Explain to me again, I did not get it the first time, why should welfare for rapacious health insurance money mills have been more lavish in the ACA as enacted?

This HuffPo link. Screw 'em. Single payer is the only sane answer apart from a reality of lobbyist influence predominating 'back then' for money takers in the insurance racket. If now locked in on their intent on overcharging a captive audience, run the program by the government, for the people, and leave the extortionists out in the rain. They'd only get wet, and; so?