Three websearchs, here, here and a bifurcated third search - more generally here and then a more focused search, here.
Following links in those searches it is easy to see the online evidence trail of Clinton Foundation substantial contemporaneous prosperity related to the uranium multination mischief/hijinks, but what of the son-in-law's hedge fund and Clinton family participation in the same, and Uranium One stock dealings while the shenanigans were happening? Was the son-in-law's hedge fund active then, was the son-in-law then with Goldman, was Goldman active in Uranium One shares during the dealings involving Bill Clinton and the Wyoming ore body? In total: What sort of insider slushing may have happened? With a Clinton family flavor?
Might the next Assange/Wikileaks email "release trove" touch upon Uranium One? Illegality re same?
These are all relevant questions. Unfortinately, I have no evidence to say anything beyond what already online trails disclose or suggest. My bottom line: With such questions, and no answers, I am going to vote Jill Stein.
For all I know, "Uranium One" might show up in a Goldman-Sachs speech transcript, if released.
BONUS NOTE: Invest the time to check out the new top sidebar item. It segues well into prior following sidebar content. Students under oppressive education debtload, in particular, should pay attention.
