The man has a track record. Have a look. Here and here, partners in outlook.
And of course he'd be against redistribution, robbing Peter to pay Paul. As a matter of consistency of worldview.
This Facebook link.
Another link. Another. Legislative Update, (legislation not discussed). Op-ed Co-signator. Letter co-signed. You have to wonder why the two gentlemen in that video declined to get into Minnesota Family Council themes and variations. Or letter/op-ed writing. Not enough time, obviously. Bitching about schools consumed available time where Minnesota Family Council allegiance could have been a topic. Do you define a person by what he declines to try to discuss and justify to the general public when the opportunity arises?