Pages

Monday, December 18, 2017

It appears there is no substantial disagreement over the Tina Smith Senate appointment.

MinnPost, "Why Minnesota’s Democratic House delegation unanimously supports Tina Smith for Senate in 2018, By Sam Brodey - 12/14/17," online here, notes, in part:

Minnesota’s Democrats in Washington emphasized the importance of retaining Franken’s seat, which was not expected to be in play until 2020, as the party also takes on a laundry list of other tasks: defending the governor’s mansion, keeping Sen. Amy Klobuchar’s seat, holding on to three battleground U.S. House districts while trying to flip two others, and recapturing control of the state Legislature.

Fifth District Rep. Keith Ellison, also the No. 2 official at the Democratic National Committee, was the first Minnesota lawmaker to say that he will be supporting Smith in the 2018 election. (Ellison had been rumored as a potential candidate for this seat, a possibility he quickly ruled out with his statement.)

“The way we keep that seat blue and in our hands,” Ellison said on Wednesday, “is we gather around Tina and help get her in here to finish Al’s term.”

“Trump is in the White House, man. We cannot afford to not maintain this seat. It’s just too close, it’s too dangerous. The Senate has enough problems maintaining what it has. A lot of Democratic seats have to be protected.”

[...] When asked about heading off a challenge from Smith’s left, Ellison — one of two Minnesota congressmen to endorse Sanders in 2016 — said, “If anyone is looking to me, they need to listen to me when I say I’m supporting Tina, and they need to support Tina as well.”

“That’s what’s in the best interest of the people of the state. I’m just asking people to set their personal ambition aside for the good of us all.”

The MinnPost item makes it clear that Minnesota's less progressive Democrat U.S. House members, those aside from Ellison, each is in agreement.

Surely Minnesota Republicans in the U.S. House and otherwise may dislike Dayton's choice. That is why I used the word "substantial" in headlining this post.