.[11] Before approaching, the Vandals knocked down the aqueducts that supplied water to the city.[12] Pope Leo I was able to convince Gaiseric to spare those who did not resist, protect buildings from fire, and to not torture captives.[13] [...]

The Vandals sacked the city for two weeks[13] before returning to Africa, during which the imperial government of the Western Roman Empire was effectively paralysed. They marched south through Campania, devastating the region, and attempted to sack Neapolis but failed as the city had better defences.

Aftermath

[...]  The two-week Vandal sack of 455 is generally considered more destructive than the three-day Visigoth sack of 410.[18] Victor of Vita records that several shiploads of slave captives arrived in Africa from Rome, who were then divided between the Vandals. Deogratias, the Bishop of Carthage, bought the freedom of some of the Romans by selling all of the valuables from his church. Deogratias hosted and fed them in larger churches in Carthage until they could be repatriated back to Rome.

So, a bare two week siege, not what Minnesota suffered, two months in length. 

Slaves taken. Transported. Some church actions lessened the plight of some of those seized.

Moving on, PiPress carried an NYT post about the mess after, and, what goals of the marauding Vandals were met. (No paywall.) See, also, carried postings here and here.

The main focus of this post now shifts to another PiPress AP carry:

Minneapolis left to decide future of streetside memorials to 2 people killed by federal officers

The public grieving spots echo the community-driven memorial to George Floyd, who was murdered in 2020

Crabgrass does support such two monuments to what was done, with a suggestion. Each should include a bronze plaque, headlined, "TRUMP KILLED - THEN LIED" and then being followed by detail, including a clear statement that it was a naked act of politics to invade Minnesota with barbarians because Minnesota at the time was a Democratic State and had voted each of three times for whoever was running against Trump; 2016, 2020 and 2024. Beyond that, further detail is less essential. But it should include the fact that Trump lied about the deaths and citizen observation proved the lie beyond any doubt; and that JD in particular said egregious things

The fucking bastards . . . NEVER FORGET


Sunday, February 15, 2026

Pam Bondi, Erika Kirk, which is the more puke-worthy?

Bondi is more aggressive, Kirk is the more vapid. 

Bondi is even harder to listen to than Kirk. That takes a special talent.

Bondi wins on the shut-the-fuck-up index, but it is close.

Then there is Mackenzie Scott, a wonderful human. Who says little and is not disliked.

The three seem about the same age.Bondi is the savage of the three. She comes across as warm and human and bright as Stephen Miller.

The Republicans should run a Bondi - Miller ticket.


Saturday, February 14, 2026

“I am on a carnivore diet, so I just eat meat and ferments,” RFK Jr said.

 When asked about Super Bowl snacking the headline gives Sec. Kennedy's answer. See, e.g., here and here.

He mentioned yogurt. But ferments is bigger than that. My question is would he consider sauerkraut for his Super Bowl friendship group?

And, can we call him "a Kraut?" Or "a Kimchi?" 

I'd like to do that, if it's appropriate. I'd even like to call him "an ignorant Kraut." The "ignorant" part is an opinion and the Kraut part would be by admission.







 

With a promise federal goons in Minneapolis streets will be reassigned, meaning someone else will have a load of grief dumped on them, which killing was worse, Renee Good or Alex Pretti?

Not a trick question. The single shooter event was premeditated, Ross silently walking around the auto and placing himself in a position where he could bleat "self-defense" when the agency protocol said not to do so, and then the second and third shots into the passing auto; that was premeditated murder, or do you infer differently from the total of online video we've seen.

The Pretti shooting was gross. This is not to say otherwise. But premeditation can arguably be said to have been absent in that senseless killing. 

Beyond those paragraphs, the end of the story will be written other than here.

Enough has already been said, so closing Trump is a fascist narcissist. In apparent mental decline toward incapacitating narcissistic dementia. Let's close on that. The thing curiously in parallel with his pulling Bovino out of Minnesota and sending Homan was his crashing in polling, to where one can infer but for the polls, Bovino would still be strutting town in his particularized way. Prove me wrong. If you can.

It is a nice day outside. There is cause to enjoy it. More posting in following days.

 

What sound does a lie make?

 https://apnews.com/video/vance-says-ice-agent-involved-in-fatal-shooting-has-absolute-immunity-5109e1f2c2504fc5b3249196cc6ba014

Any questions?

Try this link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGAHzvVwc_Y&list=RDoSpqj3V0s2E&index=15 

Some people use music to say things others take to the streets in peaceful protest to say.

Get the fuck out of Minneapolis. 
Bad cop, good cop does not work when all you send are bad cops.
 

 

Friday, February 13, 2026

If an image can be worth a thousand words, I give you an image link, you write your essay.

 https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/1024/cpsprodpb/99db/live/09b252e0-028a-11f1-9972-d3f265c101c6.jpg

I bet you write a horror story. Masked goons running amok. Slash and burn.

I did not write anything because I did not need to. Script's there already

AND - If you want another image, I'll link another image

How y'all doing? 

 

Thursday, February 12, 2026

"McLaughlin also gave a statement to the Post that denied any mistreatment or deprivation of constitutional rights and said that detainees get proper meals, medical treatment and showers, and also access to lawyers and family. The letter from the advocacy groups, however, cites claims of “excessive force” inside the Camp East Montana facility, where guards allegedly utilize sexual violence to enforce discipline."

Two mid-item paragraphs run together are the above headline, the source being: 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/dec/09/texas-ice-camp-abuse-immigration  -- quoting

In a 19-page letter, addressed to senior government officials at the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency and Fort Bliss military command, the coalition accuses officers at the immigration detention facility on the base, called Camp East Montana, of being “in violation of agency policies and standards, as well as statutory and constitutional protections”.

The advocates called for the immediate closure of the camp, where more than 2,700 detainees are being held in a complex of tents.

“In light of these abuses, we urge the end to detention of immigrants at Fort Bliss,” said the letter signed by eight organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union, Humans Rights Watch, Estrella del Paso, the Texas Civil Rights Project and Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center.

The letter was addressed to ICE acting director Todd Lyons and others, and copied to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) office of inspector general and the Senate armed forces committee.

ICE officials in El Paso directed media inquiries to the DHS, which denied all the allegations.

“Any claim that there are ‘inhumane’ conditions at ICE detention centers are categorically false. No detainees are being beaten or abused,” said the DHS assistant secretary, Tricia McLaughlin, in a written statement.

In Minnesota, the key detention center, the Wipple Building, once defense lawyers were admitted to meet with clients, was found to be only a bit short of a cesspool. 

Crowding detainees together is a health risk, where the wrongfully kidnapped ones are then turned back into the general Minnesota population or into other home states. 

This while the quack Kennedy runs health policy. It is dumb as dirt to be that inconsiderate of things.

That Texas site is where the two TB cases were detected, and where the total number of detainees varies day to day, packing densities are unclear, and wrongful kidnapped citizens from all over the States could be exposed carriers released back into their communities. 

 

Stauber and his Minnesota Iron Range support people should take a tariff stand cognizant of the fact that all their processed taconite goes international through Canada's Welland Canal. Etc. re the St. Lawrence Seaway.

 https://www.forbes.com/sites/craighooper/2025/01/30/canada-tariff-biggest-threat-to-great-lakes-since-war-of-1812/

Perhaps Stauber is more concerned with being on Trump's good graces, than he is with the economy of his constituents. A move is timely if he pressures the mentally declining man and his economic advisor pool, before it is too late. With Vance seeming disinclined to exercise 25th Amendment duties, Stauber may either see what a stonewall looks like, or he moves the needle.

Either way, he has to try. And that involves contact and discussion with JD.

Emmer cannot avoid having a role. 

 

 

The Economist tracks Trump on two levels - polling and the economy.

 https://www.economist.com/interactive/trump-approval-tracker

https://www.economist.com/interactive/trump-approval-tracker/economy 

Crabgrass bet = it only will get worse for Trump.

The dementia situation is not specifically an issue in Economist reporting. That, or I missed it as one of the many trees making up the forest

Biggest takeaway - The economy is a wreck and people know it and dislike it being that. It is the biggest single factor moving the needle into net negative territory.

If nothing else buries him, the wretched things he's done to ruin the economy will bite.

The overall poll reporting differs little except for being less comprehensive. Readers can do independent research, but they should not expect different results other than in detail.

 

 

The rancor remains. Current Gov Walz speaks after Homan's "Vietnam exit-boogie announcement" and next Gov. Klobuchar is interviewed.

 Walz.

Klobuchar.

They don't think it's that easy, over and out. It's Wait-a-minute... 

Trump's poll numbers have not yet plunged enough, and Minnesota needs to be made whole for the plight Trump inflicted upon the State.

It is not over. The siege perps go, the damage remains, and the King Perp remains in the White House demented but unbowed. It sucks. 

 

 

The courts are not always wrong.

 Politico.

 

With immigrants a topic, some legal ones did open a Pandora's Box.

https://visitthereach.us/the-immigrants-of-the-manhattan-project/ 

 

How low, mean and petty-retributive is Donald Trump? Beyond the siege of Democratic cities? In other ways? How stinking bad? (By circumstantial inference)

 


 Above is one of the latest siege images Strib printed before Homan's withdrawal speech. Given the polling, the urge to caption the image, "Who's Next," was dropped because after Trump's having his ass handed him in polling over ICE/CBP methods, he may fire Stephen Miller and avoid further polling losses, if feasible.

But, how petty and retributive is the man? How far is his reach that way?

Our DOW (DoD officially, but Trump/Hegseth do it their way) posts: 

https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/4399812/war-department-cuts-ties-with-harvard-university/ 

That's go an embedded awkward Hegseth speech if you care, but the item states:

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth today announced the War Department would sever its academic ties with Harvard University, because attendance at the school no longer meets the needs of the War Department or the military services. 

[video omitted] 

"For too long, this department has sent our best and brightest officers to Harvard, hoping the university would better understand and appreciate our warrior class," he said. "Instead, too many of our officers came back looking too much like Harvard — heads full of globalist and radical ideologies that do not improve our fighting ranks." 

Beginning with the 2026-2027 school year, the War Department will discontinue graduate-level professional military education, fellowships and certificate programs at the school. Hegseth noted that military personnel who are currently attending classes will be able to finish those courses of study. 

The secretary said the U.S. military has, in the past, had an important and often positive relationship with Harvard. 

"In 1775 ... Gen. George Washington took command of the Continental Army in Harvard Yard and used the university as a military base," he said. "From that time, through the Korean War, military service was commonplace at Harvard. There are more recipients of our nation's Medal of Honor who went to Harvard than any other civilian institution in the United States." 

Today, Hegseth said, Harvard is no longer a welcoming institution to military personnel or the right place to develop them.

The secretary also cited as a problem the relationships Harvard has with foreign powers, and an on-campus culture that is incongruent with military and American values and interests. 

"Campus research programs have partnered with the Chinese Communist Party," he said. "And university leadership encouraged a campus environment that celebrated Hamas, allowed attacks on Jews, and still promotes discrimination based on race in violation of Supreme Court decisions." 

While the War Department announced cessation of academic relations with Harvard, the secretary said in the coming weeks, the department and military services would evaluate similar relationships with other schools.

There's more, but is there some special reason, why Harvard, and will Hegseth's alma mater Princeton or any other school be next? How do you weigh that?

Well there is search = harvard turned down Barron Trump 

As to how far and how petty; and as to whether Hegseth will really dump on other schools, do the search and consider the implication of returned items - re both questions; how retributive; and will others suffer "warrior scorn" now that folks can connect Barron's college options, and Harvard's being an administration target.

So, presumably other Ivy League rejections of Barron happened before NYU took him, and will there be a patterned domino effect, related per DOD/Barron rejections/

Who is Trump that way, and perhaps Barron took a shot at Princeton, the Hegseth alma mater, and they're unfit now for a warrior ethos too? 

 UPDATE; bonus link: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/02/pete-hegseth-military-harvard-donald-trump.html

FURTHER: It's reported, for example, that Barron chose NYU to remain housed in Trump Tower while in college. It likely does beat dorms or campus neighborhoods. 

FURTHER: Ivanka's spouse Jared Kushner did get into Harvard, but perhaps dad Donald did not want to grease the skids the way the Kushner dad got both sons into Harvard. Or the Harvard endowment possibly would not accept cryoto.

In fairness, getting into NYU is no shabby accomplishment. Even if strings were pulled. It's a good school.

Analysis of a shooting during a federal siege similar to the killings of Good and Pretti in Minnesota, but not being lethal, shows that siege tactics were intentional and universal, beyond Minnesota's bounds.

EmptyWheel:

This shooting was during the earlier siege of another Democratic Party favoring city, Chicago. More like the murder of Renee Good, shooting into an auto, etc. than like the ganging up against Pretti with multiple shooters.

 

Ramsey, Minnesota. The little town I live in of about 30,000 residents held, Tuesday, two days ago, a City Council meeting with two aspects of interest beyond the town, itself. Meetings are televised and archiived.

 This particular meeting is online here. An index of items is onscreen to the right of the viewport. Items 3.1 and 4 are of greater, or wider interest, than others.

Item 3.1 was swearing into permanent police force status of two probational officers. The uniforms were standardized, not subject to personal style decisions as to camo or other outfitting stuff. Throughout things, all the police including those observers standing at the back of the meeting were unmasked. It is standard procedure that way. Each of the inductees was identified by the chief by name and badge number.

Standard uniform dress did not involve pepper spray dispensers, nor tear gas canisters. Service firearms were appropriate. There was no aspect of intentional intimidation dress or demeanor. It was as any disciplined and responsible police force would do. It was known to be taking the right steps.

Then, item 4. Citizen input about the ICE and CBP siege effects which were more concentrated in the Twin Cities but were felt even in sleepy and predominately white Ramsey, north of the Twin Cities. Specific ICE encounters were disclosed, by Citizens, wanting some Council response, to have things better prepared for the next time a siege may be instigated. Feelings of one woman married to a Hispanic citizen were noted at the start of Citizen Input.

Things such as requiring anyone moving about the city claiming federal, state or local law enforcement powers having to remain unmasked, and to have identifiable numbered badge or name on the uniform, and to be wearing body cameras, would be simple ordinances to be enacted, and should be enacted. The use of chemical irritants, poisons not allowed in warfare, should be banned within city limits. The intimidating swagger and dress of the invading federal personnel has been documented online to where everyone knows the auto window breaking, beatings, dragging people from their automobiles, and the two cold blooded murders are cause to say if the town of 30,000 knows the right way the feds damned well know it too, and deliberately shit all over the idea of "by the book" as a way to avoid extreme intimidation of a population.

The feds knew better, but intentionally did not act better. Bottom line, Trump on down to the thug in the mask on the street with the intent to beat and intimidate, each of them should be held accountable for totally unacceptable disturbance of the peace.

Elections will clean up a lot of the problem. but that's years out. Current  cleaning up of things is needed, as well as federal money to compensate for all the economic havoc the bastards inflicted - that is needed but unlikely to be accorded to the deserving State of Minnesota, its political subunits, and its people. 

It is most unfortunate the demented bastard Trump will not suitably be dealt with for his hateful siege.

There is an injustice to that, and again, the point of this entire post is to show a Minnesota town of 30,000 knows better, so why doesn't a National Cabinet level operation conform to "by the book?" The answer is inescapable via logical circumstantial inference. The dogs did not want to behave as they knew proper, and that's top down, and the dogs have to be disciplined. Packs of wild dogs are a danger, but at least this pack appears rabies free. In some cases, a close call, but what looked like rabid mayhem inferentially was intended mayhem.

That point is made because in the course of the town's citizen input the mayor continued to say avoid getting into motives; which is a denial of circumstantial evidence being as good as direct evidence, which is a pattern jury instruction.

In effect the mayor misunderstood that aspect of the law. Motive almost always has to be inferred, from the  FACTS, and it is to deny the entire history of law to think otherwise and to ignore proof of motive via circumstantial evidence. This is not saying the mayor was wrongly motivated, clearly he believed his counsel on point and correct. He simply was dead wrong. And that is worth pointing out. He'll do better.

Readers unfamiliar with a representative case of civil discourse at a town council  meeting are urged to examine those two parts of the meeting, as well as other parts more localized in impact, if they are curious of how such meetings proceed.

The blog has readers outside of the U.S.. and they in particular might enjoy seeing the televised archive of one representative town meeting. It seems generic, but other towns likely differ in detail.

Of particular interest to Ramsey's people and officials, the Open Meeting Law mandates that decisions be made in open meetings, and there are aspects where sequential one-on-one conversations may involve a majority of a counsel, in violation of the intent and reach of the Open Meeting Law, a Minnesota State Statute. 

Thus councilmembers should always strive for public open meeting discussions, where in Ramsey even council work sessions are open to the public, but rarely attended by anything beyond a handful of citizens. Open availability, and the absence of closed secret deliberations is the point of the law and its reach.

 

 

Homan goes "Vietnam." Declaring it a victory, and getting out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9Q0Qk5xGic 

That was posted by The Hill, and the accompanying text, indicates over two million viewers. Crabgrass did not watch the entire thing, but enough.

The damage of lawless federal agent conduct, apparently motivated over politics, by Trump, through agents, remains. Three murderers need to be brought to justice for killing two citizens of Minnesota. We cannot tolerate anything less than a State trial for breach of State law - the laws against homicide. The question of excessive use of force, under Minnesota standards of law, needs resolution.

This does not undo the damage the Trump hateful thing has done. It cannot be undone. Trump must be held in ongoing disdain. His administration and his party should, in an ideal world, result in upcoming election whompings.

They deserve such public repudiation, and Democratic Party election wins will allow the correction of error and the punishment of those who abused federal power.

How many elections it will take? Likely the next two affecting federal offices and posts. Reform of Trump damage to the courts might take court packing, after election results permit it. 

Again, in Vietnam, the French, then our nation intruded, but Ho Chi Minh and his supporters lived there and stayed, and won by the intruders leaving.

That is an inevitable pattern. Homan's admitted it. Trump has to accept it. And Trump has his poll results to consider, as to whether there was any degree of wisdom to wage a siege upon the State of Minnesota. To the extent current levels of dementia allow him to consider anything without danger to the public from the dementia, he should consider his decision making and the advice he's been given in the process.

 

Wednesday, February 11, 2026

A post earlier featured the new Minnesota boutique criminal defense law firm, Thompson Jacobs, who represent, as of today, a high profile defendant.

 Business is popping. The pair know all the shabby tricks prosecutors pull, and emphasize their investigation chops. As in quitting over orders down the hierarchy from Trump, via a Bondi couduit. Orders to not invetigate the obvious bur rather the devious, and they were too moral to do that. 

In any even NYT:

Facing charges over his role at a church protest, Mr. Lemon, a journalist, retained a veteran litigator who recently resigned from the U.S. attorney’s office in Minnesota.

Things move in mysterious ways, when you have a defendant who knows the score, and a decimated prosecution, facing better experienced peers. That trial - if it ever happens - will be a joke of a slop-over onto the Bondi-Trump thing, which cares more about the Epstein Papers anyway. The crabgrass guess is a pretrial dismissal, unless Bondi-Trump judge shop for somebody like that lady creep in Miami, who let things stall into the second term demise over wrongly expropriated classified shit.

Don Lemon, good job, sir. From the article:

Joseph H. Thompson, a former senior federal prosecutor who resigned from the U.S. attorney’s office in Minnesota in mid-January over the Justice Department’s handling of the immigration operation, has joined Mr. Lemon’s defense team, according to a court filing.

Mr. Thompson’s appointment is the latest plot twist in a high-profile case that has been anomalous from the start. By representing the most prominent of nine defendants charged in the church protest case, Mr. Thompson will face off against a department that employed him for nearly 17 years. Mr. Thompson will work alongside Mr. Lemon’s lead defense lawyer, Abbe Lowell.

The government’s investigation began after Mr. Lemon, a former CNN anchor who now works as an independent journalist producing content for a YouTube show, accompanied protesters who disrupted the Sunday morning service at Cities Church in St. Paul, Minn., on Jan. 18. Demonstrators targeted the church because one of its pastors, David Easterwood, is a senior official with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in the state. Mr. Easterwood was not at the service.

Mr. Lemon, 59, met with protest organizers at the parking lot of a grocery store, followed them into the church and live streamed as they chanted “ICE out!” and “Hands up, don’t shoot!”

And the evil empire squealed and bleated - A CHURCH, THEY DESECRATED A CHURCH. OF GOD!

As if Trump cares. Hegsetn, he's enough bats in the belfrey to care, and likely will get another Cross tattoo over the ourrtage he must be inclined to show to keep the public persona humming. What they've yet to show is what the man has inked onto his ass.

More NYT generic detail - 

In a video of the protest Mr. Lemon posted on social media, he is seen interviewing worshipers as well as protesters inside the church, at one point saying, “We are not part of the activists, but we’re here reporting on them.”

That night, Harmeet K. Dhillon, the assistant attorney general for civil rights, issued a statement calling Mr. Lemon’s role in the protest “pseudojournalism” that was not protected under the First Amendment.

Days later, a federal magistrate judge signed arrest warrants for three of the protesters but declined to sign off on warrants for the arrest of Mr. Lemon and four other people. The chief federal judge in Minnesota, Patrick J. Schiltz, agreed with the magistrate judge, saying the government had not produced evidence that Mr. Lemon had broken the law.

Well he was there, and he publicized it. So there. NYT recites how an Indictment was obtained, making a new phrase of out times appropriate. Free the Easterwood Nine

Although crabgrass hasn't heard it chanted, crabgrass does not get around and if it's pumped enought, it will get chanted. That's the expectation, here. NYT adds:

The aggressiveness with which the Justice Department has pursued the church protest case has unsettled career prosecutors, according to several people familiar with events at the U.S. attorney’s office in recent days. Several of them, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly, have noted that the indictment does not include the names of any career prosecutors at the U.S. attorney’s office in Minnesota as would be common in a civil rights criminal case.

Mr. Thompson, who had been the second in command at the U.S. attorney’s office in Minnesota, resigned on Jan. 13 along with several colleagues after clashing with leaders at the Justice Department over its handling of the investigation into the killing of a Minneapolis woman, Renee Good, by an ICE agent.

Yes. It is a real chkcken shit thing being done. But it's Trump, and after all, when it's not big time bullshit out of the man, it's little super-petty chicken shit instead.

Trump the variant, you could say.

In any event, now, this band of misfit individuals, will see "pseudojournalism" get its day in court, and unless they've facts discovered that Lemon somehow masterminded the thing, his being there, with a bona fide press background, is what journalism is about. 

Crabgrass, it's editorial here, but Lemon had boots on the ground. As Bovino had boots on the ground (and tear gas canisters hanging over his heart).They were there. Lemon was dressed more like a normal human, but MY GOD, IN A CHURCH!!

Over all -- Big deal. They were there. The service ended up not being the same old shit where the young were dragged there and bored. Instead, it popped. 

And in considering Lemon "there" and Bovino "there" the perplexing ongoing problem, is how sinister "there" was because Trump had a hardon against every of his percieved "enemies," including the entire State of Minnesota, which, somehow wronged the man by liking Biden better. And some voted for that pile.

____________UPDATE__________

Abbe Lowell is the lawyer Hunter Biden used, where vindictive prosecution was obvious and well argued, before a brick instead of a subtle perceptive judge, and the Easterwood Nine have the briefing already done. Change the names, but the cases are all the same. How the judge shopping shows up will be interesting, but while Justice is blind, expect that she'll set down the scales, and face-palm on the quality question for this prosecution happening. What else can Justice do, this one being what it is. IN CLOSING

FREE THE EASTERWOOD NINE!!!!! Chanting it as a mantra, try it. It can, when chanted long enough with a skilled mastered breathing pace, really buzz the mind.

And please, cheer for and support the new Minnesota criminal defense boutique. 

They're news. Don Lemon now is news. Little else really is. And Epstein is alive in Tel Aviv. It was a double that got snuffed in the detention cell. Really. Epstein and Putin have teamed to run Trump as a meandering puppet. Xi applauds. Prove me wrong.

Well, perhaps a detail or two may not square, but as the dead Charlie said, Prove - Me - Wrong. 

____________FURTHER UPDATE______________

https://emptywheel.net/don-lemon-hires-minnesotas-top-public-integrity-prosecutor/


 And when one person mentioned may not represent a household name, there is X at https://x.com/AAGDhillon - showing Dhillon is a Bondi. Equal in capability. Perhaps better in court. 

At any rate, Wheeler does her usual thorough job, so go there, read it, follow her links, and realize she's more on top of  things than crabgrass. Here you get feeling and a picture, there you get a story.

The bottom line is things are lawyered up, and will grind tediously to some resolution, likely by the time nobody really cares anymore.