Link. It is the type of presentation unlikely to attrack Boeing, Microsoft, Carlyle Group, or Lockeed as future sponsors. Or might they pay up, to buy him off if he is for sale?
ZeroHedge, yesterday, kept up some questioning, and that makes the initial Tucker thing still good news, yes/no?
Christopher Mellon wrote for Politico early this month.
Wouldn't you like to know what the documents Trump held onto say? Is that not relevant to being an informed citizen? But, somebody with some motives classified them. Wouldn't you like to know who made that decision, and why?
EpochTimes - same story, they post an "About Us" but who should we believe? ZeroHedge reposting the ET story.
Newsweek. Posting of alien tech exploitation attempts. You remember Newsweek? They used to be big.
The Hill, with interesting sidebar links of other video content on YouTube. This video is worth watching, so readers are urged - watch it.
The Hill, again, a different guest commentator, again, readers are urged to watch.
NASA on YouTube. Hours long.
Knowing nothing beyond what is on the web, it appears that a credible disclosure campaign is happening, and why now grabs my interest.
The withholding of secret documents could span a range of interesting information some, somewhere, do not want released to the people. Military planning, private news from other nations, things of that sort are likely in such a body of facts or discoveries. There are areas of science where there is open literature, public journals, and a classified literature in parallel.
But if this curious recent release of info has a basis, it could be related to classified documents kept by officials, Trump, Pence, Biden all recently having divulged such hoarding (or carelessness) with secret stuff.
If Trump, being put to a trial, held information of the kind now leaking out, the leak would have a logical cause, at the present time. Otherwise, why now?
Who knows? Not Crabgrass. Crabgrass has questions. Not answers.