Wednesday, July 02, 2025

Politicians are a great investment. Every billionaire should buy a few. But dodge the ones who won't stay bought.

 Separate from the headline, clearly so since these are gentlemen as seen by the cut of their jib, per reporting: Senate Republicans pass Trump’s sweeping policy bill, clearing major hurdle | US Senate | The Guardian -

click to enlarge to see the smirks and read names

The vote for passage came just after noon on Tuesday, and required the vice-president, JD Vance, to break a tie that resulted after three Republicans joined with all Democrats in voting against it.

In a joint statement, the speaker, Mike Johnson, and the House Republican leadership said: “Republicans were elected to do exactly what this bill achieves: secure the border, make tax cuts permanent, unleash American energy dominance, restore peace through strength, cut wasteful spending, and return to a government that puts Americans first. This bill is President Trump’s agenda, and we are making it law.”

Hogshit!  But Johnson is right about what he did not directly say - it gives billionaires yet more tax avoidance ammo, a bonanza for them in the class war the wealthy have been waging over decades against THE PEOPLE. 

And in detail -

[...] It funds Trump’s plans for mass deportations by allocating $45bn for Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facilities, $14bn for deportation operations and billions of dollars more to hire an additional 10,000 new agents by 2029. It also includes more than $50bn for the construction of new border fortifications, which will probably include a wall along the border with Mexico.

To satisfy demands from fiscal conservatives for cuts to the US’s large federal budget deficit, the bill imposes new work requirements on enrollees of Medicaid, which provides healthcare to low-income and disabled Americans. It also imposes a limit on the provider tax states use to fund their program, which could lead to reductions in services. Finally, it sunsets some incentives for green-energy technologies created by Congress under Joe Biden.

Because of the tax break for the rich the deficit grows larger.

JD? His vote was the 51st. Putting the abomination across the finish line,  

JD used to have a future, but now, just one more like the opening pictured three.

Who votes for assholes like that? Lame brains? The rich of course. But, who else? And why?

The suspicion is it's the other party's fault, for being butt stupid and abandoning workers. The rhetoric even changed to Schumer's "two in the burbs" false math.

But cut some slack, the other party has wealthy donors too. THEIR MAIN CONSTITUENCY. 

So --- Look at the "revenge" those white Trump voters got from their Trump of the United States. What they deserve. 

Drive a pick-up truck for Jesus; all that. This as their payoff. And they earned it.




Saturday, June 28, 2025

Mamdani

 First, the man himself, after the votes were counted. A Forbes item, so not a claque for Mamdani.

Next, Robert Reich on Democracy Now! speaking about the impact Mamdani's primary win symbolizes. That outlet has a left of center history, so weigh that, since Reich also is nobody's centrist.

Thursday, June 26, 2025

In defense of the Euro-U.S. and Israel aggression against Iran over its nuclear ambitions - what the ambitions could be vs what the Iranians said.

 History is Obama and Iran agreed to something that Trump 45 repudiated, and the Iranians showed resultant distrust. Not unjustified, but how it happened to where Trump and coalition formed the resolve that Iran could not develop nuclear weapons capability and that based upon distrust that meant the powers in charge wanted all uranium enrichment to stop. Those were the parameters facing Iran, whatever its actual aims were.

Negotiations from that starting point are aptly summarized - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States%E2%80%93Iran_negotiations

It can be said the Iranians were jerking the other negotiating side around because they thought they could.

60 % U235 enrichment is not weapons grade yet, but is further centrifugation from weapons grade and when multi-kg of the 60% stuff has been enriched and is being held, wtf is to be concluded?

It is not needed for reactor use for electrification, unless some thorium reacter or other exotic configuration is planned, and the Iranians have not said that. Managed chain reaction in thorium technology does require trigger reactive material, and some more conventional designs might too. Crabgrass is not versed in technological detail, but 60% is above needed levels of enrichment.

Trump said UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER. After the Israelis had disabled Iran - their pilots were the ones at risk, not the B2 pilots after Israel had disabled Iranian defenses (and whacked a few people they wanted to whack). The risk was the initial incursion and disabling radar and antiaircraft capacity. No matter how much Trump plays "Our noble pilots" as a theme song Israel did the heavy lifting.

There was distrust. There was cause, the Iranians declining in "negotiating" to acknowledge military realities, and playing things out without the demanded compromise - ending any/all enrichment with inspections because trust was lacking.

The West, as a generic term that makes typing easier but is subject to debate, demanded no weapons capability, and hence no further enrichment, none, nada, don't even think it.

Given the parameters, war was limited in time, but necessary to make a point.

Also it is largely irrelevant to debate how effective the B2 uber-bunkerbust thing was. It was done without mishap, and can easily as things now are, be done again, and again, and more so.

Iran has to cave. A few missles at the Qatar U.S. base being a tepid but symbolic counter, for saving face, but not any real threat. Iran is beaten and must accept whatever terms are imposed. Hence, the truth seems that those throwing shade upon how effective or ineffective the B2 strike was, the point is it can be repeated without real risk or consequences, so Iran is pushed into a corner.

Closing the Strait or Hormuz would be Iran cutting off the nose to spite the face, and hence unlikely.

So the stick's been used, now it is time for the carrot. Normalization without capitulation, so that the Iranian people are no longer puched into a degree of suffering that could push them to regime change.

The current regime has been obstreperous, but not reckless. so regime change is a bad idea.

That is about where things seem to stand, if viewed objectively. It is not a guarantee of what happens, but there seems a likelihood of a mutually satisfactory ongoing set of relations without Iran doing any further enrichement of Uranium. End of analysis, correct or not, it is how it seems to be to Crabgrass. 

Wednesday, June 25, 2025

Suggestions otherwise are fake news.

 https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/06/irans-nuclear-facilities-have-been-obliterated-and-suggestions-otherwise-are-fake-news/

They are so politively assured of themselves because each is telling the other the same thing and it is so exciting to them that they comtemplate having another parade! 

[ HINT: fake news, the parade part - birtthday's over ]

With victory all but assured, Mamdani, a 33-year-old democratic socialist who ran an energetic campaign centered on the cost of living, told supporters, “I will be your Democratic nominee for the mayor of New York City." “I will be the mayor for every New Yorker, whether you voted for me, for Governor Cuomo, or felt too disillusioned by a long-broken political system to vote at all,” he said. “I will work to be a mayor you will be proud to call your own.”

 THIS IS BIG. The headline is from two short paragraphs in MPR's carry of an AP report.

https://www.mprnews.org/story/2025/06/25/zohran-mamdani-declares-victory-in-nycs-democratic-mayoral-primary-as-cuomo-concedes 

A breath of fresh air in Schumer - Jeffries land. The ho-hum candidate lost. 

New Your City is ready for an unusual experience. A non-Machine mayor.

They've had Bloomberg, Christsakes, and Rudy the bankrupt loudmouth Trump gofor. 

This guy, a winner. Hope for a good term in office (although so far he's won only the Dem primary).

___________UPDATE___________

Since some may not read the details of the story, an excerpt of important items:

Cuomo characterized the city as a threatening, out-of-control place desperate for an experienced leader who could restore order. He brought the power of a political dynasty to the race, securing an impressive array of endorsements from important local leaders and labor groups, all while political action committees created to support his campaign pulled in staggering sums of cash.

Mamdani, meanwhile, offered an optimistic message that life in the city could improve under his agenda, which was laser-focused on the idea that a mayor has the power to do things that lower the cost of living. The party’s progressive wing coalesced behind him and he secured endorsements from two of the country’s foremost progressives, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Unofficial results from the New York City’s Board of Elections showed that Mamdani was ranked on more ballots than Cuomo. Mamdani was listed as the second choice by tens of thousands of more voters than Cuomo. And the number of votes that will factor into ranked choice voting is sure to shrink. More than 200,000 voters only listed a first choice, the Board of Elections results show, meaning that Mamdani’s performance in the first round may ultimately be enough to clear the 50% threshold.

The race’s ultimate outcome could say something about what kind of leader Democrats are looking for during President Donald Trump’s second term.

[... above link in original] 

Mamdani's grassroots run has been hard not to notice.

His army of young canvassers relentlessly knocked on doors throughout the city seeking support. Posters of his grinning mug were up on shop windows. You couldn't get on social media without seeing one of his well-produced videos pitching his vision — free buses, free child care, new apartments, a higher minimum wage and more, paid for by new taxes on rich people.

That youthful energy was apparent Tuesday evening, as both cautiously optimistic canvassers and ecstatic supporters lined the streets of Central Brooklyn on a sizzling hot summer day, creating a party-like atmosphere that spread from poll sites into the surrounding neighborhoods.

Outside his family’s Caribbean apothecary, Amani Kojo, a 23-year-old first-time voter, passed out iced tea to Mamdani canvassers, encouraging them to stay hydrated.

“It’s 100 degrees outside and it's a vibe. New York City feels alive again,” Kojo said, raising a pile of Mamdani pamphlets. “It feels very electric seeing all the people around, the flyers, all the posts on my Instagram all day.”

Cuomo and some other Democrats have cast Mamdani as unqualified. They say he doesn't have the management chops to wrangle the city's sprawling bureaucracy or handle crises. Critics have also taken aim at Mamdani's support for Palestinian human rights.

In effect, organized progressive grassroots defeated Big Money Machine business-as-usual. As such, it is a landmark win toward 2028 midterms and 2024 elections, with Trump's vile time ending Jan 20, 2025.

In that latter situation, there will be JD. And a nation in fully uncertain circumstances, in a trade war, in conflict with Iran, and in unprecedented graft-chasing. Inflation will be an issue, until it is not.

The Repubicans might cram through that terrible bill, and its consequences will happen, chips falling where they may. But for now, a progressive agenda resonated with a dispirited voting public in a major East Coast city. We go from there.

Today's news might grow legs, or become something less than moving the nation away from its troubling status quo. Crabgrass hopes one way, Trump governs another. A trade war rages. Prices rise.

Money talks, and the rich continue their class warfare against the population, paying scant taxes, if any. 

 _____________FURTHER UPDATE______________

Times of Israel covers the NYC primary:

Cuomo is a centrist Democrat with a long record of support for Israel. He campaigned heavily to win over Jewish voters with appearances at synagogues, Jewish events and in meetings with Jewish leaders.

Mamdani is a longtime anti-Israel activist who has said that the Palestinian cause got him into politics and is central to his identity. He alarmed many Jewish New Yorkers with his anti-Israel rhetoric and policies. He backs the boycott movement targeting Israel, has refused to acknowledge Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state, identified as an anti-Zionist, and repeatedly accused Israel of genocide.

He has vowed that, if elected, he will arrest Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu if Netanyahu visits New York. Mamdani has cited the International Criminal Court arrest warrant against Netanyahu, but the court has no jurisdiction in the US, and cooperating with the court is illegal under federal law.

In the closing weeks of the campaign, Mamdani defended the phrase “Globalize the intifada,” which, for Jews, is seen as a call to violence. The Second Intifada against Israel was marked by suicide bombings of Israeli civilians and killed over 1,000 Israelis. Mamdani’s comparison last week of the intifada to the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising drew a rebuke from the US Holocaust Memorial Museum.

Mamdani, 33, is a member of the far-left Democratic Socialists of America, a party that has made anti-Israel activism one of its planks. If elected in November, he will become the city’s first Muslim mayor.

A gifted communicator, Mamdani won over young, liberal voters with an energetic campaign, savvy social media and progressive policy proposals such as free buses, rent freezes and government-run grocery stores.

New York City mayoral candidates at a forum hosted by the B’nai Jeshurun synagogue on the Upper West Side of Manhattan, June 8, 2025. From left: New York City Comptroller Brad Lander, New York State Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani, and former comptroller Scott Stringer. (Luke Tress/Times of Israel)

Aside from Israel issues, concerns abound about Mamdani’s policies. The public transportation system, already strapped for cash, is the purview of the state, government-run stores could hurt small businesses, and rent freezes could stymie real estate development, for example.

Mamdani has little legislative experience or background managing an operation as vast as the city government. The city has more than 300,000 employees and a budget of more than $110 billion. The New York Times editorial board said last week, “We do not believe that Mr. Mamdani deserves a spot on New Yorkers’ ballots.”

Voters, in effect, said, "Fuck the New York Times, we're tired of their bullshit," or, "so what, the Times are irrelevant," and if so, it is a healthy outcome because the NYT is not an altogether reliable outlet, and certainly is no friend of progressives. 

Continuing: 

Minority and older voters favored Cuomo, according to polling ahead of the election. Mainstream Jewish groups, including the city’s Orthodox and Hasidic communities, also lined up behind Cuomo.

Cuomo had broader name recognition than other candidates due to his tenure as governor, but his candidacy came with baggage. He resigned from office in 2021 amid sexual harassment allegations and was accused of mishandling nursing homes during the COVID pandemic.

With religious Jewish communities, during the pandemic, Cuomo sparked outrage for his policies limiting gatherings that those communities felt targeted them. He made amends during the campaign, though, and won the endorsements of nearly all of the city’s Orthodox leaders. His COVID record may have suppressed turnout, though, despite those endorsements.

Former New York State governor Andrew Cuomo at an event marking the completion of a new Torah scroll, in New York City, May 15, 2025. (Luke Tress/Times of Israel)

Mamdani also courted Jewish voters and won the endorsements of the anti-Zionist Jewish Voice for Peace and the far-left Jews for Economic and Racial Justice through the group’s electoral arm, the Jewish Vote. His cross-endorsement from Lander, who identifies as a progressive Zionist, also may have helped him with Jewish voters. As comptroller, Lander is the [second] highest-ranking elected official in the city government.

Polling ahead of the election showed either Lander or Mamdani as the second-choice favorite for Jewish voters, behind Cuomo.

New York City Mayor Eric Adams is running as an independent in the general election. Adams, like Cuomo, is a centrist and a staunch supporter of Israel. He has a deep well of support among Jewish communities, particularly in Brooklyn, where he served as the borough president, although he is unpopular with the general public. Adams has rolled out a series of pro-Jewish measures in recent months, including setting up an antisemitism task force, establishing a business council to foster ties with Israel, and codifying the IHRA definition of antisemitism for city government.

[links are in original] With NYC having a large Jewish population Cuomo chased that vote, but still lost. Whether an anti-Trump vote was strong is undeniable, but the suggestion is the anti-Trump vote centered among the young and progressive element of the Democratic Party, and not necessarily among Jewish voters. Nor among party regulars, and that defeat of business-as-usual crap is heartening to activist progressive sentiment.

It looks as if the status quo Dem establishment was so unimpressive to voters, and the idea of change so attractive, that the vote turned out as it did. 

 

Tuesday, June 24, 2025

An excerpt from an India media outlet, and Morgan Freeman narrerates stuff.

A short video, with projected numbers.

Morgan Freeman here and here, with more stuff here:

 https://www.youtube.com/@MORGANFREEMAN-b7f 

 Without knowing much beyond those links, such as how they are funded or maintained, and sponsored and scripted if not by the speaker himself,  there is uncertainty where Denzel Washington is similarly featured. See, also, https://www.youtube.com/@DenzelLegacy-g8r.

What/who/why questions arise beyond the content, what is said and why said that way and not otherwise.

Discovering stuff online is only a part of understanding in multiple aspects, stuff online.

More perhaps on shutting the Strait of Hormuz.  I have seen it described as 21 miles wide, with two mile wide shipping lanes both ways separated by two miles. Presumably shallows and terrain dictate no wider traffic. One source said 2km, and not 2mi.

Can Iran shut the traffic down, and will they and if so, for how long to make a point?

Mining, mine removal, and remining would be a low cost for Iran to explore, a question being how sophisticate is their capability to mine, the technology they have, and countermeasures. It is wide open to speculation given how much coverage has been in the past, and what Iranian decisions may be now.

There is online strong suggestion that the Iranian parliament has reached a decision to close the Strait. 

It seems the case. Where things go from that decision to impact on the world economy is unclear.

North Dakota fracking's break even point may again be exceeded on a price per barrel basis, and how that and Permian Basin pumping can match the need if the Strait becomes inoperative seems to suggest a deficit in coverage pumping. That and a tariff war together can spell disaster of a scale the Grat Depression reached. Hope it is not so, but wait and see.

 

There is so much confusion, I can't get no relief.

 Allegedly there is a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. It is alleged both sides have already violated it, each side accusing the other.

Vance has said we are not at war with Iran, we are at war with its nuclear program.

The U.S. did only one strike effort, a coordinated bombing of three nuclear sites. 

Israel has assassinated numerous people, mostly Iranian military. Now saying its objectives have been met and agreeing now to a ceasfire.

The question seems to be were there Iranian powers that were out of line with a policy other leaders in Iran could live with. I.e., were military forces keeping the nuclear question alive when others were willing to abandon it and move on with life as usual; and did the U.S. and Israel have advanced intelligence that this was the case?

Generals were whacked in a substantial number. Iranians now are alleged to be amenable to a stop to the "at war" status quo.

The suggestion that Iran soft liners were unable to control hardliners and that locales of targeted militaristic types may have been given Israel for precision strikes. If so, Iran has an unstable leadership at present, and the situation requires further attention.

Aside from that, Trump is now pushing for that super-bullshit bill of his to be passed by a complacent Republican majority in both houses of Congress, having the numbers - show the loyalty being the repeated Trump pushing theme in getting that simply stinking thing through both houses. The Senate Parliamentarian is posing as the force to remove some of the poison pills House Republicans installed but are willing to see removed, so that the liars can say, "See, everybody got something via a bipartisan process as Congress is supposed to act." 

But that supposition is premised on bipartisan action FOR the benefit of the people, not togetherness against the proles' best interests.

Tax the fucking rich! 

The fact is the bill is pure fucking of the people so Elon and the other billionaires and millionaires and oil industry types who bankrolled the Trump campaign can get their tax break payback. Fucking Joe Worker for Sam Millionaire is crap, but only wealthy people are allowed into Congress by BOTH parties and the rest is Kabuki Theater to lie to a nation. With neither House of Congress willing to curb insider trading of their membership what more proof is needed that "Feather your own nest" is the rule of the two-party stranglehold over the will of the people? 

Pelosi traded. Trust her now? Bullshit! They are all in it together, or if not all, enough of a majority to run things AGAINST the people. Hegseth's "We the People" tattoo not withstanding. Nice tattoo, Heggie but there is that multimillion mansion in Tennessee the Murdochs bought you and there is Vance's visit with the Murdochs days before this entire Israel - Iran thing happened.

Go figure. 

UPDATE: Go figure, and work in the role of the media in all of it. 

Visits to the Murdochs. 

There is a logic to it. Not a good logic, but a logic. It sucks, but other than saying it as it is, what can we do? Vote the other party? Get real. National Socialism at play, in the U.S. of A?

Go figure. 

FURTHER: "Hands off" and "No Kings" are a steam valve. To release pressure so the boiler does not explode.

 But what else are we allowed? Zippo, is the answer. Marines in the street, in L.A. Trains running on time. TSA in the airports.

FURTHER: For another day, when we know more, the trade war - what is the aim, and what is the result? Both interesting questions, each with its own answer, perhaps both with the same answer. Unlikely that. And - the war on the professors and their institutions. What we learn affects who we become. And what we know may differ in widespread degrees from what we were schooled on.

Monday, June 23, 2025

Body language and blue tie.


 Standing apart from the cluster of the other three, furrowed brow, hands clasped as if his balls are at risk for opposing the war mongering. Or does Crabgrass misread body language somehow?

Jeffrey Epstein Ehud Barak. Trump doing Bibi's bidding.

Jeffrey Epstein and Ehud Barack, as to whose intelligence operation Epstein may have represented. 

Here, here, and here.  Or not?

Epstein files and the Iran war entry - here, here and here

"Where there's smoke, there's fire," is an old saying, but come on. Dems had DOJ files during Biden's term and nothing came out. Innocent unless proven guilty.

But ego tripping over a possible boost in regard, or a smokescreen for other nefarious deeds? That's not fully proven, but after the parade fiasco, the ego trip possibility has circumstantial feasibility.

_________UPDATE________

Some are critics, reminding us of that joke about the basket of tiny MAGA kittens. Weeks later Trump asked about the tint little MAGA kittens, and the little girl said, "They're no longer MAGA kittens. Their eyes opened." 

Sunday, June 22, 2025

Hermann Goering said it. Whitehouse.gov posts an echo chamber. Big populated echo chamber. So much for democracy. This is MAGA INSTEAD.

 

That's not posted today at Whitehouse.gov - as you'd expect. Instead -

WHAT THEY ARE SAYING: President Trump’s Display of Peace Through Strength

Horseshit Republicans saying horseshit things, as Hermann explained.

And so many of them, posted one after the other, all posted so very quickly. Day after the event; Attaboys after attaboys. The footsoldiers of Whitehouse.gov did their homework, and given the weekend and realistic timing, it had to have been a seek and gather prior to the event. Or not? You decide.

 

 UPDATE: PBS video with commentary. Also, here and here.

Livestreaming at time this is posted, Pentagon press conference this morning. 

 

FURTHER UPDATE: It is time to interject sensible discourse. Before the blowback happens.

And Bernie, avoid the diversion, and back to eyes on the prize, winning the war the oligarchs are waging against the rest of us, the people. This Draconian fascist billionaires beautiful bill can be hidden beyond chest pounding, the bombers headed back to Missouri and all that stuff.

Defeat that fucking shameful bill, and get back to civil aims of bringing the U.S. healthcare pig sty into the 21st century of a nation really caring for the health of its people, out of decency, instead of using a never ceasing threat as a stick to beat folks into submission to not taxing the rich. 

NO MORE WAR. Concentrate on the problems that exist in Oklahoma and Vermont . . .

Keep the vision. Fight back.

 

FURTHER UPDATE: No King! 

FURTHER UPDATE: The initial whitehouse.gov link was redone. "Peace Through Strength" it says, as in bomb them into peace --  each of those throng of war mongering supporter officials, if in elective office, deserves to be voted out. Bottom line, drop bombs, declare victory, and lie, lie, lie. It's Bibi's war. Not mine. Not yours. Not your childrens', and not an excuse to deny you healthcare coverage.

.

Wednesday, June 18, 2025

Let's hope the U.S. is not suckered into war with Iran, by Isreal, you two fight and we'll hold your coat. FDD, Foundation for Defemse of Democracy is a Neocon front for taking the nation to war. That's what Neocons do, it's their lifeblood.

 Start where Crabgrass started, an email newsletter, Lee Fang -

Pro-Israel Lobby Groups Flood Legacy Media to Pressure U.S. into Iran War

 What might be a stub of the item is online, 

https://www.leefang.com/p/pro-israel-lobby-groups-flood-legacy

There is mention online of a subscription wall. However, the online item appears to be largely in parallel to the email. The online item states:

"The United States joining a strike on Fordow and any other facilities that remain is a must at this point," tweeted FDD deputy director Andrea Stricker.

FDD portrays itself as a nonprofit founded after September 11th, engaged in advocacy for "strengthening U.S. national security and reducing or eliminating threats posed by adversaries and enemies of the United States and other free nations."

That description is misleading.

IRS documents reveal that FDD filed for nonprofit status on April 24, 2001—months before 9/11. The group was originally named "EMET," Hebrew for "truth," with the stated purpose of enhancing "Israel's image in North America and the public's understanding of issues affecting Israeli-Arab relations."

Brigadier General (Res.) Sima Vaknin Gill, a former Israeli Air Force intelligence officer who helped establish several pro-Israel lobbying efforts in the U.S. during her tenure at Israel's Ministry of Strategic Affairs, has identified FDD as a key asset. In a previous presentation on tracking pro-Palestinian organizations in America through data-mining and other form, Vaknin-Gill noted, "We have FDD. We have others working on this."

FDD routinely lobbies Congress to escalate tensions on Iran and other countries viewed as adversaries of Israel. Last year, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Tex., led a Senate letter to the Biden administration demanding increased sanctions on Iranian banks. Metadata from the document shows that the author of the Cruz letter was Nick Stewart, FDD’s Senior Director of Government Relations, who is responsible to managing congressional relations and other lobbying efforts.

Meanwhile, FDD routinely partners with the Israeli government officials to coordinate legal strategies for curbing pro-Palestinian activism in the United States. In 2019, for instance FDD legal expert Orde Kittrie was listed on a government panel hosted in Israel hosted by government officials on combating nonviolent economic protests of Israel’s human rights abuses in the West Bank.

FDD operates within a larger ecosystem of pro-Israel advocacy. Dozens of think tanks, Super PACs, institutes, and lobbying organizations work to advance Israeli government positions in American politics.

Ted Cruz is a mention unpinning the bullshit meter for sure. Wanting to know more, web search was next trtied. An interesting link,  https://www.guidestar.org/profile/13-4174402 - notes:

FDD was founded shortly after 9/11 by a group of visionary philanthropists and policymakers to support the defense of democratic societies under assault by terrorism and militant Islamism. Our Leadership Council of Distinguished Advisors includes former FBI Director Louis J. Freeh, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former National Security Advisor Robert "Bud" McFarlane, former Ambassador Max Kampelman, Sen. Joe Lieberman (ID-CT), and former CIA Director R. James Woolsey.

Those affiliated with FDD come from many backgrounds and political perspectives, but all believe:
- No one should be denied basic human rights, including minority rights, women's rights, and religious freedom.
- Free and democratic nations have a right to defend themselves and an obligation to defend one another.
- Terrorism, the deliberate use of violence against citizens to achieve political objectives, is always wrong and must never be condoned.

An activist think tank with a solid track record of transforming ideas into actions that get results, FDD uniquely combines policy research, counterterrorism and democracy education, strategic communications, and investigative journalism.
The Foundation for Defense of Democracies focuses its efforts where opinions are formed and, ultimately, where the war of ideas will be won or lost: in the media, on college campuses, in the courthouse, and in the policy community, both at home and abroad. 

A neocon nest for certain, the Bush warmonger crowd that gut us mired into Iraq regime change. A stench upon the entirte operation settles and will not disperse. 

The operation has a Wikipedia page: 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundation_for_Defense_of_Democracies 

ProPublica gives financial info showing the operation is well funded at multi-million dollar levels. 

https://www.fdd.org/team/fdd-team/ shows a lot of folks, mostly no-names, and not the power NEOCONS who founded the effort. There is a propaganda item:

https://www.fdd.org/issue/israel-at-war/ 

From back in 2015, Slate had a focus on the then effort to kill the Obama-Iran deal:

https://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/foreigners/2015/08/foundation_for_the_defense_of_democracies_inside_the_small_pro_israel_think.htm

 In short, as trustworthy as a cobra. Don't go near, don't be gulled.

Let Israel fight its own hostilities toward its neighbors, and commit ethnic clensing in Gaza by itself, not as a U.S. thing, but their war mongering for their own reasons and benefit, with the rest of the world watching and judging. But, that said, it looks as if Trump is getting suckered, or is already gung-ho onboard and moving that way as these sentences are being written.

Enough. 

____________UPDATE_____________

Here, https://www.fdd.org/team/nsn/, by dint of sheer numbers, is a fright roster, for certain. WTF are all these dudes and ladies doing, as a 501{c}(3) and not as a viper nest paying taxes at least? 

_________FURTHER UPDATE__________

Read the entire linked Lee Fang authored item, it describes media bias too. 

_________FURTHER UPDATE__________

Guardian reports Congressional dithering while Trump is telling Iran "Unconditional Surrender." The headlining suggests something bigger than the few voices saying the U.S. going to war is a Congressional decision, not one for the Executive branch to alone decide. It looks weak, and Iran can take no comfort in it happening as it is. Trump appears attuned to the Israeli propaganda effort, or leaning that way against Gabbard's saying Iran is not on the verge of nuclear weaponry. In that context, how many nuclear warheads does Israel hold, when the question is Israel against Iran? Likely enough that if used Iran would be an ongoing glowing cinder of radioactive waste making Fukushima or Chernobyl look tame.

Israel holds that power. So we wait to see. Meanwhile, what mischief is being done to us, the people, by the Republicans and that Big Beautiful Bill to fuck we the people? As we are being told, "Hey, look over there!!!"? There's been the "Hands Off" and the "No Kings" rallies so far. The next should be, "End The Bullshit." That one would get record turnout.

A "Tax The Rich" rally would be a big drawing card too, but Indivisible has yet to go there. Beyond that, this sabre rattling, it's going on now, so what did JD tell the Murdochs in Montana given this Israel - Iran development, and FOX running with the FDD stories? We proles can only guess. JD won't tell us. Are the Iranians reduced to eating cats and dogs? Lie to me please, JD.

 

Monday, June 16, 2025

My God, I hope not!

 The headline is about Strib publishing: 

Is Amy Klobuchar running for president? Her visit to New Hampshire could provide clues.

Minnesota’s senior senator hasn’t closed the door on running for president when asked, and 2028 could be her last shot.

The Minnesota Star Tribune
June 13, 2025 at 8:24PM

If pressed I could probably think of a million reasons against her running, but it  boils down to one -

Amy Klobuchar.

Opinions can differ 

Related DWT:

Progressives Need Not Apply: Hakeem Jeffries' New Primary Machine

 

 

Friday, June 13, 2025

UPDATE: 50501 WEBSITE. https://www.fiftyfifty.one/

FURTHER UPDATE: AP publishes: https://apnews.com/article/trump-military-parade-army-poll-birthday-dc2352f07b77df2f56ca8b8084a4b4d2


 Image credit --https://www.downwithtyranny.com/post/se%C3%B1or-taco-s-counter-revolution-is-failing-and-getting-more-dangerous 

 

From AP report -

Do not expect many Republicans at 50501 events, except those fired, or having Medicaid or foodstamp Angst. The poll shows what it shows. Hope for heavy rain in DC; sunshine on NO KINGS

Israel - Iran update.

 DWT has novel and sound coverage.

In terms of articulate interesting good people in conversation, this may be as good as it gets. Watch.

 Emergency Powers: Trump’s Favorite Loophole | The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart

Really. Trust me. And to the extent they talk of polarization on the internet, it's something Crabgrass shows, but tries to be better.


Just a question out of curiosity - Should long-tenured ICE members be called LICE?

 Stephen Miller is long tenured. That is a fact.

UPDATE: Questions of that sort come up. Two I can think of, if Hegseth were VP would Trump even need the Secret Service; and now that we've seen Pam Bondi would we be better off if the Gaetz nomination had not been withdrawn and he'd been appointed?

Sez something about quality, it does.

Another, do you think Israel would have attacked Iran without prior notice to the U.S., and if you think yes, do you expect the inventory in Israel of bunker buster bombs Biden supplied them is at levels it was last week, or do you guess it might be partly depleted?

Other hypotheticals exist, but here's a big one - Will the nationwide No Kings crowds be bigger than the crowds the Trump-worship parade will draw? And which costs taxpayers more in waste and abuse, even if without fraud?

Have a nice day or two.

No Kings Day shall have an expected attendance of 20,000 in St. Paul, at the Capitol.

 And it will be a dissatisfaction day event, primarily,  as PiPress reports Friday, for the Saturday June 14 event: 

Local organizers expect 20,000 or more Minnesotans will be joining a nationwide No Kings movement to protest President Donald Trump’s policies on Saturday.

Protesters will be rallying at the Minnesota Capitol for the event, which is part of a web of demonstrations around the country to counter Trump’s $25 million to $45 million military parade planned for the same day. [...]

Demonstrators will assemble at 11 a.m. at St. Paul College and begin marching to the Minnesota Capitol at noon, according to organizers including Indivisible Twin Cities, MN50501, Women’s March Minnesota and MN AFL-CIO labor unions.

Lisa Erbes is the co-leader of Indivisible Twin Cities. Erbes said the No Kings organizers want to bring awareness to Trump’s actions that they believe are unconstitutional and authoritarian. Speakers at the event will cover topics such as Medicaid cuts, racial justice, immigration concerns and ICE raids.

“Our goal is to send the message loud and clear that Americans do not want to live under a king or under fascism or a dictatorship,” Erbes said.

Forty other No Kings events will be happening Saturday in Minnesota, according to Ann Treacy, Women’s March Minnesota board member.

“We’re trying to get large numbers, we’re trying to get a place where we can all feel solidarity together, as well as show people this is how we feel,” Treacy said. “What we do want to see is more of the Constitution being held to, more of due process, more transparency, more democracy.”

[...] Gov. Tim Walz, Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan, Attorney General Keith Ellison and civil rights attorney Nekima Levy Armstrong will speak at the event.

There is a DFL leaning of the event, although dissatisfied Republicans and independents will be welcome, if decently behaved. It is not a confrontational style planned, although clearly a confrontational statement is intended. Look at the title. Look at the Constitution. No Kings. 

While MSM covers the Israeli Iran events, EmptyWheel has a post about tomorrow's planned "NO KINGS DAY" protests nationwide.

 Link

Israel attacks Iran. Trump warns Iran more might be coming. JD days ago went to Montana to secretly meet the Murdochs, and possibly others.

 Reports are online at multiple sources, where readers can find detail.

Of interest, this, from yesterday, where Crabgrass has no WSJ access beyond the paywall:

Israel could strike Iran within days, US and Israeli officials say - WSJ



So, WSJ had advanced notice? Making this more interesting. Possibly JD gave the Murdochs advanced notice, and possibly they traded investments, and possibly not. There should be some record.

And here on Friday the 13th, it happened, as the WSJ speculated, and tomorrow there's a U.S. Army anniversary, Flag Day. What a world.

UPDATE: AJ has its own reporting while much else online is carrying AP news services.

RT reports:

I gave Iran chance after chance – Trump

Despite the Israeli strikes, the US president has urged Tehran to comply with Washington’s demands over its nuclear program “before it is too late”

FURTHER; The last paragraph of an AP item Strib carried -

In a sign of the far-reaching implications of the emerging conflict, Israel’s main airport was closed and benchmark Brent crude spiked on news of the attack, rising nearly 8% before retreating slightly.

It would be worthwhile if somebody in MSM or elsewhere tried to ferret out any Administration or Congressional oil futures trading activity, including staffers and Trump family members, prior to the Israeli attack. Insiders are insiders because of inside information, and it is doubtful whether this happened without some knowledge among the spook and foreign policy community, including Congressional committees. What did Jake Sullivan know and when did he know it. He had a portfolio in the Biden administration, but he's an outsider now, but possibly still talks to people and has not, to Crabgrass knowledge, had his security clearance pulled. Tentacles abound.


Thursday, June 12, 2025

What failed as a too-late October surprise last election year has been infused with new life by Elon posting and scrubbing a Trump-Epstein tweet allegation. James Carville is trying to get it to grow legs this time. Might it give Kash Patal a cred headache?

Setting things up, Daily Beast, as noted on election's eve, plus or minus mere days published:

Epstein Showed Me Photos of Trump with Topless Young Women Sitting in His Lap, Claims Author

 

Jeffrey Epstein showed off photos of Donald Trump with “topless young women” sitting in his lap, the controversial author Michael Wolff has alleged.

[...] They were taken in the “late ’90s” at Epstein’s Palm Beach home, where he victimized dozens of underage girls along with his procurer, Ghislaine Maxwell, Wolff said. 

Wolff alleged that they were in Epstein’s safe, which the FBI seized when they raided his homes in New York and Palm Beach in July 2019. The massive haul of evidence taken by the feds has never been made public—and while prosecutors disclosed after the raid that they had “hundreds of photos of girls and young women,” they have never offered any more details of them.

 “And in some of the pictures, they’re sitting in his lap. I mean, and, and then there’s one I especially remember where there’s a stain, a telltale stain and on the front of Trump’s pants, and the girls are pointing at him and laughing.” Trump separated from his second wife Marla Maples in 1997 and began dating his third wife, Melania, in 1998.

A photo illustration of Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump.
Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump were friends in the 1990s. Now Michael Wolff says that at the time, Trump partied with "topless young women" at Epstein's home.
The Trump campaign hit back at Wolff for the claims, calling him “disgraced.” A campaign spokesperson said in a statement to the Beast, “Michael Wolff is a disgraced writer who routinely fabricates lies in order to sell fiction books because he clearly has no morals or ethics. 
He waited until days before the election to make outlandish false smears all in an effort to engage in blatant election interference on behalf of Kamala Harris. He’s a failed journalist that is resorting to lying for attention 
Sources in the Trump camp claimed that he had severed his relationship with Epstein when he learned of allegations that he was a sex trafficker and pointed to his quote: “I was not a fan of Jeffrey Epstein. And you watched people yesterday saying that I threw him out of a club. I didn’t want anything to do with him. That was many, many years ago.” 

That's the story. Trump's sued others for defamation and Trump has not sued Wolff.

Carville, here. Days ago. After Elon's tweet show. In that video, Carville references a video of Wolff on camera making the claim, here, mere days before Carville published. Carville seemed careful to phrase the story as allegations, and then some "if true" future guesswork. Etc. View the videos.

None of this is a Crabgrass breaking story. It is a recount of publishing by others.

If true: The FBI might have seized the photos, or they might have been placed elsewhere by Epstein before his latest apprehension and unusual death. Or they might never have been if Wolff is misrecollecting. Being dead, Jeffrey is unavailable to testify should litigation arise, and the law has rules applicable for such situations.

So, a swearing contest between Wolff and Trump, unless the FBI has the goods and if subpoenaed in litigation Patel gives honest disclosure. Who knows? Unless Trump sues.

 What does Elon know, and when did he know it?

UPDATE: Somewhere in the video Carville referenced "Polaroid or something" is recalled to have been mentioned by Wolff. If Polaroid, and not deteriorated, they could be proven as not recent AI doctored things, and dated, or so it would be hoped. It could be a point of contention - NOT ME, or DOCTORED IMAGE allegations would be less credible, should Patal's FBI produce something, if it comes to that.

Trump has the option of denial without litigating it. Lame? Sure, but Donald's done and said things before. Or the whole thing blows over.

FURTHER: It seems Wolff is placed to try, should he choose to, a suit claiming he was defamed by the Trump team's denial language, if claiming it is untrue. In the course of any such litigation, the underlying truth of what Wolff has alleged and repeated might be at issue, with the FBI conceivably holding and producing by subpoena evidence, or not. The statute of limitations for defamation tort, wherever, a case could be filed, should not have run since November 2024. The ball's in Wolff's court.

FURTHER: Web search.

Noting Mr. Trump's bozo big beautiful ego trip, for only a few multimillion dollars of your public money.

Link. What else did you expect, Malania and JD's spouse taking part? You ask too much. See if you spot JD and Stephen Miller among the mavens. Barron.

So long, folks.


Monday, June 09, 2025

JD chats with Glenn Beck, and gives a naval academy speech. Busy man, on small things. But what's he said?

The Beck thing is long, so the mid-item unredacted quote is too. Starting with JD talking:

 

If we see Germans do something incredibly offensive to American values, I think Americans are going to recoil a little bit at that. You know, I went to Germany very recently, very briefly, Glenn. 
Just to visit the troops and say, hello.

And I was hearing from Germans during that very brief visit on the ground, saying that they were worried about free speech policies in their own country.

Well, if we have 38,000 troops there and we're living amongst the Germans, we're literally defending their country.

I think you can expect Americans to at least express some negative opinions about some of the free speech policies they're seeing in Europe.

And, Glenn, you know this as well as anybody. Things that start in Europe. Sometimes come over to America. The same way that things that start in America, make their ways to Europe.

The kind of social media censorship that we've seen in western Europe.

It will -- it's already made its way to the United States. That's the story of the Biden administration, silencing people on social media.

So we will be very protective of American interests when it comes to things like social media regulation.

We want to promote free speech. We don't want our European friends telling social media companies that they have to silence Christians, or silence conservatives.

GLENN: Right.

J.D.: And I think there will be that friction over the next ten years. It's not that we're not friends. But there is a disagreement you didn't see ten years ago.

GLENN: Right. So they've decided they will not pursue being a leader in AI. But they will make all the rules. How confident are you, that we are in a -- a winning position here on AI?

It is advancing so rapidly. And the things that I hear that come out of China, it's either another way hipped. It's all a paper tiger. Or they're way ahead. Where are we, do you think, on AI and, you know, AGI.

J.D.: Well, I think that we're ahead, Glenn. But nobody -- nobody says that we're way ahead, should be believed. You know, in artificial intelligence, six months is a lifetime. Twelve months is a generation. We're probably 12 months, maybe two years ahead of where the Chinese are, when it comes to critical hardware, when it comes to necessary infrastructure. When it comes to the engineering talent. But that is not very far ahead at all. And we're really going to have to invest a lot in developing America's next generation of scientists. Glenn, we're going to have to make sure that our hardware companies, that we stop regulating them to death. That our energy infrastructure. That we stop regulating them to death. Because if we allow the Chinese to catch up. We may never ever have an edge on China in this space again.

And I think for a lot of people, artificial intelligence is a chat bot. It's something that maybe helps a college student write a paper.

No, no, no. The artificial intelligence that I'm worried about, Glenn, is the kind of intelligence that helps them develop next generation weapons. It helps their rockets and missiles hit their target, and 99 percent more accurate than the weapons that use artificial intelligence. They're just massive defense technology implications of this.

That it's kind of like, what would have happened, if the English Army had faulted the Americans in the Revolutionary War, and we had M-16s and they had muskets.

We don't want to be on our battlefield of the future and have -- you know, we have the muskets, and the Chinese have the M-16s. I think AI is the critical part of staying ahead of the Communist Chinese.

And it's something, look, we're very focused on. We have a great guy. It's David Sacks in the administration who is leading this effort. But it's full pedal to the metal, Glenn. We have to constantly be innovating and staying ahead of the game. We can't follow the European lead of regulating. We want America to innovate, and that's what we're doing.

GLENN: I spoke to the president a couple weeks ago. And, you know, I was going to ask him about nuclear energy. And he just volunteered. I said, what about energy with AI?

And he went to say, you know, we're talking about making them their own -- you know, their own utilities. And they can build it. We can clear, even if they want nuclear power plants. That didn't print.

I mean, I thought that was one of the bigger headlines of my lifetime. And nobody seemed to pick that up, or care about that.

And we do lose, if we don't have these power plants. Are we -- what are we doing to accelerate?

I mean, they need 99 percent of our power by 2028.

99 percent of the power that's currently being made.

We need power plants.

J.D.: Yeah. You're a smart guy, Glenn. Because I don't know what else the President said during that interview, but I doubt it's as important as that point.

GLENN: Nothing.

J.D.: This is a critical issue. And, yes, what we've done. We've had Lee Zeldin's EPA, and all of our environmental folks look at how we cut through the red tape. And make it possible. Because the market would do this. Right?

These companies would like to do that.is.

But it's the environmental bureaucrats that have told them, you can't really attach any power plant off-grid to a pure, you know, artificial intelligence hardware facility. We're tearing down those regulations and making it possible again.

And then, of course, Glenn, part of this is not just building these facilities, but it's powering them with the fuel that we need. And the president -- you hear this term, all of the above.

The President has really said, we're all of the above.

GLENN: Have to be.

J.D.: We're lowering the regulations on coal. We're powering the natural gas folks.

Petroleum, obviously, nuclear.

Like, this is a president who said, all power that we have, we need to put it into this prospect. And, Glenn, one important point on this. You look at a chart of electric degeneration, the People's Republic of China versus the United States.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

J.D.: Four years ago, we blew them out of the water. Right now, the PRC is producing about three times as much electricity as we are. And we flatlined in the last 20 years. That innovation. That development.

That's got to change. We've got to be producing more power for the next wave of innovation. 

It's maybe the most important part of the puzzle.

Okay. Elon's and other AI will have little local ill-regulated nukes. NIMBY shout-out. Watch Out!

And coal? And the Europeans don't like Nazi-talk but we are better on that.

And the Chinese. There always are the Chinese. If we need a scapegoat, they're there and on the verge.

The academy speech here's my YouTube link. Forty minutes. Didn't bother watchng, but you're in charge of your own time. Hope he said wise and trenchent things. Doubt it.

 Talking to Glenn Beck, wherever he's gone to, and a commencement speech to military people.

JD's out there, but seeming to not be pumping iron over the BB Bill stuff. Or the manufactured spat between money/power as Elon and Trump are phrased by too much of the media.

Just stuff. Glenn Beck had his fifteen minutes of fame, but he's not the hot topic today. 

But little nukes, every server farm having a shot of installing whatever? Great idea, maybe. Just NIMBY. A lot of other back yards are out there, Wyoming or whatever.