Pages

Monday, October 15, 2018

The unofficial campaign slogan for the closing weeks of the general election appears to be: “Keith Ellison: He’s Not Doug Wardlow.”

The headline is from MinnPost, here.

Be thankful there is the Ellison alternative to mayhem like Wardlow. And his tutor cop, Bob Kroll, who you can read about online: here, here and here, an item linked to in earlier posting. A mayor who had to put up with Kroll, and knows who Wardlow is, co-signed and posted her view of the Wardlow attitude and agenda.

What needs saying, is that even if the Parker-Monahan pair can produce a video showing anger and shouted expletives, even a touching wrongly but with no physical injury of any kind alleged nor proven; SO WHAT?

This poor traumatized flower act has played itself out by over-repetition, and it jibes poorly with Monahan somehow, strangely, teaming up with conservative radio host Andrew Parker in the saddle as Monahan's counsel and publicist. Parker who was Wardlow's boss for half of Wardlow's legal practice - bingo Monahan on the team.

For media request, please contact my attorney, Andrew Parker, 612-355-4100

— Karen Monahan (@KarenMonahan01) October 1, 2018

Also, what in the world is "narcissistic abuse" beyond something somebody told Monahan, (or perhaps she found the term on the web)? It's an invention, and a mediocre one.

The headline thought atop this post seems the theme of the item from Betsy Hodges and other women, "Without Reservation, We Support Keith Ellison."

When it comes to quality of a total history of Ellison accomplishment, against Wardlow's history of being allied to James Dobson's 19th Century patriarchal world view, or go back to the War of the Roses where kings had heads chopped off over "faith," and then consider how Wardlow is a throwback to times we need to keep behind us. He is hateful toward women having the right to plan family expansions so that careers are not imperiled by unwanted and unanticipated pregnancies where abortion under the Roe v. Wade decision is a way out of a pressing bind. He doesn't care, any more than James Dobson does about how such a reality weighs heavy. He's a male, never going to be personally experiencing being pregnant, planned or unwanted. He does not have the capability or mindset to "walk in their shoes," and in fact declines to even try. Women to him appear to be best when, like his spouse, they bear children, cook and mind the home.


Women should be the strongest voice saying: 

Doug Wardlow running to be the State's top lawyer representing me and my needs; 


JUST SAY NO.

And vote it that way too.

And that is not a hedged NO.

It has to be an absolute NO, NEVER, NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, NOT WHEN A BALLOT ALLOWS REJECTION OF THAT ENTIRE WARDLOW CROCK, A DECISIVE REJECTION WHICH MUST HAPPEN TO NOT SET THE STATE BACK TO THE 1950'S VIEW OF THE LITTLE HOUSEWIFE. NEVER AGAIN, NOT THAT CRAP - NO.

DITTO FOR THINKING UNION RANK AND FILE WHO CAN TRUST THEIR LEADERSHIP TO KEEP MEMBERSHIP INFORMED AND ACTIVELY MOTIVATED.

 It takes special effort to get a total zero rating by AFL-CIO, but Wardlow did. Even Mary Franson got a 3% rating, Drazkowski a 3%. Wardlow, zero.

If you want a nutshell view of Wardlow, where you can explore from there:

 https://www.realdougwardlow.com/

End of rant.