The Senate Dems vetting Barrett are throwing softballs, giving speeches, but appear fully content with the Barrett appointment. Barrett is no opponent of Wall Street or corporate America, coporate International, concentrated wealth, trade agreements, the energy sector, or agency decision making power. She fits in.

Link. If you stand for and represent donor and lobbying powers, you can be Supreme.

Who knows or cares among those with installation power about how far you'd allow elasticity or austerity attaching to and allowed population aims - on social issues only - to yin or yang. Speeches are for social issue positions - appointment approval hinges on having played the game as money wants it. Dems take contributions; Repuublicans do too, and career moves after leaving office are not independent of conduct while in office. The right stuff. Approval. Both parties, in reality, if not in rhetoric. What matters; capital friendly. Ask Joe, the Obamas, the Clintons, Schumer.